386 research outputs found

    Automatic Differentiation for Inverse Problems in X-ray Imaging and Microscopy

    Get PDF
    Computational techniques allow breaking the limits of traditional imaging methods, such as time restrictions, resolution, and optics flaws. While simple computational methods can be enough for highly controlled microscope setups or just for previews, an increased level of complexity is instead required for advanced setups, acquisition modalities or where uncertainty is high; the need for complex computational methods clashes with rapid design and execution. In all these cases, Automatic Differentiation, one of the subtopics of Artificial Intelligence, may offer a functional solution, but only if a GPU implementation is available. In this paper, we show how a framework built to solve just one optimisation problem can be employed for many different X-ray imaging inverse problems

    A label free disposable device for rapid isolation of rare tumor cells from blood by ultrasounds

    Get PDF
    The use of blood samples as liquid biopsy is a label-free method for cancer diagnosis that offers benefits over traditional invasive biopsy techniques. Cell sorting by acoustic waves offers a means to separate rare cells from blood samples based on their physical properties in a label-free, contactless and biocompatible manner. Herein, we describe a flow-through separation approach that provides an efficient separation of tumor cells (TCs) from white blood cells (WBCs) in a microfluidic device, "THINUS-Chip" (Thin-Ultrasonic-Separator-Chip), actuated by ultrasounds. We introduce for the first time the concept of plate acoustic waves (PAW) applied to acoustophoresis as a new strategy. It lies in the geometrical chip design: different to other microseparators based on either bulk acoustic waves (BAW) or surface waves (SAW, SSAW and tSAW), it allows the use of polymeric materials without restrictions in the frequency of work. We demonstrate its ability to perform high-throughput isolation of TCs from WBCs, allowing a recovery rate of 84%±8% of TCs with a purity higher than 80% and combined viability of 85% at a flow rate of 80 µL/min (4.8 mL/h). The THINUS-Chip performs cell fractionation with low-cost manufacturing processes, opening the door to possible easy printing fabrication

    Treatment patterns for metastatic colorectal cancer in Spain

    Get PDF
    Abstract Purpose The primary aim of this retrospective study was to describe the treatment patterns according to the type of treatment received by patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in Spain. Methods This was a retrospective, observational, multicenter study performed by 33 sites throughout Spain that included consecutive patients aged 18 years or older who had received or were receiving treatment for mCRC. Results At the time of inclusion, of the 873 evaluable patients, 507 (58%) had received two lines, 235 (27%) had received three lines, 106 (12%) had received four lines, and the remaining patients had received up to ten lines. The most frequent chemotherapy schemes were the FOLFOX or CAPOX regimens (66%) for frst-line treatment, FOLFOX, CAPOX or FOLFIRI (70%) for second-line treatment, and FOLFOX, FOLFIRI or other fuoropyrimidine-based regimens for third- and fourth-line (over 60%) treatment. Sixty percent of patients received targeted therapy as part of their frst-line treatment, and this proportion increased up to approximately 70% of patients as part of the second-line of treatment. A relevant proportion of patients were treated with unknown KRAS, and especially the BRAF, mutation statuses. Conclusions This study reveals inconsistencies regarding adherence to the recommendations of the ESMO guidelines for the management of mCRC in Spain. Improved adherence to the standard practice described in such guidelines for the determination of RAS and BRAF mutation statuses and the use of targeted therapies in frst-line treatment should be considered to guarantee that patients can beneft from the best therapeutic approaches available. Keywords Colorectal cancer · Metastatic · Treatment patterns · KRAS/BRAF mutation status · Clinical practice guidelin

    Development and tests of a new prototype detector for the XAFS beamline at Elettra Synchrotron in Trieste

    Get PDF
    The XAFS beamline at Elettra Synchrotron in Trieste combines X-ray absorption spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction to provide chemically specific structural information of materials. It operates in the energy range 2.4-27 keV by using a silicon double reflection Bragg monochromator. The fluorescence measurement is performed in place of the absorption spectroscopy when the sample transparency is too low for transmission measurements or the element to study is too diluted in the sample. We report on the development and on the preliminary tests of a new prototype detector based on Silicon Drift Detectors technology and the SIRIO ultra low noise front-end ASIC. The new system will be able to reduce drastically the time needed to perform fluorescence measurements, while keeping a short dead time and maintaining an adequate energy resolution to perform spectroscopy. The custom-made silicon sensor and the electronics are designed specifically for the beamline requirements.Comment: Proceeding of the 6YRM 12th-14th Oct 2015 - L'Aquila (Italy). Accepted for publication on Journal of Physics: Conference Serie

    SEOM clinical guidelines for pancreatic and biliary tract cancer (2020)

    Get PDF
    Pancreatic cancer (PC) and biliary tract cancer (BTC) are both aggressive and highly fatal malignancies. Nowadays we have a profound knowledge about the molecular landscape of these neoplasms and this has allowed new therapeutic options. Surgery is the only potentially curative therapy in both cancers, but disease recurrence is frequent. In PC, adjuvant treatment with mFOLFIRINOX has improved overall survival (OS) and in BTC adjuvant treatment with capecitabine seems to improve OS and relapse-free survival. Concomitant radio-chemotherapy could also be considered following R1 surgery in both neoplasms. Neoadjuvant treatment represents the best option for achieving an R0 resection in borderline PC. Upfront systemic chemotherapy is the treatment of choice in unresectable locally advanced PC and BTC; then locoregional therapy could be considered after an initial period of at least 3-4 months of systemic chemotherapy. In metastatic PC, FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel have improved OS compared with gemcitabine alone. In metastatic BTC, cisplatin plus gemcitabine constitute the standard treatment. Progress in the knowledge of molecular biology has enabled the identification of new targets for therapy with encouraging results that could in the future improve the survival and quality of life of patients with PC and BTC

