Considerations for treatment-free remission in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: a joint patient-physician perspective

Abstract Treatment-free remission after discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy is now an emerging treatment goal in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, who have achieved a deep and stable response to treatment. While guidance are now available, considering patients' questions on this progressive concept have yet to be addressed. The overall aim of this European Steering Group is a patient-centered approach that educates patients on their treatment options, including treatment-free remission, facilitates better patient-physician relationships, and meets patients' emotional and psychological needs. This article outlines five key topic areas on discontinuing tyrosine kinase therapy and the implications of treatment-free remission for patient-physician consideration: what treatment-free remission is and when it is appropriate; which patients may and may not be eligible for treatment-free remission; what patient considerations for discontinuing therapy are, such as tyrosine kinase withdrawal syndrome, potential psychological implications, molecular recurrence and re-treatment. This Steering Group advocates that patients with chronic myeloid leukemia should have access to high quality, frequent molecular monitoring and be managed in a specialist centre with appropriate medical and psychological support. As patient concerns on attempting treatment-free remission become forefront in patient-physician discussions, a greater number of eligible patients may be willing to discontinue therapy

Molecular status 36 months after TKI discontinuation in CML is highly predictive for subsequent loss of MMR-final report from AFTER-SKI

Non peer reviewe

The EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS) score is superior to the Sokal score for predicting survival in chronic myeloid leukemia

Prognostic scores support clinicians in selecting risk-adjusted treatments and in comparatively assessing different results. For patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), four baseline prognostic scores are commonly used. Our aim was to compare the prognostic performance of the scores and to arrive at an evidence-based score recommendation. In 2949 patients not involved in any score development, higher hazard ratios and concordance indices in any comparison demonstrated the best discrimination of long-term survival with the ELTS score. In a second step, of 5154 patients analyzed to investigate risk group classification differences, 23% (n = 1197) were allocated to high-risk by the Sokal score. Of the 1197 Sokal high-risk patients, 56% were non-high-risk according to the ELTS score and had a significantly more favorable long-term survival prognosis than the 526 high-risk patients according to both scores. The Sokal score identified too many patients as high-risk and relatively few (40%) as low-risk (versus 60% with the ELTS score). Inappropriate risk classification jeopardizes optimal treatment selection. The ELTS score outperformed the Sokal score, the Euro, and the EUTOS score regarding risk group discrimination. The recent recommendation of the European LeukemiaNet for preferred use of the ELTS score was supported with significant statistical evidence.Peer reviewe

Prognosis of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia presenting in advanced phase is defined mainly by blast count, but also by age, chromosomal aberrations and hemoglobin

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is usually diagnosed in chronic phase, yet there is a small percentage of patients that is diagnosed in accelerated phase or blast crisis. Due to this rarity, little is known about the prognosis of these patients. Our aim was to identify prognostic factors for this cohort. We identified 283 patients in the EUTOS population-based and out-study registries that were diagnosed in advanced phase. Nearly all patients were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Median survival in this heterogeneous cohort was 8.2 years. When comparing patients with more than 30% blasts to those with 20-29% blasts, the hazard ratio (HR) was 1.32 (95%-confidence interval (CI): [0.7-2.6]). Patients with 20-29% blasts had a significantly higher risk than patients with less than 20% blasts (HR: 2.24, 95%-CI: [1.2-4.0], P = .008). We found that the blast count was the most important prognostic factor; however, age, hemoglobin, basophils and other chromosomal aberrations should be considered as well. The ELTS score was able to define two groups (high risk vs non-high risk) with an HR of 3.01 (95%-CI: [1.81-5.00], P <.001). Regarding the contrasting definitions of blast crisis, our data clearly supported the 20% cut-off over the 30% cut-off in this cohort. Based on our results, we conclude that a one-phase rather than a two-phase categorization of de novo advanced phase CML patients is appropriate.Peer reviewe

Persistent splenomegaly during imatinib therapy and the definition of complete hematological response in chronic myelogenous leukemia

International audienceSplenomegaly belongs among typical findings on physical examination in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) (1). Its disappearance is a part of achieving complete hematological response (CHR), that is nowadays (when second generation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors are available) of particular interest during imatinib treatment. However, the kinetics of the disappearance of splenomegaly in patients with CML has still never been studied. We have analyzed 20 out of 245 patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML that had a still palpable spleen at the 3rd month of imatinib therapy in terms of treatment response at 18 months from the start of therapy. Our analysis have showed that eight (40%) of these 20 patients had achieved a treatment response at these time points. Moreover 11 patients had still a palpable splenomegaly at the 6th month after the start of imatinib therapy and 6 (54%) of them had a therapeutic response at the 18th month, suggesting that slower spleen shrinkage in patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML does not necessarily mean the failure of the therapy in the future

Analysis of chronic myeloid leukemia during deep molecular response by genomic PCR: a traffic light stratification model with impact on treatment-free remission

This work investigated patient-specific genomic BCR-ABL1 fusions as markers of measurable residual disease (MRD) in chronic myeloid leukaemia, with a focus on relevance to treatment-free remission (TFR) after achievement of deep molecular response (DMR) on tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. DNA and mRNA BCR-ABL1 measurements by qPCR were compared in 2189 samples (129 patients) and by digital PCR in 1279 sample (62 patients). A high correlation was found at levels of disease above MR4, but there was a poor correlation for samples during DMR. A combination of DNA and RNA MRD measurements resulted in a better prediction of molecular relapse-free survival (MRFS) after TKI stop (n = 17) or scheduled interruption (n = 25). At 18 months after treatment cessation, patients with stopped or interrupted TKI therapy who were DNA negative/RNA negative during DMR maintenance (green group) had an MRFS of 80% and 100%, respectively, compared with those who were DNA positive/RNA negative (MRFS = 57% and 67%, respectively; yellow group) or DNA positive/RNA positive (MRFS = 20% for both cohorts; red group). Thus, we propose a “traffic light” stratification as a TFR predictor based on DNA and mRNA BCR-ABL1 measurements during DMR maintenance before TKI cessation

Impact of BCR::ABL1 transcript type on RT-qPCR amplification performance and molecular response to therapy

Several studies have reported that chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients expressing e14a2 BCR::ABL1 have a faster molecular response to therapy compared to patients expressing e13a2. To explore the reason for this difference we undertook a detailed technical comparison of the commonly used Europe Against Cancer (EAC) BCR::ABL1 reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay in European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) reference laboratories (n = 10). We found the amplification ratio of the e13a2 amplicon was 38% greater than e14a2 (p = 0.015), and the amplification efficiency was 2% greater (P = 0.17). This subtle difference led to measurable transcript-type dependent variation in estimates of residual disease which could be corrected by (i) taking the qPCR amplification efficiency into account, (ii) using alternative RT-qPCR approaches or (iii) droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), a technique which is relatively insensitive to differences in amplification kinetics. In CML patients, higher levels of BCR::ABL1/GUSB were identified at diagnosis for patients expressing e13a2 (n = 67) compared to e14a2 (n = 78) when analysed by RT-qPCR (P = 0.0005) but not ddPCR (P = 0.5). These data indicate that widely used RT-qPCR assays result in subtly different estimates of disease depending on BCR::ABL1 transcript type; these differences are small but may need to be considered for optimal patient management