Molecular mechanism for the interaction between gibberellin and brassinosteroid signaling pathways in Arabidopsis

[EN] Plant development is modulated by the convergence of multiple environmental and endogenous signals, and the mechanisms that allow the integration of different signaling pathways is currently being unveiled. A paradigmatic case is the concurrence of brassinosteroid (BR) and gibberellin (GA) signaling in the control of cell expansion during photomorphogenesis, which is supported by physiological observations in several plants but for which no molecular mechanism has been proposed. In this work, we show that the integration of these two signaling pathways occurs through the physical interaction between the DELLA protein GAI, which is a major negative regulator of the GA pathway, and BRASSINAZOLE RESISTANT1 (BZR1), a transcription factor that broadly regulates gene expression in response to BRs. We provide biochemical evidence, both in vitro and in vivo, indicating that GAI inactivates the transcriptional regulatory activity of BZR1 upon their interaction by inhibiting the ability of BZR1 to bind to target promoters. The physiological relevance of this interaction was confirmed by the observation that the dominant gai-1 allele interferes with BR-regulated gene expression, whereas the bzr1-1D allele displays enhanced resistance to DELLA accumulation during hypocotyl elongation. Because DELLA proteins mediate the response to multiple environmental signals, our results provide an initial molecular framework for the integration with BRs of additional pathways that control plant development.We thank the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre, Tai-ping Sun, Zhi-Yong Wang, Yanhai Yin, Ana Cano-Delgado, Luis Lopez-Molina, and Francois Parcy for providing seeds or reagents; Laura Garcia-Carcel and Gaston Pizzio for help in the early stages of this work; and Salome Prat for fruitful discussions, sharing unpublished results, and careful reading of the manuscript. J.G.-B. holds a Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas Fellowship of the Joint Admissions Exercise Predoctoral Program. E. G. M. is recipient of a postdoctoral "Juan de la Cierva" contract from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation. A. L. was supported in part by a fellowship of the Fondo per gli Investimenti della Ricerca di Base Progetto Giovani of the Italian Ministry of Education, University, and Research. Work in the authors' laboratory was funded by Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation Grants BIO2007-60923, BIO2010-15071, and CSD2007-00057 and by Generalitat Valenciana Grants ACOMP/2010/190 and PROMETEO/2010/020. Rothamsted Research is funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) of the United Kingdom.Gallego Bartolomé, J.; Minguet, EG.; Grau Enguix, F.; Abbas, M.; Locascio, AAM.; Thomas, SG.; Alabadí Diego, D.... (2012). Molecular mechanism for the interaction between gibberellin and brassinosteroid signaling pathways in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109(33):13446-13451. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119992109S134461345110933Depuydt, S., & Hardtke, C. S. (2011). Hormone Signalling Crosstalk in Plant Growth Regulation. Current Biology, 21(9), R365-R373. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.013Alabadi, D., Blazquez, M. A., Carbonell, J., Ferrandiz, C., & Perez-Amador, M. A. (2009). Instructive roles for hormones in plant development. The International Journal of Developmental Biology, 53(8-9-10), 1597-1608. doi:10.1387/ijdb.072423daHartwell, L. H., Hopfield, J. J., Leibler, S., & Murray, A. W. (1999). From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature, 402(S6761), C47-C52. doi:10.1038/35011540Kuppusamy, K. T., Walcher, C. L., & Nemhauser, J. L. (2008). Cross-regulatory mechanisms in hormone signaling. Plant Molecular Biology, 69(4), 375-381. doi:10.1007/s11103-008-9389-2Jaillais, Y., & Chory, J. (2010). Unraveling the paradoxes of plant hormone signaling integration. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 17(6), 642-645. doi:10.1038/nsmb0610-642Sun, T. (2011). The Molecular Mechanism and Evolution of the GA–GID1–DELLA Signaling Module in Plants. Current Biology, 21(9), R338-R345. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.036Hou, X., Lee, L. Y. C., Xia, K., Yan, Y., & Yu, H. (2010). DELLAs Modulate Jasmonate Signaling via Competitive Binding to JAZs. Developmental Cell, 19(6), 884-894. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2010.10.024Fonseca, S., Chico, J. M., & Solano, R. (2009). The jasmonate pathway: the ligand, the receptor and the core signalling module. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 12(5), 539-547. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2009.07.013Frigerio, M., Alabadí, D., Pérez-Gómez, J., García-Cárcel, L., Phillips, A. L., Hedden, P., & Blázquez, M. A. (2006). Transcriptional Regulation of Gibberellin Metabolism Genes by Auxin Signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 142(2), 553-563. doi:10.1104/pp.106.084871Vert, G., Walcher, C. L., Chory, J., & Nemhauser, J. L. (2008). Integration of auxin and brassinosteroid pathways by Auxin Response Factor 2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(28), 9829-9834. doi:10.1073/pnas.0803996105Nemhauser, J. L., Mockler, T. C., & Chory, J. (2004). Interdependency of Brassinosteroid and Auxin Signaling in Arabidopsis. PLoS Biology, 2(9), e258. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020258Clouse, S. D. (2011). Brassinosteroid Signal Transduction: From Receptor Kinase Activation to Transcriptional Networks Regulating Plant Development. The Plant Cell, 23(4), 1219-1230. doi:10.1105/tpc.111.084475Tanaka, K., Nakamura, Y., Asami, T., Yoshida, S., Matsuo, T., & Okamoto, S. (2003). Physiological Roles of Brassinosteroids in Early Growth of Arabidopsis: Brassinosteroids Have a Synergistic Relationship with Gibberellin as well as Auxin in Light-Grown Hypocotyl Elongation. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 22(3), 259-271. doi:10.1007/s00344-003-0119-3Alabadí, D., Gil, J., Blázquez, M. A., & García-Martínez, J. L. (2004). Gibberellins Repress Photomorphogenesis in Darkness. Plant Physiology, 134(3), 1050-1057. doi:10.1104/pp.103.035451Li, J., Nagpal, P., Vitart, V., McMorris, T. C., & Chory, J. (1996). A Role for Brassinosteroids in Light-Dependent Development of Arabidopsis. Science, 272(5260), 398-401. doi:10.1126/science.272.5260.398Szekeres, M., Németh, K., Koncz-Kálmán, Z., Mathur, J., Kauschmann, A., Altmann, T., … Koncz, C. (1996). Brassinosteroids Rescue the Deficiency of CYP90, a Cytochrome P450, Controlling Cell Elongation and De-etiolation in Arabidopsis. Cell, 85(2), 171-182. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81094-6Chory, J., Nagpal, P., & Peto, C. A. (1991). Phenotypic and Genetic Analysis of det2, a New Mutant That Affects Light-Regulated Seedling Development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 445-459. doi:10.1105/tpc.3.5.445Cheadle, C., Vawter, M. P., Freed, W. J., & Becker, K. G. (2003). Analysis of Microarray Data Using Z Score Transformation. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 5(2), 73-81. doi:10.1016/s1525-1578(10)60455-2Koornneef, M., & van der Veen, J. H. (1980). Induction and analysis of gibberellin sensitive mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) heynh. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 58(6), 257-263. doi:10.1007/bf00265176Davière, J.-M., de Lucas, M., & Prat, S. (2008). Transcriptional factor interaction: a central step in DELLA function. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 18(4), 295-303. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2008.05.004Leivar, P., Tepperman, J. M., Monte, E., Calderon, R. H., Liu, T. L., & Quail, P. H. (2009). Definition of Early Transcriptional Circuitry Involved in Light-Induced Reversal of PIF-Imposed Repression of Photomorphogenesis in Young Arabidopsis Seedlings. The Plant Cell, 21(11), 3535-3553. doi:10.1105/tpc.109.070672Shin, J., Kim, K., Kang, H., Zulfugarov, I. S., Bae, G., Lee, C.-H., … Choi, G. (2009). Phytochromes promote seedling light responses by inhibiting four negatively-acting phytochrome-interacting factors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(18), 7660-7665. doi:10.1073/pnas.0812219106Silverstone, A. L. (2001). Repressing a Repressor: Gibberellin-Induced Rapid Reduction of the RGA Protein in Arabidopsis. THE PLANT CELL ONLINE, 13(7), 1555-1566. doi:10.1105/tpc.13.7.1555Dill, A., Jung, H.