Metodología para seleccionar tecnologías Web 2.0 para la docencia

Actualmente existe un gran auge en el uso y difusión de las herramientas Web 2.0 tanto en el contexto profesional como en el personal. Su aplicación al ámbito de la docencia, tal y como sugieren algunos estudios, puede tener numerosas ventajas. Sin embargo, el abanico de herramientas Web 2.0 es muy amplio y por tanto sería de utilidad disponer de una metodología que pudiera guiar al docente a la hora de elegir la tecnología más adecuada a su proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje según los objetivos perseguidos, así como en su implantación y posterior evaluación de los resultados alcanzados. En este artículo, se presenta una metodología de ayuda a los docentes de cualquier área de conocimiento para la selección e implantación de la tecnología Web 2.0 que más se adapte a un determinado proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje en base a criterios docentes y técnicos. Esta metodología es el resultado de un proyecto de mejora e innovación educativa en el cual se han llevado a cabo diversas experiencias docentes sobre la aplicación de herramientas Web 2.0 en asignaturas de distintas titulaciones universitarias.SUMMARY -- The use and dissemination of Web 2.0 tools in professional and personal context is becoming more popular every day. Its application to teaching, as it is suggested by some studies, may have numerous advantages. However, the range of Web 2.0 tools is very broad and it would therefore be useful to have a methodology that guide the teacher in choosing the most appropriate technology to their teaching-learning process, taking into account some final objectives, as well as implementing and evaluating the achieved results. This paper presents a methodology to assist teachers from any area of knowledge in the selection of the Web 2.0 technology that best suits a particular teaching-learning process. This selection is based on some educational and technical criteria. The presented methodology is the result of an educational innovation and improvement project in which various teaching experiences based on the use of Web 2.0 tools have been carried out in different subjects of science degrees.Peer Reviewe

Maturity Model for Interoperability Potential Measurement

Interoperability potential concerns the preparation level of an enterprise to establish an efficient collaboration with possible part- ners. In order to improve their interoperability, enterprises need to know witch level of maturity they have achieved. This article pro- poses a complete maturity model composed by a methodology and a reference set of parameters to measure interoperability potential. In order to clarify the proposal, an example of application in a real case is described.Campos, C.; Chalmeta, R.; Grangel, R.; Poler Escoto, R. (2013). Maturity Model for Interoperability Potential Measurement. Information Systems Management. 30(3):218-234. doi:10.1080/10580530.2013.794630S218234303Alfaro, J. J., Rodriguez-Rodriguez, R., Verdecho, M. J., & Ortiz, A. (2009). Business process interoperability and collaborative performance measurement. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 22(9), 877-889. doi:10.1080/09511920902866112Sabucedo, L. Á., & Rifón, L. A. (2010). Managing Citizen Profiles in the Domain of e-Government: The cPortfolio Project. Information Systems Management, 27(4), 309-319. doi:10.1080/10580530.2010.514181Berre, A.-J., Elvesæter, B., Figay, N., Guglielmina, C., Johnsen, S. G., Karlsen, D., … Lippe, S. (s. f.). The ATHENA Interoperability Framework. Enterprise Interoperability II, 569-580. doi:10.1007/978-1-84628-858-6_62Blanc, S., Ducq, Y., & Vallespir, B. (2007). Evolution management towards interoperable supply chains using performance measurement. Computers in Industry, 58(7), 720-732. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2007.05.011Campos, C., Martí, I., Grangel, R., Mascherpa, A. and Chalmeta, R. A methodological proposal for the development of an interoperability framework.Model Driven Interoperability for Sustainable Information Systems (MDISIS′08) (CAiSE′08). Vol. 340, pp.47–57. CEUR-WS. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-340/paper04.pdfChalmeta, R., & Grangel, R. (2005). Performance measurement systems for virtual enterprise integration. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 18(1), 73-84. doi:10.1080/0951192042000213164Doumeingts, G. and Chen, D. Basic concepts and approaches to develop interoperability of enterprise applications.PRO-VE,IFIP Conference Proceedings. Edited by: Camarinha-Matos, L. M. and Afsarmanesh, H. Vol. 262, pp.323–330. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.Duque, A., Campos, C., Jimenez-Ruiz, E. and Chalmeta, R. An ontological solution to supprot interoperability in the textile industry.Second IFIP WG 5.8 International Workshop, IWEI 2009. Edited by: Poler, M. V. S. R. Vol. 38, pp.38–51. New York: Springer.Guédria, W., Naudet, Y., & Chen, D. (2008). Interoperability Maturity Models – Survey and Comparison –. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 273-282. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88875-8_48Hoving, R. (2007). Information Technology Leadership Challenges — Past, Present, and Future. Information Systems Management, 24(2), 147-153. doi:10.1080/10580530701221049Palomares, N., Campos, C., & Palomero, S. (2010). How to Develop a Questionnaire in Order to Measure Interoperability Levels in Enterprises. Enterprise Interoperability IV, 387-396. doi:10.1007/978-1-84996-257-5_36Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74-81. doi:10.1057/ejis.1995.

Metodología para seleccionar tecnologías Web 2.0 para la docencia

Actualmente existe un gran auge en el uso y difusión de las herramientas Web 2.0 tanto en el contexto profesional como en el personal. Su aplicación al ámbito de la docencia, tal y como sugieren algunos estudios, puede tener numerosas ventajas. Sin embargo, el abanico de herramientas Web 2.0 es muy amplio y por tanto sería de utilidad disponer de una metodología que pudiera guiar al docente a la hora de elegir la tecnología más adecuada a su proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje según los objetivos perseguidos, así como en su implantación y posterior evaluación de los resultados alcanzados. En este artículo, se presenta una metodología de ayuda a los docentes de cualquier área de conocimiento para la selección e implantación de la tecnología Web 2.0 que más se adapte a un determinado proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje en base a criterios docentes y técnicos. Esta metodología es el resultado de un proyecto de mejora e innovación educativa en el cual se han llevado a cabo diversas experiencias docentes sobre la aplicación de herramientas Web 2.0 en asignaturas de distintas titulaciones universitarias.SUMMARY -- The use and dissemination of Web 2.0 tools in professional and personal context is becoming more popular every day. Its application to teaching, as it is suggested by some studies, may have numerous advantages. However, the range of Web 2.0 tools is very broad and it would therefore be useful to have a methodology that guide the teacher in choosing the most appropriate technology to their teaching-learning process, taking into account some final objectives, as well as implementing and evaluating the achieved results. This paper presents a methodology to assist teachers from any area of knowledge in the selection of the Web 2.0 technology that best suits a particular teaching-learning process. This selection is based on some educational and technical criteria. The presented methodology is the result of an educational innovation and improvement project in which various teaching experiences based on the use of Web 2.0 tools have been carried out in different subjects of science degrees.Peer Reviewe

ISO 15531 MANDATE: A Product-process-resource based Approach for Managing Modularity in Production Management

Abstract: Managing modularity and commonality in product development more and more needs modularity and commonality in the production process, with the objectives of reducing manufacturing costs, time to market and improving quality. A critical issue is the way of managing data, information and knowledge: data most of the time structured according to data models, often using proprietary formats, leading to consistency problems for the exchanges. The use of international standards is a good way of improving quality of the information systems used in production management, since they facilitate interoperability of the software tools used. They also contribute to the integration of the production process in a product life cycle management-based approach. This study presents the ISO 15531 MANDATE standard for the exchanges o