Deconvolution of the immune landscape of cancer transcriptomics data, its relationship to patient survival and tumour subtypes

The immune response to a given cancer can profoundly influence a tumour’s trajectory and response to treatment, but the ability to analyse this component of the microenvironment is still limited. To this end, a number of immune marker gene signatures have been reported which were designed to enable the profiling of the immune system from transcriptomics data from tissue and blood samples. Our initial analyses of these resources suggested that these existing signatures had a number of serious deficiencies. In this study, a co-expression based approach led to the development of a new set of immune cell marker gene signatures (ImSig). ImSig supports the quantitative and qualitative assessment of eight immune cell types in expression data generated from either blood or tissue. The utility of ImSig was validated across a wide variety of clinical datasets and compared to published signatures. Evidence is provided for the superiority of ImSig and the utility of network analysis for data deconvolution, demonstrating the ability to monitor changes in immune cell abundance and activation state. ImSig was also used to examine immune infiltration in the context of cancer classification and treatment. Patient-matched ER+ breast cancer samples before and after treatment with letrozole were analysed. Significant elevation of infiltration of macrophages and T cells on treatment was observed in responders but not in non-responders, potentially revealing a biomarker for response. ImSig was also used to study the immune infiltrate in 12 cancer types. By computing the relative abundance of immune cells in these samples, their relationship to survival was investigated. It was interesting to observe that half of the cancers showed trends towards poor prognosis with increased infiltration of immune cells. ImSig alongside the network-based framework can also be used for a more explorative analysis such as to identify biomarkers and activation or differentiation states of immune cells. Melanoma is a highly immunogenic cancer and has shown tremendous success with immune checkpoint inhibitors in a subset of patients. In chapter-6, the molecular subgrouping of melanoma was explored using a network-based approach. Despite the plethora of evidence suggesting various aspects of the immune system to contribute towards the response to immunotherapy in melanoma, there has been little to no effort to consider this heterogeneity while developing molecular subgroups. The use of ImSig was therefore explored for the stratification of melanoma patients into immuno-subgroups. The subgrouping methodology divided the tumours into four groups with different immune profiles. Interestingly, these groupings showed prognostic significance, reiterating the need to consider the heterogeneity of immune cells in future studies. On identifying the most dominant phenotypes that contribute towards prognosis of these patients and in comparison to the published subgroupings of melanoma, we argue that the subgroup of samples enriched in keratin genes are not clinically meaningful. ImSig and the associated analysis framework described in this work, support the retrospective analysis of tissue derived transcriptomics data enabling better characterisation of immune infiltrate associated with disease, and in so doing, provide a resource useful for prognosis and potentially in guiding treatment

nirmallab/cspot: First release

CSPOT: A scalable framework for automated processing of highly multiplexed tissue image

Peptide Vaccine Therapy in Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths and the second most prevalent (after breast cancer) in the western world. High metastatic relapse rates and severe side effects associated with the adjuvant treatment have urged oncologists and clinicians to find a novel, less toxic therapeutic strategy. Considering the limited success of the past clinical trials involving peptide vaccine therapy to treat colorectal cancer, it is necessary to revise our knowledge of the immune system and its potential use in tackling cancer. This review presents the efforts of the scientific community in the development of peptide vaccine therapy for colorectal cancer. We review recent clinical trials and the strategies for immunologic monitoring of responses to peptide vaccine therapy. We also discuss the mechanisms underlying the therapy and potential molecular targets in colon cancer

Multidimensional Genome-wide Analyses Show Accurate FVIII Integration by ZFN in Primary Human Cells

10.1038/mt.2015.223MOLECULAR THERAPY243607-61

Health-status outcomes with invasive or conservative care in coronary disease

BACKGROUND In the ISCHEMIA trial, an invasive strategy with angiographic assessment and revascularization did not reduce clinical events among patients with stable ischemic heart disease and moderate or severe ischemia. A secondary objective of the trial was to assess angina-related health status among these patients. METHODS We assessed angina-related symptoms, function, and quality of life with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) at randomization, at months 1.5, 3, and 6, and every 6 months thereafter in participants who had been randomly assigned to an invasive treatment strategy (2295 participants) or a conservative strategy (2322). Mixed-effects cumulative probability models within a Bayesian framework were used to estimate differences between the treatment groups. The primary outcome of this health-status analysis was the SAQ summary score (scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status). All analyses were performed in the overall population and according to baseline angina frequency. RESULTS At baseline, 35% of patients reported having no angina in the previous month. SAQ summary scores increased in both treatment groups, with increases at 3, 12, and 36 months that were 4.1 points (95% credible interval, 3.2 to 5.0), 4.2 points (95% credible interval, 3.3 to 5.1), and 2.9 points (95% credible interval, 2.2 to 3.7) higher with the invasive strategy than with the conservative strategy. Differences were larger among participants who had more frequent angina at baseline (8.5 vs. 0.1 points at 3 months and 5.3 vs. 1.2 points at 36 months among participants with daily or weekly angina as compared with no angina). CONCLUSIONS In the overall trial population with moderate or severe ischemia, which included 35% of participants without angina at baseline, patients randomly assigned to the invasive strategy had greater improvement in angina-related health status than those assigned to the conservative strategy. The modest mean differences favoring the invasive strategy in the overall group reflected minimal differences among asymptomatic patients and larger differences among patients who had had angina at baseline

Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease

BACKGROUND Among patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, whether clinical outcomes are better in those who receive an invasive intervention plus medical therapy than in those who receive medical therapy alone is uncertain. METHODS We randomly assigned 5179 patients with moderate or severe ischemia to an initial invasive strategy (angiography and revascularization when feasible) and medical therapy or to an initial conservative strategy of medical therapy alone and angiography if medical therapy failed. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. A key secondary outcome was death from cardiovascular causes or myocardial infarction. RESULTS Over a median of 3.2 years, 318 primary outcome events occurred in the invasive-strategy group and 352 occurred in the conservative-strategy group. At 6 months, the cumulative event rate was 5.3% in the invasive-strategy group and 3.4% in the conservative-strategy group (difference, 1.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 3.0); at 5 years, the cumulative event rate was 16.4% and 18.2%, respectively (difference, 121.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 124.7 to 1.0). Results were similar with respect to the key secondary outcome. The incidence of the primary outcome was sensitive to the definition of myocardial infarction; a secondary analysis yielded more procedural myocardial infarctions of uncertain clinical importance. There were 145 deaths in the invasive-strategy group and 144 deaths in the conservative-strategy group (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.32). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, we did not find evidence that an initial invasive strategy, as compared with an initial conservative strategy, reduced the risk of ischemic cardiovascular events or death from any cause over a median of 3.2 years. The trial findings were sensitive to the definition of myocardial infarction that was used