92 research outputs found

    ASSOCIATION OF THE METABOLIC SYNDROME CONSTITUENTS WITH MARKERS OF SUBCLINICAL TARGET ORGAN DAMAGE DURING FOLLOW-UP OF INTELLECTUAL LABORERS

    Get PDF
    Aim. To evaluate the relation of metabolic syndrome (MS) and its constituents with markers of subclinical damage of target organs (TOD) in follow-up of almost healthy intellectual laborers.Material and methods. From the selection of 1600 employees of a bank we randomly selected 383 with at least one component of MS without cardiovascular disorders, of those by the end of 2 years period 331 came to final visit (response 86%). Mean age 46,6±9,0 y., mostly women (214 (64,6%)). All patients underwent anthropometry, blood pressure measurement (BP), lipids investigation, creatinine and fasting glucose, echocardiography with the assessment of the left ventricle hypertrophy (LVH), ultrasound study of carotid arteries (intima-media complex thickness — CIM, and atherosclerotic plaques), vascular rigidity assessment, anklebrachial index, albumin concentration in single portion of urine at both stages of observation.Results. While performing multiple logistic regression, presence of arterial hypertension (AH) associated with increased probability of LVH, thickening of CIM and higher vessel rigidity in standardization by gender and age. Relation of MS with the markers of TOD has not been found. In 2 years of follow-up there was a significant increase of patients with thickening of CIM (from 81 (24,5%) to 146 (44,1%), p<0,001) and decrease of LVH prevalence (from 154 (46,7%) to 109 (32,9%), p=0,003) together with significant decrease of BP and total cholesterol.Conclusion. Presence of AH is associated with higher probability of LVH and increased vessel rigidity, as atherosclerotic changes in carotid arteries. MS was not related with an increased prevalence of TOD, and the main predetermining factors for structural heart abnormalities, the vessels and kidneys, were gender and age. In 2 years of observation there was markedly decreased number of patients with LVH and kidney dysfunction at the background of BP pattern improvement, and increase of the number of patients with thicker CIM, regardless of a decrease of the hypercholesterolemia patients. In MS patients there was more common to use antihypertension treatments, that led to more prominent LVH regression

    Investigation of Nonlinear Optical Properties of Quantum Dots Deposited onto a Sample Glass Using Time-Resolved Inline Digital Holography

    Get PDF
    We report on the application of time-resolved inline digital holography in the study of the nonlinear optical properties of quantum dots deposited onto sample glass. The Fresnel diffraction patterns of the probe pulse due to noncollinear degenerate phase modulation induced by a femtosecond pump pulse were extracted from the set of inline digital holograms and analyzed. The absolute values of the nonlinear refractive index of both the sample glass substrate and the deposited layer of quantum dots were evaluated using the proposed technique. To characterize the inhomogeneous distribution of the samples’ nonlinear optical properties, we proposed plotting an optical nonlinearity map calculated as a local standard deviation of the diffraction pattern intensities induced by noncollinear degenerate phase modulation.publishedVersionPeer reviewe

    Appointment of lipid-lowering therapy in the Russian population: comparison of SCORE and SCORE2 (according to the ESSE-RF study)

