A prospective, randomized, double-blinded control study on comparison of tramadol, clonidine and dexmedetomidine for post spinal anesthesia shivering

Introduction: Shivering, a common intraoperative problem under spinal anesthesia increases the oxygen consumption considerably and is uncomfortable and distressing to the patient, anesthesiologist as well as surgeon. The present study was designed to explore the effectiveness of tramadol, clonidine and dexmedetomidine in the treatment of post spinal anesthesia shivering and to look for their adverse effects. Methods: This prospective, randomized, double blinded control study was done on 90 patients who developed shivering under spinal anesthesia. They were randomly allocated into three groups with Group T receiving tramadol 1 mg.kg−1, Group C getting clonidine 1 mcg.kg−1 and Group D patients receiving dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg.kg−1. The time taken to control shivering, recurrence rate, hemodynamic variables, sedation score and adverse effects were observed. Results: Dexmedetomidine was faster in the control of shivering in 5.7 ± 0.79 minutes (min) whereas tramadol took 6.76 ± 0.93 min and clonidine was slower with 9.43 ± 0.93 min. The recurrence rate was much lower in the dexmedetomidine group with 3.3% than for clonidine (10%) and tramadol (23.3%) group. The sedation achieved with dexmedetomidine was better than clonidine and tramadol. The tramadol group had more cases of vomiting (four) and dexmedetomidine group had six cases of hypotension and two cases of bradycardia. Two of the clonidine patients encountered bradycardia and hypotension. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine is better than tramadol and clonidine in the control of shivering because of its faster onset and less recurrence rate. Though complications are encountered in the dexmedetomidine group, they are treatable. Resumo: Introdução: O tremor, problema comum no período intraoperatório sob raquianestesia, aumenta consideravelmente o consumo de oxigênio, além de ser desconfortável e angustiante para o paciente, o anestesiologista e o cirurgião. O presente estudo foi concebido para explorar a eficácia de tramadol, clonidina e dexmedetomidina no tratamento de tremores pós-raquianestesia e observar seus efeitos adversos. Métodos: Este estudo prospectivo, randômico, controlado e duplo-cego foi realizado com 90 pacientes que desenvolveram tremores sob raquianestesia. Os pacientes foram randomicamente alocados em três grupos para receber 1 mg.kg−1 de tramadol (Grupo T), 1 mcg.kg−1 de clonidina (Grupo C) e 0,5 mcg.kg−1 de dexmedetomidina (Grupo D). O tempo necessário para controlar os tremores, a taxa de recorrência, as variáveis hemodinâmicas, os níveis de sedação e os efeitos adversos foram registrados. Resultados: Dexmedetomidina foi mais rápida para controlar os tremores, com tempo de 5,7 ± 0,79 minutos (min); o tempo de tramadol foi de 6,76 ± 0,93 min; clonidina foi mais lenta, com tempo de 9,43 ± 0,93 min. A taxa de recorrência foi muito menor no grupo dexmedetomidina (3,3%) que nos grupos clonidina (10%) e tramadol (23,3%). A sedação obtida com dexmedetomidina foi melhor que a obtida com clonidina e tramadol. O grupo tramadol teve mais casos de vômito (quatro); o grupo dexmedetomidina teve seis casos de hipotensão e dois casos de bradicardia. Dois pacientes do grupo clonidina apresentaram bradicardia e hipotensão. Conclusão: Dexmedetomidina foi melhor que tramadol e clonidina para o controlo de tremores devido ao seu início de ação mais rápido e taxa de recorrência mais baixa. Embora complicações tenham sido observadas no grupo dexmedetomidina, elas foram tratáveis. Keywords: Clonidine, Dexmedetomidine, Hypothermia, Shivering, Spinal anesthesia, Tramadol, Palavras-chave: Clonidina, Dexmedetomidina, Hipotermia, Tremor, Raquianestesia, Tramado

A prospective, randomized, double-blinded control study on comparison of tramadol, clonidine and dexmedetomidine for post spinal anesthesia shivering

Abstract Introduction Shivering, a common intraoperative problem under spinal anesthesia increases the oxygen consumption considerably and is uncomfortable and distressing to the patient, anesthesiologist as well as surgeon. The present study was designed to explore the effectiveness of tramadol, clonidine and dexmedetomidine in the treatment of post spinal anesthesia shivering and to look for their adverse effects. Methods This prospective, randomized, double blinded control study was done on 90 patients who developed shivering under spinal anesthesia. They were randomly allocated into three groups with Group T receiving tramadol 1 mg.kg-1, Group C getting clonidine 1 mcg.kg-1 and Group D patients receiving dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg.kg-1. The time taken to control shivering, recurrence rate, hemodynamic variables, sedation score and adverse effects were observed. Results Dexmedetomidine was faster in the control of shivering in 5.7 ± 0.79 minutes (min) whereas tramadol took 6.76 ± 0.93 min and clonidine was slower with 9.43 ± 0.93 min. The recurrence rate was much lower in the dexmedetomidine group with 3.3% than for clonidine (10%) and tramadol (23.3%) group. The sedation achieved with dexmedetomidine was better than clonidine and tramadol. The tramadol group had more cases of vomiting (four) and dexmedetomidine group had six cases of hypotension and two cases of bradycardia. Two of the clonidine patients encountered bradycardia and hypotension. Conclusion Dexmedetomidine is better than tramadol and clonidine in the control of shivering because of its faster onset and less recurrence rate. Though complications are encountered in the dexmedetomidine group, they are treatable

Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Effect of Dexmedetomidine and Morphine as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Bupivacaine in Infraumbilical Surgeries: A Randomised Clinical Trial

Introduction: Regional anaesthesia is the standard technique for lower limb infraumbilical procedures. To provide a better analgesic profile, adjuvants are added to local anaesthetics to enhance their action. Opioids have been used as an adjuvant for a long-time. With evolving pharmacology, various drugs satisfy the criteria of being an adjuvant. One such drug is Dexmedetomidine, a novel alpha-2 agonist. Aim: To compare the duration of analgesia of intrathecal Morphine and Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in a subarachnoid block for lower limb infraumbilical surgeries. Materials and Methods: In this randomised clinical, double-blinded study conducted in a multispecialty hospital over the period of June 2020 to February 2021, 70 patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group M received Morphine 125 μg, and Group D received dexmedetomidine 5 μg as an adjuvant to 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. The primary outcome was to compare the duration of postoperative analgesia. The secondary results assessed the block characteristics, haemodynamic parameters, rescue analgesic consumption, sedation score, and side-effects like bradycardia, hypotension, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and respiratory depression. Data was spread in an Excel sheet and descriptive analysis done. Normally distributed continuous variables were compared using a Student’s t-test, and discrete variables were compared using a Chi-square test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Both groups were similar with respect to age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anaesthesiologists grading, and duration of surgery. The duration of analgesia was 956.97±120.043 minutes in group M and 392.83±50.354 minutes in group D (p-value <0.001). The total consumption of paracetamol was 1984.71±499.111 mg in group M and 3543.86±406.17 mg in group D. The onset and regression were significantly faster in group D. There was significant hypotension and bradycardia up to the 40th minute and an increase in heart rate, respiratory rate, and mean arterial pressure between 5-7 hours in group D. The sedation score was more in group D for the initial two hours. Postoperatively, the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus was more in group M. Conclusion: It can be concluded that 125 μg of intrathecal morphine is a better adjuvant to spinal bupivacaine, providing excellent postoperative analgesia compared to 5 μg of intrathecal dexmedetomidine. However, dexmedetomidine had more incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, and sedation when compared to morphine intrathecally