13 research outputs found
Cluster observations of non-time-continuous magnetosonic waves
Equatorial magnetosonic waves are normally observed as temporally
continuous sets of emissions lasting from minutes to hours. Recent
observations, however, have shown that this is not always the case. Using
Cluster data, this study identifies two distinct forms of these non-temporallycontinuous
emissions. The first, referred to as rising tone emissions, are characterised
by the systematic onset of wave activity at increasing proton gyroharmonic
frequencies. Sets of harmonic emissions (emission elements) are
observed to occur periodically in the region ±10⊠off the geomagnetic equator.
The sweep rate of these emissions maximises at the geomagnetic equator.
In addition, the ellipticity and propagation direction also change systematically
as Cluster crosses the geomagnetic equator. It is shown that the
observed frequency sweep rate is unlikely to result from the sideband instability
related to nonlinear trapping of suprathermal protons in the wave field.
The second form of emissions is characterised by the simultaneous onset of
activity across a range of harmonic frequencies. These waves are observed
at irregular intervals. Their occurrence correlates with changes in the spacecraft
potential, a measurement that is used as a proxy for electron densit
Editorial honoring the 2018 reviewers for JGR Space Physics
The Editors of the Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics would like to honor and thank the 2018 manuscript reviewers for the journal. This is a largeâscale, communityâwide effort for which 1,358 scientists submitted 3,027 reviews in 2018. We understand that this is a volunteer task and we greatly appreciate your time and effort to fulfill this service role back to the research community
Predicting geostationary 40â150Â keV electron flux using ARMAX (an autoregressive moving average transfer function), RNN (a Recurrent Neural Network), and logistic regression: a comparison of models
We screen several algorithms for their ability to produce good predictive models of hourly 40â150 keV electron flux at geostationary orbit (data from GOES-13) using solar wind, Interplanetary Magnetic Field, and geomagnetic index parameters that would be available for real time forecasting. Value-predicting models developed using ARMAX (autoregressive moving average transfer function), RNN (recurrent neural network), or stepwise-reduced regression produced roughly similar results. Including magnetic local time as a categorical variable to describe both the differing levels of flux and the differing influence of parameters improved the models (r as high as 0.814; Heidke Skill Score (HSS) as high as 0.663), however value-predicting models did a poor job at predicting highs and lows. Diagnostic tests are introduced (cubic fit to observation-prediction relationship and Lag1 correlation) that better assess predictions of extremes than single metrics such as root mean square error, mean absolute error, or median symmetric accuracy. Classifier models (RNN and logistic regression) were equally able to predict flux rise above the 75th percentile (HSS as high as 0.667). Logistic regression models were improved by the addition of multiplicative interaction and quadratic terms. Only predictors from 1 or 3 hr before were necessary and a detailed description of flux time series behavior was not needed. Stepwise selection of these variables trimmed non-contributing parameters for a more parsimonious and portable logistic regression model that predicted as well as neural network-derived models. We provide a logistic regression model (LL3: LogisticLag3) based on inputs measured 3 hr previous, along with optimal probability thresholds, for future predictions
Achievements and Challenges in the Science of Space Weather
In June 2016 a group of 40 space weather scientists attended the workshop on Scientific Foundations of Space Weather at the International Space Science Institute in Bern. In this lead article to the volume based on the talks and discussions during the workshop we review some of main past achievements in the field and outline some of the challenges that the science of space weather is facing today and in the future.Peer reviewe
Overview of Solar WindâMagnetosphereâIonosphereâAtmosphere Coupling and the Generation of Magnetospheric Currents
Defining and resolving current systems in geospace
Electric currents flowing through near-Earth space (R â€12RE) can support a highly distorted magnetic field topology, changing particle drift paths and therefore having a nonlinear feedback on the currents themselves. A number of current systems exist in the magnetosphere, most commonly defined as (1) the dayside magnetopause Chapman-Ferraro currents, (2) the Birkeland field-aligned currents with highlatitude "region 1" and lower-latitude "region 2" currents connected to the partial ring current, (3) the magnetotail currents, and (4) the symmetric ring current. In the near-Earth nightside region, however, several of these current systems flow in close proximity to each other. Moreover, the existence of other temporal current systems, such as the substorm current wedge or "banana" current, has been reported. It is very difficult to identify a local measurement as belonging to a specific system. Such identification is important, however, because how the current closes and how these loops change in space and time governs the magnetic topology of the magnetosphere and therefore controls the physical processes of geospace. Furthermore, many methods exist for identifying the regions of near-Earth space carrying each type of current. This study presents a robust collection of these definitions of current systems in geospace, particularly in the near- Earth nightside magnetosphere, as viewed from a variety of observational and computational analysis techniques. The influence of definitional choice on the resulting interpretation of physical processes governing geospace dynamics is presented and discussed. © Author(s) 2015
Model evaluation guidelines for geomagnetic index predictions
Geomagnetic indices are convenient quantities that distill the complicated physics of some region or aspect of nearâEarth space into a single parameter. Most of the bestâknown indices are calculated from groundâbased magnetometer data sets, such as Dst, SYMâH, Kp, AE, AL, and PC. Many models have been created that predict the values of these indices, often using solar wind measurements upstream from Earth as the input variables to the calculation. This document reviews the current state of models that predict geomagnetic indices and the methods used to assess their ability to reproduce the target index time series. These existing methods are synthesized into a baseline collection of metrics for benchmarking a new or updated geomagnetic index prediction model. These methods fall into two categories: (1) fit performance metrics such as rootâmeanâsquare error and mean absolute error that are applied to a time series comparison of model output and observations and (2) event detection performance metrics such as Heidke Skill Score and probability of detection that are derived from a contingency table that compares model and observation values exceeding (or not) a threshold value. A few examples of codes being used with this set of metrics are presented, and other aspects of metrics assessment best practices, limitations, and uncertainties are discussed, including several caveats to consider when using geomagnetic indices
Overview, Progress and Next Steps for Our Understanding of the Near-Earth Space Radiation and Plasma Environment: Science and Applications
The Near-Earth Space Radiation and Plasma Environment falls within the realm of G3 Cluster (G3 refers to âNear-Earth Radiation and Plasma Environmentâ of the âCoupled Geospace Systemâ) under the COSPAR (Committee On Space Research) /International Space Weather Action Teams (ISWAT) Initiative. The diverse and dynamic particle populations from this region pose challenges from both science and space weather-impact perspectives. The G3 cluster has intimate connections with solar, heliosphere clusters, and the other Geospace ones (G1, G2) through a chain of physical processes. This paper reviews recent scientific advances in understanding this complex space environment, identifies gaps in research and space weather applications, and maps out our recommendations on priorities for the next 5-10 years
Overview of Solar WindâMagnetosphereâIonosphereâAtmosphere Coupling and the Generation of Magnetospheric Currents
We review the morphology and dynamics of the electrical current systems of the terrestrial magnetosphere and ionosphere. Observations from the Active Magnetosphere and Planetary Electrodynamics Response Experiment (AMPERE) over the three years 2010 to 2012 are employed to illustrate the variability of the field-aligned currents that couple the magnetosphere and ionosphere, on timescales from minutes to years, in response to the impact of solar wind disturbances on the magnetosphere and changes in the level of solar illumination of the polar ionospheres. The variability is discussed within the context of the occurrence of magnetic reconnection between the solar wind and terrestrial magnetic fields at the magnetopause, the transport of magnetic flux within the magnetosphere, and the onset of magnetic reconnection in the magnetotail. The conditions under which the currents are expected to be weak, and hence minimally contaminate measurements of the internally-produced magnetic field of the Earth, are briefly outlined