    Get PDF
    Aim. In 2021, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) were published, where a new SCORE2 CVD risk assessment model was introduced. In our work, we compared approaches to determine the indications for initiating lipid-lowering therapy in the Russian population aged 25-64 years according to the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of lipid metabolism disorders of the Russian National Atherosclerosis Society (2020) and ESC guidelines for CVD prevention (2021).Material and methods. The ESSE-RF epidemiological study was conducted in 12 Russian regions. All participants signed informed consent and completed approved questionnaires. We performed anthropometric and blood pressure (BP) measurements, as well as fasting blood sampling. In total, 20665 people aged 25-64 years were examined. The analysis included data from 19546 respondents (women, 12325 (63,1%)).Results. Of the 19546 participants, 3828 (19,6%) were classified as high or very high CV risk based on the 9 criteria: BP ≄180/110 mm Hg, total cholesterol >8,0 mmol/l, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) >4,9 mmol/l, lipid-lowering therapy, chronic kidney disease (CKD) with glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1,73 m2, type 2 diabetes, previous stroke and/or myocardial infarction. Of 3828 people, lipidlowering therapy was indicated in 3758 (98%) (criteria for LDL ≄1,8 mmol/l and LDL ≄1,4 mmol/l, respectively, high and very high risk). In addition, 5519 individuals aged <40 years were excluded from further analysis due to the lower age threshold of models. For 10199 participants aged >40 years without established CVD, diabetes, CKD, cardiovascular risk stratification was performed according to the SCORE and SCORE2. Of them, according to the Russian National Atherosclerosis Society (2020) and ESC 2021 guidelines, lipid-lowering therapy was indicated for 701 and 9487 participants, respectively.Conclusion. Using the new approach proposed by the ESC in 2021, the number of patients aged 40-64 years without CVD, diabetes and CKD with indications for lipidlowering therapy for primary prevention in Russia increases by 14 times compared with the 2020 Russian National Atherosclerosis Society guidelines

    ĐŸĐ”Ń€ĐČĐžŃ‡ĐœĐ°Ń ĐžĐœĐČĐ°Đ»ĐžĐŽĐœĐŸŃŃ‚ŃŒ ĐČслДЎстĐČОД глауĐșĐŸĐŒŃ‹ ĐČ ĐšŃ€Đ°ŃĐœĐŸŃŃ€ŃĐșĐŸĐŒ ĐșраД

