A new approach for content-based image retrieval for medical applications using low-level image descriptors

Content based image retrieval (CBIR) has become an important factor in medical imaging research and is obtaining a great success. More applications still need to be developed to get more powerful systems for better image similarity matching, and as a result getting better image retrieval systems. This research focuses on implementing low-level descriptors to maximize the quality of the retrieval of medical images. Such a research is supposed to set a better result in terms of image similarity matching. In this research a system that uses low-level descriptors is introduced. Three descriptors have been developed and applied in an attempt to increase the accuracy of image matching. The final results showed a qualified system in medical images retrieval specially that the low-level image descriptors have not been used yet in the image similarity matching in the medical field

Shangri-La: a medical case-based retrieval tool

Large amounts of medical visual data are produced in hospitals daily and made available continuously via publications in the scientific literature, representing the medical knowledge. However, it is not always easy to find the desired information and in clinical routine the time to fulfil an information need is often very limited. Information retrieval systems are a useful tool to provide access to these documents/images in the biomedical literature related to information needs of medical professionals. Shangri–La is a medical retrieval system that can potentially help clinicians to make decisions on difficult cases. It retrieves articles from the biomedical literature when querying a case description and attached images. The system is based on a multimodal retrieval approach with a focus on the integration of visual information connected to text. The approach includes a query–adaptive multimodal fusion criterion that analyses if visual features are suitable to be fused with text for the retrieval. Furthermore, image modality information is integrated in the retrieval step. The approach is evaluated using the ImageCLEFmed 2013 medical retrieval benchmark and can thus be compared to other approaches. Results show that the final approach outperforms the best multimodal approach submitted to ImageCLEFmed 2013

Overview of the ImageCLEF 2013 medical tasks

In 2013, the tenth edition of the medical task of the Image-CLEF benchmark was organized. For the first time, the ImageCLEFmedworkshop takes place in the United States of America at the annualAMIA (American Medical Informatics Association) meeting even thoughthe task was organized as in previous years in connection with the otherImageCLEF tasks. Like 2012, a subset of the open access collection ofPubMed Central was distributed. This year, there were four subtasks:modality classification, compound figure separation, image–based andcase–based retrieval. The compound figure separation task was includeddue to the large number of multipanel images available in the literatureand the importance to separate them for targeted retrieval. More com-pound figures were also included in the modality classification task tomake it correspond to the distribution in the full database. The retrievaltasks remained in the same format as in previous years but a largernumber of tasks were available for image–based and case–based tasks.This paper presents an analysis of the techniques applied by the tengroups participating 2013 in ImageCLEFmed

Use Case Oriented Medical Visual Information Retrieval & System Evaluation

Large amounts of medical visual data are produced daily in hospitals, while new imaging techniques continue to emerge. In addition, many images are made available continuously via publications in the scientific literature and can also be valuable for clinical routine, research and education. Information retrieval systems are useful tools to provide access to the biomedical literature and fulfil the information needs of medical professionals. The tools developed in this thesis can potentially help clinicians make decisions about difficult diagnoses via a case-based retrieval system based on a use case associated with a specific evaluation task. This system retrieves articles from the biomedical literature when querying with a case description and attached images. This thesis proposes a multimodal approach for medical case-based retrieval with focus on the integration of visual information connected to text. Furthermore, the ImageCLEFmed evaluation campaign was organised during this thesis promoting medical retrieval system evaluation

MIRACLE’s Combination of Visual and Textual Queries for Medical Images Retrieval

This paper presents the 2005 MIRACLE’s team participation in the ImageCLEFmed task of ImageCLEF 2005. This task certainly requires the use of image retrieval techniques and therefore it is mainly aimed at image analysis research groups. Although our areas of expertise don’t include image analysis research, we decided to make the effort to participate in this task to promote and encourage multidisciplinary participation in all aspects of information retrieval, no matter if it is text or content based. We resort to a publicly available image retrieval system (GIFT [1]) when needed

