Metabolite production and/or gut microbiota-associated metabotypes?

Funding Information: This research was supported by the Project PID2019-103914RB-I00 from the Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN, Spain) and by Fundación Séneca de la Región de Murcia (Spain), grant number 20880/PI/18. J.A.G.-B. was supported by a Standard European Marie Curie Fellowship from the European Commission. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 838991. A.C.M. and C.E.I.-A. are the holders of predoctoral grants from MINECO (grant number BES-2016-078098) and MICINN (grant number FPU18/03961) (Spain), respectively. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Royal Society of Chemistry.Despite the high human interindividual variability in response to (poly)phenol consumption, the cause-and-effect relationship between some dietary (poly)phenols (flavanols and olive oil phenolics) and health effects (endothelial function and prevention of LDL oxidation, respectively) has been well established. Most of the variables affecting this interindividual variability have been identified (food matrix, gut microbiota, single-nucleotide-polymorphisms, etc.). However, the final drivers for the health effects of (poly)phenol consumption have not been fully identified. At least partially, these drivers could be (i) the (poly)phenols ingested that exert their effect in the gastrointestinal tract, (ii) the bioavailable metabolites that exert their effects systemically and/or (iii) the gut microbial ecology associated with (poly)phenol metabolism (i.e., gut microbiota-associated metabotypes). However, statistical associations between health effects and the occurrence of circulating and/or excreted metabolites, as well as cross-sectional studies that correlate gut microbial ecologies and health, do not prove a causal role unequivocally. We provide a critical overview and perspective on the possible main drivers of the effects of (poly)phenols on human health and suggest possible actions to identify the putative actors responsible for the effects.publishersversionpublishe

Dietary Phenolics against Breast Cancer. A Critical Evidence-Based Review and Future Perspectives

© 2020 by the authors.Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy and the leading cause of cancer-related death in adult women worldwide. Over 85% of BC cases are non-hereditary, caused by modifiable extrinsic factors related to lifestyle, including dietary habits, which play a crucial role in cancer prevention. Although many epidemiological and observational studies have inversely correlated the fruit and vegetable consumption with the BC incidence, the involvement of their phenolic content in this correlation remains contradictory. During decades, wrong approaches that did not consider the bioavailability, metabolism, and breast tissue distribution of dietary phenolics persist behind the large currently existing gap between preclinical and clinical research. In the present review, we provide comprehensive preclinical and clinical evidence according to physiologically relevant in vitro and in vivo studies. Some dietary phenolics such as resveratrol (RSV), quercetin, isoflavones, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), lignans, and curcumin are gaining attention for their chemopreventive properties in preclinical research. However, the clinical evidence of dietary phenolics as BC chemopreventive compounds is still inconclusive. Therefore, the only way to validate promising preclinical results is to conduct clinical trials in BC patients. In this regard, future perspectives on dietary phenolics and BC research are also critically discussedThis research was funded by the projects PID2019-103914RB-I00 (MICINN, Spain), 19900/GERM/15 (Fundación Séneca de la Región de Murcia, Spain), and 201870E014 and 201770E081 (CSIC, Spain). J.A.G.B. was supported by a Juan de la Cierva contract (IJCI-2016-27633) from the Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (Spain) and a Standard European Marie Curie Fellowship from the European Commission. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 838991.Peer reviewe

Treatment with tocilizumab or corticosteroids for COVID-19 patients with hyperinflammatory state: a multicentre cohort study (SAM-COVID-19)

Objectives: The objective of this study was to estimate the association between tocilizumab or corticosteroids and the risk of intubation or death in patients with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) with a hyperinflammatory state according to clinical and laboratory parameters. Methods: A cohort study was performed in 60 Spanish hospitals including 778 patients with COVID-19 and clinical and laboratory data indicative of a hyperinflammatory state. Treatment was mainly with tocilizumab, an intermediate-high dose of corticosteroids (IHDC), a pulse dose of corticosteroids (PDC), combination therapy, or no treatment. Primary outcome was intubation or death; follow-up was 21 days. Propensity score-adjusted estimations using Cox regression (logistic regression if needed) were calculated. Propensity scores were used as confounders, matching variables and for the inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTWs). Results: In all, 88, 117, 78 and 151 patients treated with tocilizumab, IHDC, PDC, and combination therapy, respectively, were compared with 344 untreated patients. The primary endpoint occurred in 10 (11.4%), 27 (23.1%), 12 (15.4%), 40 (25.6%) and 69 (21.1%), respectively. The IPTW-based hazard ratios (odds ratio for combination therapy) for the primary endpoint were 0.32 (95%CI 0.22-0.47; p < 0.001) for tocilizumab, 0.82 (0.71-1.30; p 0.82) for IHDC, 0.61 (0.43-0.86; p 0.006) for PDC, and 1.17 (0.86-1.58; p 0.30) for combination therapy. Other applications of the propensity score provided similar results, but were not significant for PDC. Tocilizumab was also associated with lower hazard of death alone in IPTW analysis (0.07; 0.02-0.17; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Tocilizumab might be useful in COVID-19 patients with a hyperinflammatory state and should be prioritized for randomized trials in this situatio

