Multifaceted role of cycling DOF factor 3 (CDF3) in the regulation of flowering time and abiotic stress responses in Arabidopsis

[EN] DNA-binding with one finger (DOF)-type transcription factors are involved in many fundamental processes in higher plants, from responses to light and phytohormones to flowering time and seed maturation, but their relation with abiotic stress tolerance is largely unknown. Here, we identify the roles of CDF3, an Arabidopsis DOF gene in abiotic stress responses and developmental processes like flowering time. CDF3 is highly induced by drought, extreme temperatures and abscisic acid treatment. The CDF3 T-DNA insertion mutant cdf3-1 is much more sensitive to drought and low temperature stress, whereas CDF3 overexpression enhances the tolerance of transgenic plants to drought, cold and osmotic stress and promotes late flowering. Transcriptome analysis revealed that CDF3 regulates a set of genes involved in cellular osmoprotection and oxidative stress, including the stress tolerance transcription factors CBFs, DREB2A and ZAT12, which involve both gigantea-dependent and independent pathways. Consistently, metabolite profiling disclosed that the total amount of some protective metabolites including -aminobutyric acid, proline, glutamine and sucrose were higher in CDF3-overexpressing plants. Taken together, these results indicate that CDF3 plays a multifaceted role acting on both flowering time and abiotic stress tolerance, in part by controlling the CBF/DREB2A-CRT/DRE and ZAT10/12 modules.We thank Dr Pablo Gonzalez-Melendi and Dr Jan Zouhar for technical handling of the confocal microscope and Dr Rafael Catala for the assistance with the low temperature stress assays. This work was supported by grants from Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA; projects 2009-0004-C01, 2012-0008-C01), Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (projects BIO2010-1487, BFU2013-49665-EXP). A.R.C. and J.D.F. were supported by INIA pre-doctoral fellowshipsCorrales, AR.; Carrillo, L.; Lasierra, P.; Nebauer, SG.; Dominguez-Figueroa, J.; Renau-Morata, B.; Pollmann, S.... (2017). Multifaceted role of cycling DOF factor 3 (CDF3) in the regulation of flowering time and abiotic stress responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell & Environment. 40(5):748-764. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12894S748764405Achard, P., Gong, F., Cheminant, S., Alioua, M., Hedden, P., & Genschik, P. (2008). The Cold-Inducible CBF1 Factor–Dependent Signaling Pathway Modulates the Accumulation of the Growth-Repressing DELLA Proteins via Its Effect on Gibberellin Metabolism. The Plant Cell, 20(8), 2117-2129. doi:10.1105/tpc.108.058941Ahuja, I., de Vos, R. C. H., Bones, A. M., & Hall, R. D. (2010). Plant molecular stress responses face climate change. Trends in Plant Science, 15(12), 664-674. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2010.08.002Alonso, R., Oñate-Sánchez, L., Weltmeier, F., Ehlert, A., Diaz, I., Dietrich, K., … Dröge-Laser, W. (2009). A Pivotal Role of the Basic Leucine Zipper Transcription Factor bZIP53 in the Regulation of Arabidopsis Seed Maturation Gene Expression Based on Heterodimerization and Protein Complex Formation. The Plant Cell, 21(6), 1747-1761. doi:10.1105/tpc.108.062968BEUVE, N., RISPAIL, N., LAINE, P., CLIQUET, J.-B., OURRY, A., & LE DEUNFF, E. (2004). Putative role of gamma -aminobutyric acid (GABA) as a long-distance signal in up-regulation of nitrate uptake in Brassica napus L. Plant, Cell and Environment, 27(8), 1035-1046. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01208.xBlümel, M., Dally, N., & Jung, C. (2015). Flowering time regulation in crops — what did we learn from Arabidopsis? Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 32, 121-129. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2014.11.023Bouche, N., Fait, A., Bouchez, D., Moller, S. G., & Fromm, H. (2003). Mitochondrial succinic-semialdehyde dehydrogenase of the  -aminobutyrate shunt is required to restrict levels of reactive oxygen intermediates in plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(11), 6843-6848. doi:10.1073/pnas.1037532100Catala, R., Medina, J., & Salinas, J. (2011). Integration of low temperature and light signaling during cold acclimation response in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(39), 16475-16480. doi:10.1073/pnas.1107161108Chaves, M. M., Flexas, J., & Pinheiro, C. (2008). Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Annals of Botany, 103(4), 551-560. doi:10.1093/aob/mcn125Chen, H., Hwang, J. E., Lim, C. J., Kim, D. Y., Lee, S. Y., & Lim, C. O. (2010). Arabidopsis DREB2C functions as a transcriptional activator of HsfA3 during the heat stress response. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 401(2), 238-244. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.09.038Claussen, W. (2005). Proline as a measure of stress in tomato plants. Plant Science, 168(1), 241-248. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.07.039Clough, S. J., & Bent, A. F. (1998). Floral dip: a simplified method forAgrobacterium-mediated transformation ofArabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal, 16(6), 735-743. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.xCorrales, A., Carrillo, L., Nebauer, S., Renau-Morata, B., Sánchez-Perales, M., Fernández-Nohales, P., … Medina, J. (2014). Salinity Assay in Arabidopsis. BIO-PROTOCOL, 4(16). doi:10.21769/bioprotoc.1216Corrales, A.-R., Nebauer, S. G., Carrillo, L., Fernández-Nohales, P., Marqués, J., Renau-Morata, B., … Medina, J. (2014). Characterization of tomato Cycling Dof Factors reveals conserved and new functions in the control of flowering time and abiotic stress responses. Journal of Experimental Botany, 65(4), 995-1012. doi:10.1093/jxb/ert451Davletova, S., Schlauch, K., Coutu, J., & Mittler, R. (2005). The Zinc-Finger Protein Zat12 Plays a Central Role in Reactive Oxygen and Abiotic Stress Signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 139(2), 847-856. doi:10.1104/pp.105.068254DÉJARDIN, A., SOKOLOV, L. N., & KLECZKOWSKI, L. A. (1999). Sugar/osmoticum levels modulate differential abscisic acid-independent expression of two stress-responsive sucrose synthase genes in Arabidopsis. Biochemical Journal, 344(2), 503-509. doi:10.1042/bj3440503Dubois, M., Skirycz, A., Claeys, H., Maleux, K., Dhondt, S., De Bodt, S., … Inzé, D. (2013). ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR6 Acts as a Central Regulator of Leaf Growth under Water-Limiting Conditions in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 162(1), 319-332. doi:10.1104/pp.113.216341Farrant, J. M., & Moore, J. P. (2011). Programming desiccation-tolerance: from plants to seeds to resurrection plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 14(3), 340-345. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2011.03.018Fornara, F., Montaigu, A., Sánchez‐Villarreal, A., Takahashi, Y., Ver Loren van Themaat, E., Huettel, B., … Coupland, G. (2015). The GI – CDF module of Arabidopsis affects freezing tolerance and growth as well as flowering. The Plant Journal, 81(5), 695-706. doi:10.1111/tpj.12759Fornara, F., Panigrahi, K. C. S., Gissot, L., Sauerbrunn, N., Rühl, M., Jarillo, J. A., & Coupland, G. (2009). Arabidopsis DOF Transcription Factors Act Redundantly to Reduce CONSTANS Expression and Are Essential for a Photoperiodic Flowering Response. Developmental Cell, 17(1), 75-86. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2009.06.015Fowler, S. (1999). GIGANTEA: a circadian clock-controlled gene that regulates photoperiodic flowering in Arabidopsis and encodes a protein with several possible membrane-spanning domains. The EMBO Journal, 18(17), 4679-4688. doi:10.1093/emboj/18.17.4679Galmés, J., Medrano, H., & Flexas, J. (2007). Photosynthetic limitations in response to water stress and recovery in Mediterranean plants with different growth forms. New Phytologist, 175(1), 81-93. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02087.xGill, S. S., & Tuteja, N. (2010). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 48(12), 909-930. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016Gilmour, S. J., Fowler, S. G., & Thomashow, M. F. (2004). Arabidopsis Transcriptional Activators CBF1, CBF2, and CBF3 have Matching Functional Activities. Plant Molecular Biology, 54(5), 767-781. doi:10.1023/b:plan.0000040902.06881.d4Gong, P., Zhang, J., Li, H., Yang, C., Zhang, C., Zhang, X., … Ye, Z. (2010). Transcriptional profiles of drought-responsive genes in modulating transcription signal transduction, and biochemical pathways in tomato. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61(13), 3563-3575. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq167Gould, P. D., Locke, J. C. W., Larue, C., Southern, M. M., Davis, S. J., Hanano, S., … Hall, A. (2006). The Molecular Basis of Temperature Compensation in the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock. The Plant Cell, 18(5), 1177-1187. doi:10.1105/tpc.105.039990Han, Q., Kang, G., & Guo, T. (2013). Proteomic analysis of spring freeze-stress responsive proteins in leaves of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 63, 236-244. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.12.002Hernando-Amado, S., González-Calle, V., Carbonero, P., & Barrero-Sicilia, C. (2012). The family of DOF transcription factors in Brachypodium distachyon: phylogenetic comparison with rice and barley DOFs and expression profiling. BMC Plant Biology, 12(1), 202. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-12-202Zou, H.-F., Zhang, Y.-Q., Wei, W., Chen, H.-W., Song, Q.-X., Liu, Y.-F., … Chen, S.-Y. (2012). The transcription factor AtDOF4.2 regulates shoot branching and seed coat formation in Arabidopsis. Biochemical Journal, 449(2), 373-388. doi:10.1042/bj20110060Hussain, S. S., Kayani, M. A., & Amjad, M. (2011). Transcription factors as tools to engineer enhanced drought stress tolerance in plants. Biotechnology Progress, 27(2), 297-306. doi:10.1002/btpr.514Imaizumi, T. (2005). FKF1 F-Box Protein Mediates Cyclic Degradation of a Repressor of CONSTANS in Arabidopsis. Science, 309(5732), 293-297. doi:10.1126/science.1110586Ingram, J., & Bartels, D. (1996). THE MOLECULAR BASIS OF DEHYDRATION TOLERANCE IN PLANTS. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 47(1), 377-403. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.377Jarillo, J. A., Del Olmo, I., Gómez-Zambrano, A., Lázaro, A., López-González, L., Miguel, E., … Piñeiro, M. (2008). Photoperiodic control of flowering time: a review. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(S1), 221. doi:10.5424/sjar/200806s1-391Izaurralde, E. (1997). The asymmetric distribution of the constituents of the Ran system is essential for transport into and out of the nucleus. The EMBO Journal, 16(21), 6535-6547. doi:10.1093/emboj/16.21.6535Karimi, M., Depicker, A., & Hilson, P. (2007). Recombinational Cloning with Plant Gateway Vectors. Plant Physiology, 145(4), 1144-1154. doi:10.1104/pp.107.106989Kim, S. Y., & Nam, K. H. (2010). Physiological roles of ERD10 in abiotic stresses and seed germination of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Reports, 29(2), 203-209. doi:10.1007/s00299-009-0813-0Kiyosue, T., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (1994). Cloning of cDNAs for genes that are early-responsive to dehydration stress (ERDs) inArabidopsis thaliana L.: identification of three ERDs as HSP cognate genes. Plant Molecular Biology, 25(5), 791-798. doi:10.1007/bf00028874Kurai, T., Wakayama, M., Abiko, T., Yanagisawa, S., Aoki, N., & Ohsugi, R. (2011). Introduction of the ZmDof1 gene into rice enhances carbon and nitrogen assimilation under low-nitrogen conditions. