10 research outputs found

    Revisión Sistemática: problemática de la generación de microplásticos y sus principales impactos en el medio marino

    Get PDF
    La presente revisión sistemática describe los principales impactos de la presencia de microplásticos en el medio marino y su interacción con los organismos acuáticos mediante la revisión de la literatura científica existente, para ello se eligieron tres objetivos específicos que responden a los impactos en la cadena trófica, las principales fuentes de generación de microplásticos y los contaminantes adheridos a microplásticos. Se obtuvo como resultado que las principales afectaciones en los organismos acuáticos son en el sistemas digestivo y reproductivo a causa de la ingestión de microplásticos de diferentes tamaños en distintas especies analizadas. En cuanto a las principales fuentes de generación de estos polímeros destacan la industria cosmética y la industria pesquera, según su origen primario y secundario, respectivamente. Además se identificaron diversos contaminantes adheridos a los microplásticos entre los que destacan contaminantes orgánicos persistentes y metales pesados, los cuales fueron los que se mencionan con mayor frecuencia en los artículos revisados; de esta manera, los microplásticos podrían funcionar como vectores de contaminantes al ser ingeridos por distintos organismos marinos y a la vez introducirlos en diversos ecosistemas mediante su desplazamiento. Debido a que el tema recién va tomando relevancia y se investiga desde hace poco tiempo, el impacto de los microplásticos es aún impredecible

    Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

    Get PDF
    Funder: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013347Funder: Flemish Society for Critical Care NursesAbstract: Purpose: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are particularly susceptible to developing pressure injuries. Epidemiologic data is however unavailable. We aimed to provide an international picture of the extent of pressure injuries and factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries in adult ICU patients. Methods: International 1-day point-prevalence study; follow-up for outcome assessment until hospital discharge (maximum 12 weeks). Factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injury and hospital mortality were assessed by generalised linear mixed-effects regression analysis. Results: Data from 13,254 patients in 1117 ICUs (90 countries) revealed 6747 pressure injuries; 3997 (59.2%) were ICU-acquired. Overall prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.9–27.3). ICU-acquired prevalence was 16.2% (95% CI 15.6–16.8). Sacrum (37%) and heels (19.5%) were most affected. Factors independently associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries were older age, male sex, being underweight, emergency surgery, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Braden score 3 days, comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency), organ support (renal replacement, mechanical ventilation on ICU admission), and being in a low or lower-middle income-economy. Gradually increasing associations with mortality were identified for increasing severity of pressure injury: stage I (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.2–1.8), stage II (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–1.9), and stage III or worse (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3–3.3). Conclusion: Pressure injuries are common in adult ICU patients. ICU-acquired pressure injuries are associated with mainly intrinsic factors and mortality. Optimal care standards, increased awareness, appropriate resource allocation, and further research into optimal prevention are pivotal to tackle this important patient safety threat

    Correction to: Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study (Intensive Care Medicine, (2021), 47, 2, (160-169), 10.1007/s00134-020-06234-9)

    No full text
    The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The members of the ESICM Trials Group Collaborators were not shown in the article but only in the ESM. The full list of collaborators is shown below. The original article has been corrected
    corecore