-S., & Sun, T. -p. (2001). The DELLA motif is essential for gibberellin-induced degradation of RGA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(24), 14162-14167. doi:10.1073/pnas.251534098Alabadí, D., Gallego-Bartolomé, J., Orlando, L., García-Cárcel, L., Rubio, V., Martínez, C., … Blázquez, M. A. (2007). Gibberellins modulate light signaling pathways to prevent Arabidopsis seedling de-etiolation in darkness. The Plant Journal, 53(2), 324-335. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03346.xYin, Y., Wang, Z.-Y., Mora-Garcia, S., Li, J., Yoshida, S., Asami, T., & Chory, J. (2002). BES1 Accumulates in the Nucleus in Response to Brassinosteroids to Regulate Gene Expression and Promote Stem Elongation. Cell, 109(2), 181-191. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00721-3He, J.-X., Gendron, J. M., Yang, Y., Li, J., & Wang, Z.-Y. (2002). The GSK3-like kinase BIN2 phosphorylates and destabilizes BZR1, a positive regulator of the brassinosteroid signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(15), 10185-10190. doi:10.1073/pnas.152342599Wang, Z.-Y., Nakano, T., Gendron, J., He, J., Chen, M., Vafeados, D., … Chory, J. (2002). Nuclear-Localized BZR1 Mediates Brassinosteroid-Induced Growth and Feedback Suppression of Brassinosteroid Biosynthesis. Developmental Cell, 2(4), 505-513. doi:10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00153-3Ryu, H., Kim, K., Cho, H., Park, J., Choe, S., & Hwang, I. (2007). Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling of BZR1 Mediated by Phosphorylation Is Essential in Arabidopsis Brassinosteroid Signaling. The Plant Cell, 19(9), 2749-2762. doi:10.1105/tpc.107.053728Gampala, S. S., Kim, T.-W., He, J.-X., Tang, W., Deng, Z., Bai, M.-Y., … Wang, Z.-Y. (2007). An Essential Role for 14-3-3 Proteins in Brassinosteroid Signal Transduction in Arabidopsis. Developmental Cell, 13(2), 177-189. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2007.06.009De Lucas, M., Davière, J.-M., Rodríguez-Falcón, M., Pontin, M., Iglesias-Pedraz, J. M., Lorrain, S., … Prat, S. (2008). A molecular framework for light and gibberellin control of cell elongation. Nature, 451(7177), 480-484. doi:10.1038/nature06520Sun, T., & Gubler, F. (2004). MOLECULAR MECHANISM OF GIBBERELLIN SIGNALING IN PLANTS. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 55(1), 197-223. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141753He, J.-X. (2005). BZR1 Is a Transcriptional Repressor with Dual Roles in Brassinosteroid Homeostasis and Growth Responses. Science, 307(5715), 1634-1638. doi:10.1126/science.1107580Sun, Y., Fan, X.-Y., Cao, D.-M., Tang, W., He, K., Zhu, J.-Y., … Wang, Z.-Y. (2010). Integration of Brassinosteroid Signal Transduction with the Transcription Network for Plant Growth Regulation in Arabidopsis. Developmental Cell, 19(5), 765-777. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2010.10.010Triezenberg, S. J., Kingsbury, R. C., & McKnight, S. L. (1988). Functional dissection of VP16, the trans-activator of herpes simplex virus immediate early gene expression. Genes & Development, 2(6), 718-729. doi:10.1101/gad.2.6.718Feng, S., Martinez, C., Gusmaroli, G., Wang, Y., Zhou, J., Wang, F., … Deng, X. W. (2008). Coordinated regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana development by light and gibberellins. Nature, 451(7177), 475-479. doi:10.1038/nature06448Gallego-Bartolomé, J., Arana, M. V., Vandenbussche, F., Žádníková, P., Minguet, E. G., Guardiola, V., … Blázquez, M. A. (2011). Hierarchy of hormone action controlling apical hook development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 67(4), 622-634. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04621.xGallego-Bartolomé, J., Alabadí, D., & Blázquez, M. A. (2011). DELLA-Induced Early Transcriptional Changes during Etiolated Development in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE, 6(8), e23918. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023918Steber, C. M., & McCourt, P. (2001). A Role for Brassinosteroids in Germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 125(2), 763-769. doi:10.1104/pp.125.2.763Yin, Y., Vafeados, D., Tao, Y., Yoshida, S., Asami, T., & Chory, J. (2005). A New Class of Transcription Factors Mediates Brassinosteroid-Regulated Gene Expression in Arabidopsis. Cell, 120(2), 249-259. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.044Müller, B., & Sheen, J. (2008). Cytokinin and auxin interaction in root stem-cell specification during early embryogenesis. Nature, 453(7198), 1094-1097. doi:10.1038/nature0694

