30 research outputs found

    The development of a robotic endoscope

    Get PDF
    This paper describes the development of a prototype robotic endoscope for gastrointestinal diagnosis and therapy. The goal of this device is to access, in a minimally invasive fashion, the portions of the small intestine that cannot be accessed by conventional endoscopes. This paper describes the macroscopic design and function of the device, and the results of preliminary experiments that validate the concept

    The development of a robotic endoscope

    Get PDF
    This paper describes the development of a prototype robotic endoscope for gastrointestinal diagnosis and therapy. The goal of this device is to access, in a minimally invasive fashion, the portions of the small intestine that cannot be accessed by conventional endoscopes. This paper describes the macroscopic design and function of the device, and the results of preliminary experiments that validate the concept

    In vivo laparoscopic robotics

    Get PDF
    AbstractRobotic laparoscopic surgery is evolving to include in vivo robotic assistants. The impetus for the development of this technology is to provide surgeons with additional viewpoints and unconstrained manipulators that improve safety and reduce patient trauma. A family of these robots have been developed to provide vision and task assistance. Fixed-base and mobile robots have been designed and tested in animal models with much success. A cholecystectomy, prostatectomy, and nephrectomy have all been performed with the assistance of these robots. These early successful tests show how in vivo laparoscopic robotics may be part of the next advancement in surgical technology

    Innovative Robot Archetypes for In-Space Construction and Maintenance

    Get PDF
    The space environment presents unique challenges and opportunities in the assembly, inspection and maintenance of orbital and transit spaceflight systems. While conventional Extra-Vehicular Activity (EVA) technology, out of necessity, addresses each of the challenges, relatively few of the opportunities have been exploited due to crew safety and reliability considerations. Extra-Vehicular Robotics (EVR) is one of the least-explored design spaces but offers many exciting innovations transcending the crane-like Space Shuttle and International Space Station Remote Manipulator System (RMS) robots used for berthing, coarse positioning and stabilization. Microgravity environments can support new robotic archetypes with locomotion and manipulation capabilities analogous to undersea creatures. Such diversification could enable the next generation of space science platforms and vehicles that are too large and fragile to launch and deploy as self-contained payloads. Sinuous manipulators for minimally invasive inspection and repair in confined spaces, soft-stepping climbers with expansive leg reach envelopes and free-flying nanosatellite cameras can access EVA worksites generally not accessible to humans in spacesuits. These and other novel robotic archetypes are presented along with functionality concept

    Modular and Cooperative Medical Devices and Related Systems and Methods

    Get PDF
    The various embodiments disclosed herein relate to modular medical devices, including various devices with detachable modular components and various devices with pivotally attached modular components. Additional embodiments relate to procedures in which various of the devices are used cooperatively. Certain embodiments of the medical devices are robotic in vivo devices

    Analysis of the 'Endoworm' prototype's ability to grip the bowel in in vitro and ex vivo models

