73 research outputs found

    A stratified transect approach captures reef complexity with canopy-forming organisms

    Get PDF
    On the Great Barrier Reef (GBR), persistent changes to reef communities have begun to be documented, and on inshore reefs these shifts may favour the proliferation of macroalgae. Critical to understanding changes to reef community structure in response to anthropogenic impacts is developing effective methods to accurately document the abundance of different reef organisms. Effective monitoring must be time and cost efficient, replicable, and able to sufficiently and accurately detect disturbances to allow development of strategies to mitigate their impacts. Traditional techniques to document coral reef communities (i.e. photo-quadrats, benthic intercept transects) rely on planar views, which tend to either over- or under-represent canopy-forming organisms. As canopy-forming organisms are likely to be affected by anthropogenic influences (corals negatively, algae positively), it is essential for monitoring programs to implement methods sufficient to document changes to the vertical dimension of coral reefs. Here we build on previous work to document the canopy effect in coral-dominated ecosystems and propose a new survey approach suitable for implementation in algal-dominated systems. A vertically stratified transect, modified from a traditional point intercept transect, captures benthic and canopy-forming members of reef communities and provides information on three-dimensional complexity. To test the capability of the new method to detect changes in vertical reef structure, seaweed was removed from experimental quadrats and monitoring techniques were applied before and after four months of regrowth. A stratified method more accurately captured the three-dimensional change resulting from algal canopy growth, while resolving the over- and under-representation of algal biomass in two traditional techniques. We propose that a stratified transect method improves abundance estimates of canopy-forming organisms whilst maintaining data compatibility with traditional methods

    Poplar - a possibility in northern Sweden?

    Get PDF
    The countries in the European Union have agreed to increase their percentage renewable energy sources to 20 %. To reach this goal an increase of biomass production needs to be made. One way of achieving this is by using nonnative species. Poplar in Sweden produces biomass faster than the domestic trees. In the southern parts of Sweden plantations has been made with good results. In the northern parts survival is a problem that needs to be solved before plantations can be made for commercial use. To find planting material that is suitable for the colder climate clonal tests has been planted, but only a few of the plantations are old enough to evaluate. Another problem in the north is that poplar can not be planted on forest land due to its low pH. The reformation of agriculture however, leaves a habitat with good nutritional values and suitable pH. Since many of these are being planted with Norwegian spruce today, when evaluating poplar, comparisons should be made against the production of these. To try to predict the potential of production and survival we have looked at the only three plantations we have found that are old enough. They have been compared to each other and a plantation in the south most parts of Sweden. The difference in production between spruce and poplar has also been examined at each location. The results show that poplar can achieve a great production in the northern costal area in Sweden, but in two of the test areas the survival has been very low. In the third area both survival and growth has been good and is growing in a similar way as the one in the south. This gives reason to believe that poplar has a good potential for producing biomass at a commercial level.Intresset för snabbvÀxande trÀdslag har ökat i takt med det ökade behovet av förnyelsebara energikÀllor. Poppel Àr ett snabbvÀxande trÀdslag med god förmÄga till hög och snabb biomassaproduktion. I södra delarna av landet har poppel odlats med goda resultat och visat sig vara ett konkurrenskraftigt alternativ till inhemska trÀdslag. I de norra delarna av Sverige Àr överlevnaden ett problem som mÄste lösas för att poppel ska kunna vara ett konkurrenskraftigt alternativ till andra trÀdslag. Klontester har lagts ut i norra Sverige för att ta fram ett lÀmpligt plantmaterial, men mÄnga av dessa Àr Ànnu inte gamla nog att utvÀrdera. Poppel trivs pÄ bördig mark med ett högt pH. Det betyder att det i norra Sverige endast Àr Äker- och betesmark som lÀmpar sig för plantering med poppel. SÄdan mark planteras vanligen med gran vid beskogning. Gran Àr dÀrför ett lÀmpligt alternativ att jÀmföra poppelns tillvÀxt med. I detta arbete har vi tittat pÄ poppelns överlevnad och tillvÀxt i tre försök i norra Sverige för att försöka utreda om poppel Àr ett konkurrenskraftigt alternativ till andra trÀdslag Àven i norra Sverige. Vi har jÀmfört poppelns tillvÀxt med granens i de försök vi har tittat pÄ. VÄra resultat visar att poppel kan ha goda möjligheter till tillvÀxt och överlevnad i norra Sveriges kustland. I tvÄ av försöken som vi har tittat pÄ har överlevnaden varit mycket lÄg. Men tillvÀxten hos de överlevande trÀden har varit god. I det tredje försöket vi har tittat pÄ har bÄde överlevnaden och tillvÀxten varit god