Tissue deconjugation of urolithin A glucuronide to free urolithin A in systemic inflammation

Urolithin A (Uro-A) is an anti-inflammatory and cancer chemopreventive metabolite produced by the gut microbiota from the polyphenol ellagic acid. However, in vivo conjugation of Uro-A to Uro-A glucuronide (Uro-A glur) dramatically hampers its activity. We describe here for the first time the tissue deconjugation of Uro-A glur to Uro-A after lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation, which could explain the systemic in vivo activity of free Uro-A in microenvironments subjected to inflammatory stimuli.This research has been supported by the Project 201770E081 from the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC, Spain) and by the Project AGL2015-64124-R (Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Spain). J. A. G.-B. is a holder of a “Juan de la Cierva” contract from the Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (Spain).We acknowledge support of the publication fee by the CSIC Open Access Support Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI)Peer reviewe

Human studies carried out with pomegranate-based products (juice and extract)

The consumption of pomegranate juices and extracts has long been linked to many health benefits beyond nutrition, described mainly by innumerable preclinical studies. However, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) concluded in 2010 that a cause and effect relationship could not be established between the consumption of pomegranate-derived products and all the health claims presented. There are no additional EFSA opinions on health claims specifically addressed to pomegranate in the last decade. Scope and approach This review comprehensively compiles all human studies conducted on pomegranate. The aim is to discuss these studies critically to identify possible flaws and propose guidelines that might help establish a cause and effect relationship between pomegranate-derived product consumption and health. Key findings and conclusions To date, 86 human studies have evaluated the health benefits of pomegranate juices and extracts. The most promising, albeit scarce, evidence is related to blood pressure improvement. Less evidence deals with inflammation, cancer, cognitive function, physical activity, and gut microbiota modulation (prebiotic effects). After a decade since EFSA's opinion, human evidence remains inconsistent, making it difficult to support most claimed health effects. The lack of effects and(or) data discrepancy might be attributable to design limitations, including insufficient product characterization and interindividual variability that influence pomegranate polyphenols' bioefficacy. New coordinated strategies between policy makers, research/academic institutions, and industry are needed to move forward. Therefore, this review presents a roadmap to conduct well-designed trials and cover existing gaps, which could establish a cause-effect relation between pomegranate consumption and health benefits beyond nutrition.European Commission: PolyBiota - Polyphenols and Gut Microbiota interaction in Cardiovascular Health (838991)Peer reviewe

Evidence for health properties of pomegranate juices and extracts beyond nutrition: A critical systematic review of human studies

Background The consumption of pomegranate juices and extracts has long been linked to many health benefits beyond nutrition, described mainly by innumerable preclinical studies. However, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) concluded in 2010 that a cause and effect relationship could not be established between the consumption of pomegranate-derived products and all the health claims presented. There are no additional EFSA opinions on health claims specifically addressed to pomegranate in the last decade. Scope and approach This review comprehensively compiles all human studies conducted on pomegranate. The aim is to discuss these studies critically to identify possible flaws and propose guidelines that might help establish a cause and effect relationship between pomegranate-derived product consumption and health. Key findings and conclusions To date, 86 human studies have evaluated the health benefits of pomegranate juices and extracts. The most promising, albeit scarce, evidence is related to blood pressure improvement. Less evidence deals with inflammation, cancer, cognitive function, physical activity, and gut microbiota modulation (prebiotic effects). After a decade since EFSA's opinion, human evidence remains inconsistent, making it difficult to support most claimed health effects. The lack of effects and(or) data discrepancy might be attributable to design limitations, including insufficient product characterization and interindividual variability that influence pomegranate polyphenols' bioefficacy. New coordinated strategies between policy makers, research/academic institutions, and industry are needed to move forward. Therefore, this review presents a roadmap to conduct well-designed trials and cover existing gaps, which could establish a cause-effect relation between pomegranate consumption and health benefits beyond nutrition.This work was supported by the MICINN (Spain) under grant number [PID2019-103914RB-I00], and by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Curie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement [No 838991]

