71 research outputs found

    Behavioral and Neural Indices of Metacognitive Sensitivity in Preverbal Infants

    Get PDF
    Humans adapt their behavior not only by observing the consequences of their actions but also by internally monitoring their performance. This capacity, termed metacognitive sensitivity [1 ; 2], has traditionally been denied to young children because they have poor capacities in verbally reporting their own mental states [3; 4 ; 5]. Yet, these observations might reflect children’s limited capacities for explicit self-reports, rather than limitations in metacognition per se. Indeed, metacognitive sensitivity has been shown to reflect simple computational mechanisms [1; 6; 7 ; 8], and can be found in various non-verbal species [7; 8; 9 ; 10]. Thus, it might be that this faculty is present early in development, although it would be discernible through implicit behaviors and neural indices rather than explicit self-reports. Here, by relying on such non-verbal indices, we show that 12- and 18-month-old infants internally monitor the accuracy of their own decisions. At the behavioral level, infants showed increased persistence in their initial choice after making a correct as compared to an incorrect response, evidencing an appropriate evaluation of decision confidence. Moreover, infants were able to use decision confidence adaptively to either confirm their initial choice or change their mind. At the neural level, we found that a well-established electrophysiological signature of error monitoring in adults, the error-related negativity, is similarly elicited when infants make an incorrect choice. Hence, although explicit forms of metacognition mature later during childhood, infants already estimate decision confidence, monitor their errors, and use these metacognitive evaluations to regulate subsequent behavior

    Inducing Task-Relevant Responses to Speech in the Sleeping Brain

    Get PDF
    Falling asleep leads to a loss of sensory awareness and to the inability to interact with the environment [1]. While this was traditionally thought as a consequence of the brain shutting down to external inputs, it is now acknowledged that incoming stimuli can still be processed, at least to some extent, during sleep [2]. For instance, sleeping participants can create novel sensory associations between tones and odors [3] or reactivate existing semantic associations, as evidenced by event-related potentials [4; 5; 6 ; 7]. Yet, the extent to which the brain continues to process external stimuli remains largely unknown. In particular, it remains unclear whether sensory information can be processed in a flexible and task-dependent manner by the sleeping brain, all the way up to the preparation of relevant actions. Here, using semantic categorization and lexical decision tasks, we studied task-relevant responses triggered by spoken stimuli in the sleeping brain. Awake participants classified words as either animals or objects (experiment 1) or as either words or pseudowords (experiment 2) by pressing a button with their right or left hand, while transitioning toward sleep. The lateralized readiness potential (LRP), an electrophysiological index of response preparation, revealed that task-specific preparatory responses are preserved during sleep. These findings demonstrate that despite the absence of awareness and behavioral responsiveness, sleepers can still extract task-relevant information from external stimuli and covertly prepare for appropriate motor responses

    Behavioral and Neural Indices of Metacognitive Sensitivity in Preverbal Infants

    Get PDF
    Humans adapt their behavior not only by observing the consequences of their actions but also by internally monitoring their performance. This capacity, termed metacognitive sensitivity [1, 2], has traditionally been denied to young children because they have poor capacities in verbally reporting their own mental states [3–5]. Yet, these observations might reflect children’s limited capacities for explicit self-reports, rather than limitations in metacognition per se. Indeed, metacognitive sensitivity has been shown to reflect simple computational mechanisms [1, 6–8], and can be found in various non-verbal species [7–10]. Thus, it might be that this faculty is present early in development, although it would be discernible through implicit behaviors and neural indices rather than explicit self-reports. Here, by relying on such non-verbal indices, we show that 12- and 18-monthold infants internally monitor the accuracy of their own decisions. At the behavioral level, infants showed increased persistence in their initial choice after making a correct as compared to an incorrect response, evidencing an appropriate evaluation of decision confidence. Moreover, infants were able to use decision confidence adaptively to either confirm their initial choice or change their mind. At the neural level, we found that a well-established electrophysiological signature of error monitoring in adults, the errorrelated negativity, is similarly elicited when infants make an incorrect choice. Hence, although explicit forms of metacognition mature later during childhood, infants already estimate decision confidence, monitor their errors, and use these metacognitive evaluations to regulate subsequent behavior