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 9(8), 826-837. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00592.xLiu, Q., Kasuga, M., Sakuma, Y., Abe, H., Miura, S., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (1998). Two Transcription Factors, DREB1 and DREB2, with an EREBP/AP2 DNA Binding Domain Separate Two Cellular Signal Transduction Pathways in Drought- and Low-Temperature-Responsive Gene Expression, Respectively, in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 10(8), 1391. doi:10.2307/3870648Matsui, A., Ishida, J., Morosawa, T., Mochizuki, Y., Kaminuma, E., Endo, T. A., … Seki, M. (2008). Arabidopsis Transcriptome Analysis under Drought, Cold, High-Salinity and ABA Treatment Conditions using a Tiling Array. Plant and Cell Physiology, 49(8), 1135-1149. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcn101Medina, J., Bargues, M., Terol, J., Pérez-Alonso, M., & Salinas, J. (1999). The Arabidopsis CBF Gene Family Is Composed of Three Genes Encoding AP2 Domain-Containing Proteins Whose Expression Is Regulated by Low Temperature but Not by Abscisic Acid or Dehydration. Plant Physiology, 119(2), 463-470. doi:10.1104/pp.119.2.463Messerli, G., Partovi Nia, V., Trevisan, M., Kolbe, A., Schauer, N., Geigenberger, P., … Zeeman, S. C. (2007). Rapid Classification of Phenotypic Mutants of Arabidopsis via Metabolite Fingerprinting. Plant Physiology, 143(4), 1484-1492. doi:10.1104/pp.106.090795Mittler, R. (2006). Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends in Plant Science, 11(1), 15-19. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2005.11.002Mizoguchi, T., Wright, L., Fujiwara, S., Cremer, F., Lee, K., Onouchi, H., … Coupland, G. (2005). Distinct Roles of GIGANTEA in Promoting Flowering and Regulating Circadian Rhythms in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 17(8), 2255-2270. doi:10.1105/tpc.105.033464Munns, R., & Tester, M. (2008). Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59(1), 651-681. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911Murashige, T., & Skoog, F. (1962). A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15(3), 473-497. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.xNishiyama, R., Le, D. T., Watanabe, Y., Matsui, A., Tanaka, M., Seki, M., … Tran, L.-S. P. (2012). Transcriptome Analyses of a Salt-Tolerant Cytokinin-Deficient Mutant Reveal Differential Regulation of Salt Stress Response by Cytokinin Deficiency. PLoS ONE, 7(2), e32124. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032124Noguero, M., Atif, R. M., Ochatt, S., & Thompson, R. D. (2013). The role of the DNA-binding One Zinc Finger (DOF) transcription factor family in plants. Plant Science, 209, 32-45. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.03.016Novillo, F., Medina, J., & Salinas, J. (2007). Arabidopsis CBF1 and CBF3 have a different function than CBF2 in cold acclimation and define different gene classes in the CBF regulon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(52), 21002-21007. doi:10.1073/pnas.0705639105OliverosJ.C.(2007)Venny an interactive tool for comparing lists with Venn's diagrams.http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html.Oñate-Sánchez, L., & Vicente-Carbajosa, J. (2008). DNA-free RNA isolation protocols for Arabidopsis thaliana, including seeds and siliques. BMC Research Notes, 1(1), 93. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-1-93Osakabe, Y., Kajita, S., & Osakabe, K. (2011). Genetic engineering of woody plants: current and future targets in a stressful environment. Physiologia Plantarum, 142(2), 105-117. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01451.xPark, D. H. (1999). Control of Circadian Rhythms and Photoperiodic Flowering by the Arabidopsis GIGANTEA Gene. Science, 285(5433), 1579-1582. doi:10.1126/science.285.5433.1579Rajasekaran, L. R., Aspinall, D., & Paleg, L. G. (2000). Physiological mechanism of tolerance of Lycopersicon spp. exposed to salt stress. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 80(1), 151-159. doi:10.4141/p99-003Rizhsky, L., Liang, H., Shuman, J., Shulaev, V., Davletova, S., & Mittler, R. (2004). When Defense Pathways Collide. The Response of Arabidopsis to a Combination of Drought and Heat Stress. Plant Physiology, 134(4), 1683-1696. doi:10.1104/pp.103.033431Rosso, M. G., Li, Y., Strizhov, N., Reiss, B., Dekker, K., & Weisshaar, B. (2003). An Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA mutagenized population (GABI-Kat) for flanking sequence tag-based reverse genetics. Plant Molecular Biology, 53(1/2), 247-259. doi:10.1023/b:plan.0000009297.37235.4aRueda-López, M., Crespillo, R., Cánovas, F. M., & Ávila, C. (2008). Differential regulation of two glutamine synthetase genes by a single Dof transcription factor. The Plant Journal, 56(1), 73-85. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03573.xSakuma, Y., Maruyama, K., Osakabe, Y., Qin, F., Seki, M., Shinozaki, K., & Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2006). Functional Analysis of an Arabidopsis Transcription Factor, DREB2A, Involved in Drought-Responsive Gene Expression. The Plant Cell, 18(5), 1292-1309. doi:10.1105/tpc.105.035881Sato, Y., & Yokoya, S. (2007). Enhanced tolerance to drought stress in transgenic rice plants overexpressing a small heat-shock protein, sHSP17.7. Plant Cell Reports, 27(2), 329-334. doi:10.1007/s00299-007-0470-0Sawa, M., Nusinow, D. A., Kay, S. A., & Imaizumi, T. (2007). FKF1 and GIGANTEA Complex Formation Is Required for Day-Length Measurement in Arabidopsis. Science, 318(5848), 261-265. doi:10.1126/science.1146994Scarpeci, T. E., Zanor, M. I., Mueller-Roeber, B., & Valle, E. M. (2013). Overexpression of AtWRKY30 enhances abiotic stress tolerance during early growth stages in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Molecular Biology, 83(3), 265-277. doi:10.1007/s11103-013-0090-8Seki, M., Kamei, A., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (2003). Molecular responses to drought, salinity and frost: common and different paths for plant protection. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 14(2), 194-199. doi:10.1016/s0958-1669(03)00030-2Shelp, B. J., Mullen, R. T., & Waller, J. C. (2012). Compartmentation of GABA metabolism raises intriguing questions. Trends in Plant Science, 17(2), 57-59. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2011.12.006Shi, H., & Chan, Z. (2014). The cysteine2/histidine2-type transcription factor ZINC FINGER OF ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA 6 -activated C-REPEAT-BINDING FACTOR pathway is essential for melatonin-mediated freezing stress resistance in Arabidopsis. Journal of Pineal Research, 57(2), 185-191. doi:10.1111/jpi.12155Shinozaki, K., & Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2006). Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58(2), 221-227. doi:10.1093/jxb/erl164Shinozaki, K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Seki, M. (2003). Regulatory network of gene expression in the drought and cold stress responses. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 6(5), 410-417. doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(03)00092-xSkirycz, A., & Inzé, D. (2010). More from less: plant growth under limited water. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 21(2), 197-203. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2010.03.002Snedden, W. A., Arazi, T., Fromm, H., & Shelp, B. J. (1995). Calcium/Calmodulin Activation of Soybean Glutamate Decarboxylase. Plant Physiology, 108(2), 543-549. doi:10.1104/pp.108.2.543STITT, M., & KRAPP, A. (1999). The interaction between elevated carbon dioxide and nitrogen nutrition: the physiological and molecular background. Plant, Cell and Environment, 22(6), 583-621. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00386.xStudart-Guimarães, C., Fait, A., Nunes-Nesi, A., Carrari, F., Usadel, B., & Fernie, A. R. (2007). Reduced Expression of Succinyl-Coenzyme A Ligase Can Be Compensated for by Up-Regulation of the γ-Aminobutyrate Shunt in Illuminated Tomato Leaves. Plant Physiology, 145(3), 626-639. doi:10.1104/pp.107.103101Supek, F., Bošnjak, M., Škunca, N., & Šmuc, T. (2011). REVIGO Summarizes and Visualizes Long Lists of Gene Ontology Terms. PLoS ONE, 6(7), e21800. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021800Suzuki, M., Kao, C.-Y., Cocciolone, S., & McCarty, D. R. (2002). Maize VP1 complements Arabidopsisabi3 and confers a novel ABA/auxin interaction in roots. The Plant Journal, 28(4), 409-418. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01165.xTaji, T., Ohsumi, C., Iuchi, S., Seki, M., Kasuga, M., Kobayashi, M., … Shinozaki, K. (2002). Important roles of drought- and cold-inducible genes for galactinol synthase in stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal, 29(4), 417-426. doi:10.1046/j.0960-7412.2001.01227.xThomashow, M. F. (2010). Molecular Basis of Plant Cold Acclimation: Insights Gained from Studying the CBF Cold Response Pathway: Figure 1. Plant Physiology, 154(2), 571-577. doi:10.1104/pp.110.161794Toufighi, K., Brady, S. M., Austin, R., Ly, E., & Provart, N. J. (2005). The Botany Array Resource: e-Northerns, Expression Angling, and promoter analyses. The Plant Journal, 43(1), 153-163. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02437.xVogel, J. T., Zarka, D. G., Van Buskirk, H. A., Fowler, S. G., & Thomashow, M. F. (2004). Roles of the CBF2 and ZAT12 transcription factors in configuring the low temperature transcriptome of Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 41(2), 195-211. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02288.xWang, W., Vinocur, B., Shoseyov, O., & Altman, A. (2004). Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends in Plant Science, 9(5), 244-252. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2004.03.006Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (2006). TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATORY NETWORKS IN CELLULAR RESPONSES AND TOLERANCE TO DEHYDRATION AND COLD STRESSES. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 57(1), 781-803. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105444Yanagisawa, S. (2001). The Transcriptional Activation Domain of the Plant-Specific Dof1 Factor Functions in Plant, Animal, and Yeast Cells. Plant and Cell Physiology, 42(8), 813-822. doi:10.1093/pcp/pce105Yanagisawa, S. (2002). The Dof family of plant transcription factors. Trends in Plant Science, 7(12), 555-560. doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02362-2Yanagisawa, S., Akiyama, A., Kisaka, H., Uchimiya, H., & Miwa, T. (2004). Metabolic engineering with Dof1 transcription factor in plants: Improved nitrogen assimilation and growth under low-nitrogen conditions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(20), 7833-7838. doi:10.1073/pnas.0402267101Yanagisawa, S., & Schmidt, R. J. (1999). Diversity and similarity among recognition sequences of Dof transcription factors. The Plant Journal, 17(2), 209-214. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00363.xYanagisawa, S., & Sheen, J. (1998). Involvement of Maize Dof Zinc Finger Proteins in Tissue-Specific and Light-Regulated Gene Expression. The Plant Cell, 10(1), 75-89. doi:10.1105/tpc.10.1.75Yang, X., Srivastava, R., Howell, S. H., & Bassham, D. C. (2015). Activation of autophagy by unfolded proteins d

