Comparing Physiological Responses During Rowing High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) versus High Intensity Functional Training (HIFT)

High intensity interval training (HIIT) improves cardiorespiratory fitness, glycemic control, and body composition, yet the majority of studies used cycling which employs a smaller muscle mass. Less data have examined the acute response to whole-body HIIT. PURPOSE: To compare physiological responses between HIIT rowing and high intensity functional training (HIFT). METHODS: Healthy, non-obese men and women (N=18, age=25±8 yr) who are physically active (PA=7±2hr, VO2max=39±8mL/kg/min) underwent graded exercise testing to determine VO₂max and peak power output (PPO) on the rowing ergometer. On two separate days, subjects performed a time-matched bout of HIFT or HIIT rowing. HIIFT required 6 ‘all-out’ sets of 10 push-ups, 10 jump squats, 20 mountain climbers, and 20 body-weight squats separated by 75 s recovery. HIIT rowing consisted of six 1min bouts at 85% PPO with 75 s of recovery. Gas exchange data, heart rate (HR), affective valence, and RPE were obtained during exercise. Blood lactate concentration (BLa) was measured at rest, bout 3, and 5, 10, and 15 min post-exercise. RESULTS: There were significant differences (p2 was higher (p=0.03) with HIIT rowing versus HIFT (1.88 ± 0.51 vs. 1.67 ± 0.35 L/min) as was total O2 (31±8 vs. 28±6L). GroupXtime interactions (pE, and RPE occurred, with higher values demonstrated to HIFT. CONCLUSION: HIFT elicited a higher peak HR, BLa, and RER, suggesting a higher peak cardiovascular stimulus and greater activation of glycolysis, likely due to greater recruitment of fast twitch fibers. Yet, HIIT rowing elicited higher energy expenditure and mean VO2 versus HIFT. The eccentric nature of HIFT may explain the blunted VO2 response, although more studies are needed to verify this result

Establishing a distributed national research infrastructure providing bioinformatics support to life science researchers in Australia

EMBL Australia Bioinformatics Resource (EMBL-ABR) is a developing national research infrastructure, providing bioinformatics resources and support to life science and biomedical researchers in Australia. EMBL-ABR comprises 10 geographically distrib- uted national nodes with one coordinating hub, with current funding provided through Bioplatforms Australia and the University of Melbourne for its initial 2-year development phase. The EMBL-ABR mission is to: (1) increase Australia’s capacity in bioinformatics and data sciences; (2) contribute to the development of training in bioinformatics skills; (3) showcase Australian data sets at an international level and (4) enable engagement in international programs. The activities of EMBL-ABR are focussed in six key areas, aligning with comparable international initiatives such as ELIXIR, CyVerse and NIH Commons. These key areas—Tools, Data, Standards, Platforms, Compute and Training—are described in this article

ToolsAU

<h2>EMBL-ABR <a href="https://www.embl-abr.org.au/tools/toolsau/" target="_blank">ToolsAU</a>, powered by the ELIXIR Tools and Data Service Registry</h2

EMBL-ABR Search for Training Materials

A web-based tool to find bioinformatics training materials from various organisations both in Australia and worldwide.<div><br></div

Additional file 1: of FlexDM: Simple, parallel and fault-tolerant data mining using WEKA

Comparison of FlexDM and WEKA Experimenter XML specifications of equivalent experiments. (PDF 49 kb

Survey of Bioinformatics and Computational Needs in Australia 2016.pdf

In order to gain a snapshot of the bioinformatics and computational biology needs among life scientists and medical researchers, EMBL-ABR Hub conducted a survey (July-Sep 2016) across Australia. In total 123 responses were received from around Australia, distributed across all states and this document summarises the results and provides a link to the collected survey results. <div>This survey was originally developed by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on behalf of CyVerse. </div