Robustness of circadian clocks to daylight fluctuations: hints from the picoeucaryote Ostreococcus tauri

The development of systemic approaches in biology has put emphasis on identifying genetic modules whose behavior can be modeled accurately so as to gain insight into their structure and function. However most gene circuits in a cell are under control of external signals and thus quantitative agreement between experimental data and a mathematical model is difficult. Circadian biology has been one notable exception: quantitative models of the internal clock that orchestrates biological processes over the 24-hour diurnal cycle have been constructed for a few organisms, from cyanobacteria to plants and mammals. In most cases, a complex architecture with interlocked feedback loops has been evidenced. Here we present first modeling results for the circadian clock of the green unicellular alga Ostreococcus tauri. Two plant-like clock genes have been shown to play a central role in Ostreococcus clock. We find that their expression time profiles can be accurately reproduced by a minimal model of a two-gene transcriptional feedback loop. Remarkably, best adjustment of data recorded under light/dark alternation is obtained when assuming that the oscillator is not coupled to the diurnal cycle. This suggests that coupling to light is confined to specific time intervals and has no dynamical effect when the oscillator is entrained by the diurnal cycle. This intringuing property may reflect a strategy to minimize the impact of fluctuations in daylight intensity on the core circadian oscillator, a type of perturbation that has been rarely considered when assessing the robustness of circadian clocks

Global Profiling of Rice and Poplar Transcriptomes Highlights Key Conserved Circadian-Controlled Pathways and cis-Regulatory Modules

Circadian clocks provide an adaptive advantage through anticipation of daily and seasonal environmental changes. In plants, the central clock oscillator is regulated by several interlocking feedback loops. It was shown that a substantial proportion of the Arabidopsis genome cycles with phases of peak expression covering the entire day. Synchronized transcriptome cycling is driven through an extensive network of diurnal and clock-regulated transcription factors and their target cis-regulatory elements. Study of the cycling transcriptome in other plant species could thus help elucidate the similarities and differences and identify hubs of regulation common to monocot and dicot plants.Using a combination of oligonucleotide microarrays and data mining pipelines, we examined daily rhythms in gene expression in one monocotyledonous and one dicotyledonous plant, rice and poplar, respectively. Cycling transcriptomes were interrogated under different diurnal (driven) and circadian (free running) light and temperature conditions. Collectively, photocycles and thermocycles regulated about 60% of the expressed nuclear genes in rice and poplar. Depending on the condition tested, up to one third of oscillating Arabidopsis-poplar-rice orthologs were phased within three hours of each other suggesting a high degree of conservation in terms of rhythmic gene expression. We identified clusters of rhythmically co-expressed genes and searched their promoter sequences to identify phase-specific cis-elements, including elements that were conserved in the promoters of Arabidopsis, poplar, and rice.Our results show that the cycling patterns of many circadian clock genes are highly conserved across poplar, rice, and Arabidopsis. The expression of many orthologous genes in key metabolic and regulatory pathways is diurnal and/or circadian regulated and phased to similar times of day. Our results confirm previous findings in Arabidopsis of three major classes of cis-regulatory modules within the plant circadian network: the morning (ME, GBOX), evening (EE, GATA), and midnight (PBX/TBX/SBX) modules. Identification of identical overrepresented motifs in the promoters of cycling genes from different species suggests that the core diurnal/circadian cis-regulatory network is deeply conserved between mono- and dicotyledonous species

The HY5-PIF regulatory module coordinates light and temperature control of photosynthetic gene transcription

The ability to interpret daily and seasonal alterations in light and temperature signals is essential for plant survival. This is particularly important during seedling establishment when the phytochrome photoreceptors activate photosynthetic pigment production for photoautotrophic growth. Phytochromes accomplish this partly through the suppression of phytochrome interacting factors (PIFs), negative regulators of chlorophyll and carotenoid biosynthesis. While the bZIP transcription factor long hypocotyl 5 (HY5), a potent PIF antagonist, promotes photosynthetic pigment accumulation in response to light. Here we demonstrate that by directly targeting a common promoter cis-element (G-box), HY5 and PIFs form a dynamic activation-suppression transcriptional module responsive to light and temperature cues. This antagonistic regulatory module provides a simple, direct mechanism through which environmental change can redirect transcriptional control of genes required for photosynthesis and photoprotection. In the regulation of photopigment biosynthesis genes, HY5 and PIFs do not operate alone, but with the circadian clock. However, sudden changes in light or temperature conditions can trigger changes in HY5 and PIFs abundance that adjust the expression of common target genes to optimise photosynthetic performance and growth