Proteolysis, lipolysis, volatile compounds, texture, and flavor of Hispánico cheese made using frozen ewe milk curds pressed for different times

Hispánico cheese is manufactured in Spain from a mixture of cow and ewe milk. Production of ewe milk varies throughout the year, with a peak in spring and a valley in summer and autumn. To overcome this seasonal shortage, curd from spring ewe milk may be frozen and used for cheese manufacture some months later. In the present work, ewe milk curds pressed for 15, 60, or 120. min were held at -24°C for 4 mo, thawed, cut to 1-mm pieces, and mixed with fresh cow milk curd for the manufacture of experimental Hispánico cheeses. Control cheese was made from a mixture of pasteurized cow and ewe milk in the same (8020) proportion. Cheeses, made in duplicate experiments, were analyzed throughout a 60-d ripening period. No significant differences between cheeses were found for lactic acid bacteria counts, dry matter content, hydrophilic peptides, 47 out of 68. vol.tile compounds, texture, and flavor characteristics. On the other hand, differences of minor practical significance between experimental and control cheeses, unrelated to the use of frozen ewe milk curd or the pressing time of ewe milk curd, were found for pH value, aminopeptidase activity, proteolysis, hydrophobic peptides, free amino acids, free fatty acids, and the remaining 21. vol.tile compounds. It may be concluded that the use of frozen ewe milk curd in the manufacture of Hispánico cheese does not alter its main characteristics. © 2010 American Dairy Science Association

Influence of physicochemical characteristics and high pressure processing on the volatile fraction of Iberian dry-cured ham

The volatile fraction of 30 Iberian dry-cured hams of different physicochemical characteristics and the effect of high pressure processing (HPP) at 600 MPa on volatile compounds were investigated. According to the analysis of variance carried out on the levels of 122 volatile compounds, intramuscular fat content influenced the levels of 8 benzene compounds, 5 carboxylic acids, 2 ketones, 2 furanones, 1 alcohol, 1 aldehyde and 1 sulfur compound, salt concentration influenced the levels of 1 aldehyde and 1 ketone, salt-in-lean ratio had no effect on volatile compounds, and water activity influenced the levels of 3 sulfur compounds, 1 alcohol and 1 aldehyde. HPP-treated samples of Iberian ham had higher levels of 4 compounds and lower levels of 31 compounds than untreated samples. A higher influence of HPP treatment on volatile compounds than physicochemical characteristics was observed for Iberian ham. Therefore, HPP treatment conditions should be optimized in order to diminish its possible effect on Iberian ham odor and aroma characteristics. © 2017 Elsevier Lt

Main drivers of (poly)phenol effects on human health: Metabolite production and/or gut microbiota-associated metabotypes?

Despite the high human interindividual variability in response to (poly)phenol consumption, the cause-and-effect relationship between some dietary (poly)phenols (flavanols and olive oil phenolics) and health effects (endothelial function and prevention of LDL oxidation, respectively) has been well established. Most of the variables affecting this interindividual variability have been identified (food matrix, gut microbiota, single-nucleotide-polymorphisms, etc.). However, the final drivers for the health effects of (poly)phenol consumption have not been fully identified. At least partially, these drivers could be (i) the (poly)phenols ingested that exert their effect in the gastrointestinal tract, (ii) the bioavailable metabolites that exert their effects systemically and/or (iii) the gut microbial ecology associated with (poly)phenol metabolism (i.e., gut microbiota-associated metabotypes). However, statistical associations between health effects and the occurrence of circulating and/or excreted metabolites, as well as cross-sectional studies that correlate gut microbial ecologies and health, do not prove a causal role unequivocally. We provide a critical overview and perspective on the possible main drivers of the effects of (poly)phenols on human health and suggest possible actions to identify the putative actors responsible for the effects.This research was supported by the Project PID2019-103914RB-I00 from the Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN, Spain) and by Fundación Séneca de la Región de Murcia (Spain), grant number 20880/PI/18. J.A.G.-B. was supported by a Standard European Marie Curie Fellowship from the European Commission. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 838991. A.C.M. and C.E.I.-A. are the holders of predoctoral grants from MINECO (grant number BES-2016-078098) and MICINN (grant number FPU18/03961) (Spain), respectivelyPeer reviewe