    Clinical nutrition as part of the treatment pathway of pancreatic cancer patients: an expert consensus

    Full text link
    Purpose: Malnutrition is a common problem among pancreatic cancer (PC) patients that negatively impacts on their quality of life (QoL) and clinical outcomes. The main objective of this consensus is to address the role of Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT) into the comprehensive therapeutic management of PC patients. Methods: A Spanish multidisciplinary group of specialists from the areas of Medical Oncology; Radiation Oncology; Endocrinology and Nutrition; and General Surgery agreed to assess the role of MNT as part of the best therapeutic management of PC patients. Results: The panel established different recommendations focused on nutritional screening and nutritional screening tools, MNT strategies according to PC status, and MNT in palliative treatment. Conclusions: There is an unmet need to integrate nutritional therapy as a crucial part of the multimodal care process in PC patients. Health authorities, health care professionals, cancer patients, and their families should be aware of the relevance of nutritional status and MNT on clinical outcomes and QoL of PC patientsOpen Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. Logistics of the meetings and the assistance with the medical writing have been provided by unrestricted Grant from Baxter Laboratorie

    Oncological translational research in the Spanish national health system: the INTRO study

    Full text link
    Under the auspices of the Foundation for Excellence and Quality in Oncology (ECO), the Translational Research in Oncology Medical Services Study (INTRO) was conducted with the aim of describing the current state of, and future expectations for translational cancer research in Spanish medical centres. The first step in the investigation was intended to analyse the current condition of the national Medical Oncology Services network by examining different aspects of the oncology research field. A descriptive and observational multicentre study was performed at a statewide level; information was collected by surveying a cross-section of all those responsible for Medical Oncology Services in Spain. The survey was completed by key informants, who were selected independently by each service, between September 2010 and April 2011. We were able to gather comprehensive data from a total of 27 Spanish hospitals. These data enabled us to describe the allocation of human and material resources devoted to clinical and translational research across the Medical Oncology Services and to describe the organisational and functional components of these services and units. These data included information pertaining to the activities developed, their funding sources, and their functional dependence on other internal or external bodies. Finally, we explored the degree of dissemination and use of some specific techniques used for the genetic diagnosis of cancer, which have recently been introduced in Medical Oncology within the Spanish healthcare system. A wide range of variability exists between different oncology services in Spanish hospitals. Time should be spent reflecting on the need and opportunities for improvement in the development of translational research within the field of oncology.Caballero, C.; Jantus-Lewintre, E.; Carrato, A.; García Foncillas, J.; Gascon, P.; Blasco, A.; Moreno Nogueira, JA.... (2014). Oncological translational research in the Spanish national health system: the INTRO study. Clinical and Translational Oncology. 16(8):686-695. doi:10.1007/s12094-013-1138-6S686695168Díaz-Rubio E. Translational research in clinical oncology: challenges and opportunities. Farm Hosp. 2010;34(Supl.1):1–7.Marincola FM. Translational medicine: a two-way road. J Transl Med. 2003;1(1):1.Ablin RJ, Marincola FM, Natali PG. The “excellence in translational medicine” and “bedside-to-bench” awards 2008–09. J Transl Med. 2010;13(8):95.García-Sáenz JA, Bueno C, SanPedro T, Díaz-Rubio E. La nueva oncología médica: aportación de la biología molecular al diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer. In: Díaz-Rubio E, editor. Tomo IV. Madrid: You and Us; 2006. p. 1–24.ORDEN SCO/709/2002, Boletín Oficial del Estado, 3 de abril de 2003, núm. 80, pp. 12742–12746. http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2002/04/03/pdfs/A12742-12746.pdf . Accessed 30 sept 2013.Soto-Martínez JL, Baselga-Torres J, Carrato-Mena A. La investigación Translacional en Oncología Médica. En Primer Libro blanco de la Oncología Médica en España. Dosier 2006. Madrid: Editorial Dispublic SL; 2007. p. 177–99.Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. Agencia de Calidad del Sistema Nacional de Salud. Estrategia en Cáncer del Sistema Nacional de Salud. 2006. http://www.msc.es/organizacion/ sns/planCalidadSNS/docs/estratCancerSNS.pdf. Accessed 30 sept 2013.Lenfant C. Shattuck lecture–clinical research to clinical practice-lost in translation? N Engl J Med. 2003;349(9):868–74.Laurence J. Translating translational research. Transl Res. 2006;148(1):1–3.Lemieux-Charles L, McGuire WL. What do we know about health care team effectiveness? A review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63(3):263–300.Oandasan I, Baker RG, Barker K, Bosco C, D’Amour D, Jones L, et al. Teamwork in health care: promoting effective teamwork in healthcare in Canada; policy synthesis and recommendations. June 2006. http://www.chsrf.ca/Migrated/PDF/teamwork-synthesis-report_e.pdf . Accessed 30 Sep 2013.Mankoff SP, Brander C, Ferrone S, Marincola FM. Lost in Translation: obstacles to translational medicine. J Transl Med. 2004;2(1):14.Curran T. Lost in translation: the future of cancer research? Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(13):4644.Valladares Y. Memoria y actas del primer congreso de investigación sobre el cáncer en España. Madrid; 1983.Vicente J. Apuntes para una historia de la Oncología en España. Los orígenes. Oncología. 2000;23(7):310–7.Legido-Quigley H, Otero L, la Parra D, Alvarez-Dardet C, Martin-Moreno JM, McKee M. Will austerity cuts dismantle the Spanish healthcare system? BMJ. 2013;13(346):f2363
    corecore