Functional outcome measures for distal radius fractures : a systematic review

Objective: This systematic review aimed to identify and describe the utility of functional outcome measures reported in intervention trials between 2010 and 2020, and to map these measures to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model. Method: The search was carried out on MEDLINE, CINAHL and Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials. Peer-reviewed intervention studies detailing the functional outcome measures used for any treatment for distal radius fracture were selected. Participant characteristics, outcome measures reported and the trends in their use over time and geographical locations were extracted. Results: This review analysed 119 studies. Thirty-one functional outcome measures were used across 36 countries. Ninety-two percent of studies measured both the Body Function/Structure and Activity/Participation domains of the ICF. The most frequently used measures were the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, Range of Motion and Grip Strength. There is a lack of measures on successful return to meaningful occupation. Conclusion: The outcome measures identified were equally spread across the ICF domains. There is a growing importance of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to supplement performance-based measures, but a lack of measure on successful return to meaningful occupation

Grip strength, functional range and anthropometric dimensions, and indication on fulfilling occupations in the home and workplace : a cross-sectional study

Introduction: Little is known about the relationship between the types of grip strength, functional range, anthropometric measures, and function in the home and workplace. The study aimed to determine their relationships and explore their contributions to performing usual work duties and overall function in participants with and without hand and wrist injury. Method: Forty-four participants were measured on Maximal Voluntary Isometric Grip Strength, Rapid Exchange Grip Contractions and Isometric Endurance, Forearm Length and Volumetry, and the Dart Thrower’s Motion (DTM) measure. They completed the Patient Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Work Module. Results: The grip measures significantly correlated with Volumetry (r = 0.62–0.74) in participants with and without hand and wrist injury. The Isometric Endurance and DTM measure of the non-injured hand were found to be contributing factors for participants with hand and wrist injury when returning to usual work duties and overall function. Conclusion: The non-injured hand function plays a role in the overall function for participants with hand and wrist injuries. Isometric Endurance and DTM measure could assist clinicians in determining suitable rehabilitation targets, resulting in a better function required for occupations in the home or workplace

Psychometric properties of the goniometric assessment of the Dart Thrower's Motion

Introduction: The Dart Thrower’s Motion is an important movement for hand function. A goniometric clinical measure on Dart Thrower’s Motion has been developed. However, its validity and reliability in people with wrist and hand injury is not known. This study investigated the inter-rater and test–retest reliability and criterion validity of the Dart Thrower’s Motion measure. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used. Thirty-five participants with hand or wrist injury completed the goniometric assessment of the Dart Thrower’s Motion and goniometric wrist active range of motion assessment three times in a hand clinic. Two assessors and a reader to record the results were involved. Participants also completed the patient-rated wrist and hand evaluation. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.70–0.83 and 0.91–0.92, respectively for inter-rater and test–retest reliability in the injured hands indicated moderate to high reliability. The Pearson correlation coefficients between the Dart Thrower’s Motion measure and wrist active range of motion assessment ranged from 0.45 to 0.73, and with patient-rated wrist and hand evaluation ranged from −0.36 to −0.53. The results indicate that goniometric assessment of the Dart Thrower’s Motion has acceptable criterion validity. Conclusion: The goniometric assessment of Dart Thrower’s Motion can be considered a valid and reliable clinical measure for measuring the impact of the injury to one’s hand and wrist range of motion and function. It shows its clinical utility in people with hand and wrist injury. It is hoped this simple measure can be eventually implemented in clinical settings, allowing for an increased understanding of an individual’s functional use of the hand and wrist