Protein-altering variants associated with body mass index implicate pathways that control energy intake and expenditure in obesity (vol 50, pg 26, 2017)

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper

Publisher Correction:Protein-altering variants associated with body mass index implicate pathways that control energy intake and expenditure in obesity

In the published version of this paper, the name of author Emanuele Di Angelantonio was misspelled. This error has now been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article

Protein-altering variants associated with body mass index implicate pathways that control energy intake and expenditure in obesity (vol 50, pg 26, 2018)

A.P.R. was supported by R01DK089256. A.W.H. is supported by an NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (APP1103329). A.K.M. received funding from NIH/NIDDK K01DK107836. A.T.H. is a Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator (WT098395) and an NIH Research Senior Investigator. A.P.M. is a Wellcome Trust Senior Fellow in Basic Biomedical Science (WT098017). A.R.W. is supported by the European Research Council (SZ-245 50371-GLUCOSEGENES-FP7-IDEAS-ERC). A.U.J. is supported by the American Heart Association (13POST16500011) and the NIH (R01DK089256, R01DK101855, K99HL130580). B.K. and E.K.S. were supported by the Doris Duke Medical Foundation, the NIH (R01DK106621), the University of Michigan Internal Medicine Department, Division of Gastroenterology, the University of Michigan Biological Sciences Scholars Program and the Central Society for Clinical Research. C.J.W. is supported by the NIH (HL094535, HL109946). D.J.L. is supported by R01HG008983 and R21DA040177. D.R.W. is supported by the Danish Diabetes Academy, which is funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation. V. Salomaa has been supported by the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research. F.W.A. is supported by Dekker scholarship–Junior Staff Member 2014T001 Netherlands Heart Foundation and the UCL Hospitals NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. F.D. is supported by the UK MRC (MC_UU_12013/1-9). G.C.-P. received scholarship support from the University of Queensland and QIMR Berghofer. G.L. is funded by the Montreal Heart Institute Foundation and the Canada Research Chair program. H.Y. and T.M.F. are supported by the European Research Council (323195; SZ-245 50371-GLUCOSEGENES-FP7-IDEAS-ERC). I.M.H. is supported by BMBF (01ER1206) and BMBF (01ER1507m), the NIH and the Max Planck Society. J. Haessler was supported by NHLBI R21HL121422. J.N.H. is supported by NIH R01DK075787. K.E.N. was supported by the NIH (R01DK089256, R01HD057194, U01HG007416, R01DK101855) and the American Heart Association (13GRNT16490017). M.A.R. is supported by the Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine Award, Clarendon Scholarship. M.I.M. is a Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator (WT098381) and an NIH Research Senior Investigator. M.D. is supported by the NCI (R25CA94880, P30CA008748). P.R.N. is supported by the European Research Council (AdG; 293574), the Research Council of Norway, the University of Bergen, the KG Jebsen Foundation and the Helse Vest, Norwegian Diabetes Association. P.T.E. is supported by the NIH (1R01HL092577, R01HL128914, K24HL105780), by an Established Investigator Award from the American Heart Association (13EIA14220013) and by the Foundation Leducq (14CVD01). P.L.A. was supported by NHLBI R21HL121422 and R01DK089256. P.L.H. is supported by the NIH (NS33335, HL57818). R.S.F. is supported by the NIH (T32GM096911). R.J.F.L. is supported by the NIH (R01DK110113, U01HG007417, R01DK101855, R01DK107786). S.A.L. is supported by the NIH (K23HL114724) and a Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Clinical Scientist Development Award. T.D.S. holds an ERC Advanced Principal Investigator award. T.A.M. is supported by an NHMRC Fellowship (APP1042255). T.H.P. received Lundbeck Foundation and Benzon Foundation support. V.T. is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). Z.K. is supported by the Leenaards Foundation, the Swiss National Science Foundation (31003A-143914) and SystemsX.ch (51RTP0_151019). Part of this work was conducted using the UK Biobank resource (project numbers 1251 and 9072)

Outcomes from elective colorectal cancer surgery during the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic

Aim This study aimed to describe the change in surgical practice and the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on mortality after surgical resection of colorectal cancer during the initial phases of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Method This was an international cohort study of patients undergoing elective resection of colon or rectal cancer without preoperative suspicion of SARS-CoV-2. Centres entered data from their first recorded case of COVID-19 until 19 April 2020. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included anastomotic leak, postoperative SARS-CoV-2 and a comparison with prepandemic European Society of Coloproctology cohort data. Results From 2073 patients in 40 countries, 1.3% (27/2073) had a defunctioning stoma and 3.0% (63/2073) had an end stoma instead of an anastomosis only. Thirty-day mortality was 1.8% (38/2073), the incidence of postoperative SARS-CoV-2 was 3.8% (78/2073) and the anastomotic leak rate was 4.9% (86/1738). Mortality was lowest in patients without a leak or SARS-CoV-2 (14/1601, 0.9%) and highest in patients with both a leak and SARS-CoV-2 (5/13, 38.5%). Mortality was independently associated with anastomotic leak (adjusted odds ratio 6.01, 95% confidence interval 2.58–14.06), postoperative SARS-CoV-2 (16.90, 7.86–36.38), male sex (2.46, 1.01–5.93), age >70 years (2.87, 1.32–6.20) and advanced cancer stage (3.43, 1.16–10.21). Compared with prepandemic data, there were fewer anastomotic leaks (4.9% versus 7.7%) and an overall shorter length of stay (6 versus 7 days) but higher mortality (1.7% versus 1.1%). Conclusion Surgeons need to further mitigate against both SARS-CoV-2 and anastomotic leak when offering surgery during current and future COVID-19 waves based on patient, operative and organizational risks

Preoperative nasopharyngeal swab testing and postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing elective surgery during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Surgical services are preparing to scale up in areas affected by COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate the association between preoperative SARS-CoV-2 testing and postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing elective cancer surgery. METHODS: This international cohort study included adult patients undergoing elective surgery for cancer in areas affected by SARS-CoV-2 up to 19 April 2020. Patients suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection before operation were excluded. The primary outcome measure was postoperative pulmonary complications at 30 days after surgery. Preoperative testing strategies were adjusted for confounding using mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Of 8784 patients (432 hospitals, 53 countries), 2303 patients (26.2 per cent) underwent preoperative testing: 1458 (16.6 per cent) had a swab test, 521 (5.9 per cent) CT only, and 324 (3.7 per cent) swab and CT. Pulmonary complications occurred in 3.9 per cent, whereas SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed in 2.6 per cent. After risk adjustment, having at least one negative preoperative nasopharyngeal swab test (adjusted odds ratio 0.68, 95 per cent confidence interval 0.68 to 0.98; P = 0.040) was associated with a lower rate of pulmonary complications. Swab testing was beneficial before major surgery and in areas with a high 14-day SARS-CoV-2 case notification rate, but not before minor surgery or in low-risk areas. To prevent one pulmonary complication, the number needed to swab test before major or minor surgery was 18 and 48 respectively in high-risk areas, and 73 and 387 in low-risk areas. CONCLUSION: Preoperative nasopharyngeal swab testing was beneficial before major surgery and in high SARS-CoV-2 risk areas. There was no proven benefit of swab testing before minor surgery in low-risk areas