Organizational Paradoxes

As our world becomes more fast-paced, complex, ambiguous, uncertain and interconnected, multiple competing tensions and demands jockey for our attention in organizational life. How managers respond to these tensions is fundamental to an organization's fate. Psychologists have long advocated the cognitive nature of paradoxes and that they are cognitively and socially constructed. I advocate that Kelly's theory of personal constructs holds great promise in getting managers to think more deeply about how they think they construe the seemingly opposing tensions confronting their everyday strategic work. In contributing to the paradox literature, I argue that Kelly's bi-polarity of construing extends beyond (complex, not simple) “either/or” thinking to a much higher level “and/both” thinking where opposites cease to be opposites and that the poles of a construct are in fact complementarities. Using a pilot study with a senior executive, I demonstrate how a modified repertory grid technique captures paradoxical thinking.Department of Management and Marketin

How useful are the strategic tools we teach in Business Schools?

Strategic tools are indispensible for business and competitive analysis. Yet we know very little about managers’ internal logic as they put these tools into practical use. We situate our study in a business school context using action learning prior to the manifestation of practice to complement our understanding of practice. Using Personal Construct Theory and Repertory Grids, our mid-range theorizing showed that, contrary to current thinking about strategic tools, managers think in dualities (often paradoxically) and have a preference for multiple-tools-in-use, tools that provide different perspectives, peripheral vision, connected thinking, simultaneously help differentiate and integrate complex issues, and guide the thinking process. These findings are important for designing better tools and the nurturing of critical managerial competencies needed for a complicated world. Our study's focus also has wider implications for scholars as we see our own material evaluated by those who will put these lessons into practice