    Get PDF
    PURPOSE. Assessment of the state of primary disability (PD) caused by glaucoma in the adult population of the Krasnoyarsk Region over time in the period from 2017 to 2021.METHODS. The information from the reporting documentation of the Bureaus of Medical and Social Expertise (MSE) of Russia and the Krasnoyarsk Region for 2017–2021 was analyzed. The analysis of primary disability indicators was carried out for two age groups of the adult population: individuals of working age (men aged 18–59; women aged 18–54) and individuals of retirement age (men aged 60 and older; women aged 55 and older). The obtained results were processed using the Statistica 10.0 software (StatSoft, USA).RESULTS. During 2017–2021 in the Krasnoyarsk Region, 1930 adults were recognized for the first time as disabled due to an ocular pathology. Glaucoma occupied the first ranking place — 31.0% (599) of cases in the structure of primary disability. Individuals of retirement age became disabled in 86.8% (520) of cases. Residents of the cities of the region became disabled in 69.1% (414) of cases. Males dominated among those who were recognized as disabled for the first time (RDF) due to glaucoma — 60.4% (362) of cases. The level of PD for glaucoma among the adult population of the region in 2017 was 0.52, in 2018 — 0.52, in 2019 — 0.59, in 2020 — 0.44, in 2021 — 0.57 per 10 thousand adult population. For five years, there was an increase in the level of PD due to glaucoma by 50% among the able-bodied urban population of the region, by 45.6% among senior citizens, by 110% among the able-bodied village population. In persons of retirement age living in rural areas of the region, the prevalence of PD decreased by 21.1%. The maximum values of the intensive indicator of PD were determined for men of retirement age: in 2017 — 3.6 per 10 thousand, in 2021 — 3.8 per 10 thousand of the corresponding population of the region. Formation of the contingent of disabled people occurred mainly due to the RDF of I and II disability groups. The proportion of group I disability was the largest — 40.4% (242/599) of cases. People with group I disability were more often treated with local antihypertensive drugs, were operated on at stage 3 of glaucoma.CONCLUSION. To reduce primary disability for glaucoma it is necessary to increase preventive efforts, timely use modern methods of diagnosis and treatment, including surgery, and ensure sufficient availability of ophthalmological personnel and high-tech equipment.