8 research outputs found
Els bombardejos italians a Barcelona i la protecció internacional dels béns culturals
Treballs Finals de Grau de Dret. Universitat de Barcelona. Curs: 2016-2017. Tutora: Rosa Ana Alija Fernández.
Vinculat al Projecte Dret al Dret. Clínica jurídica de Lluita contra la ImpunitatLa Guerra Civil espanyola no deixa indiferent a ningú. Va ser una cruenta guerra civil internacionalitzada que preludiava el que havia de venir-li al món. Va ser un camp de proves on les potències nazi-feixistes van intervenir i van experimentar amb nous mitjans i mètodes de fer la guerra. Els bombardejos deliberats contra la població civil a diverses ciutats espanyoles, que van trasbalsar la comunitat internacional, en són la tràgica prova. La destrucció de béns culturals, una de les seves nefastes conseqüències, era un tema preocupava la comunitat internacional, però molt freqüentment ha quedat tapat per l’horror i les dimensions de les pèrdues humanes.
Aquest treball s’emmarca dins del projecte Dret al Dret de la facultat de dret de la Universitat de Barcelona. En concret, s’inscriu dins del suport que la Clínica Jurídica de Lluita contra la Impunitat presta a la Plataforma Bombes d’Impunitat, que tracta de manera transversal els bombardejos durant la Guerra Civil espanyola i la recuperació de la memòria. L’objectiu d’aquest treball és cercar arguments jurídics, en l’àmbit de la protecció jurídica internacional dels béns culturals, per tal d’esbrinar si els bombardejos italians sobre la ciutat de Barcelona i la conseqüent destrucció de béns culturals serien il·legals als ulls del Dret Internacional.
La Guerra Civil espanyola també va sacsejar els fonaments del Dret Internacional Públic perquè va suscitar problemes nous i va retorçar la interpretació de les normes vigents en aquells anys. En aquest sentit, l’estudi explora les normes sobre béns culturals en el dret convencional de l’època; planteja l’existència i l’aplicació de normes consuetudinàries al conflicte espanyol; i valora la incidència de la participació italiana durant la Guerra Civil a la llum dels principis del Dret Internacional. Per fer-ho, s’analitzen conceptes que actualment estan desenvolupats –com els objectius militars– i d’altres que són problemàtics –com el de “ciutat oberta” o la bel·ligerància–. En general, la protecció internacional dels béns culturals aplicada al cas espanyol roman encara poc tractada, almenys des d’una perspectiva jurídica..
What do we do with ISIS crimes? An analysis of the problems of creating an exclusive tribunal to prosecute them
As a result of the military defeat of ISIS in 2019, tens of thousands of fighters and their families, including many foreigners –Europeans also– were arrested and interned in prisons and camps in northeastern Syria. The Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) called on the international community to establish a jurisdictional mechanism to address the accountability of those responsible for crimes committed by ISIS. Since then, different options have been discussed. One of them, which emerged from several European governments reluctant to repatriate ISIS members, was the establishment of an international or hybrid court with the aim of prosecuting only ISIS members. This article reviews the main problems raised by the proposal that affect its legitimacy and legal design
Detailed stratified GWAS analysis for severe COVID-19 in four European populations
Given the highly variable clinical phenotype of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a deeper analysis of the host genetic contribution to severe COVID-19 is important to improve our understanding of underlying disease mechanisms. Here, we describe an extended genome-wide association meta-analysis of a well-characterized cohort of 3255 COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure and 12 488 population controls from Italy, Spain, Norway and Germany/Austria, including stratified analyses based on age, sex and disease severity, as well as targeted analyses of chromosome Y haplotypes, the human leukocyte antigen region and the SARS-CoV-2 peptidome. By inversion imputation, we traced a reported association at 17q21.31 to a ~0.9-Mb inversion polymorphism that creates two highly differentiated haplotypes and characterized the potential effects of the inversion in detail. Our data, together with the 5th release of summary statistics from the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative including non-Caucasian individuals, also identified a new locus at 19q13.33, including NAPSA, a gene which is expressed primarily in alveolar cells responsible for gas exchange in the lung.S.E.H. and C.A.S. partially supported genotyping through a philanthropic donation. A.F. and D.E. were supported by a grant from the German Federal Ministry of Education and COVID-19 grant Research (BMBF; ID:01KI20197); A.F., D.E. and F.D. were supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Cluster of Excellence ‘Precision Medicine in Chronic Inflammation’ (EXC2167). D.E. was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the framework of the Computational Life Sciences funding concept (CompLS grant 031L0165). D.E., K.B. and S.B. acknowledge the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF14CC0001 and NNF17OC0027594). T.L.L., A.T. and O.