    Hitching a ride on Hercules:fatal epibiosis drives ecosystem change from mud banks to oyster reefs

    Get PDF
    [Excerpt] Best known as a "love them or hate them" luxury food, or for their pearls, oysters are also ecosystem engineers, forming vast oyster reefs. Oyster reefs provide habitat for a myriad of species, and support fisheries, improve water quality and provide coastal protection. These services are estimated to be worth US5,500–5,500–99,000 per hectare per year (Grabowski et al. 2012). Globally, oyster reefs have declined by 85% through destructive overfishing, coastal development, pollution, and introduced competitors, predators and diseases (Beck et al. 2011). Active restoration is becoming an increasingly popular tool to bring back lost oyster reefs and the ecosystem services they provide (Fitzsimons et al. 2019). However, restoration is not always successful, and knowledge about how reefs naturally form and function is vital to improve restoration success. Oyster larvae only settle on hard substrates. Reefs proliferate because oyster shells provide a settlement surface, and oysters provide chemical and sound cues that facilitate larval settlement (Lillis et al. 2013). However, these reefs often form on intertidal sand and mud banks. This raises the question, how do oyster reefs form on mud banks in the absence of hard surfaces

    Maten mÀrks: förutsÀttningar för konsumentmakt

    Get PDF
    MĂ„nga mĂ€nniskor anser sig numera ha större makt i rollen som konsumenter Ă€n som medborgare som röstar i partival. Som konsumenter kan vi idag ta stĂ€llning till en rad olika ansprĂ„k som görs pĂ„ produkter och tjĂ€nster. Hur ser vi konsumenter pĂ„ livsmedel som genom olika mĂ€rken pĂ„stĂ„s ha unika egenskaper i produktionsledet: för miljön, för konsumentens hĂ€lsa, för arbetsförhĂ„llanden för fabriks- och jordbruksarbetarna, för djurens vĂ€l och ve, eller för det egna produktionslandets vĂ€lstĂ„nd? Förekommer motsĂ€ttningar och konkurrens mellan olika miljö- och varumĂ€rken? Vilka aktörer har makt att vara med och bestĂ€mma om vad som ska rĂ€knas som miljövĂ€nligt, socialt rĂ€ttvis eller djurvĂ€nlig produktion? GĂ„r det – om det Ă€r önskvĂ€rt – att göra den gröna och etiska konsumtionens informationsredskap mer “demokratiska”? Finns det viktiga egenskaper hos varor och produktion som mĂ„ste falla utanför konsumentmakten? Dessa frĂ„gor, som alla behandlas i boken, knyter an till frĂ„gan om vilka förutsĂ€ttningar konsumenter egentligen har att fatta fria och politiska beslut som Ă€ven gĂ„r bortom var och ens egennytta. I den allmĂ€nna samhĂ€llsdebatten ses konsumenters makt av allt fler aktörer som en central förutsĂ€ttning för att miljöproblem och andra samhĂ€llsproblem ska kunna lösas. DĂ€rmed blir en ökad kunskap om konsumentmaktens förutsĂ€ttningar extra betydelsefull. Boken riktar sig till studenter, forskare, myndigheter och till alla andra med intresse för samhĂ€llsvetenskap och humaniora med inrikning pĂ„ konsument- och livsmedelsfrĂ„gor, samt andra livsmedelsrelaterade vetenskaper. Mikael Klintman Ă€r docent och universitetslektor vid Forskningspolitiska institutet, Lunds universitet. Magnus Boström Ă€r docent, lektor och forskare vid institutionen för livsvetenskaper, Södertörns Högskola. Lena Ekelund Ă€r fil dr i nationalekonomi och docent i trĂ€gĂ„rdsvetenskap med ekonomisk inriktning vid Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet i Alnarp. Anna-Lisa LindĂ©n Ă€r professor vid sociologiska institutionen, Lunds universitet

