COGNITION AND FUNCTIONALITY IN BREAST CANCER SURVIVORS UNDERGOING HORMONE THERAPY

O objetivo foi descrever a função cognitiva e a capacidade funcional de sobreviventes de câncer de mama que praticam exercício físico. Oito mulheres diagnosticadas com câncer de mama em estágios I-III participaram deste estudo. Testes cognitivos foram aplicados para avaliar a função cognitiva geral, velocidade de processamento, função executiva e atenção. A capacidade funcional foi determinada por testes de resistência aeróbia, agilidade dinâmica e equilíbrio e testes de força de membros superiores e inferiores. As mulheres do presente estudo tinham 64,5 ± 4,8 anos, índice de massa corporal de 32,6 ± 5,4 kg.m-2 e escolaridade de 10,0 ± 3,5 anos. Os resultados demonstraram desempenho no questionário MSSE e teste de fluência verbal preservados em mulheres idosas diagnosticadas com câncer de mama há quatro anos, com obesidade e que estavam se exercitando por aproximadamente 2,5 anos. Por outro lado, elas apresentaram desempenho inferior no teste cognitivo Trail Making Test e nos testes funcionais do que os valores normativos da literatura, indicando um prejuízo na atenção, velocidade de processamento, flexibilidade cognitiva e baixa capacidade funcional.El objetivo fue describir la función cognitiva y la capacidad funcional de las supervivientes de cáncer de mama que practican ejercicio físico. Ocho mujeres diagnosticadas con cáncer de mama en estadio I-III participaron en este estudio. Se aplicaron pruebas cognitivas para evaluar la función cognitiva general, la velocidad de procesamiento, la función ejecutiva y la atención. La capacidad funcional se determinó mediante pruebas de resistencia aeróbica, agilidad dinámica y equilibrio y pruebas de fuerza superior e inferior. Las mujeres del presente estudio tenían 64,5 ± 4,8 años, el índice de masa corporal 32,6 ± 5,4 kg.m-2 y la escolaridad de 10,0 ± 3,5 años. Los resultados demostraron un desempeño preservado en el cuestionario MSSE y la prueba de fluidez verbal en mujeres mayores diagnosticadas con cáncer de mama hace cuatro años, con obesidad y que hacían ejercicio durante aproximadamente 2,5 años. Por otro lado, ellas presentaron un desempeño más bajo en el Trail Making Test cognitivo y en las pruebas funcionales que los valores normativos de la literatura, indicando un deterioro en la atención, velocidad de procesamiento, flexibilidad cognitiva y baja capacidad funcional.The study aimed to describe the cognitive function and the functional capacity of breast cancer survivors who practice physical exercise. Eight women diagnosed with stages I-III breast cancer participated in this study. Cognitive tests were applied to assess overall cognitive function, processing speed, executive function, and attention. The women in the present study were 64.5 ± 4.8 years old, had a body mass index of 32.6 ± 5.4 kg.m-2, and had 10.0 ± 3.5 years of schooling. The results showed a preserved performance in the MSSE questionnaire and verbal fluency test in older women diagnosed with breast cancer four years ago, with obesity, who have been exercising for approximately 2.5 years. On the other hand, they presented a lower performance in the cognitive Trail Making Test and the functional tests than the normative values in the literature, indicating an impaired attention, processing speed, cognitive flexibility, and low functional capacity

Recruitment methods and yield rates in a clinical trial of physical exercise for older adults with hypertension—HAEL Study : a study within a trial

Background: Although the prevalence of hypertension is high in older adults, clinical trial recruitment is a challenge. Our main aim was to describe the HAEL Study recruitment methods and yield rates. The secondary objectives were to explore the reasons for exclusion and to describe the characteristics of the enrolled participants. Methods: This is a descriptive study within a trial. The HAEL Study was a Brazilian randomized two-center, parallel trial with an estimated sample of 184 participants. The recruitment strategy was based on four methods: electronic health records, word of mouth, print and electronic flyer, and press media. The yield rate was the ratio of the number of participants who underwent randomization to the total number of volunteers screened, calculated for overall, per recruitment method, by study center and by age group and sex. Additionally, we described the reasons for exclusion in the screening phase, as well as the demographic characteristics of those enrolled. The data are presented in absolute/relative frequencies and mean ± standard deviation. Results: A total of 717 individuals were screened, and 168 were randomized over 32 months. The yield rate was higher for word of mouth (30.1%) in the overall sample. However, press media contributed the most (39.9%) to the absolute number of participants randomized in the trial. The coordinating center and participating center differed in methods with the highest yield ratios and absolute numbers of randomized participants. The main reason for exclusion in the screening phase was due to the physically active status in those intending to participate in the study (61.5%). Out of 220 participants included, 52 were excluded mainly because they did not meet the eligibility criteria (26.9%). Most of the screened volunteers were women (60.2%) age 60–69 years (59.5%), and most of the randomized participants were Caucasian/white Caucasian/white (78.0%). Conclusions: Multiple recruitment methods constituted effective strategies. We observed that approximately one of every four individuals screened was allocated to an intervention group. Even so, there were limitations in obtaining a representative sample of older Brazilian adults with hypertension. Data show an underrepresentation of race and age groups

The “Hypertension Approaches in the Elderly: a Lifestyle study” multicenter, randomized trial (HAEL Study): rationale and methodological protocol

