660 research outputs found
Comparison and Mapping Facilitate Relation Discovery and Predication
Relational concepts play a central role in human perception and cognition, but little is known about how they are acquired. For example, how do we come to understand that physical force is a higher-order multiplicative relation between mass and acceleration, or that two circles are the same-shape in the same way that two squares are? A recent model of relational learning, DORA (Discovery of Relations by Analogy; Doumas, Hummel & Sandhofer, 2008), predicts that comparison and analogical mapping play a central role in the discovery and predication of novel higher-order relations. We report two experiments testing and confirming this prediction
A theory of relation learning and cross-domain generalization
People readily generalize knowledge to novel domains and stimuli. We present a theory, instantiated in a computational model, based on the idea that cross-domain generalization in humans is a case of analogical inference over structured (i.e., symbolic) relational representations. The model is an extension of the Learning and Inference with Schemas and Analogy (LISA; Hummel & Holyoak, 1997, 2003) and Discovery of Relations by Analogy (DORA; Doumas et al., 2008) models of relational inference and learning. The resulting model learns both the content and format (i.e., structure) of relational representations from nonrelational inputs without supervision, when augmented with the capacity for reinforcement learning it leverages these representations to learn about individual domains, and then generalizes to new domains on the first exposure (i.e., zero-shot learning) via analogical inference. We demonstrate the capacity of the model to learn structured relational representations from a variety of simple visual stimuli, and to perform cross-domain generalization between video games (Breakout and Pong) and between several psychological tasks. We demonstrate that the model’s trajectory closely mirrors the trajectory of children as they learn about relations, accounting for phenomena from the literature on the development of children’s reasoning and analogy making. The model’s ability to generalize between domains demonstrates the flexibility afforded by representing domains in terms of their underlying relational structure, rather than simply in terms of the statistical relations between their inputs and outputs
Tensors and compositionality in neural systems
Neither neurobiological nor process models of meaning composition specify the operator through which constituent parts are bound together into compositional structures. In this paper, we argue that a neurophysiological computation system cannot achieve the compositionality exhibited in human thought and language if it were to rely on a multiplicative operator to perform binding, as the tensor product (TP)-based systems that have been widely adopted in cognitive science, neuroscience and artificial intelligence do. We show via simulation and two behavioural experiments that TPs violate variable-value independence, but human behaviour does not. Specifically, TPs fail to capture that in the statements fuzzy cactus and fuzzy penguin, both cactus and penguin are predicated by fuzzy(x) and belong to the set of fuzzy things, rendering these arguments similar to each other. Consistent with that thesis, people judged arguments that shared the same role to be similar, even when those arguments themselves (e.g., cacti and penguins) were judged to be dissimilar when in isolation. By contrast, the similarity of the TPs representing fuzzy(cactus) and fuzzy(penguin) was determined by the similarity of the arguments, which in this case approaches zero. Based on these results, we argue that neural systems that use TPs for binding cannot approximate how the human mind and brain represent compositional information during processing. We describe a contrasting binding mechanism that any physiological or artificial neural system could use to maintain independence between a role and its argument, a prerequisite for compositionality and, thus, for instantiating the expressive power of human thought and language in a neural system
An ecologically valid examination of event-based and time-based prospective memory using immersive virtual reality:The effects of delay and task type on everyday prospective memory
Recent research has focused on assessing either event- or time-based
prospective memory (PM) using laboratory tasks. Yet, the findings pertaining to
PM performance on laboratory tasks are often inconsistent with the findings on
corresponding naturalistic experiments. Ecologically valid neuropsychological
tasks resemble the complexity and cognitive demands of everyday tasks, offer an
adequate level of experimental control, and allow a generalisation of the
findings to everyday performance. The Virtual Reality Everyday Assessment Lab
(VR-EAL), an immersive virtual reality neuropsychological battery with enhanced
ecological validity, was implemented to comprehensively assess everyday PM
(i.e., focal and non-focal event-based, and time-based). The effects of the
length of delay between encoding and initiating the PM intention and the type
of PM task on everyday PM performance were examined. The results revealed that
everyday PM performance was affected by the length of delay rather than the
type of PM task. The effect of the length of delay differentially affected
performance on the focal, non-focal, and time-based tasks and was proportional
to the PM cue focality (i.e., semantic relationship with the intended action).
This study also highlighted methodological considerations such as the
differentiation between functioning and ability, distinction of cue attributes,
and the necessity of ecological validity.Comment: 9 Figures, 4 Table
Endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA) in hypertension and chronic kidney disease: A rose with many thorns
The discovery of endothelin created a lot of enthusiasm and paved new therapeutic avenues for the treatment of arterial hypertension. Endothelin plays a significant role in blood pressure regulation through pronounced vasoconstriction and modulation of sodium and water reabsorption in the kidneys. Endothelin receptor antagonists have been tested in many clinical trials in patients with arterial hypertension, heart failure, pulmonary arterial hypertension, systemic sclerosis, chronic kidney disease, and diabetic nephropathy. However, the results were usually disappointing, except in pulmonary hypertension and scleroderma digital ulcers. The future of ERAs for the treatment of arterial hypertension and chronic kidney disease does not seem bright, and only the combination with other classes of antihypertensive drugs might offer a way out
- …