22 research outputs found
Standardization and clinical implementation of liquid biopsy assays - IMI's CANCER-ID
The innovative medicine initiative (IMI) project CANCER-ID (www.cancer-id.eu) is a 5 year (2014-2019) international public-private partnership of currently 40 partners from 14 countries, with the aim to evaluate technologies for Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC), circulating free tumor DNA (ctDNA), microRNA (miRNA) and exosome enrichment, isolation and analysis. At the core of CANCER-ID's activities are establishment of harmonized best practice protocols from patient sample collection, pre-analytical sample handling, sample and bioinformatics analyses down to the actionable information guiding patient selection and personalized treatment. CANCER-ID is furthermore testign and supporting development of standards for liquid biopsy as well as clinical implementation of liquid biopsy based protocols in the clinical setting. This included interaction with regulatory bodies in Europe (EMA InnovationTask Force) and the US (FDA Public-Private Partnership liaison) to support future approval of liquid biopsies in multi-centered worldwide clinical studies. During the clincial validation phase of the project, clinical-ready liquid biopsies protocols have been implemented in an observational study on the potential predictive value of monitoring treatment response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibition (ICI) in 180 NSCLC patients in the UMC Groningen, The Netherlands, as well as in two ICI-chemotherapy combination studies in triple-Negative BReast Cancer and Luminal B-type breast cancer, respectively, run by the University of Oslo, Norway (Alice NCT03164993 and ICON NCT03409198). Within both studies, blood has been collected at baseline and at follow-up visits for ctDNA and CTC analysis, including technical evaluation of CTC PD-L1 protein expression. The aim is to assess whether the allelic frequency of mutations identified by plasma NGS as a potential measure for Tumor Mutational Burden or the number of PD-L1 positive/overall CTC at different time points is indicative of treatment success. The studies aim at providing data to assess whehter clinical predictive information could be inferred from baseline number of detected mutations and PD-L1 expressing CTCs. Preliminary data of these analyses will be presented. As a follow-up activity of the IMI CANCER-ID program, the European Liquid Biopsy society (ELBS) is currently being established by Prof. Pantel at UKE Hamburg, Germany. The ELBS will be open to all interested liquid biopsy stakeholders worldwide as a platform for scientific exchange, further efforts to standardize technologies and protocols in the field as well as for the initiation of the new basic and clinical research projects with the aim to make liquid biopsies and integral part of clinical studies and patient care. This work is supported by IMI JU & EFPIA (grant no. 115749, CANCER-ID). Samples from patients and healthy volunteers, respectively, were collected under signed informed consent
International study on inter-reader variability for circulating tumor cells in breast cancer
Introduction
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been studied in breast cancer with the CellSearch® system. Given the low CTC counts in non-metastatic breast cancer, it is important to evaluate the inter-reader agreement.
Methods
CellSearch® images (N = 272) of either CTCs or white blood cells or artifacts from 109 non-metastatic (M0) and 22 metastatic (M1) breast cancer patients from reported studies were sent to 22 readers from 15 academic laboratories and 8 readers from two Veridex laboratories. Each image was scored as No CTC vs CTC HER2- vs CTC HER2+. The 8 Veridex readers were summarized to a Veridex Consensus (VC) to compare each academic reader using % agreement and kappa (κ) statistics. Agreement was compared according to disease stage and CTC counts using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.
Results
For CTC definition (No CTC vs CTC), the median agreement between academic readers and VC was 92% (range 69 to 97%) with a median κ of 0.83 (range 0.37 to 0.93). Lower agreement was observed in images from M0 (median 91%, range 70 to 96%) compared to M1 (median 98%, range 64 to 100%) patients (P < 0.001) and from M0 and <3CTCs (median 87%, range 66 to 95%) compared to M0 and ≥3CTCs samples (median 95%, range 77 to 99%), (P < 0.001). For CTC HER2 expression (HER2- vs HER2+), the median agreement was 87% (range 51 to 95%) with a median κ of 0.74 (range 0.25 to 0.90).
Conclusions
The inter-reader agreement for CTC definition was high. Reduced agreement was observed in M0 patients with low CTC counts. Continuous training and independent image review are require
Integrative clustering reveals a novel split in the luminal A subtype of breast cancer with impact on outcome
Background: Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease at the clinical and molecular level. In this study we integrate classifications extracted from five different molecular levels in order to identify integrated subtypes. Methods: Tumor tissue from 425 patients with primary breast cancer from the Oslo2 study was cut and blended, and divided into fractions for DNA, RNA and protein isolation and metabolomics, allowing the acquisition of representative and comparable molecular data. Patients were stratified into groups based on their tumor characteristics from five different molecular levels, using various clustering methods. Finally, all previously identified and newly determined subgroups were combined in a multilevel classification using a "cluster-of-clusters" approach with consensus clustering. Results: Based on DNA copy number data, tumors were categorized into three groups according to the complex arm aberration index. mRNA expression profiles divided tumors into five molecular subgroups according to PAM50 subtyping, and clustering based on microRNA expression revealed four subgroups. Reverse-phase protein array data divided tumors into five subgroups. Hierarchical clustering of tumor metabolic profiles revealed three clusters. Combining DNA copy number and mRNA expression classified tumors into seven clusters based on pathway activity levels, and tumors were classified into ten subtypes using integrative clustering. The final consensus clustering that incorporated all aforementioned subtypes revealed six major groups. Five corresponded well with the mRNA subtypes, while a sixth group resulted from a split of the luminal A subtype; these tumors belonged to distinct microRNA clusters. Gain-of-function studies using MCF-7 cells showed that microRNAs differentially expressed between the luminal A clusters were important for cancer cell survival. These microRNAs were used to validate the split in luminal A tumors in four independent breast cancer cohorts. In two cohorts the microRNAs divided tumors into subgroups with significantly different outcomes, and in another a trend was observed. Conclusions: The six integrated subtypes identified confirm the heterogeneity of breast cancer and show that finer subdivisions of subtypes are evident. Increasing knowledge of the heterogeneity of the luminal A subtype may add pivotal information to guide therapeutic choices, evidently bringing us closer to improved treatment for this largest subgroup of breast cancer.Peer reviewe
DNA methylation signature (SAM40) identifies subgroups of the Luminal A breast cancer samples with distinct survival
Breast cancer patients with Luminal A disease generally have a good prognosis, but among this patient group are patients with good prognosis that are currently overtreated with adjuvant chemotherapy, and also patients that have a bad prognosis and should be given more aggressive treatment. There is no available method for subclassification of this patient group. Here we present a DNA methylation signature (SAM40) that segregates Luminal A patients based on prognosis, and identify one good prognosis group and one bad prognosis group. The prognostic impact of SAM40 was validated in four independent patient cohorts. Being able to subdivide the Luminal A patients may give the two-sided benefit of identifying one subgroup that may benefit from a more aggressive treatment than what is given today, and importantly, identifying a subgroup that may benefit from less treatment.Peer reviewe
International study on inter-reader variability for circulating tumor cells in breast cancer
Introduction: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been studied in breast cancer with the CellSearch® system. Given the low CTC counts in non-metastatic breast cancer, it is important to evaluate the inter-reader agreement.Methods: CellSearch® images (N = 272) of either CTCs or white blood cells or artifacts from 109 non-metastatic (M0) and 22 metastatic (M1) breast cancer patients from reported studies were sent to 22 readers from 15 academic laboratories and 8 readers from two Veridex laboratories. Each image was scored as No CTC vs CTC HER2- vs CTC HER2+. The 8 Veridex readers were summarized to a Veridex Consensus (VC) to compare each academic reader using % agreement and kappa (κ) statistics. Agreement was compared according to disease stage and CTC counts using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.Results: For CTC definition (No CTC vs CTC), the median agreement between academic readers and VC was 92% (range 69 to 97%) with a median κ of 0.83 (range 0.37 to 0.93). Lower agreement was observed in images from M0 (median 91%, range 70 to 96%) compared to M1 (median 98%, range 64 to 100%) patients (P < 0.001) and from M0 and <3CTCs (median 87%, range 66 to 95%) compared to M0 and ≥3CTCs samples (median 95%, range 77 to 99%), (P < 0.001). For CTC HER2 expression (HER2- vs HER2+), the median agreement was 87% (range 51 to 95%) with a median κ of 0.74 (range 0.25 to 0.90).Conclusions: The inter-reader agreement for CTC definition was high. Reduced agreement was observed in M0 patients with low CTC counts. Continuous training and independent image review are required
No evidence that protein truncating variants in BRIP1 are associated with breast cancer risk: implications for gene panel testing.
BACKGROUND: BRCA1 interacting protein C-terminal helicase 1 (BRIP1) is one of the Fanconi Anaemia Complementation (FANC) group family of DNA repair proteins. Biallelic mutations in BRIP1 are responsible for FANC group J, and previous studies have also suggested that rare protein truncating variants in BRIP1 are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. These studies have led to inclusion of BRIP1 on targeted sequencing panels for breast cancer risk prediction. METHODS: We evaluated a truncating variant, p.Arg798Ter (rs137852986), and 10 missense variants of BRIP1, in 48 144 cases and 43 607 controls of European origin, drawn from 41 studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). Additionally, we sequenced the coding regions of BRIP1 in 13 213 cases and 5242 controls from the UK, 1313 cases and 1123 controls from three population-based studies as part of the Breast Cancer Family Registry, and 1853 familial cases and 2001 controls from Australia. RESULTS: The rare truncating allele of rs137852986 was observed in 23 cases and 18 controls in Europeans in BCAC (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.03, p=0.79). Truncating variants were found in the sequencing studies in 34 cases (0.21%) and 19 controls (0.23%) (combined OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.70, p=0.75). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that truncating variants in BRIP1, and in particular p.Arg798Ter, are not associated with a substantial increase in breast cancer risk. Such observations have important implications for the reporting of results from breast cancer screening panels.The COGS project is funded through a European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme grant
(agreement number 223175 - HEALTH-F2-2009-223175). BCAC is funded by Cancer Research UK
[C1287/A10118, C1287/A12014] and by the European Community´s Seventh Framework Programme under
grant agreement number 223175 (grant number HEALTH-F2-2009-223175) (COGS). Funding for the iCOGS
infrastructure came from: the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement
n° 223175 (HEALTH-F2-2009-223175) (COGS), Cancer Research UK (C1287/A10118, C1287/A 10710,
C12292/A11174, C1281/A12014, C5047/A8384, C5047/A15007, C5047/A10692, C8197/A16565), the
National Institutes of Health (CA128978) and Post-Cancer GWAS initiative (1U19 CA148537, 1U19
16
CA148065 and 1U19 CA148112 - the GAME-ON initiative), the Department of Defense (W81XWH-10-1-
0341), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) for the CIHR Team in Familial Risks of Breast
Cancer, Komen Foundation for the Cure, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, and the Ovarian Cancer
Research Fund. This study made use of data generated by the Wellcome Trust Case Control consortium.
Funding for the project was provided by the Wellcome Trust under award 076113. The results published here
are in part based upon data generated by The Cancer Genome Atlas Project established by the National Cancer
Institute and National Human Genome Research Institute.This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from BMJ Group at http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103529