Relationship between subjective well-being and healthy lifestyle behaviours in older adults: a longitudinal study

Objectives: People who report better subjective well-being tend to be healthier in their daily behaviours. The objective of this study is to assess whether different components of subjective well-being are prospectively associated with different healthy lifestyle behaviours and to assess whether these associations differ by age. Method: A total of 1,892 participants aged 50+ living in Spain were interviewed in 2011–12 and 2014–15. Life satisfaction was measured with the Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving Scale. Positive and negative affect were assessed using the Day Reconstruction Method. Physical activity was assessed with the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire version 2. The remaining healthy lifestyle behaviours were self-reported. Generalised Estimating Equations (GEE) models were run. Results: Not having a heavy episodic alcohol drinking was the healthy lifestyle behaviour most fulfilled (97.97%), whereas the intake of five or more fruits and vegetables was the least followed (33.12%). GEE models conducted over the 50–64 and the 65+ age groups showed that a higher life satisfaction was significantly related to a higher physical activity in both groups. Relationships between a higher negative affect and presenting a lower level of physical activity, and a higher positive affect and following the right consumption of fruits and vegetables and being a non-daily smoker, were only found in the older group. Conclusion: The relationship between subjective well-being and healthy lifestyle behaviours was found fundamentally in those aged 65+ years. Interventions focused on incrementing subjective well-being would have an impact on keeping a healthy lifestyle and, therefore, on reducing morbidity and mortalityEU Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (635316) European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013, 223071) Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation ACI-Promociona (ACI2009-1010) Instituto de Salud Carlos III-FIS (PS09/00295, PS09/01845, PI12/01490, PI13/00059, PI16/00218, PI16/01073) European Union European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) “A Way to Build Europe” Instituto de Salud Carlos III Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental “Contratos predoctorales para Formación de Personal Investigador, FPI-UAM”, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain Ayudas para la Formación de Profesorado Universitario (FPU15/02634) Ajuts per a la Incorporació de Científics i Tecnòleg

Differential Impact of Transient and Chronic Loneliness on Health Status. A Longitudinal Study

Loneliness is associated with worse health status out-comes. Yet, the present study is one of the first to identify howpatterns of loneliness (transient and chronic) are associated withhealth over time.Design:A total of 2,390 individuals were inter-viewed in 2011–2012 and 2014–2015 in a follow-up study con-ducted over a nationally representative sample of Spain. Afterconfirming a longitudinal relationship between loneliness andhealth status, a growth curve mixture modeling was used toexamine health trajectories.Main outcome measures:The three-item UCLA Loneliness Scale was used to assess loneliness. Healthstatus was measured with self-reported questions regarding tendomains (vision, mobility, and self-care, among others), and sevenmeasured tests (including grip strength, walking speed and imme-diate and delayed verbal recall).Results:A quarter of participantswere lonely at baseline. Both the group of transient and chronicloneliness showed a negative significant relationship with healthstatus at follow-up, (b¼ 0.063 andb¼ 0.075 respectively,p<0.001). Nevertheless, the health status did not change acrosstime in any group.Conclusion:People experiencing chronic lone-liness had the worst health status. Different patterns of lonelinesscould benefit from the appropriate interventionsThis work was supported by the EU Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research andInnovation [635316 (ATHLOS Project)], by the European Community’s Seventh FrameworkProgramme (FP7/2007-2013) under agreement number 223071 (COURAGE in Europe), by theSpanish Ministry of Science and Innovation ACI-Promociona (ACI2009-1010), and by the Institutode Salud Carlos III-FIS research grants [PS09/00295, PS09/01845, PI12/01490, PI13/00059, PI16/00218 and PI16/01073]. Projects PI12/01490, PI13/00059, PI16/00218 and PI16/01073 have beenco-funded by the European Union European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)‘A Way toBuild Europe’. The work was also supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III Centro deInvestigaci on Biom edica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM). ST is supported by theFoundation for Education and European Culture (IPEP), the Sara Borrell postdoctoral programme(reference no. CD15/00019 from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII–Spain) and the Fondo190N. MART IN-MAR IA ET AL.Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER). NMM is supported by the programme‘Contratos pre-doctorales para Formaci on de Personal Investigador, FPI-UAM’, Universidad Aut onoma deMadrid, Spai

Influence of Gender in Advanced Heart Failure Therapies and Outcome Following Transplantation

