73 research outputs found

    A Phase 2 Study of Coltuximab Ravtansine (SAR3419) Monotherapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

    Get PDF
    International audienceBackground Long-term disease-free survival in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains unsatisfactory, and treatment options are limited for those patients who relapse or fail to respond following initial therapy. We conducted a dose-escalation/expansion phase 2, multicenter, single-arm study to determine the optimal dose of coltuximab ravtansine (SAR3419), an anti-CD19 antibody-drug conjugate, in this setting. Patients and Methods The dose-escalation part of the study determined the selected dose of coltuximab ravtansine for evaluation of efficacy and safety in the dose-expansion phase. Patients received coltuximab ravtansine induction therapy (up to 8 weekly doses); responding patients were eligible for maintenance therapy (biweekly administrations for up to 24 weeks). Three dose levels of coltuximab ravtansine were examined: 55, 70, and 90 mg/m2. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR) and safety. Results A total of 36 patients were treated: 19 during dose escalation; 17 during dose expansion. One dose-limiting toxicity was observed at 90 mg/m2 (grade 3 peripheral motor neuropathy), and therefore 70 mg/m2 was selected for the dose-expansion phase. Five patients discontinued therapy due to adverse events (AEs). The most common AEs were pyrexia, diarrhea, and nausea. Of 17 evaluable patients treated at the selected dose, 4 responded (estimated ORR using Bayesian methodology: 25.47% [80% confidence interval: 14.18-39.6%]); DOR was 1.94 (range: 1-5.6) months. Based on these results, the study was prematurely discontinued. Conclusions Coltuximab ravtansine is well tolerated but is associated with a low clinical response rate in patients with relapsed/refractory AL

    Multiple Myeloma Treatment in Real-world Clinical Practice : Results of a Prospective, Multinational, Noninterventional Study