Overview of the 2005 cross-language image retrieval track (ImageCLEF)

The purpose of this paper is to outline efforts from the 2005 CLEF crosslanguage image retrieval campaign (ImageCLEF). The aim of this CLEF track is to explore the use of both text and content-based retrieval methods for cross-language image retrieval. Four tasks were offered in the ImageCLEF track: a ad-hoc retrieval from an historic photographic collection, ad-hoc retrieval from a medical collection, an automatic image annotation task, and a user-centered (interactive) evaluation task that is explained in the iCLEF summary. 24 research groups from a variety of backgrounds and nationalities (14 countries) participated in ImageCLEF. In this paper we describe the ImageCLEF tasks, submissions from participating groups and summarise the main fndings

Semi–Supervised Learning for Image Modality Classification

Searching for medical image content is a regular task for many physicians, especially in radiology. Retrieval of medical images from the scientific literature can benefit from automatic modality classification to focus the search and filter out non–relevant items. Training datasets are often unevenly distributed regarding the classes resulting sometimes in a less than optimal classification performance. This article proposes a semi–supervised learning approach applied using a k–Nearest Neighbour (k–NN) classifier to exploit unlabelled data and to expand the training set. The algorithmic implementation is described and the method is evaluated on the ImageCLEFmed modality classification benchmark. Results show that this approach achieves an improved performance over supervised k–NN and Random Forest classifiers. Moreover, medical case–based retrieval benefits from the modality filter

