The Bacteriophage λ DNA replication protein P inhibits the oriC DNA-and ATP-binding functions of the DNA replication initiator protein DnaA of escherichia coli

Under the condition of expression of λ P protein at lethal level, the oriC DNA-binding activity is significantly affected in wild-type E. coli but not in the rpl mutant. In purified system, the λ P protein inhibits the binding of both oriC DNA and ATP to the wild-type DnaA protein but not to the rpl DnaA protein. We conclude that the λ P protein inhibits the binding of oriC DNA and ATP to the wild-type DnaA protein, which causes the inhibition of host DNA synthesis initiation that ultimately leads to bacterial death. A possible beneficial effect of this interaction of λ P protein with E. coli DNA initiator protein DnaA for phage DNA replication has been proposed

Isolation of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain from soil that can degrade polyurethane diol.

Polyurethane diol (PUR-diol), a synthetic polymer, is widely used as a modifier for water-soluble resins and emulsions in wood appliances and auto coatings. Non-biodegradability of polyurethanes (PUR) and PUR-based materials poses a threat to environment that has led scientists to isolate microbes capable of degrading PUR. However, the bio-degradation of PUR-diol has not yet been reported. In this study, we report isolation of a soil bacterium that can survive using PUR-diol as sole carbon source. PUR-diol degradation by the organism was confirmed by thin layer chromatographic analysis of the conditioned medium obtained after the growth wherein a significant reduction of PUR-diol was observed compared to non-inoculated medium. To quantify the PUR-diol degradation, a sensitive assay based on High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography has been developed that showed 32% degradation of PUR-diol by the organism in 10 days. Degradation kinetics showed the maximal depletion of PUR-diol during logarithmic growth of the organism indicating a direct relation between the growth and PUR-diol degradation. Mutagenic study and GC-MS analysis revealed that esterase activity is involved in this degradation event. The ribotyping and metabolic fingerprinting analysis showed that this organism is a strain of Pseudomonous aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa). It has also been observed that this strain is able to degrade Impranil DLN™, a variety of commercially available PUR. Therefore this study identifies a new bacterium from soil that has the potential to reduce PUR-related waste burden and adds a new facet to diverse functional activities of P. aeruginosa

cAMP Stringently Regulates Human Cathelicidin Antimicrobial Peptide Expression in the Mucosal Epithelial Cells by Activating cAMP-response Element-binding Protein, AP-1, and Inducible cAMP Early Repressor*

Little is known about the regulation of the innate host defense peptide cathelicidin at the mucosal surfaces. Expression is believed to be transcriptionally regulated, and several cis-acting elements have been identified in the cathelicidin putative promoter. However, the trans-acting factors have not been clearly defined. We have recently reported that bacterial exotoxins suppress cathelicidin expression in sodium butyrate-differentiated intestinal epithelial cells (ECs), and this may be mediated through inducible cAMP early repressor. Here we have shown that cAMP-signaling pathways transcriptionally regulate cathelicidin expression in various ECs. cAMP-response element-binding protein (CREB) and AP-1 (activator protein-1) bind to the cathelicidin putative promoter in vitro. Additionally, transcriptional complexes containing CREB, AP-1, and cathelicidin upstream regulatory sequences are formed within ECs. We have also shown that these complexes may activate cathelicidin promoter and are required for its inducible expression in ECs. This is underscored by the fact that silencing of CREB and AP-1 results in failure of ECs to up-regulate cathelicidin, and hepatitis B virus X protein may use CREB to induce cathelicidin. On the other hand, inducible cAMP early repressor competes with CREB and AP-1 for binding to the cathelicidin promoter and represses transcription, thus functioning as a counter-regulatory mechanism. Finally, both CREB and AP-1 were shown to play major roles in the regulation of cathelicidin in sodium butyrate-differentiated HT-29 cells. This is the first report of a detailed mechanistic study of inducible cathelicidin expression in the mucosal ECs. At the same time, it describes a novel immunomodulatory function of cAMP