71 research outputs found
Behavioral and Neural Indices of Metacognitive Sensitivity in Preverbal Infants
Humans adapt their behavior not only by observing the consequences of their actions but also by internally monitoring their performance. This capacity, termed metacognitive sensitivity [1 ; 2], has traditionally been denied to young children because they have poor capacities in verbally reporting their own mental states [3; 4 ; 5]. Yet, these observations might reflect childrenâs limited capacities for explicit self-reports, rather than limitations in metacognition per se. Indeed, metacognitive sensitivity has been shown to reflect simple computational mechanisms [1; 6; 7 ; 8], and can be found in various non-verbal species [7; 8; 9 ; 10]. Thus, it might be that this faculty is present early in development, although it would be discernible through implicit behaviors and neural indices rather than explicit self-reports. Here, by relying on such non-verbal indices, we show that 12- and 18-month-old infants internally monitor the accuracy of their own decisions. At the behavioral level, infants showed increased persistence in their initial choice after making a correct as compared to an incorrect response, evidencing an appropriate evaluation of decision confidence. Moreover, infants were able to use decision confidence adaptively to either confirm their initial choice or change their mind. At the neural level, we found that a well-established electrophysiological signature of error monitoring in adults, the error-related negativity, is similarly elicited when infants make an incorrect choice. Hence, although explicit forms of metacognition mature later during childhood, infants already estimate decision confidence, monitor their errors, and use these metacognitive evaluations to regulate subsequent behavior
Inducing Task-Relevant Responses to Speech in the Sleeping Brain
Falling asleep leads to a loss of sensory awareness and to the inability to interact with the environment [1]. While this was traditionally thought as a consequence of the brain shutting down to external inputs, it is now acknowledged that incoming stimuli can still be processed, at least to some extent, during sleep [2]. For instance, sleeping participants can create novel sensory associations between tones and odors [3] or reactivate existing semantic associations, as evidenced by event-related potentials [4; 5; 6 ; 7]. Yet, the extent to which the brain continues to process external stimuli remains largely unknown. In particular, it remains unclear whether sensory information can be processed in a flexible and task-dependent manner by the sleeping brain, all the way up to the preparation of relevant actions. Here, using semantic categorization and lexical decision tasks, we studied task-relevant responses triggered by spoken stimuli in the sleeping brain. Awake participants classified words as either animals or objects (experiment 1) or as either words or pseudowords (experiment 2) by pressing a button with their right or left hand, while transitioning toward sleep. The lateralized readiness potential (LRP), an electrophysiological index of response preparation, revealed that task-specific preparatory responses are preserved during sleep. These findings demonstrate that despite the absence of awareness and behavioral responsiveness, sleepers can still extract task-relevant information from external stimuli and covertly prepare for appropriate motor responses
Behavioral and Neural Indices of Metacognitive Sensitivity in Preverbal Infants
Humans adapt their behavior not only by observing
the consequences of their actions but also by internally
monitoring their performance. This capacity, termed metacognitive sensitivity [1, 2], has traditionally been denied to young children because they have poor capacities in verbally reporting their own mental states [3â5]. Yet, these observations might reflect childrenâs limited capacities for explicit self-reports, rather than limitations in metacognition per se.
Indeed, metacognitive sensitivity has been shown to reflect simple computational mechanisms [1, 6â8], and can be found in various non-verbal species [7â10]. Thus, it might be that this faculty is present early in development, although it would be discernible through implicit behaviors and neural indices rather than explicit self-reports. Here, by relying on such non-verbal indices, we show that 12- and 18-monthold
infants internally monitor the accuracy of their own decisions. At the behavioral level, infants showed increased persistence in their initial choice after making a correct as compared to an incorrect response, evidencing an appropriate evaluation of decision confidence.
