Imatinib and spironolactone suppress hepcidin expression

Disorders of iron metabolism are largely attributed to an excessive or insufficient expression of hepcidin, the master regulator of systemic iron homeostasis. Here, we investigated whether drugs targeting genetic regulators of hepcidin can affect iron homeostasis. We focused our efforts on drugs approved for clinical use to enable repositioning strategies and/or to reveal iron-related side effects of widely prescribed therapeutics. To identify hepcidin-modulating therapeutics, we re-evaluated data generated by a genome-wide RNAi screen for hepcidin regulators. We identified ‘druggable’ screening hits and validated those by applying RNAi of potential drug targets and small-molecule testing in a hepatocytic cell line, in primary murine and human hepatocytes and in mice. We initially identified spironolactone, diclofenac, imatinib and Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) as hepcidin modulating drugs in cellular assays. Among these, imatinib and spironolactone further suppressed liver hepcidin expression in mice. Our results demonstrate that a commonly used anti-hypertensive drug, spironolactone, which is prescribed for the treatment of heart failure, acne and female hirsutism, as well as imatinib, a first-line, lifelong therapeutic option for some frequent cancer types suppress hepcidin expression in cultured cells and in mice. We expect these results to be of relevance for patient management, which needs to be addressed in prospective clinical studies

Die intrazerebrale Gentherapie des Aromatischen-L-Aminosäure-Decarboxylase-Mangels mit Eladocagene exuparvovec : Eine Stellungnahme der Gesellschaft für Neuropädiatrie (GNP), der Arbeitsgemeinschaft pädiatrischer Stoffwechselstörungen (APS), der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin (DGKJ)

Background The autosomal recessive defect of aromatic L‑amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) causes a severe combined deficiency of dopamine, serotonin and catecholamines. The clinical picture is characterized by truncal hypotonia, delayed or absent achievement of motor milestones, and oculogyric crises from infancy onwards. The response to conventional drug treatment is very limited, especially in severe cases. The intracerebral application of eladocagene exuparvovec, an AAV2-based gene therapy, which is expected to be approved in mid-2021, is the first available causal therapeutic approach. Aim In collaboration with the German Society of Neuropediatrics (GNP), the Working Group of Pediatric Metabolic Disorders (APS), the German Society of Neurosurgery (DGNC) and the German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ), the structural requirements and practical aspects in the preparation, implementation and follow-up of the treatment with eladocagene exuparvovec were elaborated. Discussion The present statement compiles the necessary framework conditions for a quality-assured administration of eladocagene exuparvovec. The treatment requires prehospital, inpatient and posthospital care by a multiprofessional team in a specialized and qualified treatment center. Patient follow-up is intended to contribute to knowledge-generating care. Due to lack of data on the therapeutic (long-term) effect as well as on advantages and disadvantages of the different stereotactic approaches, a structured follow-up plan and documentation in an appropriate, industry-independent registry are necessary.Hintergrund Der autosomal-rezessiv vererbte Defekt der aromatischen L‑Aminosäure-Decarboxylase (AADC) führt zu einem ausgeprägten, kombinierten Mangel an Dopamin, Serotonin und Katecholaminen. Das klinische Bild ist charakterisiert durch eine rumpfbetonte, muskuläre Hypotonie, verzögertes oder fehlendes Erreichen der motorischen Meilensteine und okulogyre Krisen ab dem Säuglingsalter. Der Erfolg der konventionellen, medikamentösen Behandlung ist besonders bei schweren Verläufen sehr limitiert. Mit der intrazerebralen Applikation von Eladocagene exuparvovec (Upstaza®), einer AAV2-basierten Gentherapie, deren Zulassung für Mitte 2021 erwartet wird, steht erstmals ein kausaler Therapieansatz zur Verfügung. Ziel In Zusammenarbeit mit der Gesellschaft für Neuropädiatrie (GNP), der Arbeitsgemeinschaft pädiatrischer Stoffwechselstörungen (APS), der Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin (DGKJ) wurden die Strukturvoraussetzungen und die praktischen Aspekte in der Vorbereitung, Durchführung und Nachsorge der Therapie mit Eladocagene exuparvovec erarbeitet. Diskussion Die vorliegende Stellungnahme stellt die notwendigen Rahmenbedingungen für eine qualitätsgesicherte Anwendung von Eladocagene exuparvovec zusammen. Die Behandlung erfordert eine prästationäre, stationäre und poststationäre Betreuung durch ein multiprofessionelles Team in einem spezialisierten und qualifizierten Therapiezentrum. Die Nachsorge der Patienten soll zu einer wissensgenerierenden Versorgung beitragen. Aufgrund von fehlenden Daten zur therapeutischen (Langzeit‑)Wirkung sowie zu Vor- und Nachteilen der verschiedenen stereotaktischen Prozeduren sind ein strukturierter Nachsorgeplan und die Erfassung in einem geeigneten, industrieunabhängigen Register notwendig