    Coral restoration in a changing world - a global synthesis of methods and techniques

    Get PDF
    Coral reef ecosystems have suffered an unprecedented loss of habitat-forming hard corals in recent decades, due to increased nutrient outputs from agriculture, elevated levels of suspended sediment caused by deforestation and development, destructive fishing practices, over-harvesting of reef species, outbreaks of corallivorous crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS, Acanthaster planci), coral disease and tropical storms. However, in recent years climate change has emerged as the primary threat to coral reefs. While reefs have a natural capacity for recovery, recurring events like mass coral bleaching and extreme weather events is increasing in frequency, intensity and severity, and are eroding the time for recovery between catastrophic events. Marine conservation has primarily focused on passive habitat protection over active restoration, in contrast to terrestrial ecosystems where active restoration is common practice. Further, active restoration is well accepted for wetlands and shellfish reefs however coral reef restoration has remained controversial both in academia and amongst marine managers. This is despite recent research suggesting that optimal conservation outcomes include both habitat protection and restoration. Critics often argue that coral restoration detracts focus from mitigating climate change and other threats to the marine environment, while proponents of coral restoration counter that interventions can serve to protect coral biodiversity and endangered species in the short-term, while mitigation of large-scale threats such as climate change and water quality take effect. Despite this disconnect between coral restoration practitioners, coral reef managers and scientists, active coral restoration is increasingly used as a tool to attempt to restore coral populations. The field has largely developed through independent work of isolated groups, and has fallen victim to ‘growing pains’ associated with ecological restoration in many other ecosystems. Partly this is due to a reluctance to share outcomes of projects, and in some cases a lack of monitoring or appropriate reporting of project outcomes. To mitigate this, we aimed to synthesise the available knowledge in a comprehensive global review of coral restoration methods, incorporating data from a traditional literature search of the scientific literature, complemented with information gathered from online sources and through a survey of coral restoration practitioners. We identified 329 case studies on coral restoration, of which 195 were from the scientific literature, 79 were sourced from the grey literature (i.e. reports and online descriptions), and 55 were responses to our survey of restoration practitioners. We identified ten coral restoration intervention types: coral gardening - transplantation phase (23% of records), direct transplantation (21%), artificial reefs (19%), coral gardening - nursery phase (17%), coral gardening (both phases, 7%), substrate enhancement with electricity (4%), substrate stabilisation (4%), algae removal (2%), larval enhancement (1%) and microfragmentation (<1%). The majority of interventions involve coral fragmentation or transplantation of coral fragments (70%). While 52 countries are represented in the dataset, the majority of projects were conducted in the USA, Philippines, Thailand and Indonesia (together representing 40% of projects). Coral restoration case studies are dominated by short-term projects, with 66% of all projects reporting less than 18 months of monitoring of the restored sites. Overall, the median length of projects was 12 months. Similarly, most projects are relatively small in spatial scale, with a median size of restored area of 500 m2. A diverse range of species are represented in the dataset, with 221 different species from 89 coral genera. Overall, coral restoration projects focused primarily (65% of studies) on fast-growing branching corals. Among all the published documents, the top five species (22% of studies) were Acropora cervicornis, Pocillopora damicornis, Stylophora pistillata, Porites cylindrica and Acropora palmata. Over a quarter of projects (26%) involved the coral genus Acropora, while 9% of studies included a single species - Acropora cervicornis. Much of the focus on Acropora cervicornis and Acropora palmata is likely to have resulted from these important reef-forming species being listed as threatened on the United States Endangered Species List and as Endangered on the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List of Endangered Species (IUCN 2018). We have dedicated a section to each intervention type covered in this review, and describe the potential and limitations of each intervention type in detail there. However, collating this information has highlighted the following main points which apply to coral restoration in general. 1. On average, survival in restored corals is relatively high. All coral genera with sufficient replication from which to draw conclusions (>10 studies listing that genus) report an average survival between 60-70%. 2. Differences in survival and growth are largely species and/or location specific, so the selection of specific methods should be tailored to the local conditions, costs, availability of materials, and to the specific objectives of each project. 3. Projects are overall small and short, however substantial scaling up is required for restoration to be a useful tool in supporting the persistence of reefs in the future. While there is ample evidence detailing how to successfully grow corals at smaller scales, few interventions demonstrate a capacity to be scaled up much beyond one hectare. Notable exceptions include methods which propagate sexually derived coral larvae. 4. To date, coral restoration has been plagued by the same common problems as ecological restoration in other ecosystems. Mitigating these will be crucial to successfully scale up projects, and to retain public trust in restoration as a tool for resilience based management. a. Lack of clear objectives - There is a clear mismatch between the stated objectives of projects, and the design of projects and monitoring of outcomes. Poorly articulated or overinflated objectives risk alienating the general public and scientists, by over-promising and under-delivering. Social and economic objectives have inherent value and do not need to be disguised with ecological objectives. b. Lack of appropriate monitoring - A large proportion of projects do not monitor metrics relevant to their stated objectives, or do not continue monitoring for long enough to provide meaningful estimates of success. Further, there is a clear need for standardisation in the metrics that are used, to allow comparisons between projects. c. Lack of appropriate reporting - The outcomes of a large proportion of projects are not documented, which restricts knowledge-sharing and adaptive learning. While we attempted to access some of the unreported projects through our survey, it is clear we have only scratched the surface of existing knowledge. d. Poorly designed projects - An effect of inadequate monitoring and reporting is that projects are poorly suited to their specific area and conditions. Improved knowledge-sharing and development of best practice coral restoration guidelines aims to mitigate this problem