ImageCLEF 2013: The vision, the data and the open challenges

This paper presents an overview of the ImageCLEF 2013 lab. Since its first edition in 2003, ImageCLEF has become one of the key initiatives promoting the benchmark evaluation of algorithms for the cross-language annotation and retrieval of images in various domains, such as public and personal images, to data acquired by mobile robot platforms and botanic collections. Over the years, by providing new data collections and challenging tasks to the community of interest, the ImageCLEF lab has achieved an unique position in the multi lingual image annotation and retrieval research landscape. The 2013 edition consisted of three tasks: the photo annotation and retrieval task, the plant identification task and the robot vision task. Furthermore, the medical annotation task, that traditionally has been under the ImageCLEF umbrella and that this year celebrates its tenth anniversary, has been organized in conjunction with AMIA for the first time. The paper describes the tasks and the 2013 competition, giving an unifying perspective of the present activities of the lab while discussion the future challenges and opportunities.This work has been partially supported by the Halser Foundation (B. C.),by the LiMoSINe FP7 project under grant # 288024 (B. T.), by the Khresmoi (grant# 257528) and PROMISE ( grant # 258191) FP 7 projects (H.M.) and by the tranScriptorium FP7 project under grant # 600707 (M. V., R. P.)Caputo ., B.; Muller ., H.; Thomee ., B.; Villegas, M.; Paredes Palacios, R.; Zellhofer ., D.; Goeau ., H.... (2013). ImageCLEF 2013: The vision, the data and the open challenges. En Information Access Evaluation. Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Visualization. Springer Verlag (Germany). 8138:250-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40802-1_26S2502688138Muller, H., Clough, P., Deselaers, T., Caputo, B.: ImageCLEF: experimental evaluation in visual information retrieval. Springer (2010)Tsikrika, T., Seco de Herrera, A.G., Müller, H.: Assessing the scholarly impact of imageCLEF. In: Forner, P., Gonzalo, J., Kekäläinen, J., Lalmas, M., de Rijke, M. (eds.) CLEF 2011. LNCS, vol. 6941, pp. 95–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Huiskes, M., Lew, M.: The MIR Flickr retrieval evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Multimedia Information Retrieval, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 39–43 (2008)Huiskes, M., Thomee, B., Lew, M.: New trends and ideas in visual concept detection. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Multimedia Information Retrieval, Philadelphia, PA, USA, pp. 527–536 (2010)Villegas, M., Paredes, R.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2012 Scalable Web Image Annotation Task. In: CLEF 2012 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes, Rome, Italy (2012)Zellhöfer, D.: Overview of the Personal Photo Retrieval Pilot Task at ImageCLEF 2012. In: CLEF 2012 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes, Rome, Italy (2012)Villegas, M., Paredes, R., Thomee, B.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2013 Scalable Concept Image Annotation Subtask. In: CLEF 2013 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes, Valencia, Spain (2013)Zellhöfer, D.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2013 Personal Photo Retrieval Subtask. In: CLEF 2013 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes, Valencia, Spain (2013)Leafsnap (2011)Plantnet (2013)Mobile flora (2013)Folia (2012)Goëau, H., Bonnet, P., Joly, A., Bakic, V., Boujemaa, N., Barthelemy, D., Molino, J.F.: The imageclef 2013 plant identification task. In: ImageCLEF 2013 Working Notes (2013)Pronobis, A., Xing, L., Caputo, B.: Overview of the CLEF 2009 robot vision track. In: Peters, C., Caputo, B., Gonzalo, J., Jones, G.J.F., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Müller, H., Tsikrika, T. (eds.) CLEF 2009. LNCS, vol. 6242, pp. 110–119. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Pronobis, A., Caputo, B.: The robot vision task. In: Muller, H., Clough, P., Deselaers, T., Caputo, B. (eds.) ImageCLEF. The Information Retrieval Series, vol. 32, pp. 185–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Pronobis, A., Christensen, H.I., Caputo, B.: Overview of the imageCLEF@ICPR 2010 robot vision track. In: Ünay, D., Çataltepe, Z., Aksoy, S. (eds.) ICPR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6388, pp. 171–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Martinez-Gomez, J., Garcia-Varea, I., Caputo, B.: Overview of the imageclef 2012 robot vision task. In: CLEF 2012 Working Notes (2012)Rusu, R., Cousins, S.: 3d is here: Point cloud library (pcl). In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2011)Bosch, A., Zisserman, A., Munoz, X.: Image classification using random forests and ferns. In: International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1–8. Citeseer (2007)Dalal, N., Triggs, B.: Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2005, vol. 1, pp. 886–893. IEEE (2005)Linde, O., Lindeberg, T.: Object recognition using composed receptive field histograms of higher dimensionality. In: Proc. ICPR. Citeseer (2004)Orabona, F., Castellini, C., Caputo, B., Luo, J., Sandini, G.: Indoor place recognition using online independent support vector machines. In: Proc. BMVC, vol. 7 (2007)Orabona, F., Castellini, C., Caputo, B., Jie, L., Sandini, G.: On-line independent support vector machines. Pattern Recognition 43, 1402–1412 (2010)Orabona, F., Jie, L., Caputo, B.: Online-Batch Strongly Convex Multi Kernel Learning. In: Proc. of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR (2010)Orabona, F., Jie, L., Caputo, B.: Multi kernel learning with online-batch optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research 13, 165–191 (2012)Clough, P., Müller, H., Sanderson, M.: The CLEF 2004 cross-language image retrieval track. In: Peters, C., Clough, P., Gonzalo, J., Jones, G.J.F., Kluck, M., Magnini, B. (eds.) CLEF 2004. LNCS, vol. 3491, pp. 597–613. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Clough, P., Müller, H., Deselaers, T., Grubinger, M., Lehmann, T.M., Jensen, J., Hersh, W.: The CLEF 2005 cross–language image retrieval track. In: Peters, C., Gey, F.C., Gonzalo, J., Müller, H., Jones, G.J.F., Kluck, M., Magnini, B., de Rijke, M., Giampiccolo, D. (eds.) CLEF 2005. LNCS, vol. 4022, pp. 535–557. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Müller, H., Deselaers, T., Deserno, T., Clough, P., Kim, E., Hersh, W.: Overview of the imageCLEFmed 2006 medical retrieval and medical annotation tasks. In: Peters, C., Clough, P., Gey, F.C., Karlgren, J., Magnini, B., Oard, D.W., de Rijke, M., Stempfhuber, M. (eds.) CLEF 2006. LNCS, vol. 4730, pp. 595–608. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Müller, H., Deselaers, T., Deserno, T., Kalpathy–Cramer, J., Kim, E., Hersh, W.: Overview of the imageCLEFmed 2007 medical retrieval and medical annotation tasks. In: Peters, C., Jijkoun, V., Mandl, T., Müller, H., Oard, D.W., Peñas, A., Petras, V., Santos, D. (eds.) CLEF 2007. LNCS, vol. 5152, pp. 472–491. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Müller, H., Kalpathy–Cramer, J., Eggel, I., Bedrick, S., Radhouani, S., Bakke, B., Kahn Jr., C.E., Hersh, W.: Overview of the CLEF 2009 medical image retrieval track. In: Peters, C., Caputo, B., Gonzalo, J., Jones, G.J.F., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Müller, H., Tsikrika, T. (eds.) CLEF 2009, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6242, pp. 72–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Tommasi, T., Caputo, B., Welter, P., Güld, M.O., Deserno, T.M.: Overview of the CLEF 2009 medical image annotation track. In: Peters, C., Caputo, B., Gonzalo, J., Jones, G.J.F., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Müller, H., Tsikrika, T. (eds.) CLEF 2009. LNCS, vol. 6242, pp. 85–93. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Müller, H., Clough, P., Deselaers, T., Caputo, B. (eds.): ImageCLEF – Experimental Evaluation in Visual Information Retrieval. The Springer International Series on Information Retrieval, vol. 32. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Müller, H., Bedrick, S., Eggel, I., García Seco de Herrera, A., Tsikrika, T.: The CLEF 2011 medical image retrieval and classification tasks. In: Working Notes of CLEF 2011 (Cross Language Evaluation Forum) (2011)Müller, H., García Seco de Herrera, A., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Demner Fushman, D., Antani, S., Eggel, I.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2012 medical image retrieval and classification tasks. In: Working Notes of CLEF 2012 (Cross Language Evaluation Forum) (2012)García Seco de Herrera, A., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Demner Fushman, D., Antani, S., Müller, H.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2013 medical tasks. In: Working Notes of CLEF 2013 (Cross Language Evaluation Forum) (2013

