Assessment of Several Empirical Relationships for Deriving Daily Means of UV-A Irradiance from Meteosat-Based Estimates of the Total Irradiance

International audienceDaily estimates of the solar UV-A radiation (315–400 nm) at the surface, anywhere, anytime, are needed in many epidemiology studies. Satellite-derived databases of solar total irradiance, combined with empirical relationships converting totals into daily means of UV-A irradiance I UV , are a means to satisfy such needs. Four empirical relationships are applied to three different databases: HelioClim-3 (versions 4 and 5) and CAMS Radiation Service—formerly known as MACC-RAD—derived from Meteosat images. The results of these combinations are compared to ground-based measurements located in mid-latitude Europe, mostly in Belgium. Whatever the database, the relationships of Podstawczynska (2010) and of Bilbao et al. (2011) exhibit very large underestimation and RMSE on the order of 40%–50% of the mean I UV. Better and more acceptable results are attained with the relationships proposed by Zavodska and Reichrt (1985) and that of Wald (2012). The relative RMSE is still large and in the range 10%–30% of the mean I UV. The correlation coefficients are large for all relationships. Each of them captures most of the variability contained in the UV measurements and can be used in studies where correlation plays a major role

Smart Approaches for Evaluating Photosynthetically Active Radiation at Various Stations Based on MSG Prime Satellite Imagery

Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) is the 400–700 nm portion of the solar radiation spectrum that photoautotrophic organisms including plants, algae, and cyanobacteria use for photosynthesis. PAR is a key variable in global ecosystem and Earth system modeling, playing a prominent role in carbon and water cycling. Alongside air temperature, water availability, and atmospheric CO2 concentration, PAR controls photosynthesis and consequently biomass productivity in general. The management of agricultural and horticultural crops, forests, grasslands, and even grasses at sports venues is a non-exhaustive list of applications for which an accurate knowledge of the PAR resource is desirable. Modern agrivoltaic systems also require a good knowledge of PAR in conjunction with the variables needed to monitor the co-located photovoltaic system. In situ quality-controlled PAR sensors provide high-quality information for specific locations. However, due to associated installation and maintenance costs, such high-quality data are relatively scarce and generally extend over a restricted and sometimes non-continuous period. Numerous studies have already demonstrated the potential offered by surface radiation estimates based on satellite information as reliable alternatives to in situ measurements. The accuracy of these estimations is site-dependent and is related, for example, to the local climate, landscape, and viewing angle of the satellite. To assess the accuracy of PAR satellite models, we inter-compared 11 methods for estimating 30 min surface PAR based on satellite-derived estimations at 33 ground-based station locations over several climate regions in Europe, Africa, and South America. Averaged across stations, the results showed average relative biases (relative to the measurement mean) across methods of 1 to 20%, an average relative standard deviation of 25 to 30%, an average relative root mean square error of 25% to 35% and a correlation coefficient always above 0.95 for all methods. Improved performance was seen for all methods at relatively cloud-free sites, and quality degraded towards the edge of the Meteosat Second Generation viewing area. A good compromise between computational time, memory allocation, and performance was achieved for most locations using the Jacovides coefficient applied to the global horizontal irradiance from HelioClim-3 or the CAMS Radiation Service. In conclusion, satellite estimations can provide a reliable alternative estimation of ground-based PAR for most applications

An Unprecedented Arctic Ozone Depletion Event During Spring 2020 and its Impacts Across Europe

International audienceThe response of the ozone column across Europe to the extreme 2020 Arctic ozone depletion was examined by analysing ground-based observations at 38 European stations. The ozone decrease at the northernmost site, Ny-Ålesund (79°N) was about 43% with respect to a climatology of more than 30 years. The magnitude of the decrease declined by about 0.7 % deg-1 moving to south to reach nearly 15% at 40°N. In addition, it was found that the variations of the ozone column at each of the selected stations in March-May were similar to those observed at Ny-Ålesund but with a delay increasing to about 20 days at mid-latitudes with a gradient of approximately 0.5 days deg-1. The distributions of reconstructed ozone column anomalies over a sector covering a large European area show decreasing ozone that started from the north at the beginning of April 2020 and spread south. Such behaviour was shown to be similar to that observed after the Arctic ozone depletion in 2011. Stratospheric dynamical patterns in March to May 2011 and during 2020 suggested that the migration of ozone-poor air masses from polar areas to the south after the vortex breakup caused the observed ozone responses. A brief survey of the ozone mass mixing ratios at three stratospheric levels showed the exceptional strength of the 2020 episode. Despite the stronger and longer-lasting Arctic ozone loss in 2020, the analysis in this work indicates a similar ozone response at latitudes below 50°N to both 2011 and 2020 phenomena

UV Index monitoring in Europe

The UV Index was established more than 20 years ago as a tool for sun protection and health care. Shortly after its introduction, UV Index monitoring started in several countries either by newly acquired instruments or by converting measurements from existing instruments into the UV Index. The number of stations and networks has increased over the years. Currently, 160 stations in 25 European countries deliver online values to the public via the Internet. In this paper an overview of these UV Index monitoring sites in Europe is given. The overview includes instruments as well as quality assurance and quality control procedures. Furthermore, some examples are given about how UV Index values are presented to the public. Through these efforts, 57% of the European population is supplied with high quality information, enabling them to adapt behaviour. Although health care, including skin cancer prevention, is costeffective, a proportion of the European population still doesn’t have access to UV Index information