    Best practice coral restoration for the Great Barrier Reef

    Get PDF
    As the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) continues to degrade through repeated mass bleaching events, crown-of-thorns starfish and major disease outbreaks, and the impacts of intense cyclones, pressure is growing for direct intervention to assist the recovery of reef-building corals. Decreasing coral cover on the GBR and other Australian reefs has been recognised as a serious problem relatively recently in Australia but follows a global trend, with many overseas reefs now highly degraded. Various types of coral restoration, rehabilitation and assisted recovery projects have been trialled overseas for decades and it makes sense to look at what has and hasn’t worked overseas to determine a range of options that may suit GBR conditions. Some direct interventions to assist coral recovery have been trialled in Australia such as transplanting corals, algae removal to promote coral recovery and larval enhancement promoting direct coral recruitment. In addition, after physical damage from cyclones, ship strikes or dragged anchors, local dive operators and dive clubs (permitted or unpermitted) often attempt to assist the recovery of corals by tipping over flipped tabular corals and reattaching broken branching corals or sea fans. These latter assisted recovery techniques are rarely underpinned by scientific data on coral recovery. A lack of best practice guidelines for these actions limits the chance of success and increases the health and safety risks of these activities

    Nursing home administrators’ perspectives on a study feedback report : a cross sectional survey

    Get PDF
    BackgroundThis project is part of the Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) program of research, a multi-level and longitudinal research program being conducted in 36 nursing homes in three Canadian Prairie Provinces. The overall goal of TREC is to improve the quality of care for older persons living in nursing homes and the quality of work life for care providers. The purpose of this paper is to report on development and evaluation of facility annual reports (FARs) from facility administrators&rsquo; perspectives on the usefulness, meaningfulness, and understandability of selected data from the TREC survey. MethodsA cross sectional survey design was used in this study. The feedback reports were developed in collaboration with participating facility administrators. FARs presented results in four contextual areas: workplace culture, feedback processes, job satisfaction, and staff burnout. Six weeks after FARs were mailed to each administrator, we conducted structured telephone interviews with administrators to elicit their evaluation of the FARs. Administrators were also asked if they had taken any actions as a result of the FAR. Descriptive and inferential statistics, as well as content analysis for open-ended questions, were used to summarize findings. ResultsThirty-one facility administrators (representing thirty-two facilities) participated in the interviews. Six administrators had taken action and 18 were planning on taking action as a result of FARs. The majority found the four contextual areas addressed in FAR to be useful, meaningful, and understandable. They liked the comparisons made between data from years one and two and between their facility and other TREC study sites in their province. Twenty-two indicated that they would like to receive information on additional areas such as aggressive behaviours of residents and information sharing. Twenty-four administrators indicated that FARs contained enough information, while eight found FARs &lsquo;too short&rsquo;. Administrators who reported that the FAR contained enough information were more likely to take action within their facilities than administrators who reported that they needed more information. ConclusionsAlthough the FAR was brief, the presentation of the four contextual areas was relevant to the majority of administrators and prompted them to plan or to take action within their facility. <br /