Ö. were funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation), project numbers 279645989; 433116033; 437857095. M.W. and H.E. are supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) through the Research Training Group 1743, ‘Genes, Environment and Inflammation’. L.V. received funding from: Ricerca Finalizzata Ministero della Salute (RF-2016-02364358), Italian Ministry of Health ‘CV PREVITAL’—strategie di prevenzione primaria cardiovascolare primaria nella popolazione italiana; The European Union (EU) Programme Horizon 2020 (under grant agreement No. 777377) for the project LITMUS- and for the project ‘REVEAL’; Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda ‘Ricerca corrente’, Fondazione Sviluppo Ca’ Granda ‘Liver-BIBLE’ (PR-0391), Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda ‘5permille’ ‘COVID-19 Biobank’ (RC100017A). A.B. was supported by a grant from Fondazione Cariplo to Fondazione Tettamanti: ‘Bio-banking of Covid-19 patient samples to support national and international research (Covid-Bank). This research was partly funded by an MIUR grant to the Department of Medical Sciences, under the program ‘Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2018–2022’. This study makes use of data generated by the GCAT-Genomes for Life. Cohort study of the Genomes of Catalonia, Fundació IGTP (The Institute for Health Science Research Germans Trias i Pujol) IGTP is part of the CERCA Program/Generalitat de Catalunya. GCAT is supported by Acción de Dinamización del ISCIII-MINECO and the Ministry of Health of the Generalitat of Catalunya (ADE 10/00026); the Agència de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR) (2017-SGR 529). M.M. received research funding from grant PI19/00335 Acción Estratégica en Salud, integrated in the Spanish National RDI Plan and financed by ISCIII-Subdirección General de Evaluación and the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (European Regional Development Fund (FEDER)-Una manera de hacer Europa’). B.C. is supported by national grants PI18/01512. X.F. is supported by the VEIS project (001-P-001647) (co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), ‘A way to build Europe’). Additional data included in this study were obtained in part by the COVICAT Study Group (Cohort Covid de Catalunya) supported by IsGlobal and IGTP, European Institute of Innovation & Technology (EIT), a body of the European Union, COVID-19 Rapid Response activity 73A and SR20-01024 La Caixa Foundation. A.J. and S.M. were supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (grant numbers: PSE-010000-2006-6 and IPT-010000-2010-36). A.J. was also supported by national grant PI17/00019 from the Acción Estratégica en Salud (ISCIII) and the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER). The Basque Biobank, a hospital-related platform that also involves all Osakidetza health centres, the Basque government’s Department of Health and Onkologikoa, is operated by the Basque Foundation for Health Innovation and Research-BIOEF. M.C. received Grants BFU2016-77244-R and PID2019-107836RB-I00 funded by the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI, Spain) and the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER, EU). M.R.G., J.A.H., R.G.D. and D.M.M. are supported by the ‘Spanish Ministry of Economy, Innovation and Competition, the Instituto de Salud Carlos III’ (PI19/01404, PI16/01842, PI19/00589, PI17/00535 and GLD19/00100) and by the Andalussian government (Proyectos Estratégicos-Fondos Feder PE-0451-2018, COVID-Premed, COVID GWAs). The position held by Itziar de Rojas Salarich is funded by grant FI20/00215, PFIS Contratos Predoctorales de Formación en Investigación en Salud. Enrique Calderón’s team is supported by CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), ‘Instituto de Salud Carlos III’. J.C.H. reports grants from Research Council of Norway grant no 312780 during the conduct of the study. E.S. reports grants from Research Council of Norway grant no. 312769. The BioMaterialBank Nord is supported by the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Airway Research Center North (ARCN). The BioMaterialBank Nord is member of popgen 2.0 network (P2N). P.K. Bergisch Gladbach, Germany and the Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. He is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). O.A.C. is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Research and Education and is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy—CECAD, EXC 2030–390661388. The COMRI cohort is funded by Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. This work was supported by grants of the Rolf M. Schwiete Stiftung, the Saarland University, BMBF and The States of Saarland and Lower Saxony. K.U.L. is supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG, LU-1944/3-1). Genotyping for the BoSCO study is funded by the Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Bonn. F.H. was supported by the Bavarian State Ministry for Science and Arts. Part of the genotyping was supported by a grant to A.R. from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, grant: 01ED1619A, European Alzheimer DNA BioBank, EADB) within the context of the EU Joint Programme—Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND). Additional funding was derived from the German Research Foundation (DFG) grant: RA 1971/6-1 to A.R. P.R. is supported by the DFG (CCGA Sequencing Centre and DFG ExC2167 PMI and by SH state funds for COVID19 research). F.T. is supported by the Clinician Scientist Program of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Cluster of Excellence ‘Precision Medicine in Chronic Inflammation’ (EXC2167). C.L. and J.H. are supported by the German Center for Infection Research (DZIF). T.B., M.M.B., O.W. und A.H. are supported by the Stiftung Universitätsmedizin Essen. M.A.-H. was supported by Juan de la Cierva Incorporacion program, grant IJC2018-035131-I funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. E.C.S. is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; SCHU 2419/2-1).Peer reviewe
Detailed stratified GWAS analysis for severe COVID-19 in four European populations
Given the highly variable clinical phenotype of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a deeper analysis of the host genetic contribution to severe COVID-19 is important to improve our understanding of underlying disease mechanisms. Here, we describe an extended GWAS meta-analysis of a well-characterized cohort of 3,260 COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure and 12,483 population controls from Italy, Spain, Norway and Germany/Austria, including stratified analyses based on age, sex and disease severity, as well as targeted analyses of chromosome Y haplotypes, the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region and the SARS-CoV-2 peptidome. By inversion imputation, we traced a reported association at 17q21.31 to a highly pleiotropic ∼0.9-Mb inversion polymorphism and characterized the potential effects of the inversion in detail. Our data, together with the 5th release of summary statistics from the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative, also identified a new locus at 19q13.33, including NAPSA, a gene which is expressed primarily in alveolar cells responsible for gas exchange in the lung.Andre Franke and David Ellinghaus were supported by a grant from the German
Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01KI20197), Andre Franke, David
Ellinghaus and Frauke Degenhardt were supported by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft Cluster of Excellence “Precision Medicine in Chronic
Inflammation” (EXC2167). David Ellinghaus was supported by the German Federal
Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the framework of the
Computational Life Sciences funding concept (CompLS grant 031L0165). David
Ellinghaus, Karina Banasik and Søren Brunak acknowledge the Novo Nordisk
Foundation (grant NNF14CC0001 and NNF17OC0027594). Tobias L. Lenz, Ana
Teles and Onur Özer were funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG,
German Research Foundation), project numbers 279645989; 433116033; 437857095. Mareike Wendorff and Hesham ElAbd are supported by the German
Research Foundation (DFG) through the Research Training Group 1743, "Genes,
Environment and Inflammation". This project was supported by a Covid-19 grant from
the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF; ID: 01KI20197).
Luca Valenti received funding from: Ricerca Finalizzata Ministero della Salute RF2016-02364358, Italian Ministry of Health ""CV PREVITAL – strategie di prevenzione
primaria cardiovascolare primaria nella popolazione italiana; The European Union
(EU) Programme Horizon 2020 (under grant agreement No. 777377) for the project
LITMUS- and for the project ""REVEAL""; Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda ""Ricerca
corrente"", Fondazione Sviluppo Ca' Granda ""Liver-BIBLE"" (PR-0391), Fondazione
IRCCS Ca' Granda ""5permille"" ""COVID-19 Biobank"" (RC100017A). Andrea Biondi
was supported by the grant from Fondazione Cariplo to Fondazione Tettamanti: "Biobanking of Covid-19 patient samples to support national and international research
(Covid-Bank). This research was partly funded by a MIUR grant to the Department of
Medical Sciences, under the program "Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2018–2022". This
study makes use of data generated by the GCAT-Genomes for Life. Cohort study of
the Genomes of Catalonia, Fundació IGTP. IGTP is part of the CERCA Program /
Generalitat de Catalunya. GCAT is supported by Acción de Dinamización del ISCIIIMINECO and the Ministry of Health of the Generalitat of Catalunya (ADE 10/00026);
the Agència de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR) (2017-SGR 529).