Salinity Assay in Tomato

[EN] Tomato is one of the most important horticultural crops worldwide, and is cultivated in semi-arid regions in which soil and groundwater salinity is an increasing limitation to yield. The assessment of the responses of new cultivars to salt and the comparisons among cultivars and wild species are of great interest in tomato breeding. This assay provides a reproducible and reliable method for screening tomato responses to NaCl salinity under hydroponic conditions in growth chambers. Although NaCl is the most commonly used salt in salinity studies, other salts such as Na2SO4, MgCl2 or MgSO4, usually found in saline soils, can also be assayed (Nebauer et al., 2013). Plants can be maintained for 30-45 days under the described conditions, although significant effects on growth can be observed after 10 days, depending on the salt and concentration used.We gratefully acknowledge funding through grants from the Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA; project numbers: 2009-0004-C01, 2012-0008-C01) and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (project numbers: BIO2010-14871 and ERA-NET GEN2006-27772-C2-2).Renau Morata, B.; Sánchez Perales, M.; Medina, J.; Molina Romero, RV.; Corrales, AR.; Carrillo, L.; Fernández Nohales, P.... (2014). Salinity Assay in Tomato. Bio-protocol. 4:1-8. https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.1215S18

Salinity Assay in Arabidopsis

[EN] Salinity is an important environmental constraint to crop productivity in arid and semiarid regions of the world. The evaluation of the responses to salinity of different Arabidopsis ecotypes or transgenic lines is important to identify and investigate the role of different key genes. These new characterized genes involved in the response to salinity stress are of great interest to be incorporated in crops breeding programs. Here we provide a reproducible method to evaluate the performance of Arabidopsis lines to salinity stress by analysing primary and lateral root growth and fresh weight of plants grown under in vitro conditions in growth chambers. Even though NaCl is the most frequent used salinity tests, other salts (e.g. KCl, MgCl2) can be also evaluated by this method. Arabidopsis plants can be maintained for 15-20 days in these conditions, although effects on growth and biomass can be observed, depending on the used salt and concentration, within the first 10 days.We gratefully acknowledge funding through grants from Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA; project numbers: 2009-0004-C01, 2012-0008-C01) and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (project number: BIO2010-14871 and ERA-NET GEN2006-27772-C2-2). Additionally, we are grateful for the protocol described by Lakhssassi et al. (2012).Corrales, AR.; Carrillo, L.; González Nebauer, S.; Renau Morata, B.; Sánchez Perales, M.; Fernández Nohales, P.; Marques Signes, J.... (2014). Salinity Assay in Arabidopsis. Bio-protocol. 4(16):1-6. https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.1216S1641

Characterization of tomato Cycling Dof Factors reveals conserved and new functions in the control of flowering time and abiotic stress responses