ЩЕЛЬ. ĐžŃ†Đ”ĐœĐșĐ° ŃĐŸŃŃ‚ĐŸŃĐœĐžŃ пДрĐČĐžŃ‡ĐœĐŸĐč ĐžĐœĐČĐ°Đ»ĐžĐŽĐœĐŸŃŃ‚Đž (ПИ) ĐČслДЎстĐČОД глауĐșĐŸĐŒŃ‹ у ĐČĐ·Ń€ĐŸŃĐ»ĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐœĐ°ŃĐ”Đ»Đ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐšŃ€Đ°ŃĐœĐŸŃŃ€ŃĐșĐŸĐłĐŸ Đșрая ĐČ ĐŽĐžĐœĐ°ĐŒĐžĐșĐ” Đ·Đ° ĐżĐ”Ń€ĐžĐŸĐŽ с 2017 ĐżĐŸ 2021 гг.ĐœĐ•ĐąĐžĐ”Đ«. ĐŸŃ€ĐŸĐ°ĐœĐ°Đ»ĐžĐ·ĐžŃ€ĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœŃ‹ сĐČĐ”ĐŽĐ”ĐœĐžŃ Оз ĐŸŃ‚Ń‡Đ”Ń‚ĐœĐŸĐč ĐŽĐŸĐșŃƒĐŒĐ”ĐœŃ‚Đ°Ń†ĐžĐž ŃƒŃ‡Ń€Đ”Đ¶ĐŽĐ”ĐœĐžĐč ĐŒĐ”ĐŽĐžĐșĐŸ-ŃĐŸŃ†ĐžĐ°Đ»ŃŒĐœĐŸĐč эĐșспДртОзы Đ ĐŸŃŃĐžĐž Đž ĐšŃ€Đ°ŃĐœĐŸŃŃ€ŃĐșĐŸĐłĐŸ Đșрая Đ·Đ° 2017–2021 ĐłĐŸĐŽŃ‹. ĐĐœĐ°Đ»ĐžĐ· ПИ ĐżŃ€ĐŸĐČĐ”ĐŽĐ”Đœ ĐżĐŸ ĐŽĐČŃƒĐŒ ĐČĐŸĐ·Ń€Đ°ŃŃ‚ĐœŃ‹ĐŒ ĐłŃ€ŃƒĐżĐżĐ°ĐŒ: ĐłŃ€Đ°Đ¶ĐŽĐ°ĐœĐ°ĐŒ Ń‚Ń€ŃƒĐŽĐŸŃĐżĐŸŃĐŸĐ±ĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐČĐŸĐ·Ń€Đ°ŃŃ‚Đ° (ĐŒŃƒĐ¶Ń‡ĐžĐœŃ‹ 18–59 лДт; Đ¶Đ”ĐœŃ‰ĐžĐœŃ‹ 18–54 лДт) Đž ĐłŃ€Đ°Đ¶ĐŽĐ°ĐœĐ°ĐŒ ĐżĐ”ĐœŃĐžĐŸĐœĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐČĐŸĐ·Ń€Đ°ŃŃ‚Đ° (ĐŒŃƒĐ¶Ń‡ĐžĐœŃ‹ 60 лДт Đž ŃŃ‚Đ°Ń€ŃˆĐ”; Đ¶Đ”ĐœŃ‰ĐžĐœŃ‹ 55 лДт Đž ŃŃ‚Đ°Ń€ŃˆĐ”).РЕЗУЛЏйАйЫ. В 2017–2021 гг. ĐČ ĐšŃ€Đ°ŃĐœĐŸŃŃ€ŃĐșĐŸĐŒ ĐșраД ĐČпДрĐČŃ‹Đ” ĐżŃ€ĐžĐ·ĐœĐ°ĐœŃ‹ ĐžĐœĐČĐ°Đ»ĐžĐŽĐ°ĐŒĐž (ВПИ) ĐČслДЎстĐČОД ĐżĐ°Ń‚ĐŸĐ»ĐŸĐłĐžĐž ĐŸŃ€ĐłĐ°ĐœĐ° Đ·Ń€Đ”ĐœĐžŃ 1930 Ń‡Đ”Đ»ĐŸĐČĐ”Đș ĐČ ĐČĐŸĐ·Ń€Đ°ŃŃ‚Đ” ĐŸŃ‚ 18 лДт. В струĐșŃ‚ŃƒŃ€Đ” ПИ глауĐșĐŸĐŒĐ° Đ·Đ°ĐœĐžĐŒĐ°Đ»Đ° пДрĐČĐŸĐ” Ń€Đ°ĐœĐłĐŸĐČĐŸĐ” ĐŒĐ”ŃŃ‚ĐŸ — 31,0% (599) ŃĐ»ŃƒŃ‡Đ°Đ”ĐČ. В 86,8% (520) ŃĐ»ŃƒŃ‡Đ°Đ”ĐČ ĐžĐœĐČĐ°Đ»ĐžĐŽĐ°ĐŒĐž ŃŃ‚Đ°ĐœĐŸĐČĐžĐ»ĐžŃŃŒ ĐłŃ€Đ°Đ¶ĐŽĐ°ĐœĐ” ĐżĐ”ĐœŃĐžĐŸĐœĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐČĐŸĐ·Ń€Đ°ŃŃ‚Đ°, ĐČ 69,1% (414) — жОтДлО ĐłĐŸŃ€ĐŸĐŽĐŸĐČ Đșрая. ХрДЎО ВПИ ĐżŃ€Đ”ĐŸĐ±Đ»Đ°ĐŽĐ°Đ»Đž ĐŒŃƒĐ¶Ń‡ĐžĐœŃ‹ — 60,4% (362) ŃĐ»ŃƒŃ‡Đ°Đ”ĐČ. ĐŁŃ€ĐŸĐČĐ”ĐœŃŒ ПИ ĐżĐŸ глауĐșĐŸĐŒĐ” срДЎО ĐČĐ·Ń€ĐŸŃĐ»ĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐœĐ°ŃĐ”Đ»Đ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐČ 2017 ĐłĐŸĐŽŃƒ ŃĐŸŃŃ‚Đ°ĐČĐ»ŃĐ» 0,52, ĐČ 2018 ĐłĐŸĐŽŃƒ — 0,52, ĐČ 2019 ĐłĐŸĐŽŃƒ — 0,59, ĐČ 2020 ĐłĐŸĐŽŃƒ – 0,44, ĐČ 2021 ĐłĐŸĐŽŃƒ — 0,57 ĐœĐ° 10 тыс. ĐœĐ°ŃĐ”Đ»Đ”ĐœĐžŃ. За 5 лДт ĐżŃ€ĐŸĐžĐ·ĐŸŃˆĐ»ĐŸ уĐČĐ”Đ»ĐžŃ‡Đ”ĐœĐžĐ” ПИ ĐČслДЎстĐČОД