    Full text link
    [EN] Access to the small bowel by means of an enteroscope is difficult, even using current devices such as single-balloon or double-balloon enteroscopes. Exploration time and patient discomfort are the main drawbacks. The prototype 'Endoworm' analysed in this paper is based on a pneumatic translation system that, gripping the bowel, enables the endoscope to move forward while the bowel slides back over its most proximal part. The grip capacity is related to the pressure inside the balloon, which depends on the insufflate volume of air. Different materials were used as in vitro and ex vivo models: rigid polymethyl methacrylate, flexible silicone, polyester urethane and ex vivo pig small bowel. On measuring the pressure-volume relationship, we found that it depended on the elastic properties of the lumen and that the frictional force depended on the air pressure inside the balloons and the lumen's elastic properties. In the presence of a lubricant, the grip on the simulated intestinal lumens was drastically reduced, as was the influence of the lumen's properties. This paper focuses on the Endoworm's ability to grip the bowel, which is crucial to achieving effective endoscope forward advance and bowel foldingThe author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The study was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through Project (PI18/01365) and by the UPV/IIS LA Fe through the (Endoworm 3.0) Project. CIBER-BBN is an initiative funded by the VI National R&D&I Plan 2008-2011, Iniciativa Ingenio 2010, Consolider Program, CIBER Actions and financed by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III with the assistance of the European Regional Development FundTobella, J.; Pons-Beltrán, V.; Santonja, A.; Sánchez-Diaz, C.; Campillo Fernandez, AJ.; Vidaurre, A. (2020). Analysis of the 'Endoworm' prototype's ability to grip the bowel in in vitro and ex vivo models. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine. 234(5):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119209014141102345Iddan, G., Meron, G., Glukhovsky, A., & Swain, P. (2000). Wireless capsule endoscopy. Nature, 405(6785), 417-417. doi:10.1038/35013140Yamamoto, H., Sekine, Y., Sato, Y., Higashizawa, T., Miyata, T., Iino, S., … Sugano, K. (2001). Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 53(2), 216-220. doi:10.1067/mge.2001.112181Arnott, I. D. R., & Lo, S. K. (2004). REVIEW: The Clinical Utility of Wireless Capsule Endoscopy. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 49(6), 893-901. doi:10.1023/b:ddas.0000034545.58486.e6Hosoe, N., Takabayashi, K., Ogata, H., & Kanai, T. (2019). Capsule endoscopy for small‐intestinal disorders: Current status. Digestive Endoscopy, 31(5), 498-507. doi:10.1111/den.13346Fukumoto, A., Tanaka, S., Shishido, T., Takemura, Y., Oka, S., & Chayama, K. (2009). Comparison of detectability of small-bowel lesions between capsule endoscopy and double-balloon endoscopy for patients with suspected small-bowel disease. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 69(4), 857-865. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2008.06.007Akerman, P. A., Agrawal, D., Chen, W., Cantero, D., Avila, J., & Pangtay, J. (2009). Spiral enteroscopy: a novel method of enteroscopy by using the Endo-Ease Discovery SB overtube and a pediatric colonoscope. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 69(2), 327-332. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2008.07.042Moreels, T. G. (2017). Update in enteroscopy: New devices and new indications. Digestive Endoscopy, 30(2), 174-181. doi:10.1111/den.12920Pasha, S. F. (2012). Diagnostic yield of deep enteroscopy techniques for small-bowel bleeding and tumors. Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 14(2), 100-105. doi:10.1016/j.tgie.2012.02.001Lenz, P., & Domagk, D. (2012). Double- vs. single-balloon vs. spiral enteroscopy. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, 26(3), 303-313. doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2012.01.021Baniya, R., Upadhaya, S., Subedi, S. C., Khan, J., Sharma, P., Mohammed, T. S., … Jamil, L. H. (2017). Balloon enteroscopy versus spiral enteroscopy for small-bowel disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 86(6), 997-1005. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.015Menciassi, A., & Dario, P. (2003). Bio-inspired solutions for locomotion in the gastrointestinal tract: background and perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 361(1811), 2287-2298. doi:10.1098/rsta.2003.1255Zarrouk, D., Sharf, I., & Shoham, M. (2011). Analysis of Wormlike Robotic Locomotion on Compliant Surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 58(2), 301-309. doi:10.1109/tbme.2010.2066274Poon, C. C. Y., Leung, B., Chan, C. K. W., Lau, J. Y. W., & Chiu, P. W. Y. (2015). Design of wormlike automated robotic endoscope: dynamic interaction between endoscopic balloon and surrounding tissues. Surgical Endoscopy, 30(2), 772-778. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4224-8Kassim, I., Phee, L., Ng, W. S., Feng Gong, Dario, P., & Mosse, C. A. (2006). Locomotion techniques for robotic colonoscopy. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 25(3), 49-56. doi:10.1109/memb.2006.1636351Kim, Y.-T., & Kim, D.-E. (2010). Novel Propelling Mechanisms Based on Frictional Interaction for Endoscope Robot. Tribology Transactions, 53(2), 203-211. doi:10.1080/10402000903125337Massalou, D., Masson, C., Foti, P., Afquir, S., Baqué, P., Berdah, S.-V., & Bège, T. (2016). Dynamic biomechanical characterization of colon tissue according to anatomical factors. Journal of Biomechanics, 49(16), 3861-3867. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.10.023Egorov, V. I., Schastlivtsev, I. V., Prut, E. V., Baranov, A. O., & Turusov, R. A. (2002). Mechanical properties of the human gastrointestinal tract. Journal of Biomechanics, 35(10), 1417-1425. doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00084-2Hoeg, H. D., Slatkin, A. B., Burdick, J. W., & Grundfest, W. S. (s. f.). Biomechanical modeling of the small intestine as required for the design and operation of a robotic endoscope. Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065). doi:10.1109/robot.2000.844825Terry, B. S., Passernig, A. C., Hill, M. L., Schoen, J. A., & Rentschler, M. E. (2012). Small intestine mucosal adhesivity to in vivo capsule robot materials. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 15, 24-32. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.06.018Kim, J.-S., Sung, I.-H., Kim, Y.-T., Kwon, E.-Y., Kim, D.-E., & Jang, Y. H. (2006). Experimental investigation of frictional and viscoelastic properties of intestine for microendoscope application. Tribology Letters, 22(2), 143-149. doi:10.1007/s11249-006-9073-0Lyle, A. B., Luftig, J. T., & Rentschler, M. E. (2013). A tribological investigation of the small bowel lumen surface. Tribology International, 62, 171-176. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2012.11.018De Simone, A., & Luongo, A. (2013). Nonlinear viscoelastic analysis of a cylindrical balloon squeezed between two rigid moving plates. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 50(14-15), 2213-2223. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.03.028Sliker, L. J., Ciuti, G., Rentschler, M. E., & Menciassi, A. (2016). Frictional resistance model for tissue-capsule endoscope sliding contact in the gastrointestinal tract. Tribology International, 102, 472-484. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2016.06.003Zhang, C., Liu, H., & Li, H. (2014). Experimental investigation of intestinal frictional resistance in the starting process of the capsule robot. Tribology International, 70, 11-17. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2013.09.019Zhang, C., Liu, H., & Li, H. (2013). Modeling of Frictional Resistance of a Capsule Robot Moving in the Intestine at a Constant Velocity. Tribology Letters, 53(1), 71-78. doi:10.1007/s11249-013-0244-5Zhang, C., Liu, H., Tan, R., & Li, H. (2012). Modeling of Velocity-dependent Frictional Resistance of a Capsule Robot Inside an Intestine. Tribology Letters, 47(2), 295-301. doi:10.1007/s11249-012-9980-1Woo, S. H., Kim, T. W., Mohy-Ud-Din, Z., Park, I. Y., & Cho, J.-H. (2011). Small intestinal model for electrically propelled capsule endoscopy. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 10(1), 108. doi:10.1186/1475-925x-10-108Sliker, L. J., & Rentschler, M. E. (2012). The Design and Characterization of a Testing Platform for Quantitative Evaluation of Tread Performance on Multiple Biological Substrates. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 59(9), 2524-2530. doi:10.1109/tbme.2012.2205688Sánchez-Diaz, C., Senent-Cardona, E., Pons-Beltran, V., Santonja-Gimeno, A., & Vidaurre, A. (2018). Endoworm: A new semi-autonomous enteroscopy device. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 232(11), 1137-1143. doi:10.1177/0954411918806330Persson, B. N. J., & Spencer, N. D. (1999). Sliding Friction: Physical Principles and Applications. Physics Today, 52(1), 66-68. doi:10.1063/1.882557Gerson, L. B., Flodin, J. T., & Miyabayashi, K. (2008). Balloon-assisted enteroscopy: technology and troubleshooting. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 68(6), 1158-1167. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.012Glozman, D., Hassidov, N., Senesh, M., & Shoham, M. (2010). A Self-Propelled Inflatable Earthworm-Like Endoscope Actuated by Single Supply Line. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 57(6), 1264-1272. doi:10.1109/tbme.2010.2040617Baek, N.-K., Sung, I.-H., & Kim, D.-E. (2004). Frictional resistance characteristics of a capsule inside the intestine for microendoscope design. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 218(3), 193-201. doi:10.1243/095441104323118914Kwon, J., Cheung, E., Park, S., & Sitti, M. (2006). Friction enhancement via micro-patterned wet elastomer adhesives on small intestinal surfaces. Biomedical Materials, 1(4), 216-220. doi:10.1088/1748-6041/1/4/007Kim, B., Lee, S., Park, J. H., & Park, J.-O. (2005). Design and Fabrication of a Locomotive Mechanism for Capsule-Type Endoscopes Using Shape Memory Alloys (SMAs). IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 10(1), 77-86. doi:10.1109/tmech.2004.842222Terry, B. S., Lyle, A. B., Schoen, J. A., & Rentschler, M. E. (2011). Preliminary Mechanical Characterization of the Small Bowel for In Vivo Robotic Mobility. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 133(9). doi:10.1115/1.400516