Background: Hypertension is a clinical condition highly prevalent in the elderly, imposing great risks to cardiovascular diseases and loss of quality of life. Current guidelines emphasize the importance of nonpharmacological strategies as a first-line approach to lower blood pressure. Exercise is an efficient lifestyle tool that can benefit a myriad of health-related outcomes, including blood pressure control, in older adults. We herein report the protocol of the HAEL Study, which aims to evaluate the efficacy of a pragmatic combined exercise training compared with a health education program on ambulatory blood pressure and other health-related outcomes in older individuals. Methods: Randomized, single-blinded, multicenter, two-arm, parallel, superiority trial. A total of 184 subjects (92/center), ≥60 years of age, with no recent history of cardiovascular events, will be randomized on a 1:1 ratio to 12-week interventions consisting either of a combined exercise (aerobic and strength) training, three times per week, or an active-control group receiving health education intervention, once a week. Ambulatory (primary outcome) and office blood pressures, cardiorespiratory fitness and endothelial function, together with quality of life, functional fitness and autonomic control will be measured in before and after intervention. Discussion: Our conceptual hypothesis is that combined training intervention will reduce ambulatory blood pressure in comparison with health education group. Using a superiority framework, analysis plan prespecifies an intention-to-treat approach, per protocol criteria, subgroups analysis, and handling of missing data. The trial is recruiting since September 2017. Finally, this study was designed to adhere to data sharing practices. Trial registration: NCT03264443. Registered on 29 August, 2017

Indici per la valutazione della qualit? ecologica dei laghi

Collection of methods to evaluate lake quality using biological element

Maximal oxygen uptake is underestimated during incremental testing in hypertensive older adults: findings from the HAEL study

Purpose: The present cross-sectional study aimed to investigate whether a maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) verification phase (VER) could improve the accuracy of a previous graded exercise test (GXT) to assess individual VO2max in hypertensive individuals. Methods: Thirtythree older adults with hypertension (24 women) taking part in the Hypertension Approaches in the Elderly Study (NCT03264443) were recruited. Briefly, after performing a treadmill GXT to exhaustion, participants rested for 10 min and underwent a multistage VER to confirm GXT results. Individual VO2max, respiratory exchange ratio (RER), maximal heart rate (HRmax), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured during both GXT and VER tests. Mean values were compared between bouts using paired sample t-tests and VO2max was also compared between GXT and VER on an individual basis. Results: Testing was well tolerated by all participants. Both absolute (p=0.011) and relative (p=0.014) VO2max values were higher in VER than in GXT. RER (p<0.001) and RPE (p=0.002) were lower in VER, whereas HRmax (p=0.286) was not different between the two trials. Individual VO2max comparisons revealed that 54.6% of the participants (18/33) achieved a VO2max value that was ≥3% during VER (mean: 13.5%, range: from +3% to +22.1%, ES=0.062), whereas 87.9% (29/33) of the tests would have been validated as a maximal effort if the classic criteria were employed (i.e. VO2 plateau or at least two secondary criteria). Conclusion: In sedentary older individuals with hypertension, GXT to exhaustion underestimated VO2max in more than half of tested participants, even when established but criticized criteria were used to confirm whether a maximal effort was attained. Employing VER after GXT is a quick approach to assist with the verification of an individual’s VO2max

Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

Funder: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013347Funder: Flemish Society for Critical Care NursesAbstract: Purpose: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are particularly susceptible to developing pressure injuries. Epidemiologic data is however unavailable. We aimed to provide an international picture of the extent of pressure injuries and factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries in adult ICU patients. Methods: International 1-day point-prevalence study; follow-up for outcome assessment until hospital discharge (maximum 12 weeks). Factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injury and hospital mortality were assessed by generalised linear mixed-effects regression analysis. Results: Data from 13,254 patients in 1117 ICUs (90 countries) revealed 6747 pressure injuries; 3997 (59.2%) were ICU-acquired. Overall prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.9–27.3). ICU-acquired prevalence was 16.2% (95% CI 15.6–16.8). Sacrum (37%) and heels (19.5%) were most affected. Factors independently associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries were older age, male sex, being underweight, emergency surgery, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Braden score 3 days, comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency), organ support (renal replacement, mechanical ventilation on ICU admission), and being in a low or lower-middle income-economy. Gradually increasing associations with mortality were identified for increasing severity of pressure injury: stage I (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.2–1.8), stage II (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–1.9), and stage III or worse (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3–3.3). Conclusion: Pressure injuries are common in adult ICU patients. ICU-acquired pressure injuries are associated with mainly intrinsic factors and mortality. Optimal care standards, increased awareness, appropriate resource allocation, and further research into optimal prevention are pivotal to tackle this important patient safety threat

Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

Funder: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013347Funder: Flemish Society for Critical Care NursesAbstract: Purpose: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are particularly susceptible to developing pressure injuries. Epidemiologic data is however unavailable. We aimed to provide an international picture of the extent of pressure injuries and factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries in adult ICU patients. Methods: International 1-day point-prevalence study; follow-up for outcome assessment until hospital discharge (maximum 12 weeks). Factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injury and hospital mortality were assessed by generalised linear mixed-effects regression analysis. Results: Data from 13,254 patients in 1117 ICUs (90 countries) revealed 6747 pressure injuries; 3997 (59.2%) were ICU-acquired. Overall prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.9–27.3). ICU-acquired prevalence was 16.2% (95% CI 15.6–16.8). Sacrum (37%) and heels (19.5%) were most affected. Factors independently associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries were older age, male sex, being underweight, emergency surgery, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Braden score 3 days, comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency), organ support (renal replacement, mechanical ventilation on ICU admission), and being in a low or lower-middle income-economy. Gradually increasing associations with mortality were identified for increasing severity of pressure injury: stage I (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.2–1.8), stage II (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–1.9), and stage III or worse (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3–3.3). Conclusion: Pressure injuries are common in adult ICU patients. ICU-acquired pressure injuries are associated with mainly intrinsic factors and mortality. Optimal care standards, increased awareness, appropriate resource allocation, and further research into optimal prevention are pivotal to tackle this important patient safety threat

Correction to: Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake