Problematizações (im)pertinentes : (sobre)vivências das travestis nos serviços de atenção básica em saúde no Brasil

Apresentamos neste artigo algumas discussões a respeito dos corpos nomeados travestis, e seus atravessamentos históricos e sociais, evidenciando as influências discursivas e essencialistas que os inventaram. Pontuaremos brevemente o processo de subjetivação, na qual tanto pode produzir culturas em massas, normalizando e padronizando identidades uniformizadas, como pode singularizá-las, possibilitando novas vivências, experimentações, desejos e prazeres. Em seguida discutiremos sobre o sistema sexo/gênero/sexualidade e a criação da sociedade cisheteronormativa, pontuando que esse sistema nada tem de natural, sendo estrategicamente implantado para manter o poder e sua hegemonia. Nesse sentido, propomos neste artigo, problematizar as violências psicológicas vivenciadas pelas travestis nas instituições públicas de saúde, instituições que em si, deveriam erradicar todo tipo de violência, mas que acabam contribuindo com sua intensificação.We present here some discussions about the appointed bodies transvestites, and its historical and social crossings, emphasizing the discursive and essentialist influences that invented them. Briefly We will briefly outline the process of subjectivation, in which both can produce crops in masses, normalizing and standardizing uniform identities, how can distinguishes them, enabling new experiences, trials, desires and pleasures. Then we will discuss about sex system/gender/sexuality and the creation of heteronormative society, pointing out that this system is not at all natural, being strategically deployed to keep the power and hegemony. In this sense, we propose in this article, discuss the psychological violence experienced by transvestites in public health institutions, institutions which in itself should eradicate all forms of violence, but end up contributing to its intensification

Speeches and consumption of sexualities - plotting new possibilities for action in psychologies

Atualmente experimentamos aquilo que muitos autores nomeiam de período de transição das sociedades disciplinares para as de controle, neste cenário complexo, os processos de subjetivação são atravessados por linhas molares e moleculares, micro e macro políticas dentre diversos outros fenômenos compostos por dispositivos de poder e situações de controle que produzem verdades e discursos normativos acerca das sexualidades e gêneros. Diante da desvalorização e inviabilização de subjetividades vistas como dissidentes, da naturalização do biopoder e da crise identitária, as ciências ditas psicológicas enfrentam o desafio de não se transformarem em mais um dos dispositivos normatizadores e padronizadores que produzem corpos reprodutores e favorecem a manutenção do sistema de produção de subjetividades capitalísticas.Currently we experience what many authors call transition’s period from disciplinary societies to control societies, in this complex scenario, the subjectivation’s processes are crossed by molar lines and molecular lines, micro and macro political and many other phenomenas composed by device of power and control situations that produces truths and normative discourses about sexualities and genders. In the face of the devaluation and impracticability of subjectivities considered to be dissidents, the naturalization of biopower and the identity crisis, the psychological sciences are challenged not to turn into another one of the normative and standardizing devices that produces reproducing bodies and to favor the maintenance of the production system of capitalistic subjectivities

Problematizações entre a dinâmica familiar preconizada pela Assistência Social brasileira e a família monoparental feminina

A mulher, ao longo da história, foi alocada em lugar de privacidade e passividade na sociedade. Nos dias atuais, muitas mulheres são chefes de família monoparental e são a maioria dos(as) usuários(as) da política de Assistência Social brasileira, que preconiza em seu trabalho uma heterogeneidade de modelos familiares, embora não saia de um modelo cristalizado de funcionamento e papéis dentro da família. Em uma realidade familiar monoparental feminina, na qual a dinâmica familiar difere das famílias nucleares tradicionais, a política nacional de Assistência Social precisa considerar novas formas de exercício da dinâmica familiar, que não essas tradicionais, e contribuir para a desconstrução de discursos sedimentados que atravessam suas práticas.Palavras-chave: Mulher; Família; Assistência Social.

Discursos e consumos das sexualidades – tramando novas possibilidades para atuação nas psicologias

Currently we experience what many authors call transition’s period from disciplinary societies to control societies, in this complex scenario, the subjectivation’s processes are crossed by molar lines and molecular lines, micro and macro political and many other phenomenas composed by device of power and control situations that produces truths and normative discourses about sexualities and genders. In the face of the devaluation and impracticability of subjectivities considered to be dissidents, the naturalization of biopower and the identity crisis, the psychological sciences are challenged not to turn into another one of the normative and standardizing devices that produces reproducing bodies and to favor the maintenance of the production system of capitalistic subjectivities.Atualmente experimentamos aquilo que muitos autores nomeiam de período de transição das sociedades disciplinares para as de controle, neste cenário complexo, os processos de subjetivação são atravessados por linhas molares e moleculares, micro e macro políticas dentre diversos outros fenômenos compostos por dispositivos de poder e situações de controle que produzem verdades e discursos normativos acerca das sexualidades e gêneros. Diante da desvalorização e inviabilização de subjetividades vistas como dissidentes, da naturalização do biopoder e da crise identitária, as ciências ditas psicológicas enfrentam o desafio de não se transformarem em mais um dos dispositivos normatizadores e padronizadores que produzem corpos reprodutores e favorecem a manutenção do sistema de produção de subjetividades capitalísticas

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear un derstanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5–7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8–11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world’s most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepre sented in biodiversity databases.13–15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may elim inate pieces of the Amazon’s biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological com munities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple or ganism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region’s vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most ne glected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lostinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear understanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5,6,7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8,9,10,11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world's most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepresented in biodiversity databases.13,14,15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may eliminate pieces of the Amazon's biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological communities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple organism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region's vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most neglected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lost

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear understanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5,6,7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8,9,10,11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world's most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepresented in biodiversity databases.13,14,15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may eliminate pieces of the Amazon's biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological communities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple organism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region's vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most neglected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lost