The structural molecular biology network of the State of São Paulo, Brazil

This article describes the achievements of the Structural Molecular Biology Network (SMolBNet), a collaborative program of structural molecular biology, centered in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, and supported by São Paulo State Funding Agency (FAPESP). It gathers twenty scientific groups and is coordinated by the scientific staff of the Center of Structural Molecular Biology, at the National Laboratory of Synchrotron Light (LNLS), in Campinas. The SMolBNet program has been aimed at 1) solving the structure of proteins of interest related to the research projects of the groups. In some cases, the choice has been to select proteins of unknown function or of possible novel structure obtained from the sequenced genomes of the FAPESP genomic program; 2) providing the groups with training in all the steps of the protein structure determination: gene cloning, protein expression, protein purification, protein crystallization and structure determination. Having begun in 2001, the program has been successful in both aims. Here, four groups reveal their participation in the program and describe the structural aspects of the proteins they have selected to study.Esse artigo descreve realizações do Programa SMolBNet (Rede de Biologia Molecular Estrutural) do Estado de São Paulo, apoiado pela FAPESP (Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo). Ele reúne vinte grupos de pesquisa e é coordenado pelos pesquisadores do Laboratório Nacional de Luz Síncrotron (LNLS), em Campinas. O Programa SMolBNet tem como metas: Elucidar a estrutura tridimensional de proteínas de interesse aos grupos de pesquisa componentes do Programa; Prover os grupos com treinamento em todas as etapas de determinação de estrutura: clonagem gênica, expressão de proteínas, purificação de proteínas, cristalização de proteínas e elucidação de suas estruturas. Tendo começado em 2001, o Programa alcançou sucesso em ambas as metas. Neste artigo, quatro dos grupos descrevem suas participações, e discutem aspectos estruturais das proteínas que eles selecionaram para estudos.Centro de Biologia Molecular Estrutural Laboratório Nacional de Luz SíncrotronUniversidade de São Paulo Instituto de Biociências Departamento de Genética e Processos EvolutivosUniversidade de São Paulo Instituto de Química Departamento de BioquímicaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Escola Paulista de MedicinaCentro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde BIREMEUNIFESP, EPMSciEL

Crystal structure of a trimeric form of dephosphocoenzyme A kinase from Escherichia coli

Coenzyme A (CoA) is an essential cofactor used in a wide variety of biochemical pathways. The final step in the biosynthesis of CoA is catalyzed by dephosphocoenzyme A kinase (DPCK, E.C. 2.7.1.24). Here we report the crystal structure of DPCK from Escherichia coli at 1.8 Å resolution. This enzyme forms a tightly packed trimer in its crystal state, in contrast to its observed monomeric structure in solution and to the monomeric, homologous DPCK structure from Haemophilus influenzae. We have confirmed the existence of the trimeric form of the enzyme in solution using gel filtration chromatography measurements. Dephospho-CoA kinase is structurally similar to many nucleoside kinases and other P-loop-containing nucleotide triphosphate hydrolases, despite having negligible sequence similarity to these enzymes. Each monomer consists of five parallel β-strands flanked by α-helices, with an ATP-binding site formed by a P-loop motif. Orthologs of the E. coli DPCK sequence exist in a wide range of organisms, including humans. Multiple alignment of orthologous DPCK sequences reveals a set of highly conserved residues in the vicinity of the nucleotide/CoA binding site

Gcn1 and Actin Binding to Yih1: IMPLICATIONS FOR ACTIVATION OF THE eIF2 KINASE GCN2*

Yeast Yih1 protein and its mammalian ortholog IMPACT, abundant in neurons, are inhibitors of Gcn2, a kinase involved in amino acid homeostasis, stress response, and memory formation. Like Gcn2, Yih1/IMPACT harbors an N-terminal RWD domain that mediates binding to the Gcn2 activator Gcn1. Yih1 competes with Gcn2 for Gcn1 binding, thus inhibiting Gcn2. Yih1 also binds G-actin. Here, we show that Yih1-actin interaction is independent of Gcn1 and that Yih1-Gcn1 binding does not require actin. The Yih1 RWD (residues 1–132) was sufficient for Gcn2 inhibition and Gcn1 binding, but not for actin binding, showing that actin binding is dispensable for inhibiting Gcn2. Actin binding required Yih1 residues 68–258, encompassing part of the RWD and the C-terminal “ancient domain”; however, residues Asp-102 and Glu-106 in helix3 of the RWD were essential for Gcn1 binding and Gcn2 inhibition but dispensable for actin binding. Thus, the Gcn1- and actin-binding sites overlap in the RWD but have distinct binding determinants. Unexpectedly, Yih1 segment 68–258 was defective for inhibiting Gcn2 even though it binds Gcn1 at higher levels than does full-length Yih1. This and other results suggest that Yih1 binds with different requirements to distinct populations of Gcn1 molecules, and its ability to disrupt Gcn1-Gcn2 complexes is dependent on a complete RWD and hindered by actin binding. Modeling of the ancient domain on the bacterial protein YigZ showed peculiarities to the eukaryotic and prokaryotic lineages, suggesting binding sites for conserved cellular components. Our results support a role for Yih1 in a cross-talk between the cytoskeleton and translation

pH Dependence Thermal Stability of a Chymotrypsin Inhibitor from Schizolobium parahyba Seeds

The thermal stability of a Schizolobium parahyba chymotrypsin inhibitor (SPCI) as a function of pH has been investigated using fluorescence, circular dichroism, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The thermodynamic parameters derived from all methods are remarkably similar and strongly suggest the high stability of SPCI under a wide range of pH. The transition temperature (T(m)) values ranging from 57 to 85.3°C at acidic, neutral, and alkaline pH are in good agreement with proteins from mesophilic and thermophilic organisms and corroborate previous data regarding the thermal stability of SPCI. All methods gave transitions curves adequately fitted to a two-state model of the unfolding process as judged by the cooperative ratio between the van't Hoff and the calorimetric enthalpy energies close to unity in all of the pH conditions analyzed, except at pH 3.0. Thermodynamic analysis using all these methods reveals that SPCI is thermally a highly stable protein, over the wide range of pH from 3.0 to 8.8, exhibiting high stability in the pH region of 5.0–7.0. The corresponding maximum stabilities, ΔG(25), were obtained at pH 7.0 with values of 15.4 kcal mol(−1) (combined fluorescence and circular dichroism data), and 15.1 kcal mol(−1) (DSC), considering a ΔC(p) of 1.72 ± 0.24 kcal mol(−1) K(−1). The low histidine content (∼1.7%) and the high acidic residue content (∼22.5%) suggests a flat pH dependence of thermal stability in the region 2.0–8.8 and that the decrease in thermal stability at low pH can be due to the differences in pK values of the acidic groups