[EN] DNA binding with One Finger (DOF) transcription factors are involved in multiple aspects of plant growth and development but their precise roles in abiotic stress tolerance are largely unknown. Here we report a group of five tomato DOF genes, homologous to Arabidopsis Cycling DOF Factors (CDFs), that function as transcriptional regulators involved in responses to drought and salt stress and flowering-time control in a gene-specific manner. SlCDF15 are nuclear proteins that display specific binding with different affinities to canonical DNA target sequences and present diverse transcriptional activation capacities in vivo. SlCDF15 genes exhibited distinct diurnal expression patterns and were differentially induced in response to osmotic, salt, heat, and low-temperature stresses. Arabidopsis plants overexpressing SlCDF1 or SlCDF3 showed increased drought and salt tolerance. In addition, the expression of various stress-responsive genes, such as COR15, RD29A, and RD10, were differentially activated in the overexpressing lines. Interestingly, overexpression in Arabidopsis of SlCDF3 but not SlCDF1 promotes late flowering through modulation of the expression of flowering control genes such as CO and FT. Overall, our data connect SlCDFs to undescribed functions related to abiotic stress tolerance and flowering time through the regulation of specific target genes and an increase in particular metabolites.This work was supported by grants from Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA; project numbers: 2009-0004-C01, 2012-0008-C01), the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (project number: BIO2010-14871), and the MERIT Project (FP7 ITN2010-264474). ARC was supported by a pre-doctoral fellowship from the INIA. The authors would like to thank Mar Gonzalez and Victor Carrasco for technical assistance and Dr Pablo Gonzalez-Melendi for technical handling of the confocal microscope. We also thank Eugenio Grau for technical assistance with RT-PCR analyses.Corrales, A.; González Nebauer, S.; Carrillo, L.; Fernández Nohales, P.; Marques Signes, J.; Renau Morata, B.; Granell, A.... (2014). Characterization of tomato Cycling Dof Factors reveals conserved and new functions in the control of flowering time and abiotic stress responses. Journal of Experimental Botany. 65(4):995-1012. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert451S9951012654AbuQamar, S., Luo, H., Laluk, K., Mickelbart, M. V., & Mengiste, T. (2009). Crosstalk between biotic and abiotic stress responses in tomato is mediated by theAIM1transcription factor. The Plant Journal, 58(2), 347-360. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03783.xAlonso, R., Oñate-Sánchez, L., Weltmeier, F., Ehlert, A., Diaz, I., Dietrich, K., … Dröge-Laser, W. (2009). A Pivotal Role of the Basic Leucine Zipper Transcription Factor bZIP53 in the Regulation of Arabidopsis Seed Maturation Gene Expression Based on Heterodimerization and Protein Complex Formation. The Plant Cell, 21(6), 1747-1761. doi:10.1105/tpc.108.062968Altschul, S. (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research, 25(17), 3389-3402. doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389An, H. (2004). CONSTANS acts in the phloem to regulate a systemic signal that induces photoperiodic flowering of Arabidopsis. Development, 131(15), 3615-3626. doi:10.1242/dev.01231Artimo, P., Jonnalagedda, M., Arnold, K., Baratin, D., Csardi, G., de Castro, E., … Stockinger, H. (2012). ExPASy: SIB bioinformatics resource portal. Nucleic Acids Research, 40(W1), W597-W603. doi:10.1093/nar/gks400Atherton, J. G., & Harris, G. P. (1986). Flowering. The Tomato Crop, 167-200. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3137-4_4Bailey, T. L., Boden, M., Buske, F. A., Frith, M., Grant, C. E., Clementi, L., … Noble, W. S. (2009). MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Research, 37(Web Server), W202-W208. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp335Ben-Naim, O., Eshed, R., Parnis, A., Teper-Bamnolker, P., Shalit, A., Coupland, G., … Lifschitz, E. (2006). The CCAAT binding factor can mediate interactions between CONSTANS-like proteins and DNA. The Plant Journal, 46(3), 462-476. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02706.xBEUVE, N., RISPAIL, N., LAINE, P., CLIQUET, J.-B., OURRY, A., & LE DEUNFF, E. (2004). Putative role of gamma -aminobutyric acid (GABA) as a long-distance signal in up-regulation of nitrate uptake in Brassica napus L. Plant, Cell and Environment, 27(8), 1035-1046. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01208.xBlumwald, E. (2000). Sodium transport and salt tolerance in plants. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 12(4), 431-434. doi:10.1016/s0955-0674(00)00112-5Bombarely, A., Menda, N., Tecle, I. Y., Buels, R. M., Strickler, S., Fischer-York, T., … Mueller, L. A. (2010). The Sol Genomics Network (solgenomics.net): growing tomatoes using Perl. Nucleic Acids Research, 39(Database), D1149-D1155. doi:10.1093/nar/gkq866Bressan, R., Bohnert, H., & Zhu, J.-K. (2009). Abiotic Stress Tolerance: From Gene Discovery in Model Organisms to Crop Improvement. Molecular Plant, 2(1), 1-2. doi:10.1093/mp/ssn097Calvert, A. (1959). Effect of the Early Environment on the Development of Flowering in Tomato II. Light and Temperature Interactions. Journal of Horticultural Science, 34(3), 154-162. doi:10.1080/00221589.1959.11513954Carmel-Goren, L., Liu, Y. S., Lifschitz, E., & Zamir, D. (2003). TheSELF-PRUNINGgene family in tomato. Plant Molecular Biology, 52(6), 1215-1222. doi:10.1023/b:plan.0000004333.96451.11Chaves, M. M., Flexas, J., & Pinheiro, C. (2008). Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Annals of Botany, 103(4), 551-560. doi:10.1093/aob/mcn125Claussen, W. (2005). Proline as a measure of stress in tomato plants. Plant Science, 168(1), 241-248. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.07.039Clough, S. J., & Bent, A. F. (1998). Floral dip: a simplified method forAgrobacterium-mediated transformation ofArabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal, 16(6), 735-743. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.xCuartero, J., & Fernández-Muñoz, R. (1998). Tomato and salinity. Scientia Horticulturae, 78(1-4), 83-125. doi:10.1016/s0304-4238(98)00191-5Czechowski, T., Stitt, M., Altmann, T., Udvardi, M. K., & Scheible, W.-R. (2005). Genome-Wide Identification and Testing of Superior Reference Genes for Transcript Normalization in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 139(1), 5-17. doi:10.1104/pp.105.063743Diaz, I., Vicente-Carbajosa, J., Abraham, Z., Martinez, M., Isabel-La Moneda, I., & Carbonero, P. (2002). The GAMYB protein from barley interacts with the DOF transcription factor BPBF and activates endosperm-specific genes during seed development. The Plant Journal, 29(4), 453-464. doi:10.1046/j.0960-7412.2001.01230.xDieleman, J. A., & Heuvelink, E. (1992). Factors affecting the number of leaves preceding the first inflorescence in the tomato. Journal of Horticultural Science, 67(1), 1-10. doi:10.1080/00221589.1992.11516214Farrant, J. M., & Moore, J. P. (2011). Programming desiccation-tolerance: from plants to seeds to resurrection plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 14(3), 340-345. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2011.03.018Fiehn, O., Kopka, J., Trethewey, R. N., & Willmitzer, L. (2000). Identification of Uncommon Plant Metabolites Based on Calculation of Elemental Compositions Using Gas Chromatography and Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry, 72(15), 3573-3580. doi:10.1021/ac991142iFornara, F., Panigrahi, K. C. S., Gissot, L., Sauerbrunn, N., Rühl, M., Jarillo, J. A., & Coupland, G. (2009). Arabidopsis DOF Transcription Factors Act Redundantly to Reduce CONSTANS Expression and Are Essential for a Photoperiodic Flowering Response. Developmental Cell, 17(1), 75-86. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2009.06.015Gaquerel, E., Heiling, S., Schoettner, M., Zurek, G., & Baldwin, I. T. (2010). Development and Validation of a Liquid Chromatography−Electrospray Ionization−Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Method for Induced Changes inNicotiana attenuataLeaves during Simulated Herbivory. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 58(17), 9418-9427. doi:10.1021/jf1017737Gardiner, J., Sherr, I., & Scarpella, E. (2010). Expression of DOF genes identifies early stages of vascular development in Arabidopsis leaves. The International Journal of Developmental Biology, 54(8-9), 1389-1396. doi:10.1387/ijdb.093006jgGong, P., Zhang, J., Li, H., Yang, C., Zhang, C., Zhang, X., … Ye, Z. (2010). Transcriptional profiles of drought-responsive genes in modulating transcription signal transduction, and biochemical pathways in tomato. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61(13), 3563-3575. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq167Goodstein, D. M., Shu, S., Howson, R., Neupane, R., Hayes, R. D., Fazo, J., … Rokhsar, D. S. (2011). Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Research, 40(D1), D1178-D1186. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr944Gualberti, G., Papi, M., Bellucci, L., Ricci, I., Bouchez, D., Camilleri, C., … Vittorioso, P. (2002). Mutations in the Dof Zinc Finger Genes DAG2 and DAG1 Influence with Opposite Effects the Germination of Arabidopsis Seeds. The Plant Cell, 14(6), 1253-1263. doi:10.1105/tpc.010491Guindon, S., & Gascuel, O. (2003). A Simple, Fast, and Accurate Algorithm to Estimate Large Phylogenies by Maximum Likelihood. Systematic Biology, 52(5), 696-704. doi:10.1080/10635150390235520Gullberg, J., Jonsson, P., Nordström, A., Sjöström, M., & Moritz, T. (2004). Design of experiments: an efficient strategy to identify factors influencing extraction and derivatization of Arabidopsis thaliana samples in metabolomic studies with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Analytical Biochemistry, 331(2), 283-295. doi:10.1016/j.ab.2004.04.037Guo, Y., Qin, G., Gu, H., & Qu, L.-J. (2009). Dof5.6/HCA2, a Dof Transcription Factor Gene, Regulates Interfascicular Cambium Formation and Vascular Tissue Development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 21(11), 3518-3534. doi:10.1105/tpc.108.064139Haupt-Herting, S., Klug, K., & Fock, H. P. (2001). A New Approach to Measure Gross CO2 Fluxes in Leaves. Gross CO2 Assimilation, Photorespiration, and Mitochondrial Respiration in the Light in Tomato under Drought Stress. Plant Physiology, 126(1), 388-396. doi:10.1104/pp.126.1.388Hernando-Amado, S., González-Calle, V., Carbonero, P., & Barrero-Sicilia, C. (2012). The family of DOF transcription factors in Brachypodium distachyon: phylogenetic comparison with rice and barley DOFs and expression profiling. BMC Plant Biology, 12(1), 202. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-12-202Hoekstra, F. A., Golovina, E. A., & Buitink, J. (2001). Mechanisms of plant desiccation tolerance. Trends in Plant Science, 6(9), 431-438. doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(01)02052-0Hoffman, N. E., Ko, K., Milkowski, D., & Pichersky, E. (1991). Isolation and characterization of tomato cDNA and genomic clones encoding the ubiquitin gene ubi3. Plant Molecular Biology, 17(6), 1189-1201. doi:10.1007/bf00028735Huang, Z., Zhang, Z., Zhang, X., Zhang, H., Huang, D., & Huang, R. (2004). Tomato TERF1 modulates ethylene response and enhances osmotic stress tolerance by activating expression of downstream genes. FEBS Letters, 573(1-3), 110-116. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2004.07.064HUSSEY, G. (1963). Growth and Development in the Young Tomato: I. THE EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE AND LIGHT INTENSITY ON GROWTH OF THE SHOOT APEX AND LEAF PRIMORDIA. Journal of Experimental Botany, 14(2), 316-325. doi:10.1093/jxb/14.2.316Imaizumi, T. (2005). FKF1 F-Box Protein Mediates Cyclic Degradation of a Repressor of CONSTANS in Arabidopsis. Science, 309(5732), 293-297. doi:10.1126/science.1110586IWAMOTO, M., HIGO, K., & TAKANO, M. (2009). Circadian clock- and phytochrome-regulated Dof-like gene,Rdd1, is associated with grain size in rice. Plant, Cell & Environment, 32(5), 592-603. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01954.xJang, S., Marchal, V., Panigrahi, K. C. S., Wenkel, S., Soppe, W., Deng, X.-W., … Coupland, G. (2008). Arabidopsis COP1 shapes the temporal pattern of CO accumulation conferring a photoperiodic flowering response. The EMBO Journal, 27(8), 1277-1288. doi:10.1038/emboj.2008.68Jones, M. L. (2013). Mineral nutrient remobilization during corolla senescence in ethylene-sensitive and -insensitive flowers. AoB Plants, 5(0), plt023-plt023. doi:10.1093/aobpla/plt023Karimi, M., Depicker, A., & Hilson, P. (2007). Recombinational Cloning with Plant Gateway Vectors. Plant Physiology, 145(4), 1144-1154. doi:10.1104/pp.107.106989Kerepesi, I., & Galiba, G. (2000). Osmotic and Salt Stress-Induced Alteration in Soluble Carbohydrate Content in Wheat Seedlings. Crop Science, 40(2), 482. doi:10.2135/cropsci2000.402482xKinet, J. M. (1977). Effect of light conditions on the development of the inflorescence in tomato. Scientia Horticulturae, 6(1), 15-26. doi:10.1016/0304-4238(77)90074-7Kirby, J., & Kavanagh, T. A. (2002). NAN fusions: a synthetic sialidase reporter gene as a sensitive and versatile partner for GUS. The Plant Journal, 32(3), 391-400. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01422.xKloosterman, B., Abelenda, J. A., Gomez, M. del M. C., Oortwijn, M., de Boer, J. M., Kowitwanich, K., … Bachem, C. W. B. (2013). Naturally occurring allele diversity allows potato cultivation in northern latitudes. Nature, 495(7440), 246-250. doi:10.1038/nature11912Konishi, M., & Yanagisawa, S. (2007). Sequential activation of two Dof transcription factor gene promoters during vascular development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 45(8), 623-629. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2007.05.001Krohn, N. M., Yanagisawa, S., & Grasser, K. D. (2002). Specificity of the Stimulatory Interaction between Chromosomal HMGB Proteins and the Transcription Factor Dof2 and Its Negative Regulation by Protein Kinase CK2-mediated Phosphorylation. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277(36), 32438-32444. doi:10.1074/jbc.m203814200Kurai, T., Wakayama, M., Abiko, T., Yanagisawa, S., Aoki, N., & Ohsugi, R. (2011). Introduction of the ZmDof1 gene into rice enhances carbon and nitrogen assimilation under low-nitrogen conditions. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 9(8), 826-837. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00592.xKushwaha, H., Gupta, S., Singh, V. K., Rastogi, S., & Yadav, D. (2010). Genome wide identification of Dof transcription factor gene family in sorghum and its comparative phylogenetic analysis with rice and Arabidopsis. Molecular Biology Reports, 38(8), 5037-5053. doi:10.1007/s11033-010-0650-9Lakhssassi, N., Doblas, V. G., Rosado, A., del Valle, A. E., Posé, D., Jimenez, A. J., … Botella, M. A. (2012). The Arabidopsis TETRATRICOPEPTIDE THIOREDOXIN-LIKE Gene Family Is Required for Osmotic Stress Tolerance and Male Sporogenesis. Plant Physiology, 158(3), 1252-1266. doi:10.1104/pp.111.188920Lee, H. E., Shin, D., Park, S. R., Han, S.