Spatial variation of the physical and biomechanical properties within an equestrian arena surface

There is limited information about spatial variation of equestrian arena surfaces despite unequivocal evidence to suggest that lack of uniformity increases risk of injury. Spatial differences in the functional properties of an arena are likely to be due to a number of intrinsic and extrinsic characteristics including variation in the physical properties of the surface. The aim of this work was to examine spatial variation of peak load (cushioning) across an arena surface and investigate the influence that physical properties had on these variations using Principal Component Analysis. Sampling (n=61) of a 20 m by 65 m indoor synthetic equestrian arena surface occurred in one day using an Orono biomechanical surface tester (OBST). The OBST was used at every location to measure peak load (dropped twice on the same point). A 200 g sample of the surface was taken from the point of impact (at every location) and the physical properties were assessed in the laboratory. Samples were oven dried at 45⁰C for 24 hours in order to measure moisture content and percentage binder was quantified using Soxhlet extraction. Sand particle size distribution were determined using sieving and sedimentation methods and percentage organic matter was achieved by burning off organic material using a muffle furnace at 440⁰C. The surface was characterized by three principal components (PC1, PC2 and PC3). Peak load and moisture were the first principal components that accounted for 41% of surface variation. Percentage organic matter and percentage binder were identified as PC2 (20%) and PC3 (18%) respectively. This highlights their respective importance in surface variation. There was a moderate negative correlation between moisture and peak load (rs = 54%; P<0.0001) however cluster analysis revealed that peak load and moisture were grouped into five areas of similarity that corresponded to sample location, reinforced using an ANOVA (P<0.0001). The findings demonstrate an effective method of assessing uniformity and additionally, identify physical factors relevant to the load carrying capacity of this specific surface. Uneven surfaces can influence horse and rider safety therefore recognizing appropriate techniques to monitor spatial variation and implement relevant maintenance, is of key importance to equestrian athletes

LINE Retrotransposon RNA Is an Essential Structural and Functional Epigenetic Component of a Core Neocentromeric Chromatin

We have previously identified and characterized the phenomenon of ectopic human centromeres, known as neocentromeres. Human neocentromeres form epigenetically at euchromatic chromosomal sites and are structurally and functionally similar to normal human centromeres. Recent studies have indicated that neocentromere formation provides a major mechanism for centromere repositioning, karyotype evolution, and speciation. Using a marker chromosome mardel(10) containing a neocentromere formed at the normal chromosomal 10q25 region, we have previously mapped a 330-kb CENP-A–binding domain and described an increased prevalence of L1 retrotransposons in the underlying DNA sequences of the CENP-A–binding clusters. Here, we investigated the potential role of the L1 retrotransposons in the regulation of neocentromere activity. Determination of the transcriptional activity of a panel of full-length L1s (FL-L1s) across a 6-Mb region spanning the 10q25 neocentromere chromatin identified one of the FL-L1 retrotransposons, designated FL-L1b and residing centrally within the CENP-A–binding clusters, to be transcriptionally active. We demonstrated the direct incorporation of the FL-L1b RNA transcripts into the CENP-A–associated chromatin. RNAi-mediated knockdown of the FL-L1b RNA transcripts led to a reduction in CENP-A binding and an impaired mitotic function of the 10q25 neocentromere. These results indicate that LINE retrotransposon RNA is a previously undescribed essential structural and functional component of the neocentromeric chromatin and that retrotransposable elements may serve as a critical epigenetic determinant in the chromatin remodelling events leading to neocentromere formation