Diurnal and Circadian Rhythms in the Tomato Transcriptome and Their Modulation by Cryptochrome Photoreceptors

BACKGROUND: Circadian clocks are internal molecular time-keeping mechanisms that provide living organisms with the ability to adjust their growth and physiology and to anticipate diurnal environmental changes. Circadian clocks, without exception, respond to light and, in plants, light is the most potent and best characterized entraining stimulus. The capacity of plants to respond to light is achieved through a number of photo-perceptive proteins including cryptochromes and phytochromes. There is considerable experimental evidence demonstrating the roles of photoreceptors in providing light input to the clock. METHODOLOGY: In order to identify genes regulated by diurnal and circadian rhythms, and to establish possible functional relations between photoreceptors and the circadian clock in tomato, we monitored the temporal transcription pattern in plants entrained to long-day conditions, either by large scale comparative profiling, or using a focused approach over a number of photosensory and clock-related genes by QRT-PCR. In parallel, focused transcription analyses were performed in cry1a- and in CRY2-OX tomato genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: We report a large series of transcript oscillations that shed light on the complex network of interactions among tomato photoreceptors and clock-related genes. Alteration of cryptochrome gene expression induced major changes in the rhythmic oscillations of several other gene transcripts. In particular, over-expression of CRY2 had an impact not only on day/night fluctuations but also on rhythmicity under constant light conditions. Evidence was found for widespread diurnal oscillations of transcripts encoding specific enzyme classes (e.g. carotenoid biosynthesis enzymes) as well as for post-transcriptional diurnal and circadian regulation of the CRY2 transcript

Analysis and Practical Guideline of Constraint-Based Boolean Method in Genetic Network Inference

Boolean-based method, despite of its simplicity, would be a more attractive approach for inferring a network from high-throughput expression data if its effectiveness has not been limited by high false positive prediction. In this study, we explored factors that could simply be adjusted to improve the accuracy of inferring networks. Our work focused on the analysis of the effects of discretisation methods, biological constraints, and stringency of Boolean function assignment on the performance of Boolean network, including accuracy, precision, specificity and sensitivity, using three sets of microarray time-series data. The study showed that biological constraints have pivotal influence on the network performance over the other factors. It can reduce the variation in network performance resulting from the arbitrary selection of discretisation methods and stringency settings. We also presented the master Boolean network as an approach to establish the unique solution for Boolean analysis. The information acquired from the analysis was summarised and deployed as a general guideline for an efficient use of Boolean-based method in the network inference. In the end, we provided an example of the use of such a guideline in the study of Arabidopsis circadian clock genetic network from which much interesting biological information can be inferred

REVEILLE8 and PSEUDO-REPONSE REGULATOR5 Form a Negative Feedback Loop within the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock

Circadian rhythms provide organisms with an adaptive advantage, allowing them to regulate physiological and developmental events so that they occur at the most appropriate time of day. In plants, as in other eukaryotes, multiple transcriptional feedback loops are central to clock function. In one such feedback loop, the Myb-like transcription factors CCA1 and LHY directly repress expression of the pseudoresponse regulator TOC1 by binding to an evening element (EE) in the TOC1 promoter. Another key regulatory circuit involves CCA1 and LHY and the TOC1 homologs PRR5, PRR7, and PRR9. Purification of EE–binding proteins from plant extracts followed by mass spectrometry led to the identification of RVE8, a homolog of CCA1 and LHY. Similar to these well-known clock genes, expression of RVE8 is circadian-regulated with a dawn phase of expression, and RVE8 binds specifically to the EE. However, whereas cca1 and lhy mutants have short period phenotypes and overexpression of either gene causes arrhythmia, rve8 mutants have long-period and RVE8-OX plants have short-period phenotypes. Light input to the clock is normal in rve8, but temperature compensation (a hallmark of circadian rhythms) is perturbed. RVE8 binds to the promoters of both TOC1 and PRR5 in the subjective afternoon, but surprisingly only PRR5 expression is perturbed by overexpression of RVE8. Together, our data indicate that RVE8 promotes expression of a subset of EE–containing clock genes towards the end of the subjective day and forms a negative feedback loop with PRR5. Thus RVE8 and its homologs CCA1 and LHY function close to the circadian oscillator but act via distinct molecular mechanisms