-E., Jeong, M.-J., Kwon, T.-R., … Byun, M.-O. (2007). Ethylene responsive element binding protein 1 (StEREBP1) from Solanum tuberosum increases tolerance to abiotic stress in transgenic potato plants. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 353(4), 863-868. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.12.095Lijavetzky, D., Carbonero, P., & Vicente-Carbajosa, J. (2003). BMC Evolutionary Biology, 3(1), 17. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-3-17Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001). Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods, 25(4), 402-408. doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262Mackay, J. P., & Crossley, M. (1998). Zinc fingers are sticking together. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 23(1), 1-4. doi:10.1016/s0968-0004(97)01168-7Mena, M., Vicente-Carbajosa, J., Schmidt, R. J., & Carbonero, P. (1998). An endosperm-specific DOF protein from barley, highly conserved in wheat, binds to and activates transcription from the prolamin-box of a native B-hordein promoter in barley endosperm. The Plant Journal, 16(1), 53-62. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00275.xMizoguchi, T., Wright, L., Fujiwara, S., Cremer, F., Lee, K., Onouchi, H., … Coupland, G. (2005). Distinct Roles of GIGANTEA in Promoting Flowering and Regulating Circadian Rhythms in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 17(8), 2255-2270. doi:10.1105/tpc.105.033464Moreno-Risueno, M. Á., Martínez, M., Vicente-Carbajosa, J., & Carbonero, P. (2006). The family of DOF transcription factors: from green unicellular algae to vascular plants. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 277(4), 379-390. doi:10.1007/s00438-006-0186-9Moreno-Risueno, M. Á., Díaz, I., Carrillo, L., Fuentes, R., & Carbonero, P. (2007). The HvDOF19 transcription factor mediates the abscisic acid-dependent repression of hydrolase genes in germinating barley aleurone. The Plant Journal, 51(3), 352-365. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03146.xMurashige, T., & Skoog, F. (1962). A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15(3), 473-497. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.xNakagawa, T., Kurose, T., Hino, T., Tanaka, K., Kawamukai, M., Niwa, Y., … Kimura, T. (2007). Development of series of gateway binary vectors, pGWBs, for realizing efficient construction of fusion genes for plant transformation. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 104(1), 34-41. doi:10.1263/jbb.104.34Oñate-Sánchez, L., & Vicente-Carbajosa, J. (2008). DNA-free RNA isolation protocols for Arabidopsis thaliana, including seeds and siliques. BMC Research Notes, 1(1), 93. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-1-93ORELLANA, S., YAÑEZ, M., ESPINOZA, A., VERDUGO, I., GONZÁLEZ, E., RUIZ-LARA, S., & CASARETTO, J. A. (2010). The transcription factor SlAREB1 confers drought, salt stress tolerance and regulates biotic and abiotic stress-related genes in tomato. Plant, Cell & Environment, 33(12), 2191-2208. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02220.xPapi, M., Sabatini, S., Altamura, M. M., Hennig, L., Schäfer, E., Costantino, P., & Vittorioso, P. (2002). Inactivation of the Phloem-Specific Dof Zinc Finger GeneDAG1 Affects Response to Light and Integrity of the Testa of Arabidopsis Seeds. Plant Physiology, 128(2), 411-417. doi:10.1104/pp.010488Pinheiro, C., & Chaves, M. M. (2010). Photosynthesis and drought: can we make metabolic connections from available data? Journal of Experimental Botany, 62(3), 869-882. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq340Pnueli, L. (2001). Tomato SP-Interacting Proteins Define a Conserved Signaling System That Regulates Shoot Architecture and Flowering. THE PLANT CELL ONLINE, 13(12), 2687-2702. doi:10.1105/tpc.13.12.2687Rajasekaran, L. R., Aspinall, D., & Paleg, L. G. (2000). Physiological mechanism of tolerance of Lycopersicon spp. exposed to salt stress. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 80(1), 151-159. doi:10.4141/p99-003Rizhsky, L., Liang, H., Shuman, J., Shulaev, V., Davletova, S., & Mittler, R. (2004). When Defense Pathways Collide. The Response of Arabidopsis to a Combination of Drought and Heat Stress. Plant Physiology, 134(4), 1683-1696. doi:10.1104/pp.103.033431Rueda-López, M., Crespillo, R., Cánovas, F. M., & Ávila, C. (2008). Differential regulation of two glutamine synthetase genes by a single Dof transcription factor. The Plant Journal, 56(1), 73-85. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03573.xSawa, M., Nusinow, D. A., Kay, S. A., & Imaizumi, T. (2007). FKF1 and GIGANTEA Complex Formation Is Required for Day-Length Measurement in Arabidopsis. Science, 318(5848), 261-265. doi:10.1126/science.1146994Seki, M., Umezawa, T., Urano, K., & Shinozaki, K. (2007). Regulatory metabolic networks in drought stress responses. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 10(3), 296-302. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.014Shannon, M. C., & Grieve, C. M. (1998). Tolerance of vegetable crops to salinity. Scientia Horticulturae, 78(1-4), 5-38. doi:10.1016/s0304-4238(98)00189-7Shaw, L. M., McIntyre, C. L., Gresshoff, P. M., & Xue, G.-P. (2009). Members of the Dof transcription factor family in Triticum aestivum are associated with light-mediated gene regulation. Functional & Integrative Genomics, 9(4), 485-498. doi:10.1007/s10142-009-0130-2Shelp, B. J., Bown, A. W., & Faure, D. (2006). Extracellular γ-Aminobutyrate Mediates Communication between Plants and Other Organisms. Plant Physiology, 142(4), 1350-1352. doi:10.1104/pp.106.088955Shelp, B. (1999). Metabolism and functions of gamma-aminobutyric acid. Trends in Plant Science, 4(11), 446-452. doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(99)01486-7Skirycz, A., Jozefczuk, S., Stobiecki, M., Muth, D., Zanor, M. I., Witt, I., & Mueller-Roeber, B. (2007). Transcription factor AtDOF4;2 affects phenylpropanoid metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytologist, 175(3), 425-438. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02129.xSkirycz, A., Reichelt, M., Burow, M., Birkemeyer, C., Rolcik, J., Kopka, J., … Witt, I. (2006). DOF transcription factor AtDof1.1 (OBP2) is part of a regulatory network controlling glucosinolate biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 47(1), 10-24. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02767.xSuárez-López, P., Wheatley, K., Robson, F., Onouchi, H., Valverde, F., & Coupland, G. (2001). CONSTANS mediates between the circadian clock and the control of flowering in Arabidopsis. Nature, 410(6832), 1116-1120. doi:10.1038/35074138Sun, S.-J., Guo, S.-Q., Yang, X., Bao, Y.-M., Tang, H.-J., Sun, H., … Zhang, H.-S. (2010). Functional analysis of a novel Cys2/His2-type zinc finger protein involved in salt tolerance in rice. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61(10), 2807-2818. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq120Takada, S., & Goto, K. (2003). TERMINAL FLOWER2, an Arabidopsis Homolog of HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN1, Counteracts the Activation of FLOWERING LOCUS T by CONSTANS in the Vascular Tissues of Leaves to Regulate Flowering Time. The Plant Cell, 15(12), 2856-2865. doi:10.1105/tpc.016345Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2011). MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28(10), 2731-2739. doi:10.1093/molbev/msr121Thompson, J. (1997). The CLUSTAL_X windows