Overview of the ImageCLEFmed 2019 concept detection task

This paper describes the ImageCLEF 2019 Concept Detection Task. This is the 3rd edition of the medical caption task, after it was first proposed in ImageCLEF 2017. Concept detection from medical images remains a challenging task. In 2019, the format changed to a single subtask and it is part of the medical tasks, alongside the tuberculosis and visual question and answering tasks. To reduce noisy labels and limit variety, the data set focuses solely on radiology images rather than biomedical figures, extracted from the biomedical open access literature (PubMed Central). The development data consists of 56,629 training and 14,157 validation images, with corresponding Unified Medical Language System (UMLSR) concepts, extracted from the image captions. In 2019 the participation is higher, regarding the number of participating teams as well as the number of submitted runs. Several approaches were used by the teams, mostly deep learning techniques. Long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural networks (RNN), adversarial auto-encoder, convolutional neural networks (CNN) image encoders and transfer learning-based multi-label classification models were the frequently used approaches. Evaluation uses F1-scores computed per image and averaged across all 10,000 test images

Comparing Fusion Techniques for the ImageCLEF 2013 Medical Case Retrieval Task

Retrieval systems can supply similar cases with a proven diagnosis to a new example case under observation to help clinicians during their work. The ImageCLEFmed evaluation campaign proposes a framework where research groups can compare case-based retrieval approaches. This paper focuses on the case-based task and adds results of the compound figure separation and modality classification tasks. Several fusion approaches are compared to identify the approaches best adapted to the heterogeneous data of the task. Fusion of visual and textual features is analyzed, demonstrating that the selection of the fusion strategy can improve the best performance on the case-based retrieval task