14,768 research outputs found
A Kantian Critique Of The Care Tradition: Family Law And Systemic Justice
Liberal theories of justice have been rightly criticized for two things by care theorists. First, they have failed to deal with private care relationsâ inherent dependency, asymmetry and particularity. Second, they have been shown unable properly to address the asymmetry and dependency constitutive of care workersâ and care-receiversâ systemic conditions. I apply Kantâs theory of right to show that current care theories unfortunately reproduce similar problems because they also argue on the assumption that good care requires only virtuous private individuals. Giving up this assumption enables us to solve the problems regarding both private care relations and systemic injustice
A paradigm shift in theorizing about justice? A critique of Sen: Laura Valentini
In his recent book The Idea of Justice, Amartya Sen suggests that political philosophy should move beyond the dominant, Rawls-inspired, methodological paradigm â what Sen calls âtranscendental institutionalismâ â towards a more practically oriented approach to justice: ârealization-focused comparisonâ. In this article, I argue that Sen's call for a paradigm shift in thinking about justice is unwarranted. I show that his criticisms of the Rawlsian approach are either based on misunderstandings, or correct but of little consequence, and conclude that the Rawlsian approach already delivers much of what Sen himself wants from a theory of justice
On Robust Discursive Equality
This paper explores the idea of robust discursive equality on which respect-based conceptions of justificatory reciprocity often draw. I distinguish between formal and substantive discursive equality and argue that if justificatory reciprocity requires that people be accorded formally equal discursive standing, robust discursive equality should not be construed as requiring standing that is equal substantively, or in terms of its discursive purchase. Still, robust discursive equality is purchase sensitive: it does not obtain when discursive standing is impermissibly unequal in purchase. I then showcase different candidate conceptions of purchase justice, and draw conclusions about the substantive commitments of justificatory reciprocity
Fraternity and Equality
Is there a connection between the values of fraternity and outcome equality? Is inequality at odds with fraternity? There are reasons to doubt that it is. First, fraternity requires us to want our âbrothersâ and âsistersâ to fare well even when they are already better off than we are and their doing better will increase inequality. Second, fraternity seems not to require equality as a matter of fairness. Fairness requires (a certain) equality, but fraternity does not require fairness.
In examining what fraternity requires I discuss Rawls' suggestion that the difference principle corresponds to a natural meaning of fraternity, arguing that fraternity may be even more tolerant of inequality than the difference principle. Nevertheless, I defend the claim that fraternity and equality are linked, albeit not in such a way as to make inequality inconsistent with fraternity. Fraternity is related to equality since equalizing expresses the connectedness at the core of fraternity; but inequality is consistent with fraternity since there are other ways of expressing that connectedness
Political membership in the contractarian defense of cosmopolitanism
This article assesses the recent use of contractarian strategies for the justification of cosmopolitan distributive principles. It deals in particular with the cosmopolitan critique of political membership and tries to reject the claim that political communities are arbitrary for the scope of global justice. By focusing on the circumstances of justice, the nature of the parties, the veil of ignorance, and the sense of justice, the article tries to show that the cosmopolitan critique of political membership modifies the contractarian premises in a way that is both unwarranted and unnecessary. While failing to establish principles of global distributive justice, existing cosmopolitan adaptations of the social contract device simply weaken the methodâs justificatory potential
Rawls versus utilitarianism: the subset objection
This paper presents an objection to John Rawlsâs use of the original position method to argue against implementing utilitarian rules. The use of this method is pointless because a small subset of the premises Rawls relies on can be used to infer the same conclusion
Taking reasonable pluralism seriously: an internal critique of political liberalism
The later Rawls attempts to offer a non-comprehensive, but nonetheless moral justification in political philosophy. Many critics of political liberalism doubt that this is successful, but Rawlsians often complain that such criticisms rely on the unwarranted assumption that one cannot offer a moral justification other than by taking a philosophically comprehensive route. In this article, I internally criticize the justification strategy employed by the later Rawls. I show that he cannot offer us good grounds for the rational hope that citizens will assign political values priority over non-political values in cases of conflict about political matters. I also suggest an alternative approach to justification in political philosophy (that is, a weak realist, Williams-inspired account) that better respects the later Rawlsâs concern with non-comprehensiveness and pluralism than either his own view or more comprehensive approaches. Thus, if we take reasonable pluralism seriously, then we should adopt what Shklar aptly called âliberalism of fearâ. </jats:p
Implicit Language Model in LSTM for OCR
Neural networks have become the technique of choice for OCR, but many aspects
of how and why they deliver superior performance are still unknown. One key
difference between current neural network techniques using LSTMs and the
previous state-of-the-art HMM systems is that HMM systems have a strong
independence assumption. In comparison LSTMs have no explicit constraints on
the amount of context that can be considered during decoding. In this paper we
show that they learn an implicit LM and attempt to characterize the strength of
the LM in terms of equivalent n-gram context. We show that this implicitly
learned language model provides a 2.4\% CER improvement on our synthetic test
set when compared against a test set of random characters (i.e. not naturally
occurring sequences), and that the LSTM learns to use up to 5 characters of
context (which is roughly 88 frames in our configuration). We believe that this
is the first ever attempt at characterizing the strength of the implicit LM in
LSTM based OCR systems
Uncertainty behind the veil of ignorance
This paper argues that the decision problem in the original position should be characterized as a decision problem under uncertainty even when it is assumed that the denizens of the original position know that they have an equal chance of ending up in any given individual's place. It argues for this claim by arguing that (a) the continuity axiom of decision theory does not hold between all of the outcomes the denizens of the original position face and that (b) neither us nor the denizens of the original position can know the exact point where discontinuity sets in, because the language we employ in comparing different outcomes is ineradicably vague. It is also argued that the account underlying (b) can help proponents of superiority in value theory defend their view against arguments offered by Norcross and Griffin
- âŠ