Clonal chromosomal mosaicism and loss of chromosome Y in elderly men increase vulnerability for SARS-CoV-2

The pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19) had an estimated overall case fatality ratio of 1.38% (pre-vaccination), being 53% higher in males and increasing exponentially with age. Among 9578 individuals diagnosed with COVID-19 in the SCOURGE study, we found 133 cases (1.42%) with detectable clonal mosaicism for chromosome alterations (mCA) and 226 males (5.08%) with acquired loss of chromosome Y (LOY). Individuals with clonal mosaic events (mCA and/or LOY) showed a 54% increase in the risk of COVID-19 lethality. LOY is associated with transcriptomic biomarkers of immune dysfunction, pro-coagulation activity and cardiovascular risk. Interferon-induced genes involved in the initial immune response to SARS-CoV-2 are also down-regulated in LOY. Thus, mCA and LOY underlie at least part of the sex-biased severity and mortality of COVID-19 in aging patients. Given its potential therapeutic and prognostic relevance, evaluation of clonal mosaicism should be implemented as biomarker of COVID-19 severity in elderly people. Among 9578 individuals diagnosed with COVID-19 in the SCOURGE study, individuals with clonal mosaic events (clonal mosaicism for chromosome alterations and/or loss of chromosome Y) showed an increased risk of COVID-19 lethality

Cycling Dof Factors: Molecular and functional characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana AtCDF3 and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) SlCDF3 in response to abiotic stress