Marta Marquié received research funding from ant PI19/00335 Acción Estratégica en
Salud, integrated in the Spanish National RDI Plan and financed by ISCIIISubdirección General de Evaluación and the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional
(FEDER-Una manera de hacer Europa").Beatriz Cortes is supported by national
grants PI18/01512. Xavier Farre is supported by VEIS project (001-P-001647) (cofunded by European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), “A way to build Europe”).
Additional data included in this study was obtained in part by the COVICAT Study
Group (Cohort Covid de Catalunya) supported by IsGlobal and IGTP, EIT COVID-19
Rapid Response activity 73A and SR20-01024 La Caixa Foundation. Antonio Julià
and Sara Marsal were supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and
Competitiveness (grant numbers: PSE-010000-2006-6 and IPT-010000-2010-36).
Antonio Julià was also supported the by national grant PI17/00019 from the Acción
Estratégica en Salud (ISCIII) and the FEDER. The Basque Biobank is a hospitalrelated platform that also involves all Osakidetza health centres, the Basque government's Department of Health and Onkologikoa, is operated by the Basque
Foundation for Health Innovation and Research-BIOEF. Mario Cáceres received
Grants BFU2016-77244-R and PID2019-107836RB-I00 funded by the Agencia Estatal
de Investigación (AEI, Spain) and the European Regional Development Fund
(FEDER, EU). Manuel Romero Gómez, Javier Ampuero Herrojo, Rocío Gallego Durán
and Douglas Maya Miles are supported by the “Spanish Ministry of Economy,
Innovation and Competition, the Instituto de Salud Carlos III” (PI19/01404,
PI16/01842, PI19/00589, PI17/00535 and GLD19/00100), and by the Andalussian
government (Proyectos Estratégicos-Fondos Feder PE-0451-2018, COVID-Premed,
COVID GWAs). The position held by Itziar de Rojas Salarich is funded by grant
FI20/00215, PFIS Contratos Predoctorales de Formación en Investigación en Salud.
Enrique Calderón's team is supported by CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health
(CIBERESP), "Instituto de Salud Carlos III". Jan Cato Holter reports grants from
Research Council of Norway grant no 312780 during the conduct of the study. Dr.
Solligård: reports grants from Research Council of Norway grant no 312769. The
BioMaterialBank Nord is supported by the German Center for Lung Research (DZL),
Airway Research Center North (ARCN). The BioMaterialBank Nord is member of
popgen 2.0 network (P2N). Philipp Koehler has received non-financial scientific grants
from Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany, and the Cologne
Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases,
University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. He is supported by the German Federal
Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).Oliver A. Cornely is supported by the
German Federal Ministry of Research and Education and is funded by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's
Excellence Strategy – CECAD, EXC 2030 – 390661388. The COMRI cohort is funded
by Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Genotyping was performed by
the Genotyping laboratory of Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland FIMM
Technology Centre, University of Helsinki. This work was supported by grants of the
Rolf M. Schwiete Stiftung, the Saarland University, BMBF and The States of Saarland
and Lower Saxony. Kerstin U. Ludwig is supported by the German Research
Foundation (DFG, LU-1944/3-1). Genotyping for the BoSCO study is funded by the
Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Bonn. Frank Hanses was supported
by the Bavarian State Ministry for Science and Arts. Part of the genotyping was
supported by a grant to Alfredo Ramirez from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, grant: 01ED1619A, European Alzheimer DNA
BioBank, EADB) within the context of the EU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative
Disease Research (JPND). Additional funding was derived from the German Research
Foundation (DFG) grant: RA 1971/6-1 to Alfredo Ramirez. Philip Rosenstiel is
supported by the DFG (CCGA Sequencing Centre and DFG ExC2167 PMI and by SH
state funds for COVID19 research). Florian Tran is supported by the Clinician Scientist
Program of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Cluster of Excellence “Precision
Medicine in Chronic Inflammation” (EXC2167). Christoph Lange and Jan Heyckendorf
are supported by the German Center for Infection Research (DZIF). Thorsen Brenner,
Marc M Berger, Oliver Witzke und Anke Hinney are supported by the Stiftung
Universitätsmedizin Essen. Marialbert Acosta-Herrera was supported by Juan de la
Cierva Incorporacion program, grant IJC2018-035131-I funded by
MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. Eva C Schulte is supported by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; SCHU 2419/2-1).N
La destrucción de bienes culturales en conflicto armado: el caso del Dáesh en Siria
La destrucción de bienes culturales en tiempos de guerra no es un fenómeno nuevo. En últimas décadas lo hemos visto en múltiples conflictos armados en diversos lugares del mundo como Afganistán, Libia o Irak. La guerra de Siria no es una excepción. La destrucción de bienes culturales ha cobrado especial virulencia en esta confrontación bélica. El fenómeno se vio acentuado a partir de la expansión armada del grupo armado no estatal conocido como Dáesh. El Dáesh implantó un régimen brutal basado en su interpretación fanática del islam en los territorios que cayeron bajo su control y practicó una campaña deliberada de devastación del patrimonio cultural. La violación grave y flagrante de las normas de Derecho Internacional Humanitario que protegen los bienes culturales sugiere la comisión de crímenes de guerra. Esta calificación no excluiría la imputación de otros crímenes internacionales si concurrieran los elementos necesarios.