Moreover, infants were able to use decision confidence adaptively to either confirm their initial choice or change their mind. At the neural level, we found that a well-established electrophysiological signature of error monitoring in adults, the errorrelated negativity, is similarly elicited when infants make an incorrect choice. Hence, although explicit forms of metacognition mature later during childhood, infants already estimate decision confidence, monitor their errors, and use these metacognitive evaluations to regulate subsequent behavior
Manifeste en faveur d'une réforme globale du droit de la famille : prise de position publique d'ex-ministres québécois
Manifeste signĂ© par dâex-ministres de la Justice et de la Famille du QuĂ©bec Ă lâappui dâune rĂ©forme globale du droit de la famille quĂ©bĂ©cois
Développer un esprit réflexif
What do infants know about themselves? Do they have thoughts about their own thoughts? The aim of this thesis was to investigate this issue by focusing on the early development of metacognition, our capacity to monitor and regulate our own cognitive processes. Previous research essentially relied on verbal reports, and showed that reflecting upon their own mental states is difficult for preschoolers. Yet, these observations might reflect childrenâs limited capacities in explicitly reporting their own mental states, rather than limitations in metacognition per se. Here, by relying on methods coming from the comparative literature, we investigated the possibility that even infants could demonstrate rudimentary forms of metacognition in non-verbal settings. In a first study, we found that 12- and 18-month-olds can evaluate decision confidence, monitor their errors, and use these metacognitive computations to regulate subsequent behaviour. In a second study, we further show that 20-month-olds are able to share their own uncertainty with others in order to regulate behaviour. This last aspect of our results suggests that infants can consciously access metacognitive representations, although they remain unable to manipulate them verbally until much later during childhood. Taken together, our results highlight an important dissociation between core metacognitive capacities, already present in infancy, and more explicit aspects of metacognition, developing through an effortful process during childhood. More generally, the present work provides some evidence that infants not only consider their physical and social surroundings, but also, reflect upon their own cognitive states.Les bĂ©bĂ©s ont-ils des pensĂ©es sur leurs propres pensĂ©es? L'objet de cette thĂšse Ă©tait d'examiner cette question en se concentrant sur le dĂ©veloppement de la mĂ©tacognition, cette capacitĂ© que nous avons d'observer et de rĂ©guler nos propres processus cognitifs. Les recherches antĂ©rieures ont documentĂ© un dĂ©veloppement tardif de la mĂ©tacognition. Cependant, cette question a essentiellement Ă©tĂ© Ă©tudiĂ©e en demandant aux enfants de rapporter verbalement leurs propres Ă©tats mentaux. En nous appuyant sur des mĂ©thodes issues de la littĂ©rature comparative, ici nous avons Ă©tudiĂ© la possibilitĂ© que mĂȘme les bĂ©bĂ©s pourraient dĂ©montrer des capacitĂ©s mĂ©tacognitives dans des situations qui ne requiĂšrent pas de rapport verbal. Dans une premiĂšre Ă©tude, nous avons trouvĂ© que les bĂ©bĂ©s de 12 et 18 mois dĂ©tectent leurs erreurs, Ă©valuent la confiance qu'ils peuvent avoir dans leurs dĂ©cisions, et utilisent ces informations pour rĂ©guler leur comportement. Dans une deuxiĂšme Ă©tude, nous montrons que les bĂ©bĂ©s de 20 mois sont mĂȘme capables de communiquer leur propre incertitude non verbalement. Cela suggĂšre que les tout petits peuvent consciemment reprĂ©senter leur propre incertitude, mĂȘme si ils sont incapables de la verbaliser convenablement avant bien plus tard pendant l'enfance. Nos rĂ©sultats indiquent qu'il y a une dissociation importante entre les capacitĂ©s de rĂ©gulation mĂ©tacognitive, dĂ©jĂ prĂ©sentes chez le bĂ©bĂ©, et les aspects plus explicites de la mĂ©tacognition, qui se dĂ©veloppent lentement pendant l'enfance. De façon plus gĂ©nĂ©rale, nos rĂ©sultats suggĂšrent que les bĂ©bĂ©s, en plus d'analyser leur environnement physique et social, peuvent aussi examiner leurs propres processus cognitifs
Recommended from our members
Research data supporting "Transient Topographical Dynamics of the Electroencephalogram Predict Brain Connectivity and Behavioural Responsiveness During Drowsiness"
This set contains 19 EEG recordings of different participants performing an auditory semantic task as they fell asleep.
The participants were directed to not consume stimulants like coffee and to sleep 1â2 h less than normally before the experiment. All of the subjects were assessed as easy sleepers on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (scores 7â14).
The stimuli consisted of 96 spoken English words chosen from the CELEX lexical database. Half of the words denoted animals and the other half denoted objects. The subjects were asked to classify each stimulus in its respective category (animal or object) by pressing a button. The stimuli were presented through headphones, with an average distance of 8.4 s (minimum 6.2 s) between consecutive stimuli, as the subjects were lying with their eyes closed in a reclining chair. To facilitate drowsiness, the task was performed in a dark, acoustically and electrically shielded EEG room, and the participants were told that they could fall asleep at any point during the experiment, although they were asked not to stop responding deliberately while still awake.
The electroencephalogram was continuously recorded at 500 samples per second from 64 Ag/AgCl electrodes positioned and labelled according to the extended 10/20 system, with Cz as a reference and including vertical and horizontal electrooculography channels
- âŠ