    Manifeste en faveur d'une réforme globale du droit de la famille : prise de position publique d'ex-ministres québécois

    Full text link
    Manifeste signĂ© par d’ex-ministres de la Justice et de la Famille du QuĂ©bec Ă  l’appui d’une rĂ©forme globale du droit de la famille quĂ©bĂ©cois

    Le matériel didactique : Une nouvelle génération

    No full text

    Développer un esprit réflexif

    No full text
    What do infants know about themselves? Do they have thoughts about their own thoughts? The aim of this thesis was to investigate this issue by focusing on the early development of metacognition, our capacity to monitor and regulate our own cognitive processes. Previous research essentially relied on verbal reports, and showed that reflecting upon their own mental states is difficult for preschoolers. Yet, these observations might reflect children’s limited capacities in explicitly reporting their own mental states, rather than limitations in metacognition per se. Here, by relying on methods coming from the comparative literature, we investigated the possibility that even infants could demonstrate rudimentary forms of metacognition in non-verbal settings. In a first study, we found that 12- and 18-month-olds can evaluate decision confidence, monitor their errors, and use these metacognitive computations to regulate subsequent behaviour. In a second study, we further show that 20-month-olds are able to share their own uncertainty with others in order to regulate behaviour. This last aspect of our results suggests that infants can consciously access metacognitive representations, although they remain unable to manipulate them verbally until much later during childhood. Taken together, our results highlight an important dissociation between core metacognitive capacities, already present in infancy, and more explicit aspects of metacognition, developing through an effortful process during childhood. More generally, the present work provides some evidence that infants not only consider their physical and social surroundings, but also, reflect upon their own cognitive states.Les bĂ©bĂ©s ont-ils des pensĂ©es sur leurs propres pensĂ©es? L'objet de cette thĂšse Ă©tait d'examiner cette question en se concentrant sur le dĂ©veloppement de la mĂ©tacognition, cette capacitĂ© que nous avons d'observer et de rĂ©guler nos propres processus cognitifs. Les recherches antĂ©rieures ont documentĂ© un dĂ©veloppement tardif de la mĂ©tacognition. Cependant, cette question a essentiellement Ă©tĂ© Ă©tudiĂ©e en demandant aux enfants de rapporter verbalement leurs propres Ă©tats mentaux. En nous appuyant sur des mĂ©thodes issues de la littĂ©rature comparative, ici nous avons Ă©tudiĂ© la possibilitĂ© que mĂȘme les bĂ©bĂ©s pourraient dĂ©montrer des capacitĂ©s mĂ©tacognitives dans des situations qui ne requiĂšrent pas de rapport verbal. Dans une premiĂšre Ă©tude, nous avons trouvĂ© que les bĂ©bĂ©s de 12 et 18 mois dĂ©tectent leurs erreurs, Ă©valuent la confiance qu'ils peuvent avoir dans leurs dĂ©cisions, et utilisent ces informations pour rĂ©guler leur comportement. Dans une deuxiĂšme Ă©tude, nous montrons que les bĂ©bĂ©s de 20 mois sont mĂȘme capables de communiquer leur propre incertitude non verbalement. Cela suggĂšre que les tout petits peuvent consciemment reprĂ©senter leur propre incertitude, mĂȘme si ils sont incapables de la verbaliser convenablement avant bien plus tard pendant l'enfance. Nos rĂ©sultats indiquent qu'il y a une dissociation importante entre les capacitĂ©s de rĂ©gulation mĂ©tacognitive, dĂ©jĂ  prĂ©sentes chez le bĂ©bĂ©, et les aspects plus explicites de la mĂ©tacognition, qui se dĂ©veloppent lentement pendant l'enfance. De façon plus gĂ©nĂ©rale, nos rĂ©sultats suggĂšrent que les bĂ©bĂ©s, en plus d'analyser leur environnement physique et social, peuvent aussi examiner leurs propres processus cognitifs

    Au secondaire, suivez le guide

    No full text

    Distinct signatures of subjective confidence and objective accuracy in speech prosody

    No full text
    • 

    corecore