Die intrazerebrale Gentherapie des Aromatischen-L-Aminosäure-Decarboxylase-Mangels mit Eladocagene exuparvovec

<jats:title>Zusammenfassung</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Hintergrund</jats:title> <jats:p>Der autosomal-rezessiv vererbte Defekt der aromatischen L‑Aminosäure-Decarboxylase (AADC) führt zu einem ausgeprägten, kombinierten Mangel an Dopamin, Serotonin und Katecholaminen. Das klinische Bild ist charakterisiert durch eine rumpfbetonte, muskuläre Hypotonie, verzögertes oder fehlendes Erreichen der motorischen Meilensteine und okulogyre Krisen ab dem Säuglingsalter. Der Erfolg der konventionellen, medikamentösen Behandlung ist besonders bei schweren Verläufen sehr limitiert. Mit der intrazerebralen Applikation von Eladocagene exuparvovec (Upstaza®), einer AAV2-basierten Gentherapie, deren Zulassung für Mitte 2021 erwartet wird, steht erstmals ein kausaler Therapieansatz zur Verfügung.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Ziel</jats:title> <jats:p>In Zusammenarbeit mit der Gesellschaft für Neuropädiatrie (GNP), der Arbeitsgemeinschaft pädiatrischer Stoffwechselstörungen (APS), der Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin (DGKJ) wurden die Strukturvoraussetzungen und die praktischen Aspekte in der Vorbereitung, Durchführung und Nachsorge der Therapie mit Eladocagene exuparvovec erarbeitet.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Diskussion</jats:title> <jats:p>Die vorliegende Stellungnahme stellt die notwendigen Rahmenbedingungen für eine qualitätsgesicherte Anwendung von Eladocagene exuparvovec zusammen. Die Behandlung erfordert eine prästationäre, stationäre und poststationäre Betreuung durch ein multiprofessionelles Team in einem spezialisierten und qualifizierten Therapiezentrum. Die Nachsorge der Patienten soll zu einer wissensgenerierenden Versorgung beitragen. Aufgrund von fehlenden Daten zur therapeutischen (Langzeit‑)Wirkung sowie zu Vor- und Nachteilen der verschiedenen stereotaktischen Prozeduren sind ein strukturierter Nachsorgeplan und die Erfassung in einem geeigneten, industrieunabhängigen Register notwendig.</jats:p> </jats:sec&gt

New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias

Characterization of the genetic landscape of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related dementias (ADD) provides a unique opportunity for a better understanding of the associated pathophysiological processes. We performed a two-stage genome-wide association study totaling 111,326 clinically diagnosed/‘proxy’ AD cases and 677,663 controls. We found 75 risk loci, of which 42 were new at the time of analysis. Pathway enrichment analyses confirmed the involvement of amyloid/tau pathways and highlighted microglia implication. Gene prioritization in the new loci identified 31 genes that were suggestive of new genetically associated processes, including the tumor necrosis factor alpha pathway through the linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex. We also built a new genetic risk score associated with the risk of future AD/dementia or progression from mild cognitive impairment to AD/dementia. The improvement in prediction led to a 1.6- to 1.9-fold increase in AD risk from the lowest to the highest decile, in addition to effects of age and the APOE ε4 allele