    Get PDF
    Funding Information: The authors would like to thank all patients and their families and all the EMMOS investigators for their valuable contributions to the study. The authors would like to acknowledge Robert Olie for his significant contribution to the EMMOS study. Writing support during the development of our report was provided by Laura Mulcahy and Catherine Crookes of FireKite, an Ashfield company, a part of UDG Healthcare plc, which was funded by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and Janssen Global Services, LLC. The EMMOS study was supported by research funding from Janssen Pharmaceutical NV and Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Funding Information: The authors would like to thank all patients and their families and all the EMMOS investigators for their valuable contributions to the study. The authors would like to acknowledge Robert Olie for his significant contribution to the EMMOS study. Writing support during the development of our report was provided by Laura Mulcahy and Catherine Crookes of FireKite, an Ashfield company, a part of UDG Healthcare plc, which was funded by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and Janssen Global Services, LLC. The EMMOS study was supported by research funding from Janssen Pharmaceutical NV and Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Funding Information: M.M. has received personal fees from Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Novartis, and Takeda and grants from Janssen and Sanofi during the conduct of the study. E.T. has received grants from Janssen and personal fees from Janssen and Takeda during the conduct of the study, and grants from Amgen, Celgene/Genesis, personal fees from Amgen, Celgene/Genesis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, and Glaxo-Smith Kline outside the submitted work. M.V.M. has received personal fees from Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, and Takeda outside the submitted work. M.C. reports honoraria from Janssen, outside the submitted work. M. B. reports grants from Janssen Cilag during the conduct of the study. M.D. has received honoraria for participation on advisory boards for Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, and Novartis. H.S. has received honoraria from Janssen-Cilag, Celgene, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, and Takeda outside the submitted work. V.P. reports personal fees from Janssen during the conduct of the study and grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from Amgen, grants and personal fees from Sanofi, and personal fees from Takeda outside the submitted work. W.W. has received personal fees and grants from Amgen, Celgene, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Gilead, and Janssen and nonfinancial support from Roche outside the submitted work. J.S. reports grants and nonfinancial support from Janssen Pharmaceutical during the conduct of the study. V.L. reports funding from Janssen Global Services LLC during the conduct of the study and study support from Janssen-Cilag and Pharmion outside the submitted work. A.P. reports employment and shareholding of Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) during the conduct of the study. C.C. reports employment at Janssen-Cilag during the conduct of the study. C.F. reports employment at Janssen Research and Development during the conduct of the study. F.T.B. reports employment at Janssen-Cilag during the conduct of the study. The remaining authors have stated that they have no conflicts of interest. Publisher Copyright: © 2018 The AuthorsMultiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease, with little information available on its management in real-world clinical practice. The results of the present prospective, noninterventional observational study revealed great diversity in the treatment regimens used to treat MM. Our results also provide data to inform health economic, pharmacoepidemiologic, and outcomes research, providing a framework for the design of protocols to improve the outcomes of patients with MM. Background: The present prospective, multinational, noninterventional study aimed to document and describe real-world treatment regimens and disease progression in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Patients and Methods: Adult patients initiating any new MM therapy from October 2010 to October 2012 were eligible. A multistage patient/site recruitment model was applied to minimize the selection bias; enrollment was stratified by country, region, and practice type. The patient medical and disease features, treatment history, and remission status were recorded at baseline, and prospective data on treatment, efficacy, and safety were collected electronically every 3 months. Results: A total of 2358 patients were enrolled. Of these patients, 775 and 1583 did and did not undergo stem cell transplantation (SCT) at any time during treatment, respectively. Of the patients in the SCT and non-SCT groups, 49%, 21%, 14%, and 15% and 57%, 20%, 12% and 10% were enrolled at treatment line 1, 2, 3, and ≥ 4, respectively. In the SCT and non-SCT groups, 45% and 54% of the patients had received bortezomib-based therapy without thalidomide/lenalidomide, 12% and 18% had received thalidomide/lenalidomide-based therapy without bortezomib, and 30% and 4% had received bortezomib plus thalidomide/lenalidomide-based therapy as frontline treatment, respectively. The corresponding proportions of SCT and non-SCT patients in lines 2, 3, and ≥ 4 were 45% and 37%, 30% and 37%, and 12% and 3%, 33% and 27%, 35% and 32%, and 8% and 2%, and 27% and 27%, 27% and 23%, and 6% and 4%, respectively. In the SCT and non-SCT patients, the overall response rate was 86% to 97% and 64% to 85% in line 1, 74% to 78% and 59% to 68% in line 2, 55% to 83% and 48% to 60% in line 3, and 49% to 65% and 36% and 45% in line 4, respectively, for regimens that included bortezomib and/or thalidomide/lenalidomide. Conclusion: The results of our prospective study have revealed great diversity in the treatment regimens used to manage MM in real-life practice. This diversity was linked to factors such as novel agent accessibility and evolving treatment recommendations. Our results provide insight into associated clinical benefits.publishersversionPeer reviewe

    Factor V Leiden prevalence in venous thromboembolism patients.

    No full text
    International audienceBACKGROUND: Recent findings have demonstrated a high frequency of activated protein C resistance in patients suffering from deep venous thrombosis (DVT). This abnormality has been related to a mutation in the factor V gene (at nucleotide position 1,691, guanine to adenine [G-->A] substitution). AIM: To assess the frequency of the mutation in unselected inpatients with a proved DVT. To study the clinical characteristics of such patients. METHODS: All consecutive patients admitted to the hospital because of a clinical suspicion of DVT were eligible. Diagnosis of DVT with the help of venous ultrasound imaging or venography. Ventilation and perfusion lung scan was performed in all patients, and interpreted according to the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis criteria; in patients with a low- or intermediate-probability lung scan, pulmonary angiography was requested. Polymerase chain reaction amplification was performed in patients with a proved DVT. A control group consisted of bone marrow volunteer donors. RESULTS: From July 1994 to November 1995, 165 patients were included. Thrombosis was considered as distal in 77 and proximal in 88; an associated pulmonary embolism (PE) was found in 75 patients. Of 165 patients, 24 (14.5%) showed the factor V gene mutation (95% confidence interval, 9.4 to 19.8); the mutation was present in 3.5% of 200 bone marrow volunteer donors; odds ratio for having DVT in the presence of the mutation was 4.1. No difference in the level of DVT, or the presence of an associated PE was observed according to the presence of the mutation. Patients with the mutation have a significantly more frequent history of DVT (p=0.04) and more previous reported episodes (1.1 vs 0.6; p=0.04). CONCLUSION: The factor V mutation is frequent in unselected DVT patients. No difference in the severity of the thrombosis episode was observed in these patients

    Evaluation of the Impact of Renal Failure on Correlation and Concordance Between 2 Free Light Chain Assays

    No full text
    International audienceBACKGROUND:Free light chain (FLC) assays are essential for diagnosis and follow-up of plasma cell dyscrasia. Two assays are available: Freelite (Binding Site) and N Latex FLC (Siemens). The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of renal failure on concordance and correlation between the 2 FLC assays.METHODS:FLC measurements using both assays were performed on 1215 fresh serum samples from patients with or without monoclonal gammopathy and renal failure. Concordance and correlation were evaluated using Passing-Bablock regression, Pearson correlation coefficient, and the Cohen kappa coefficient, taking into account the renal failure stage (evaluated with Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration formulae) and evaluation of treatment response in patients' follow-up.RESULTS:A good correlation was demonstrated between both assays, irrespective of the renal failure stage (Pearson correlation coefficient > 0.90). For FLC ratio interpretation, there remained 7.6% to 20.8% discordances between the 2 methods throughout the whole range of renal impairment. To evaluate FLC evolution in patient follow-up, 41 patients were selected with at least 6 consecutive serum samples being collected during the study period: we observed a concordant evolution of FLC concentrations between both assays. However, few discrepancies were observed with 4 patients.CONCLUSIONS:Despite adjusted reference ranges for Freelite FLC ratio, there are approximately 12.5% discrepancies in interpretation of FLC ratio between the 2 available assays. They are not linked to renal failure stage and neither of the assays performed better than the other: results must be interpreted taking into account clinical data and the same assay must be used for patient follow-up

    Prognostic value of involved/uninvolved free light chain ratio determined by Freelite and N Latex FLC assays for identification of high-risk smoldering myeloma patients

    No full text
    International audienceBackground Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic plasma cell disorder with a high risk of progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM). The serum free light chain (sFLC) ratio is a powerful prognostic factor for SMM an sFLC ratio ≥8 has been reported to be associated with a high risk of progression to MM, and an sFLC ratio ≥100 has been described as a criterion for ultra-high-risk SMM, and has been integrated into the definition criteria for MM since 2014. However, all recommendations were based on sFLC measured using the first commercialized assay, Freelite™, while other assays are now available. We aimed to evaluate the safety and accuracy of N-Latex sFLC to identify high-risk and ultra-high-risk SMM.Methods The sFLC ratio was measured at diagnosis with both Freelite and N-Latex assays in a cohort of 176 SMM patients on a BN Prospec nephelometer. Demographic, clinical, therapeutic and laboratory data were collected at the time of diagnosis and at follow-up.Results Sixty-two patients (35.2%) progressed to MM within 2 years. Compared to Freelite™ sFLC, N Latex sFLC ratios ≥8 and ≥100 provided similar performances for the identification of high-risk and ultra-high risk SMM patients.Conclusions Our results evidenced that the N-Latex assay could be used for SMM monitoring, like Freelite. However, an N-Latex sFLC ratio ≥70 appears to provide similar performances to a Freelite sFLC ratio ≥100, with a slightly better positive predictive value. Both assays provided accurate identification of high-risk and ultra-high risk SMM patients. These results should be confirmed in an independent study

    Association between IgM anticardiolipin antibodies and deep venous thrombosis in patients without systemic lupus erythematosus.