Precisamente, el punto de partida de esta investigación es la pregunta acerca de si los actos intencionales de destrucción de bienes culturales en conflicto armado constituyen una conducta prohibida por el Derecho Internacional y, en caso afirmativo, cuáles son las vías disponibles en la actualidad para perseguirlas y castigarlas. Esta tesis se focaliza en el análisis de la destrucción de bienes culturales cometida por el Dáesh en el conflicto armado de Siria con el objetivo de perfilar una estrategia de rendición de cuentas para la persecución internacional de estos crímenes.
Para hacerlo, el trabajo se estructura en tres partes diferenciadas. La primera parte versa sobre la evolución histórica y la consolidación de las normas internacionales que incumben a la protección de los bienes culturales en situación de conflicto armado. Se observará que el sistema de represión penal de las violaciones no se ha desarrollado al mismo ritmo que otras normas protectoras. Con todo, diversos instrumentos internacionales criminalizan la destrucción intencional de bienes culturales. De igual modo, la jurisprudencia internacional ha contribuido a perfilar los elementos de este crimen de guerra. Así pues, en la segunda parte se estudia la configuración jurídica internacional del crimen de destrucción de bienes culturales con especial referencia al Estatuto de Roma de la Corte Penal Internacional. La dinámica de los conflictos armados actuales, donde la destrucción de bienes culturales se produce en gran medida a manos de grupos armados no estatales fuera de las situaciones de combate, plantea problemas de interpretación de los elementos de este crimen de guerra. El caso del Dáesh ilustra esta realidad. Por ello, la tercera parte de esta investigación se centra propiamente en el estudio de caso del Dáesh en Siria. A la vista de la documentación y de los hechos, se analizan las vías ofrecidas por el Derecho Internacional para articular una estrategia de rendición de cuentas para la persecución de los crímenes de destrucción de bienes culturales.The destruction of cultural property in times of war is not a new phenomenon. In recent decades we have seen it in multiple armed conflicts in different parts of the world such as Afghanistan, Libya, or Iraq. The war in Syria is not an exception. The destruction of cultural property has been particularly virulent in this confrontation. The phenomenon was aggravated due to the armed expansion of the non-state armed group known as ISIS. ISIS established a brutal regime based on its fanatical interpretation of Islam in the territories under its control and engaged in a deliberate campaign of devastation of cultural heritage. This serious and blatant violation of international humanitarian law suggests the commission of war crimes. This legal characterisation would not exclude charges for other international crimes if the necessary elements were present.
Precisely, the starting point of this research is whether intentional acts of destruction of cultural property in armed conflict constitute a prohibited behaviour under international law and, if so, which are the available paths to prosecute and punish them. This thesis focuses on the analysis of the destruction of cultural property committed by ISIS in the Syrian armed conflict with the aim of outlining an accountability strategy for the international prosecution of these crimes.