New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias

Characterization of the genetic landscape of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related dementias (ADD) provides a unique opportunity for a better understanding of the associated pathophysiological processes. We performed a two-stage genome-wide association study totaling 111,326 clinically diagnosed/‘proxy’ AD cases and 677,663 controls. We found 75 risk loci, of which 42 were new at the time of analysis. Pathway enrichment analyses confirmed the involvement of amyloid/tau pathways and highlighted microglia implication. Gene prioritization in the new loci identified 31 genes that were suggestive of new genetically associated processes, including the tumor necrosis factor alpha pathway through the linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex. We also built a new genetic risk score associated with the risk of future AD/dementia or progression from mild cognitive impairment to AD/dementia. The improvement in prediction led to a 1.6- to 1.9-fold increase in AD risk from the lowest to the highest decile, in addition to effects of age and the APOE ε4 allele

Risk of COVID-19 after natural infection or vaccinationResearch in context

Summary: Background: While vaccines have established utility against COVID-19, phase 3 efficacy studies have generally not comprehensively evaluated protection provided by previous infection or hybrid immunity (previous infection plus vaccination). Individual patient data from US government-supported harmonized vaccine trials provide an unprecedented sample population to address this issue. We characterized the protective efficacy of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and hybrid immunity against COVID-19 early in the pandemic over three-to six-month follow-up and compared with vaccine-associated protection. Methods: In this post-hoc cross-protocol analysis of the Moderna, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Novavax COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, we allocated participants into four groups based on previous-infection status at enrolment and treatment: no previous infection/placebo; previous infection/placebo; no previous infection/vaccine; and previous infection/vaccine. The main outcome was RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 >7–15 days (per original protocols) after final study injection. We calculated crude and adjusted efficacy measures. Findings: Previous infection/placebo participants had a 92% decreased risk of future COVID-19 compared to no previous infection/placebo participants (overall hazard ratio [HR] ratio: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.05–0.13). Among single-dose Janssen participants, hybrid immunity conferred greater protection than vaccine alone (HR: 0.03; 95% CI: 0.01–0.10). Too few infections were observed to draw statistical inferences comparing hybrid immunity to vaccine alone for other trials. Vaccination, previous infection, and hybrid immunity all provided near-complete protection against severe disease. Interpretation: Previous infection, any hybrid immunity, and two-dose vaccination all provided substantial protection against symptomatic and severe COVID-19 through the early Delta period. Thus, as a surrogate for natural infection, vaccination remains the safest approach to protection. Funding: National Institutes of Health

Risk of COVID-19 after natural infection or vaccinationResearch in context

Background: While vaccines have established utility against COVID-19, phase 3 efficacy studies have generally not comprehensively evaluated protection provided by previous infection or hybrid immunity (previous infection plus vaccination). Individual patient data from US government-supported harmonized vaccine trials provide an unprecedented sample population to address this issue. We characterized the protective efficacy of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and hybrid immunity against COVID-19 early in the pandemic over three-to six-month follow-up and compared with vaccine-associated protection. Methods: In this post-hoc cross-protocol analysis of the Moderna, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Novavax COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, we allocated participants into four groups based on previous-infection status at enrolment and treatment: no previous infection/placebo; previous infection/placebo; no previous infection/vaccine; and previous infection/vaccine. The main outcome was RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 >7–15 days (per original protocols) after final study injection. We calculated crude and adjusted efficacy measures. Findings: Previous infection/placebo participants had a 92% decreased risk of future COVID-19 compared to no previous infection/placebo participants (overall hazard ratio [HR] ratio: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.05–0.13). Among single-dose Janssen participants, hybrid immunity conferred greater protection than vaccine alone (HR: 0.03; 95% CI: 0.01–0.10). Too few infections were observed to draw statistical inferences comparing hybrid immunity to vaccine alone for other trials. Vaccination, previous infection, and hybrid immunity all provided near-complete protection against severe disease. Interpretation: Previous infection, any hybrid immunity, and two-dose vaccination all provided substantial protection against symptomatic and severe COVID-19 through the early Delta period. Thus, as a surrogate for natural infection, vaccination remains the safest approach to protection. Funding: National Institutes of Health