Biological differences between males and females change the course of different diseases and affect therapeutic measures' responses. Heart failure is not an exception to these differences. Women account for a minority of patients on the waiting list for heart transplantation or other advanced heart failure therapies. The reason for this under-representation is unknown. Men have a worse cardiovascular risk profile and suffer more often from ischemic heart disease. Conversely, transplanted women are younger and more frequently have non-ischemic cardiac disorders. Women's poorer survival on the waiting list for heart transplantation has been previously described, but this trend has been corrected in recent years. The use of ventricular assist devices in women is progressively increasing, with comparable results than in men. The indication rate for a heart transplant in women (number of women on the waiting list for millions of habitants) has remained unchanged over the past 25 years. Long-term results of heart transplants are equal for both men and women. We have analyzed the data of a national registry of heart transplant patients to look for possible future directions for a more in-depth study of sex differences in this area. We have analyzed 1-year outcomes of heart transplant recipients. We found similar results in men and women and no sex-related interactions with any of the factors related to survival or differences in death causes between men and women. We should keep trying to approach sex differences in prospective studies to confirm if they deserve a different approach, which is not supported by current evidence

Malignancy following heart transplantation: differences in incidence and prognosis between sexes – a multicenter cohort study

[Abstract] Male patients are at increased risk for developing malignancy postheart transplantation (HT); however, real incidence and prognosis in both genders remain unknown. The aim of this study was to assess differences in incidence and mortality related to malignancy between genders in a large cohort of HT patients. Incidence and mortality rates were calculated for all tumors, skin cancers (SCs), lymphoma, and nonskin solid cancers (NSSCs) as well as survival since first diagnosis of neoplasia. 5865 patients (81.6% male) were included. Total incidence rates for all tumors, SCs, and NSSCs were lower in females [all tumors: 25.7 vs. 44.8 per 1000 person‐years; rate ratio (RR) 0.68, (0.60–0.78), P < 0.001]. Mortality rates were also lower in females for all tumors [94.0 (77.3–114.3) vs. 129.6 (120.9–138.9) per 1000 person‐years; RR 0.76, (0.62–0.94), P = 0.01] and for NSSCs [125.0 (95.2–164.0) vs 234.7 (214.0–257.5) per 1000 person‐years; RR 0.60 (0.44–0.80), P = 0.001], albeit not for SCs or lymphoma. Female sex was associated with a better survival after diagnosis of malignancy [log‐rank p test = 0.0037; HR 0.74 (0.60–0.91), P = 0.004]. In conclusion, incidence of malignancies post‐HT is higher in males than in females, especially for SCs and NSSCs. Prognosis after cancer diagnosis is also worse in males

Selección de modelos mediante criterios de información en análisis factorial. Aspectos teóricos y computacionales

Tesis Univ. Granada. Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa. Leída el 27 de junio de 201

Hearing loss and social frailty in older men and women

Objetivo Explorar la asociación entre la limitación auditiva y la fragilidad social en una muestra de personas mayores de España. Método Estudio transversal con una muestra de 445 personas (190 hombres y 255 mujeres) de 65 y más años de edad no institucionalizadas, reclutadas de centros de atención primaria en España. La limitación auditiva se determinó de forma autoinformada utilizando tres preguntas. Se consideró que existía fragilidad social cuando la persona presentó dos o más de las siguientes condiciones: vivir solo/a, ausencia de persona que brinde ayuda, contacto infrecuente con la familia, contacto infrecuente con amistades, falta de confidente y falta de ayuda para las actividades cotidianas en los últimos 3 meses. Para estudiar la asociación entre la limitación auditiva y la fragilidad social se realizaron modelos de regresión logística ajustados por posibles factores de confusión, incluyendo la presencia de fragilidad física. Resultados La edad media de los/las participantes fue de 76,2 años (77,5 años para las mujeres). El 54,4% presentaban limitación auditiva y el 23,2% fueron considerados/as frágiles sociales. La limitación auditiva se asoció con la fragilidad social (odds ratio ajustada [ORa] = 1,78; intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC95%]: 1,04-3,06). No obstante, la asociación fue dependiente del sexo (p de interacción = 0,041) y en los análisis estratificados la asociación solo se halló en las mujeres (ORa = 3,21; IC95%: 1,44-7,17). Conclusiones La limitación auditiva se asoció con fragilidad social en las mujeres, pero no en los hombres. Se precisan estudios longitudinales que confirmen esta asociación y ayuden a entender el efecto diferencial del sexoObjective To explore the association between hearing loss and social frailty in a sample of Spanish older adults recruited from primary health care network. Method Cross-sectional study on a sample of 445 non-institutionalized adults aged 65 or more years (190 men and 255 women), recruited from primary care centers in Spain. Three self-reported hearing impairment questions were used to assess hearing loss. Social frailty was deemed to exist when the person presented two or more of the following conditions: living alone, absence of a person to provide help, infrequent contact with family, infrequent contact with friends, lack of confident and lack of help for daily activities in the last 3 months. To study the association between hearing loss and social frailty we used logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders, including physical frailty. Results The mean age of participants was 76.2 years (77.5 years for women). More than half of the participants (54.4%) reported hearing loss and the frequency of social frailty was 23.2%. Hearing loss was associated with social frailty (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.78; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.04-3.06). However, the association was sex-dependent (p for interaction = 0.041). In stratified analysis, the association was only found in women (aOR = 3.21; 95%CI: 1.44-7.17). Conclusions Hearing loss was associated with social frailty in women, but not in men. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm this association and to understand the differential effect of genderEste trabajo fue financiado con una ayuda del Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Asturias (España), Ref. Formento ProyectosALP. Los financiadores no desempeñaron ningún papel en el diseño del estudio ni en la recopilación, el análisis y la interpretación de los datos