глауĐșĐŸĐŒŃ‹ ĐœĐ° 50% срДЎО Ń‚Ń€ŃƒĐŽĐŸŃĐżĐŸŃĐŸĐ±ĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐłĐŸŃ€ĐŸĐŽŃĐșĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐœĐ°ŃĐ”Đ»Đ”ĐœĐžŃ, ĐœĐ° 45,6% срДЎО ĐżĐ”ĐœŃĐžĐŸĐœĐ”Ń€ĐŸĐČ-ĐłĐŸŃ€ĐŸĐ¶Đ°Đœ, ĐœĐ° 110% срДЎО Ń‚Ń€ŃƒĐŽĐŸŃĐżĐŸŃĐŸĐ±ĐœŃ‹Ń… жОтДлДĐč сДла. ĐŁ лОц ĐżĐ”ĐœŃĐžĐŸĐœĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐČĐŸĐ·Ń€Đ°ŃŃ‚Đ°, ĐżŃ€ĐŸĐ¶ĐžĐČающох ĐČ ŃĐ”Đ»ŃŒŃĐșох Ń‚Đ”Ń€Ń€ĐžŃ‚ĐŸŃ€ĐžŃŃ…, ПИ ŃĐœĐžĐ·ĐžĐ»Đ°ŃŃŒ ĐœĐ° 21,1%. МаĐșŃĐžĐŒĐ°Đ»ŃŒĐœŃ‹Đ” Đ·ĐœĐ°Ń‡Đ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐžĐœŃ‚Đ”ĐœŃĐžĐČĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐżĐŸĐșĐ°Đ·Đ°Ń‚Đ”Đ»Ń ПИ ĐŸĐżŃ€Đ”ĐŽĐ”Đ»Đ”ĐœŃ‹ у ĐŒŃƒĐ¶Ń‡ĐžĐœ ĐżĐ”ĐœŃĐžĐŸĐœĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐČĐŸĐ·Ń€Đ°ŃŃ‚Đ°: ĐČ 2017 ĐłĐŸĐŽŃƒ — 3,6 ĐœĐ° 10 тыс., ĐČ 2021 ĐłĐŸĐŽŃƒ — 3,8 ĐœĐ° 10. тыс. ŃĐŸĐŸŃ‚ĐČДтстĐČŃƒŃŽŃ‰Đ”ĐłĐŸ ĐœĐ°ŃĐ”Đ»Đ”ĐœĐžŃ Đșрая. Đ€ĐŸŃ€ĐŒĐžŃ€ĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžĐ” ĐșĐŸĐœŃ‚ĐžĐœĐłĐ”ĐœŃ‚Đ° ĐžĐœĐČĐ°Đ»ĐžĐŽĐŸĐČ ĐżŃ€ĐŸĐžŃŃ…ĐŸĐŽĐžĐ»ĐŸ ĐżŃ€Đ”ĐžĐŒŃƒŃ‰Đ”ŃŃ‚ĐČĐ”ĐœĐœĐŸ Đ·Đ° счДт ВПИ I Đž II групп. Đ”ĐŸĐ»Ń ВПИ I группы была ĐœĐ°ĐžĐ±ĐŸĐ»ŃŒŃˆĐ”Đč — 40,4% (242/599) ŃĐ»ŃƒŃ‡Đ°Đ”ĐČ. Đ˜ĐœĐČĐ°Đ»ĐžĐŽĐŸĐČ I группы ĐŸŃ‚Đ»ĐžŃ‡Đ°Đ»Đ° Đ±ĐŸÌĐ»ŃŒŃˆĐ°Ń Ń‡Đ°ŃŃ‚ĐŸŃ‚Đ° ĐžŃĐżĐŸĐ»ŃŒĐ·ĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžŃ ĐŒĐ”ŃŃ‚ĐœĐŸĐč ĐłĐžĐżĐŸŃ‚Đ”ĐœĐ·ĐžĐČĐœĐŸĐč тДрапОО Đž ĐżŃ€ĐŸĐČĐ”ĐŽĐ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐłĐžĐżĐŸŃ‚Đ”ĐœĐ·ĐžĐČĐœŃ‹Ń… ĐŸĐżĐ”Ń€Đ°Ń†ĐžĐč про ЎалДĐșĐŸ зашДЎшДĐč стаЮоо Đ·Đ°Đ±ĐŸĐ»Đ”ĐČĐ°ĐœĐžŃ ĐœĐ° Đ»ŃƒŃ‡ŃˆĐ” ĐČĐžĐŽŃŃ‰Đ”ĐŒ глазу.ЗАКЛмЧЕНИЕ. Đ’ĐŸĐżŃ€ĐŸŃŃ‹, сĐČŃĐ·Đ°ĐœĐœŃ‹Đ” с ПИ ĐżĐŸ глауĐșĐŸĐŒĐ”, ĐŽĐžĐșтуют ĐœĐ”ĐŸĐ±Ń…ĐŸĐŽĐžĐŒĐŸŃŃ‚ŃŒ ŃƒŃĐžĐ»Đ”ĐœĐžŃ ĐżŃ€ĐŸŃ„ĐžĐ»Đ°ĐșтоĐșĐž, сĐČĐŸĐ”ĐČŃ€Đ”ĐŒĐ”ĐœĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ ĐžŃĐżĐŸĐ»ŃŒĐ·ĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžŃ ŃĐŸĐČŃ€Đ”ĐŒĐ”ĐœĐœŃ‹Ń… ĐŒĐ”Ń‚ĐŸĐŽĐŸĐČ ĐŽĐžĐ°ĐłĐœĐŸŃŃ‚ĐžĐșĐž Đž Đ»Đ”Ń‡Đ”ĐœĐžŃ Đ±ĐŸĐ»ŃŒĐœŃ‹Ń… глауĐșĐŸĐŒĐŸĐč, ĐČ Ń‚ĐŸĐŒ чОслД Ń…ĐžŃ€ŃƒŃ€ĐłĐžŃ‡Đ”ŃĐșĐŸĐłĐŸ. Đ­Ń‚ĐŸ ĐČĐŸĐ·ĐŒĐŸĐ¶ĐœĐŸ про ĐŽĐŸŃŃ‚Đ°Ń‚ĐŸŃ‡ĐœĐŸĐč ĐŸĐ±Đ”ŃĐżĐ”Ń‡Đ”ĐœĐœĐŸŃŃ‚Đž ĐŒĐ”ĐŽĐžŃ†ĐžĐœŃĐșох ĐŸŃ€ĐłĐ°ĐœĐžĐ·Đ°Ń†ĐžĐč пДрĐČĐžŃ‡ĐœĐŸĐłĐŸ Đ·ĐČĐ”ĐœĐ° ĐŸŃ„Ń‚Đ°Đ»ŃŒĐŒĐŸĐ»ĐŸĐłĐžŃ‡Đ”ŃĐșĐžĐŒĐž ĐșĐ°ĐŽŃ€Đ°ĐŒĐž Đž Đ°ĐșŃ‚ŃƒĐ°Đ»ŃŒĐœŃ‹ĐŒ ĐČŃ‹ŃĐŸĐșĐŸŃ‚Đ”Ń…ĐœĐŸĐ»ĐŸĐłĐžŃ‡ĐœŃ‹ĐŒ ĐŸĐ±ĐŸŃ€ŃƒĐŽĐŸĐČĐ°ĐœĐžĐ”ĐŒ

