Assessing mangrove restoration practices using species‐interaction networks

Mangroves are uniquely important ecosystems, for preserving biodiversity, sustaining livelihoods and mitigating against climate change. However they are degraded globally and are therefore a priority for ecosystem restoration. To date, the assessment of mangrove restoration outcomes is generally poor, and the limited studies that do exist are focussed largely on forest area. Thus, more holistic ways of assessing the outcomes of mangrove restoration projects on biodiversity and associated ecological processes are urgently needed. Ecological networks are a useful tool for simultaneously examining both. Here, we assessed the utility of using species-interaction networks for evaluating mangrove restoration outcomes for the first time. We compared the structure and complexity of mangrove ecological networks in replicated ‘Monoculture Reforestation’, ‘Mixed Species Regeneration’ and ‘Reference Forest’ plots in two study areas in Sulawesi, Indonesia, an estuarine and a coastal fringe mangrove system. We also combined and evaluated sampling methods, utilising traditional plant-animal sampling while also integrating video recording data in a novel way. We found significant differences in the structure and complexity of mangrove networks between restored and natural plots, with contrasting effects between the two sites. Our results show differences in the complex ways in which taxa interact in mangrove restoration projects, which would be overlooked if common biodiversity metrics such as species-richness were used alone, with consequences for the restoration of ecosystem functioning. We also highlight the utility of video recording data collection for constructing species interaction networks, overcoming the detrimental impacts of observer presence for some key species

Why we shouldn’t blame women for gender disparity in academia : perspectives of women in zoology

The following letter, from a network of women zoologists, is a reply to the article of AlShebli et al. (2020), which suggests that female protégés reap more benefits when mentored by men and concludes that female mentors hinder the success of their female protégés and the quality of their impact. This contribution has two parts. First, we highlight the most relevant methodological flaws which, in our opinion, may have impacted the conclusions of AlShebli et al. (2020). Second, we discuss issues pertaining to women in science, bring a perspective of Women in Zoology and discuss how current diversity policies are positively changing our field

Carcinofauna bêntica estuarina de dois manguezais da costa amazônica maranhense, Brasil

RESUMO Este estudo teve por objetivo caracterizar a diversidade carcinológica de dois manguezais (igarapés Buenos Aires e Tronco) da Baía de São Marcos, na costa amazônica maranhense, Brasil. Foram realizadas quatro coletas trimestrais entre setembro de 2011 a junho de 2012. Em cada coleta foram analisados três pontos por área (zona 1, zona 2 e zona 3), totalizando 24 amostras. O material biológico foi coletado por meio de arrastos com rede do tipo puçá, catação manual e técnica de braceamento. Paralelamente à coleta do material biológico, foram verificados a salinidade, temperatura e oxigênio dissolvido de cada área analisada. Para avaliar a similaridade de agrupamento entre as zonas dos manguezais foi aplicada a análise de cluster e consecutiva elaboração de dendrogramas. Foi coletado um total de 873 indivíduos, representando nove famílias e 21 espécies, das quais Ocypodidae e Penaeidae foram as mais abundantes. Em relação à distribuição espacial, percebe-se que Clibanarius vittatus (Bosc, 1802), Clibanarius tricolor (Gibbes, 1850), Clibanarius foresti Holthuis, 1959 e Uca maracoani (Latreille, 1802) se restringiram à primeira zona dos dois manguezais, enquanto outras dez espécies foram observadas por todo o manguezal, o que pode estar intimamente relacionado ao seu hábito de vida. De um modo geral, o igarapé Buenos Aires apresentou maior número de espécies em relação ao igarapé Tronco, no entanto, existe grande similaridade faunística de crustáceos decápodes entre as duas áreas amostradas

Climate changes in mangrove forests and salt marshes

Abstract This synthesis is framed within the scope of the Brazilian Benthic Coastal Habitat Monitoring Network (ReBentos WG 4: Mangroves and Salt Marshes), focusing on papers that examine biodiversity-climate interactions as well as human-induced factors including those that decrease systemic resilience. The goal is to assess difficulties related to the detection of climate and early warning signals from monitoring data. We also explored ways to circumvent some of the obstacles identified. Exposure and sensitivity of mangrove and salt marsh species and ecosystems make them extremely vulnerable to environmental impacts and potential indicators of sea level and climate-driven environmental change. However, the interpretation of shifts in mangroves and salt marsh species and systemic attributes must be scrutinized considering local and setting-level energy signature changes; including disturbance regime and local stressors, since these vary widely on a regional scale. The potential for adaptation and survival in response to climate change depends, in addition to the inherent properties of species, on contextual processes at the local, landscape, and regional levels that support resilience. Regardless of stressor type, because of the convergence of social and ecological processes, coastal zones should be targeted for anticipatory action to reduce risks and to integrate these ecosystems into adaptation strategies. Management must be grounded on proactive mitigation and collaborative action based on long-term ecosystem-based studies and well-designed monitoring programs that can 1) provide real-time early warning and 2) close the gap between simple correlations that provide weak inferences and process-based approaches that can yield increasingly reliable attribution and improved levels of anticipation

Mangroves support an estimated annual abundance of over 700 billion juvenile fish and invertebrates

Data availability: The raw fish density data, and species and species group predictions are available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14965669).Code availability: Code used in this study is available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14965669).Supplementary information is available online at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-025-02229-w#Sec21 .Mangroves are a critical habitat that provide a suite of ecosystem services and support livelihoods. Here we undertook a global analysis to model the density and abundance of 37 commercially important juvenile fish and juvenile and resident invertebrates that are known to extensively use mangroves, by fitting expert-identified drivers of density to fish and invertebrate density data from published field studies. The numerical model predicted high densities throughout parts of Southeast and South Asia, the northern coast of South America, the Red Sea, and the Caribbean and Central America. Application of our model globally estimates that mangroves support an annual abundance of over 700 billion juvenile fish and invertebrates. While abundance at the early life-history stage does not directly equate to potential economic or biomass gains, this estimate indicates the critical role of mangroves globally in supporting fish and fisheries, and further builds the case for their conservation and restoration.This work forms part of a project supported by the International Climate Initiative (IKI). The German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) supports this initiative on the basis of a decision adopted by the German Bundestag. Initial work on this study was supported by the Lyda Hill Foundation