0432: Impact of early complications on outcomes among patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator in primary prevention

BackgroundThe life-saving benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) has been well demonstrated, and therefore their utilization has considerably grown in the last 10 years. At the same time, complications have become an increasingly important concern.ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess the prevalence and impact on outcomes (late complications and overall mortality) of early complications after ICD implantation for primary prevention in a large French population.MethodsFrom a multicentric French registry (DAI-PP Registry, 2002-2012), 5547 consecutive patients, with coronary artery disease or dilated cardiomyopathy, were implanted with an ICD in the setting of primary prevention. From 5338 (96%) patients with full information, we determined prevalence, independent associated factors and prognosis of the occurrence of early (within 30 days post implantation) complications.ResultsEarly complications occurred in 709 patients (13.5%), mainly related to lead dysfunction or hematoma (56%). Independent associated factors to early complications were renla impairment (clearance <30ml/min, OR=1.69, 95% CI 1.19-2.41, P<0.001), cardiac resynchronization therapy (OR=1.61, 95% CI 1.17-2.21, P=0.004), anticoagulant therapy (OR=1.30, 95% CI 1.04-1.63, P=0.02) and older age (OR=1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.02, P=0.03). During a mean follow-up of 3.1±2.3 years, 834 patients experienced ≥1 complication (15.6%), mainly inappropriate therapies and/or lead dysfunction (75%). After consideration of potential confounding factors, early complications were significantly associated with the occurrence of late complications (OR=2.15, 95% CI 1.73-2.66, P<0.0001) and a higher risk of overall mortality (OR=1.48, 95% CI 1.17-1.88, P=0.001).ConclusionsEarly complication is a frequent event after ICD implantation occurring in one out of six patients. These events are associated with a significant increase of late complications and overall mortality

Evaluation de l'efficacité de l'hydroquinidine chez les patients porteurs d'un syndrome de Brugada asymptomatique

LE KREMLIN-B.- PARIS 11-BU Méd (940432101) / SudocSudocFranceF

Prediction of Nonarrhythmic Mortality in Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Patients With Ischemic and Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

International audienc

Outcome of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy According to New York Heart Association Functional Classification

International audienceWe aimed to assess if the outcome of primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) without cardiac resynchronization therapy is dependent on New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. Among the participants of Defibrillateur Automatique Implantable-Prevention Primaire (DAI-PP; NCT01992458) multicenter cohort study, 155 patients in NYHA class I, 504 in NYHA class II, and 188 in NYHA class III had a QRS width <120 ms and were implanted with an ICD without cardiac resynchronization therapy and, thus, were eligible for the purpose of this analysis. Total and specific mortalities and the incidence of appropriate therapies were assessed for every NYHA. During 2,606 patient-years (3.1 +/- 2.1 years), 104 (12.3%) subjects died and 188 (22.2%) experienced appropriate therapies. After adjustment, overall mortality increased with NYHA class (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11 to 2.41, p = 0.014), driven by an increase in cardiovascular death. Conversely, incidence of appropriate ICD intervention was comparable among the 3 NYHA groups (NYHA class I 7.43, NYHA class II 7.91, and NYHA class III 12.10 per 100 patient-years; HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.59, p = 0.231). Incidence of ICD-unresponsive sudden death was very low and also comparable (NYHA class I 0.22, NYHA class II 0.36, and NYHA class III 0.83 per 100 patient years (HR 6.34, 95% CI 0.32 to 124.49, p = 0.224). No significant differences were observed in the other specific modes of death. In conclusion, although patients in NYHA class III have higher overall mortality, they experience a comparable incidence of appropriate ICD therapies. The low incidence of ICD-unresponsive sudden death in all assessed NYHA classes also supports the efficacy of ICDs, irrespective of NYHA class. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy among patients with non-ischaemic vs. ischaemic cardiomyopathy for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death

International audienc

Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Therapy in Women-Data From a Multicenter French Registry

International audienceBACKGROUND: There are limited data describing sex specificities regarding implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in the real-world European setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a large multicenter cohort of consecutive patients referred for ICD implantation for primary prevention (2002-2012), in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy, we examined the sex differences in subjects' characteristics and outcomes. Of 5539 patients, only 837 (15.1%) were women and 53.8% received cardiac resynchronization therapy. Compared to men, women presented a significantly higher proportion of nonischemic cardiomyopathy (60.2% versus 36.2%, P\textless0.001), wider QRS complex width (QRS \textgreater120 ms: 74.6% versus 68.5%, P=0.003), higher New York Heart Association functional class (≥III in 54.2%♀ versus 47.8%♂, P=0.014), and lower prevalence of atrial fibrillation (18.7% versus 24.9%, P\textless0.001). During a 16 786 patient-years follow-up, overall, fewer appropriate therapies were observed in women (hazard ratio=0.59, 95% CI 0.45-0.76; P\textless0.001). By contrast, no sex-specific interaction was observed for inappropriate shocks (odds ratio ♀=0.84, 95% CI 0.50-1.39, P=0.492), early complications (odds ratio=1.00, 95% CI 0.75-1.32, P=0.992), and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio=0.87 95% CI 0.66-1.15, P=0.324). Analysis of sex-by- cardiac resynchronization therapy interaction shows than female cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients experienced fewer appropriate therapies than men (hazard ratio=0.62, 95% CI 0.50-0.77; P\textless0.001) and lower mortality (hazard ratio=0.68, 95% CI 0.47-0.97; P=0.034). CONCLUSIONS: In our real-life registry, women account for the minority of ICD recipients and presented with a different clinical profile. Whereas female cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients had a lower incidence of appropriate ICD therapies and all-cause death than their male counterparts, the observed rates of inappropriate shocks and early complications in all ICD recipients were comparable. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT0199245

Comparison of Outcome of Possible Versus Definite Infective Endocarditis Involving Native Heart Valves

International audienc

Is oral anticoagulation needed in patients with atrial fibrillation and stent implantation at low–moderate risk of stroke?

International audienc