    Hypertension control during the COVID-19 pandemic: results of the MMM2021 in Russia

    Get PDF
    Repetitive quarantines and social restrictions during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have negatively affected the population health in general, and the control of hypertension (HTN) in particular.Aim. To evaluate the control of HTN in the Russian population during the COVID-19 period based on the results of screening for HTN May Measurement Month 2021 (MMM2021).Material and methods. During May-August 2021, 2491 participants from 11 Russian regions took part in the screening. Participation was voluntary without restrictions on sex. All participants were over 18 years of age. During the screening, blood pressure (BP) was measured three times using automatic and mechanical BP monitors. In addition, a questionnaire was filled out on behavioral risk factors, comorbidities and therapy. HTN was diagnosed with systolic BP ≄140 mmHg and/ or diastolic blood pressure ≄90 mmHg and/or taking antihypertensive therapy. The questionnaire included questions about prior COVID-19, vaccinations and their impact on the intake of antihypertensive drugs.Results. The analysis included data from 2461 respondents aged 18 to 92, of which 963 were men (39,1%). The proportion of hypertensive patients was 41,0%, while among them 59,0% took antihypertensives and 30,9% were effectively treated. In comparison with pre-pandemic period according to MMM2018-2019, the higher proportion of HTN patients in the Russian sample was revealed during MMM2021 (41,0% vs 31,3%, p<0,001) with a comparable proportion of patients receiving antihypertensive therapy (60,7% vs 59,0%, p=0,05) and treatment efficacy (28,7% vs 30,9%, p=0,36). Monotherapy was received in 44,7% of cases, while dual and triple combination therapy — in 30,9% and 14,1%, respectively. The majority of respondents (~90%) did not adjust their antihypertensive therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic.Conclusion. According to HTN screening in Russia, there is persistent ineffective control of HTN, which may be due to both the worsening pattern of behavioral risk factors, limited access to healthcare during COVID-19, and the inertia of physicians and low adherence of patients due to the asymptomatic HTN course in the majority

    Use of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents in stable outpatients with coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation. International CLARIFY registry

    Get PDF

    Why Are Outcomes Different for Registry Patients Enrolled Prospectively and Retrospectively? Insights from the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF).

    Get PDF
    Background: Retrospective and prospective observational studies are designed to reflect real-world evidence on clinical practice, but can yield conflicting results. The GARFIELD-AF Registry includes both methods of enrolment and allows analysis of differences in patient characteristics and outcomes that may result. Methods and Results: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and ≄1 risk factor for stroke at diagnosis of AF were recruited either retrospectively (n = 5069) or prospectively (n = 5501) from 19 countries and then followed prospectively. The retrospectively enrolled cohort comprised patients with established AF (for a least 6, and up to 24 months before enrolment), who were identified retrospectively (and baseline and partial follow-up data were collected from the emedical records) and then followed prospectively between 0-18 months (such that the total time of follow-up was 24 months; data collection Dec-2009 and Oct-2010). In the prospectively enrolled cohort, patients with newly diagnosed AF (≀6 weeks after diagnosis) were recruited between Mar-2010 and Oct-2011 and were followed for 24 months after enrolment. Differences between the cohorts were observed in clinical characteristics, including type of AF, stroke prevention strategies, and event rates. More patients in the retrospectively identified cohort received vitamin K antagonists (62.1% vs. 53.2%) and fewer received non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (1.8% vs . 4.2%). All-cause mortality rates per 100 person-years during the prospective follow-up (starting the first study visit up to 1 year) were significantly lower in the retrospective than prospectively identified cohort (3.04 [95% CI 2.51 to 3.67] vs . 4.05 [95% CI 3.53 to 4.63]; p = 0.016). Conclusions: Interpretations of data from registries that aim to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of patients with AF must take account of differences in registry design and the impact of recall bias and survivorship bias that is incurred with retrospective enrolment. Clinical Trial Registration: - URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier for GARFIELD-AF (NCT01090362)

    Improved risk stratification of patients with atrial fibrillation: an integrated GARFIELD-AF tool for the prediction of mortality, stroke and bleed in patients with and without anticoagulation.

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVES: To provide an accurate, web-based tool for stratifying patients with atrial fibrillation to facilitate decisions on the potential benefits/risks of anticoagulation, based on mortality, stroke and bleeding risks. DESIGN: The new tool was developed, using stepwise regression, for all and then applied to lower risk patients. C-statistics were compared with CHA2DS2-VASc using 30-fold cross-validation to control for overfitting. External validation was undertaken in an independent dataset, Outcome Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF). PARTICIPANTS: Data from 39 898 patients enrolled in the prospective GARFIELD-AF registry provided the basis for deriving and validating an integrated risk tool to predict stroke risk, mortality and bleeding risk. RESULTS: The discriminatory value of the GARFIELD-AF risk model was superior to CHA2DS2-VASc for patients with or without anticoagulation. C-statistics (95% CI) for all-cause mortality, ischaemic stroke/systemic embolism and haemorrhagic stroke/major bleeding (treated patients) were: 0.77 (0.76 to 0.78), 0.69 (0.67 to 0.71) and 0.66 (0.62 to 0.69), respectively, for the GARFIELD-AF risk models, and 0.66 (0.64-0.67), 0.64 (0.61-0.66) and 0.64 (0.61-0.68), respectively, for CHA2DS2-VASc (or HAS-BLED for bleeding). In very low to low risk patients (CHA2DS2-VASc 0 or 1 (men) and 1 or 2 (women)), the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED (for bleeding) scores offered weak discriminatory value for mortality, stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding. C-statistics for the GARFIELD-AF risk tool were 0.69 (0.64 to 0.75), 0.65 (0.56 to 0.73) and 0.60 (0.47 to 0.73) for each end point, respectively, versus 0.50 (0.45 to 0.55), 0.59 (0.50 to 0.67) and 0.55 (0.53 to 0.56) for CHA2DS2-VASc (or HAS-BLED for bleeding). Upon validation in the ORBIT-AF population, C-statistics showed that the GARFIELD-AF risk tool was effective for predicting 1-year all-cause mortality using the full and simplified model for all-cause mortality: C-statistics 0.75 (0.73 to 0.77) and 0.75 (0.73 to 0.77), respectively, and for predicting for any stroke or systemic embolism over 1 year, C-statistics 0.68 (0.62 to 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Performance of the GARFIELD-AF risk tool was superior to CHA2DS2-VASc in predicting stroke and mortality and superior to HAS-BLED for bleeding, overall and in lower risk patients. The GARFIELD-AF tool has the potential for incorporation in routine electronic systems, and for the first time, permits simultaneous evaluation of ischaemic stroke, mortality and bleeding risks. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier for GARFIELD-AF (NCT01090362) and for ORBIT-AF (NCT01165710)

    Two-year outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation: results from GARFIELD-AF.

    Get PDF
    AIMS: The relationship between outcomes and time after diagnosis for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is poorly defined, especially beyond the first year. METHODS AND RESULTS: GARFIELD-AF is an ongoing, global observational study of adults with newly diagnosed NVAF. Two-year outcomes of 17 162 patients prospectively enrolled in GARFIELD-AF were analysed in light of baseline characteristics, risk profiles for stroke/systemic embolism (SE), and antithrombotic therapy. The mean (standard deviation) age was 69.8 (11.4) years, 43.8% were women, and the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.3 (1.6); 60.8% of patients were prescribed anticoagulant therapy with/without antiplatelet (AP) therapy, 27.4% AP monotherapy, and 11.8% no antithrombotic therapy. At 2-year follow-up, all-cause mortality, stroke/SE, and major bleeding had occurred at a rate (95% confidence interval) of 3.83 (3.62; 4.05), 1.25 (1.13; 1.38), and 0.70 (0.62; 0.81) per 100 person-years, respectively. Rates for all three major events were highest during the first 4 months. Congestive heart failure, acute coronary syndromes, sudden/unwitnessed death, malignancy, respiratory failure, and infection/sepsis accounted for 65% of all known causes of death and strokes for <10%. Anticoagulant treatment was associated with a 35% lower risk of death. CONCLUSION: The most frequent of the three major outcome measures was death, whose most common causes are not known to be significantly influenced by anticoagulation. This suggests that a more comprehensive approach to the management of NVAF may be needed to improve outcome. This could include, in addition to anticoagulation, interventions targeting modifiable, cause-specific risk factors for death. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01090362

    Risk profiles and one-year outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation in India: Insights from the GARFIELD-AF Registry.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) is an ongoing prospective noninterventional registry, which is providing important information on the baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and 1-year outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). This report describes data from Indian patients recruited in this registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 52,014 patients with newly diagnosed AF were enrolled globally; of these, 1388 patients were recruited from 26 sites within India (2012-2016). In India, the mean age was 65.8 years at diagnosis of NVAF. Hypertension was the most prevalent risk factor for AF, present in 68.5% of patients from India and in 76.3% of patients globally (P < 0.001). Diabetes and coronary artery disease (CAD) were prevalent in 36.2% and 28.1% of patients as compared with global prevalence of 22.2% and 21.6%, respectively (P < 0.001 for both). Antiplatelet therapy was the most common antithrombotic treatment in India. With increasing stroke risk, however, patients were more likely to receive oral anticoagulant therapy [mainly vitamin K antagonist (VKA)], but average international normalized ratio (INR) was lower among Indian patients [median INR value 1.6 (interquartile range {IQR}: 1.3-2.3) versus 2.3 (IQR 1.8-2.8) (P < 0.001)]. Compared with other countries, patients from India had markedly higher rates of all-cause mortality [7.68 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval 6.32-9.35) vs 4.34 (4.16-4.53), P < 0.0001], while rates of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding were lower after 1 year of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Compared to previously published registries from India, the GARFIELD-AF registry describes clinical profiles and outcomes in Indian patients with AF of a different etiology. The registry data show that compared to the rest of the world, Indian AF patients are younger in age and have more diabetes and CAD. Patients with a higher stroke risk are more likely to receive anticoagulation therapy with VKA but are underdosed compared with the global average in the GARFIELD-AF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01090362
    • 

    corecore