The hearing function and ambulatory blood pressure in older adults

Objective. To examine the association between hearing function, assessed with pure-tone average (PTA) of air conduction thresholds, and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in older adults. Study Design. Cross-sectional study. Setting. A total of 1404 community-dwelling individuals aged ≥65 years from the Seniors-ENRICA cohort were examined.Methods. Hearing loss was defined as PTA > 40-AudCal hearing loss decibels (dB-aHL) in the better ear for standard frequency (0.5, 1, and 2 kHz), speech frequency (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz), and high frequency (3, 4, and 8 kHz). Circadian BP patterns were calculated as the percentage decline in systolic BP during the night, and participants were classified as dipper, nondipper, and riser. Ambulatory hypertension was defined as BP ≥ 130/80mmHg (24 hour), ≥135/85 (daytime), and ≥120/70 (nighttime) or on antihypertensive treatment. Analyses were performed with linear- and logistic-regression models adjusted for the main confounders.Results. In multivariable analyses, the PTA was associated with higher nighttime systolic BP [β coefficient per 20 dB-Ahl increment standard frequency (95% confidence interval, CI): 2.41 mm Hg (0.87, 3.95); β (95% CI) per 20 dB-aHL increment speech frequency 2.17 mm Hg (0.70, 3.64)]. Among hypertensive patients, hearing loss at standard and high-frequency PTA was associated with the riser BP pattern [odds ratio: 2.01 (95% CI, 1.03-3.93) and 1.45 (1.00-2.09), respectively]; also, hearing loss at standard PTA was linked to uncontrolled nighttime BP [1.81 (1.01-3.24)]. Conclusion. PTA was associated with higher nighttime BP, and hearing loss with a riser BP pattern and uncontrolled BP inolder hypertensive

Cross-national prevalence and factors associated with suicide ideation and attempts in older and young-and-middle age people

Objectives: To report prevalence estimates of 12-month suicide ideation and attempts in young-and-middle age adults and older people, as well as their respective associated factors. Methods: A total of 52,150 community-dwelling adults who completed the adapted version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-Depression Module were included from SAGE and COURAGE in Europe studies. The presence of 12-month suicide ideation and attempts was measured among the participants who screened positively in the Depression Module. Global and national prevalence estimates of 12-month suicide ideation and attempts were calculated according to the total sample. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to separately determine factors associated with suicidal ideation and with suicide attempts in young-and-middle age adults and older adults. Results: Higher estimates of 12-month suicidal ideation were found for high-income countries and people aged 65 years and older. Higher negative affect, higher disability, and presence of food insecurity were associated with 12-month suicidal ideation and suicide attempts for young-and-middle-adults and older adults. Higher isolation, being female, and greater number of chronic health conditions were also related to 12-month suicidal ideation in both age groups. Younger age was associated with 12-month suicidal ideation for older people, and with suicide attempts in the young-and-middle age group. Finally, higher income was related to lower rates of 12-month suicidal ideation for the young-and-middle age group. Conclusions: Older people are at increased risk of suicidal ideation globally and of suicide attempts in some countries. There were common and different factors related to suicide in adults and older adultsThe research leading to these results has received funding from USNational Institute on Aging Interagency Agreements (OGHA 04034785,YA1323–08-CN- 0020, Y1-AG-1005-01) and research grant (R01-AG034479), European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme(grant agreement 223071 - COURAGE in Europe), by the SpanishMinistry of Science and Innovation ACI-Promociona (ACI2009-1010),and by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III-FIS research grants [PS09/00295, PS09/01845, PI12/01490, PI13/00059, PI16/00218, and PI16/01073]. Projects PI12/01490, PI13/00059, PI16/00218, and PI16/01073have been co-funded by the European Union European RegionalDevelopment Fund (ERDF)“A Way to Build Europe”, The study wassupported by the Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de SaludMental (CIBERSAM