    Feedback reporting of survey data to healthcare aides

    Get PDF
    BackgroundThis project occurred during the course of the Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) program of research. TREC is a multilevel and longitudinal research program being conducted in the three Canadian Prairie Provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. The main purpose of TREC is to increase understanding about the role of organizational context in influencing knowledge use in residential long-term care settings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate healthcare aides&rsquo; (HCAs) perceptions of a one-page poster designed to feed back aggregated data (including demographic information and perceptions about influences on best practice) from the TREC survey they had recently completed. MethodsA convenience sample of 7 of the 15 nursing homes participating in the TREC research program in Alberta were invited to participate. Specific facility-level summary data were provided to each facility in the form of a one-page poster report. Two weeks following delivery of the report, a convenience sample of HCAs was surveyed using one-to-one structured interviews. ResultsOne hundred twenty-three HCAs responded to the evaluation survey. Overall, HCAs&rsquo; opinions about presentation of the feedback report and the understandability, usability, and usefulness of the content were positive. For each report, analysis of data and production and inspection of the report took up to one hour. Information sessions to introduce and explain the reports averaged 18 minutes. Two feedback reports (minimum) were supplied to each facility at a cost of CAN$2.39 per report, for printing and laminating. ConclusionsThis study highlights not only the feasibility of producing understandable, usable, and useful feedback reports of survey data but also the value and importance of providing feedback to survey respondents. More broadly, the findings suggest that modest strategies may have a positive and desirable effect in participating sites. <br /

    Educational readiness among health professionals in rheumatology: Low awareness of EULAR offerings and unfamiliarity with the course content as major barriers—results of a EULAR-funded European survey

    Get PDF
    Background Ongoing education of health professionals in rheumatology (HPR) is critical for high-quality care. An essential factor is education readiness and a high quality of educational offerings. We explored which factors contributed to education readiness and investigated currently offered postgraduate education, including the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) offerings.Methods and participants We developed an online questionnaire, translated it into 24 languages and distributed it in 30 European countries. We used natural language processing and the Latent Dirichlet Allocation to analyse the qualitative experiences of the participants as well as descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression to determine factors influencing postgraduate educational readiness. Reporting followed the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys guideline.Results The questionnaire was accessed 3589 times, and 667 complete responses from 34 European countries were recorded. The highest educational needs were ‘professional development’, ‘prevention and lifestyle intervention’. Older age, more working experience in rheumatology and higher education levels were positively associated with higher postgraduate educational readiness. While more than half of the HPR were familiar with EULAR as an association and the respondents reported an increased interest in the content of the educational offerings, the courses and the annual congress were poorly attended due to a lack of awareness, comparatively high costs and language barriers.Conclusions To promote the uptake of EULAR educational offerings, attention is needed to increase awareness among national organisations, offer accessible participation costs, and address language barriers

    Visualizing privacy : design and development of a privacy management component

    No full text
    This Master’s Thesis in Media Engineering has been performed at Ericsson in Stockholm, Sweden. Advances in technology and new services for mobile systems come with an increased concern for privacy. In this thesis, this issue is addressed by describing a privacy and trust mechanism that will allow the users to manage and create their privacy settings within a larger mobile system. The functionality and possible designs of a visual component for managing privacy has been developed in order achieve an increased understanding of privacy for the system’s users. This visual component, called The Privacy Display Widget, has been developed for and integrated within a project called MobiLife (2004). A number of research questions have been approached in order to gain a better understanding of privacy in online and mobile systems and also to better understand the user’s needs when it comes to privacy management. This master’s thesis describes the design process for the graphical user interface of the visual component. The underlying functionality is also described as well as privacy management in general and in the system in question. The results of the design process, a set of visualization concepts for the privacy management component, are illustrated and evaluated using expert and heuristic evaluations. Using the knowledge gained through literature studies and the design process, there will then be a discussion of the research questions approached in this thesis.Validerat; 20101217 (root
    • 

    corecore