Human centromere organisation and function

© 2012 Dr. Emma Louise NorthropCentromeres are essential for correct chromosome segregation during cell division. Whilst centromeric function is conserved throughout eukaryotes, the profile of centromeric DNA, although generally repetitive, is not, and neocentromeres have been reported at various euchromatic sites devoid of satellite DNA. The lack of DNA sequence conservation has led to the notion that centromere identity is maintained by epigenetic mechanisms. The repetitive nature of canonical centromeres has made studying the organization of the centromere difficult, although the discovery of neocentromeres has provided a useful model for studying the function and organization of the centromere domain, and several studies have used neocentromeres to investigate several proteins required for successful centromere formation and function. One such neocentromere model is the 10q25 neocentromere of Mardel(10), which has previously been used to map the binding domains of several centromere-associated proteins. This study utilized the 10q25 neocentromere model to map the binding domains of three global proteins reported to be enriched at canonical centromeres. The linker histone, histone H1 and the chromatin assembly protein, HMGA1 are enriched at the 10q25 domain following neocentromere formation, suggesting a possible role for each protein at active centromeres. The transcriptional regulator, CTCF, was present at the 10q25 domain both prior to and after neocentromere formation. However, neocentromere formation altered the binding profile of CTCF at the 10q25 domain, with an additional binding cluster observed overlapping the core CENP-A containing domain on the Mardel(10) neocentromere, suggesting a role for CTCF at active centromeres unrelated to the DNA sequence. This study also looked at the role CTCF may be playing at the centromere. Depletion of CTCF resulted in a decrease in transcription at canonical mouse centromeres and at the 10q25 neocentromere, and also resulted in an increase in mitotic segregation defects. Whilst it is evident that the presence of CTCF is important at the centromere for correct centromeric function, the exact mechanism by which CTCF acts at the centromere is still uncertain. Neocentromere-derived mini-chromosomes (NC-MiCs) were developed by telomere associated chromosome truncation (TACT) of the arms of the Mardel(10) marker chromosome. These NC-MiCs provide a useful model for studying the effects large-scale chromosomal rearrangements have on the size and organization of chromatin domains as they can be compared to the progenitor Mardel(10). This study used NC-MiC6, a 1.4Mb mini-chromosome derived from Mardel(10) and still containing the entire Mardel(10) CENP-A binding domain, to investigate the effect of severe chromosomal alterations on the size and organization of the centromere by analysis of the binding domain of CENP-A on NC-MiC6. The CENP-A binding domain on NC-MiC6 was reduced to one-third the size of the Mardel(10) CENP-A binding domain, despite the chromosome size being reduced by 98%. This reduction in size did not dramatically alter the stability of the chromosome, and no correlation was found between the chromosome size and the CENP-A domain size for neocentromeres. Whilst the ratio between chromosome size and centromere size is unlikely to be the trigger for the shrinkage and reorganization of the chromatin domain observed in the 10q25 CENP-A binding domain, the disruption of the chromatin scaffold matrix (S/MAR) or the flanking pericentric heterochromatin in the formation of NC-MiC6 may be responsible for this alteration. Whilst the evidence presented in this study provide further insights into the organization and function of the centromere, our knowledge is still far from complete and further studies are required before we will fully understand this complex and essential domain. Neocentromeres devoid of α-satellite DNA provide a useful model to obtain this information as they can be used to generate a linear ‘road map’ of protein binding at the neocentromere. This information can be used to further understand the organization of the centromere, and can be used in conjunction with three dimensional studies to understand the higher-order chromatin organization of the centromere, thus shedding some light on this complex domain

Centromere RNA is a key component for the assembly of nucleoproteins at the nucleolus and centromere

The centromere is a complex structure, the components and assembly pathway of which remain inadequately defined. Here, we demonstrate that centromeric α-satellite RNA and proteins CENPC1 and INCENP accumulate in the human interphase nucleolus in an RNA polymerase I–dependent manner. The nucleolar targeting of CENPC1 and INCENP requires α-satellite RNA, as evident from the delocalization of both proteins from the nucleolus in RNase-treated cells, and the nucleolar relocalization of these proteins following α-satellite RNA replenishment in these cells. Using protein truncation and in vitro mutagenesis, we have identified the nucleolar localization sequences on CENPC1 and INCENP. We present evidence that CENPC1 is an RNA-associating protein that binds α-satellite RNA by an in vitro binding assay. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, RNase treatment, and “RNA replenishment” experiments, we show that α-satellite RNA is a key component in the assembly of CENPC1, INCENP, and survivin (an INCENP-interacting protein) at the metaphase centromere. Our data suggest that centromere satellite RNA directly facilitates the accumulation and assembly of centromere-specific nucleoprotein components at the nucleolus and mitotic centromere, and that the sequestration of these components in the interphase nucleolus provides a regulatory mechanism for their timely release into the nucleoplasm for kinetochore assembly at the onset of mitosis

To Madge Preston from various correspondents, 1848-1893, and undated

Forty letters to Madge Preston from various correspondents dated 1848 to 1893 and undated and three undated newspaper clippings. Correspondents include Eliza G. Meigs, Pauline, R. B. Brent, Ida E. Murdoch, S. Bateman, Mollie, Annie C. Coons, Corrie Owens, A. Northrop, Emma Miler, Margaret Speid, W. Kohler, Ellie Lee Hardenbrook, Charles F. Simmons, cousin Maud, cousin Harriet, Moll Porter, Emma Goenner, Anne E. Singleton, Mary B. Thompson, and more. The letter dated November 15, 1868 is written in French