Planning a postprocessor to convert NC/ISO G-Code to translations for a 3/5 axis robot ACMA ABB XR701

V zaključnem delu prikazujemo, kako z implementacijo poprocesorja za pretvorbe NC/ISO G-kode v translacije 3/5 osnega robota ACMA-proizvajalca ABB-model XR701 zmanjšamo strošek nakupa robota in pripadajoče programske opreme. Poprocesor z linearno algebro in razčlenjevanjem pretvori program za rezkanje kompleksnejših oblik, večjih dimenzij in pohitri nastavitev ter pretvorbo kode z uporabo uporabnikom prijaznega vmesnika izdelanega v programski opremi Visual Studio 2017 CLI (angl. Combined Language Infrastructure) in programskim jezikom C++. Na ta način privarčujemo pri nakupu licence programske opreme za pretvarjanje ISO G-kode v robotsko kodo.In the final work, it is presented how with the implementation of a postprocessor for converting NC/ISO G-code into translations for the robot ACMA manufacturer ABB model XR701, the costs of purchasing the robot and the associated software are reduced. The postprocessor with linear algebra and parsing converts the program for cutting complex shapes and bigger dimensions, speeds up the settings and conversion using a user-friendly interface created in the software Visual Studio 2017 CLI (Combined Language Infrastructure) and C++ programming language. This saves us the purchase of licensed software programs for converting ISO G-code into a robotic code

DESIGN OF LOW ENERGY HOUSE IN CELJE

V diplomskem delu predstavljamo zasnovo nizkoenergijske hiše v Celju. V teoretičnem delu najprej predstavimo opeko in steklo kot gradbena materiala in značilne elemente nizkoenergijske hiše, ki smo jih kasneje vključili in uporabili pri zasnovi projekta. V praktičnem delu podrobneje prestavimo zasnovo hiše. Objekt je zasnovan tako, da niso prisotni toplotni mostovi in da ustreza pogojem, ki jih podaja Pravilnik o učinkoviti rabi energije v stavbah. O ustreznosti zasnove iz vidika učinkovite rabe energije je priča elaborat gradbene fizike, ki je bil narejen s pomočjo programa Gradbena fizika URSA 4.In this thesis we present the design of a low-energy house in Celje. In the theoretical part we first present the bricks and glass used as construction materials and discuss the characteristics of low-energy houses, which we later incorporated into the project\u27s design. In the practical part of the thesis we present the design of the house in detail. The building is designed in such a way that it does not have thermal bridges and that it conforms with the conditions, set out by the Regulations of efficient energy use in buildings. The building engineering physics analysis, done with the help of the software Gradbena fizika URSA 4, is proof of the design\u27s adequate energy efficiency

Use of pronouns in political discourse: a study of the 2016 US presidential election debate and the 2019/2020 Croatian presidential election debate

In my thesis, I explored pronoun use strategies utilized by presidential candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the 2016 NBC presidential debate, as well as by presidential candidates Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović and Zoran Milanović in the 2019 RTL presidential debate. My goal was to uncover manipulative tactics achieved through strategic pronoun use, and to conduct a comparative analysis of strategic pronoun use in US and Croatian political rhetoric. I opened my thesis by summarizing the theoretical framework through a short examination of the role of power in critical discourse analysis and political discourse analysis. To highlight the importance of pronouns in political rhetoric, I proceeded by listing several manners in which politicians can use pronouns to manipulate an audience and achieve their political goals, which I then demonstrated with several historical examples of strategic pronoun use in political discourse. Afterwards, I provided a general overview of the debates I chose, the 2016 NBC debate and the 2019 RTL debate, and explained my reasoning for choosing them. Following this, I utilized relevant resources to construct a general idea of each candidates’ rhetoric, as well as some general expectations for strategic pronoun use in the debates. The analysis consisted of picking out illustrative examples of language use from the debates, isolating said examples and interpreting implicit and explicit meanings with the help of relevant literature from the fields of critical discourse analysis and political discourse analysis. In the “discussion” segment, I highlighted a lack of the solidary “We” in Croatian political discourse, as well as common use of the pronoun to denote in-group and out-group membership. When it comes to the pronoun “I”, I discovered its presence in emphasizing personal involvement and manipulation of perceived agency in Grabar-Kitarović and Trump’s rhetoric, and in individualization strategies in Trump and Milanović’s rhetoric. The establishment of an “us” vs. “them” dichotomy through pronoun use as a means to achieve political polarization and gain soft power was a staple in most of the candidates’ rhetoric. I found that Milanović commonly used possessives to highlight his adversary’s association to controversial figures and groups and, along with first-person pronouns, to concede responsibility for past failures. Gendered pronouns were mostly found in character attacks and heated moments. I also uncovered a lack of research on strategic language use in Croatian political discourse and emphasized its importance for future research

Use of pronouns in political discourse: a study of the 2016 US presidential election debate and the 2019/2020 Croatian presidential election debate

In my thesis, I explored pronoun use strategies utilized by presidential candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the 2016 NBC presidential debate, as well as by presidential candidates Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović and Zoran Milanović in the 2019 RTL presidential debate. My goal was to uncover manipulative tactics achieved through strategic pronoun use, and to conduct a comparative analysis of strategic pronoun use in US and Croatian political rhetoric. I opened my thesis by summarizing the theoretical framework through a short examination of the role of power in critical discourse analysis and political discourse analysis. To highlight the importance of pronouns in political rhetoric, I proceeded by listing several manners in which politicians can use pronouns to manipulate an audience and achieve their political goals, which I then demonstrated with several historical examples of strategic pronoun use in political discourse. Afterwards, I provided a general overview of the debates I chose, the 2016 NBC debate and the 2019 RTL debate, and explained my reasoning for choosing them. Following this, I utilized relevant resources to construct a general idea of each candidates’ rhetoric, as well as some general expectations for strategic pronoun use in the debates. The analysis consisted of picking out illustrative examples of language use from the debates, isolating said examples and interpreting implicit and explicit meanings with the help of relevant literature from the fields of critical discourse analysis and political discourse analysis. In the “discussion” segment, I highlighted a lack of the solidary “We” in Croatian political discourse, as well as common use of the pronoun to denote in-group and out-group membership. When it comes to the pronoun “I”, I discovered its presence in emphasizing personal involvement and manipulation of perceived agency in Grabar-Kitarović and Trump’s rhetoric, and in individualization strategies in Trump and Milanović’s rhetoric. The establishment of an “us” vs. “them” dichotomy through pronoun use as a means to achieve political polarization and gain soft power was a staple in most of the candidates’ rhetoric. I found that Milanović commonly used possessives to highlight his adversary’s association to controversial figures and groups and, along with first-person pronouns, to concede responsibility for past failures. Gendered pronouns were mostly found in character attacks and heated moments. I also uncovered a lack of research on strategic language use in Croatian political discourse and emphasized its importance for future research