    ENDOSCOPE GEOMETRICAL ANALYSIS AND KINEMATIC CONTROL

    Get PDF
    ABSTRACT Endoscopes are used in medical practice to effect minimally invasive diagnostics and treatments through a natural or surgical orifice. The endoscope is a snakelike device with a two degree-offreedom articulated tip that bends in any direction using internal cables actuated by knobs. In this paper we use a serial robot model of the tip to show that the tip motions are not decoupled with respect to the knob inputs nor do they have constant gains. Further in a geometrical analysis it is shown that the articulated tip always lies along a circle. A tip kinematic control strategy is developed based on small motions that is able to decouple the output motions from the input motions and provide a constant gain functions. This allows the surgeon to control the endoscope in an intuitive and efficient manner

    Multi-segmented artificial locomotion systems with adaptively controlled gait transitions

    Get PDF
    This paper is devoted to the analysis and simulation of multi-segmented artificial locomotion systems. The biological paradigm is the earthworm. Here, we restrict our investigation to a crawling system which is moving along a straight line, more precisely, the system is firstly moving unidirectionally. Recent results from the examined literature present investigations of short worms (n < 4). In contrast to this, the developed mechanical model in this paper consists of a chain of 10 discrete mass points. Let us point out, that the presented investigations are not restricted to a fixed number of mass points. To achieve a movement of the system, the distances between neighboring mass points are controlled by viscoelastic force actuators. Due to a prescribed reference gait, an adaptive controller determines the necessary forces to adjust the prescribed values. Then, due shortening and lengthening of these distances together with a spiky ground contact at the mass point (preventing velocities from being negative), we achieve a global movement of the whole system – called undulatory locomotion. Specific prescribed gaits are required to guarantee a controlled movement that differ especially in the number of resting mass points and the load of actuators and spikes. To determine the most advantageous gaits, numerical investigations are performed and a weighting function offers a decision of best possible gaits. Finally, a gait transition algorithm for an autonomously change of the locomotion velocity and number of resting mass points in dependence on the spike and actuator force load is presented and tested in numerical simulations
    corecore