    No full text
    International audiencePatients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at risk of developing deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Should anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) be detectable, this risk is significantly raised, particularly when these autoanti-bodies are cofactor-dependent. We conducted a cross-sectional study of consecutive unselected outpatients referred for clinical suspicion of DVT, as an attempt to address the following questions: firstly, were aCL antibodies associated with DVT in non-SLE patients? Secondly, was this association related to the cofactor dependence? From March 1992 to February 1994, 208 patients were enrolled in the study. Venography was positive in 110 patients (DVT patients), while the diagnosis of DVT could not be confirmed in the remaining 98 (referred to as disease controls). ACL was measured by ELISA, for IgG and IgM isotypes in two ways: fetal calf serum or bovine serum albumin were used as blocking agents to distinguish between cofactor-dependent and cofactor-independent antibodies. Positive aCL was defined as optical density (OD) values greater than the 95th percentile of OD distribution of 60 healthy controls. We found a high frequency of positive IgG aCL antibodies in both DVT patients and in disease controls (25.5 vs 23.5%). We suggest an association between IgM aCL and DVT. This association was, however, not dependent on the cofactor requirement

    Spontaneous megakaryocytic colony formation does not discriminate between essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera.

    No full text
    International audienceLaboratory detection of spontaneous growth of colony-forming unit-megacaryocytes (CFU-MK), allowing us to distinguish essential thrombocythemia (ET) from reactive thrombocytosis, is therefore useful for the diagnostic of this myeloproliferative disorder. Whether CFU-MK assays allow us to discriminate at least partly between ET and other myeloproliferative disorders such as polycythemia vera (PV) remains, however, to be established. To gain insights about this point, we have performed CFU-MK cultures from bone marrow cells of patients diagnosed with ET (n = 42) or PV (n = 50) using a standardized collagen-based serum-free method. Spontaneous growth of CFU-MK was similarly detected in both 40/42 patients with ET and 47/50 patients with PV. These data suggest clearly that the CFU-MK assay is useful to detect not only ET, but also PV, but fails to discriminate, even partly, between these two myeloproliferative disorders

    Diagnostic value of a new sensitive membrane based technique for instantaneous D-dimer evaluation in patients with clinically suspected deep venous thrombosis.

    No full text
    International audienceBACKGROUND: Plasma D-Dimer analysis, using ELISA assays, has demonstrated in previous studies a high sensitivity, suggesting its utility in excluding deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Aim: To assess the performance of a new rapid plasma D-Dimer ELISA measurement in suspected DVT patients with recent clinical signs, not exceeding one week. METHODS: A prospective study of patients admitted for a suspected recent DVT. Contrast venography or compression ultrasonography were performed within 24 h of admission. A new membrane based ELISA technique, which uses an immunofiltration and two complementary monoclonal antibodies was tested. Results were expressed as positive or negative. A standard plasma D-Dimer ELISA measurement was also performed. D-Dimer performances were assessed at the end of the study. RESULTS: 265/448 patients had a proven DVT (72 distal, 193 proximal). The sensitivity of the instantaneous method in the diagnosis of overall DVT is 92 +/- 3.4% (95% CI), and specificity is 36.6 +/- 6.9%. Positive predictive value is 67.7 +/- 4.8% and negative predictive value is 76.1 +/- 8.9%. Sensitivity and negative predictive values reach 97.9 and 94.3% in the diagnosis of proximal DVT, but only 76.3 and 79.7% in the diagnosis of distal DVT. Similar results are observed with the standard ELISA method. CONCLUSION: This new rapid plasma D-Dimer measurement appears highly sensitive, and could substitute the older ELISA methods. Both methods provide lower sensitivity in the case of a distal DVT location
    corecore