To do so, the study is structured in three parts. The first part deals with the historical evolution and consolidation of international rules relevant to the protection of cultural property in war time situations. It will be noted that the system of criminal repression of violations has not developed as fast as other rules. Nevertheless, several international instruments criminalise the intentional destruction of cultural property. International jurisprudence has also contributed to delineate the elements of this war crime. Consequently, the second part deepens on the international legal definition of the crime of destruction of cultural property with particular reference to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. The dynamics of recent armed conflicts, where the destruction of cultural property occurs to a large extent at the hands of non-state armed groups outside combat situations, raises problems of interpretation of the elements of this war crime. The case of ISIS illustrates this reality. For this reason, the third part of this research focuses on the case study of ISIS in Syria. In the light of the documentation and facts, we analyse the paths offered by international law to articulate an accountability strategy for the prosecution of crimes of destruction of cultural property
Prospective observational cohort study on grading the severity of postoperative complications in global surgery research
Background
The Clavien–Dindo classification is perhaps the most widely used approach for reporting postoperative complications in clinical trials. This system classifies complication severity by the treatment provided. However, it is unclear whether the Clavien–Dindo system can be used internationally in studies across differing healthcare systems in high- (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Methods
This was a secondary analysis of the International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS), a prospective observational cohort study of elective surgery in adults. Data collection occurred over a 7-day period. Severity of complications was graded using Clavien–Dindo and the simpler ISOS grading (mild, moderate or severe, based on guided investigator judgement). Severity grading was compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Data are presented as frequencies and ICC values (with 95 per cent c.i.). The analysis was stratified by income status of the country, comparing HICs with LMICs.
Results
A total of 44 814 patients were recruited from 474 hospitals in 27 countries (19 HICs and 8 LMICs). Some 7508 patients (16·8 per cent) experienced at least one postoperative complication, equivalent to 11 664 complications in total. Using the ISOS classification, 5504 of 11 664 complications (47·2 per cent) were graded as mild, 4244 (36·4 per cent) as moderate and 1916 (16·4 per cent) as severe. Using Clavien–Dindo, 6781 of 11 664 complications (58·1 per cent) were graded as I or II, 1740 (14·9 per cent) as III, 2408 (20·6 per cent) as IV and 735 (6·3 per cent) as V. Agreement between classification systems was poor overall (ICC 0·41, 95 per cent c.i. 0·20 to 0·55), and in LMICs (ICC 0·23, 0·05 to 0·38) and HICs (ICC 0·46, 0·25 to 0·59).
Conclusion
Caution is recommended when using a treatment approach to grade complications in global surgery studies, as this may introduce bias unintentionally
The surgical safety checklist and patient outcomes after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis
© 2017 British Journal of Anaesthesia Background: The surgical safety checklist is widely used to improve the quality of perioperative care. However, clinicians continue to debate the clinical effectiveness of this tool. Methods: Prospective analysis of data from the International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS), an international observational study of elective in-patient surgery, accompanied by a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature. The exposure was surgical safety checklist use. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcome was postoperative complications. In the ISOS cohort, a multivariable multi-level generalized linear model was used to test associations. To further contextualise these findings, we included the results from the ISOS cohort in a meta-analysis. Results are reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: We included 44 814 patients from 497 hospitals in 27 countries in the ISOS analysis. There were 40 245 (89.8%) patients exposed to the checklist, whilst 7508 (16.8%) sustained ≥1 postoperative complications and 207 (0.5%) died before hospital discharge. Checklist exposure was associated with reduced mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.49 (0.32–0.77); P\u3c0.01], but no difference in complication rates [OR 1.02 (0.88–1.19); P=0.75]. In a systematic review, we screened 3732 records and identified 11 eligible studies of 453 292 patients including the ISOS cohort. Checklist exposure was associated with both reduced postoperative mortality [OR 0.75 (0.62–0.92); P\u3c0.01; I2=87%] and reduced complication rates [OR 0.73 (0.61–0.88); P\u3c0.01; I2=89%). Conclusions: Patients exposed to a surgical safety checklist experience better postoperative outcomes, but this could simply reflect wider quality of care in hospitals where checklist use is routine
Critical care admission following elective surgery was not associated with survival benefit: prospective analysis of data from 27 countries
This was an investigator initiated study funded by Nestle Health Sciences through an unrestricted research grant, and by a National Institute for Health Research (UK) Professorship held by RP. The study was sponsored by Queen Mary University of London