El tomate (Solanum lycopersicum L.) es considerado uno de los cultivos hortícolas de mayor importancia económica en el territorio Español. Sin embargo, su producción está seriamente afectada por condiciones ambientales adversas como, salinidad, sequía y temperaturas extremas. Para resolver los problemas que se presentan en condiciones de estrés, se han empleado una serie de técnicas culturales que disminuyen sus efectos negativos, siendo de gran interés el desarrollo de variedades tolerantes. En este sentido la obtención y análisis de plantas transgénicas, ha supuesto un avance tecnológico, que ha facilitado el estudio y la evaluación de genes seleccionados en relación con la tolerancia al estrés. Estudios recientes han mostrado que el uso de genes reguladores como factores de transcripción (FTs) es una gran herramienta para obtener nuevas variedades de tomate con mayor tolerancia a estreses abióticos. Las proteínas DOF (DNA binding with One Finger) son una familia de FTs específica de plantas (Yangisawa, 2002), que están involucrados en procesos fisiológicos exclusivos de plantas como: asimilación del nitrógeno y fijación del carbono fotosintético, germinación de semilla, metabolismo secundario y respuesta al fotoperiodo pero su preciso rol en la tolerancia a estrés abiótico se desconoce en gran parte. El trabajo descrito en esta tesis tiene como objetivo estudiar genes reguladores tipo DOF para incrementar la tolerancia a estrés abiotico tanto en especies modelo como en tomate. En el primer capítulo de esta tesis se muestra la caracterización funcional del gen CDF3 de Arabidopsis, así como su papel en la respuesta a estrés abiótico y otros procesos del desarrollo. La expresión del gen AtCDF3 es altamente inducido por sequía, temperaturas extremas, salinidad y tratamientos con ácido abscísico (ABA). La línea de inserción T-DNA cdf3-1 es más sensible al estrés por sequía y bajas temperaturas, mientras que líneas transgénicas de Arabidopsis 35S::AtCDF3 aumentan la tolerancia al estrés por sequía, osmótico y bajas temperaturas en comparación con plantas wild-type (WT). Además, estas plantas presentan un incremento en la tasa fotosintética y apertura estomática. El gen AtCDF3 se localiza en el núcleo y que muestran una unión específica al ADN con diferente afinidad a secuencias diana y presentan diversas capacidades de activación transcripcional en ensayos de protoplastos de Arabidopsis. El dominio C-terminal de AtCDF3 es esencial para esta localización y su capacidad activación, la delección de este dominio reduce la tolerancia a sequía en plantas transgénicas 35S::AtCDF3. Análisis por microarray revelan que el AtCDF3 regula un set de genes involucrados en el metabolismo del carbono y nitrógeno. Nuestros resultados demuestran que el gen AtCDF3 juega un doble papel en la regulación de la respuesta a estrés por sequía y bajas temperaturas y en el control del tiempo de floración. En el segundo capítulo de este trabajo se lleva a cabo la identificación de 34 genes Dof en tomate que se pueden clasificar en base a homología de secuencia en cuatro grupos A-D, similares a los descritos en Arabidopsis. Dentro del grupo D se han identificado cinco genes DOF que presentan características similares a los Cycling Dof Factors (CDFs) de Arabidopsis. Estos genes son considerados ortólogos de Arabidopsis CDF1-5, y han sido nombrados como Solanum lycopersicum CDFs o SlCDFs. Los SlCDF1-5 son proteínas nucleares que muestran una unión específica al ADN con diferente afinidad a secuencias diana y presentan diversas capacidades de activación transcripcional in vivo. Análisis de expresión de los genes SlCDF1-5 muestran diferentes patrones de expresión durante el día y son inducidos de forma diferente en respuesta a estrés osmótico, salino, y de altas y bajas temperaturas. Plantas de Arabidopsis que sobre-expresan SlCDF1 y SlCDF3 muestran un incremento de la tolerancia a la sequía y salinidad. Además, de la expresión de varios genes de respuesta estrés como AtCOR15, AtRD29A y AtERD10, son expresados de forma diferente en estas líneas. La sobre-expresión de SlCDF3 en Arabidopsis promueve un retardo en el tiempo de floración a través de la modulación de la expresión de genes que controlan la floración como CONSTANS (CO) y FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT). En general, nuestros datos demuestran que los SlCDFs están asociados a funciones aun no descritas, relacionadas con la tolerancia a estrés abiótico y el control del tiempo de floración a través de la regulación de genes específicos y a un aumento de metabolitos particulares. ABSTRACT Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is one of the horticultural crops of major economic importance in the Spanish territory. However, its production is being affected by adverse environmental conditions such as salinity, drought and extreme temperatures. To resolve the problems triggered by stress conditions, a number of agricultural techniques that reduce the negative effects of stress are being frequently applied. However, the development of stress tolerant varieties is of a great interest. In this direction, the technological progress in obtaining and analysis of transgenic plants facilitated the study and evaluation of selected genes in relation to stress tolerance. Recent studies have shown that a use of regulatory genes such as transcription factors (TFs) is a great tool to obtain new tomato varieties with greater tolerance to abiotic stresses. The DOF (DNA binding with One Finger) proteins form a family of plant-specific TFs (Yangisawa, 2002) that are involved in the regulation of particular plant processes such as nitrogen assimilation, photosynthetic carbon fixation, seed germination, secondary metabolism and flowering time bur their precise roles in abiotic stress tolerance are largely unknown. The work described in this thesis aims at the study of the DOF type regulatory genes to increase tolerance to abiotic stress in both model species and the tomato. In the first chapter of this thesis, we present molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis CDF3 gene as well as its role in the response to abiotic stress and in other developmental processes. AtCDF3 is highly induced by drought, extreme temperatures, salt and abscisic acid (ABA) treatments. The cdf3-1 T-DNA insertion mutant was more sensitive to drought and low temperature stresses, whereas the AtCDF3 overexpression enhanced the tolerance of transgenic plants to drought, cold and osmotic stress comparing to the wild-type (WT) plants. In addition, these plants exhibit increased photosynthesis rates and stomatal aperture. AtCDF3 is localized in the nuclear region, displays specific binding to the canonical DNA target sequences and has a transcriptional activation activity in Arabidopsis protoplast assays. In addition, the C-terminal domain of AtCDF3 is essential for its localization and activation capabilities and the deletion of this domain significantly reduces the tolerance to drought in transgenic 35S::AtCDF3 overexpressing plants. Microarray analysis revealed that AtCDF3 regulated a set of genes involved in nitrogen and carbon metabolism. Our results demonstrate that AtCDF3 plays dual roles in regulating plant responses to drought and low temperature stress and in control of flowering time in vegetative tissues. In the second chapter this work, we carried out to identification of 34 tomato DOF genes that were classified by sequence similarity into four groups A-D, similar to the situation in Arabidopsis. In the D group we have identified five DOF genes that show similar characteristics to the Cycling Dof Factors (CDFs) of Arabidopsis. These genes were considered orthologous to the Arabidopsis CDF1 - 5 and were named Solanum lycopersicum CDFs or SlCDFs. SlCDF1-5 are nuclear proteins that display specific binding to canonical DNA target sequences and have transcriptional activation capacities in vivo. Expression analysis of SlCDF1-5 genes showed distinct diurnal expression patterns and were differentially induced in response to osmotic, salt and low and high temperature stresses. Arabidopsis plants overexpressing SlCDF1 and SlCDF3 showed increased drought and salt tolerance. In addition, various stress-responsive genes, such as AtCOR15, AtRD29A and AtERD10, were expressed differently in these lines. The overexpression of SlCDF3 in Arabidopsis also results in the late flowering phenotype through the modulation of the expression of flowering control genes such CONSTANS (CO) and FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT). Overall, our data connet SlCDFs to undescribed functions related to abiotic stress tolerance and flowering time through the regulation of specific target genes and an increase in particular metabolites

Revolution: Museo de las estrellas un paseo por la fama : Hollywood

Convocatoria proyectos de innovación de Extremadura 2020/2021Se describe un proyecto llevado a cabo entre 13 centros educativos extremeños que consistió en desarrollar cinco unidades de trabajo gamificadas, cinco historias detectivescas con misterios por resolver, donde se ponían a prueba las habilidades de lógica, la capacidad de observación, de concentración y de atención de los alumnos. Los objetivos principales de la propuesta fueron: promover la puesta en práctica de proyectos intercentros; impulsar pedagogías activas; desarrollar la competencia digital a través del uso de las pedagogías emergentes lo que ha permitido llevar a cabo una enseñanza presencial, híbrida y virtual y atender a la diversidadExtremaduraES

Switching TNF antagonists in patients with chronic arthritis: An observational study of 488 patients over a four-year period

The objective of this work is to analyze the survival of infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab in patients who have switched among tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists for the treatment of chronic arthritis. BIOBADASER is a national registry of patients with different forms of chronic arthritis who are treated with biologics. Using this registry, we have analyzed patient switching of TNF antagonists. The cumulative discontinuation rate was calculated using the actuarial method. The log-rank test was used to compare survival curves, and Cox regression models were used to assess independent factors associated with discontinuing medication. Between February 2000 and September 2004, 4,706 patients were registered in BIOBADASER, of whom 68% had rheumatoid arthritis, 11% ankylosing spondylitis, 10% psoriatic arthritis, and 11% other forms of chronic arthritis. One- and two-year drug survival rates of the TNF antagonist were 0.83 and 0.75, respectively. There were 488 patients treated with more than one TNF antagonist. In this situation, survival of the second TNF antagonist decreased to 0.68 and 0.60 at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Survival was better in patients replacing the first TNF antagonist because of adverse events (hazard ratio (HR) for discontinuation 0.55 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34-0.84)), and worse in patients older than 60 years (HR 1.10 (95% CI 0.97-2.49)) or who were treated with infliximab (HR 3.22 (95% CI 2.13-4.87)). In summary, in patients who require continuous therapy and have failed to respond to a TNF antagonist, replacement with a different TNF antagonist may be of use under certain situations. This issue will deserve continuous reassessment with the arrival of new medications. © 2006 Gomez-Reino and Loreto Carmona; licensee BioMed Central Ltd