10 research outputs found
The Complexity of Enriched Mu-Calculi
The fully enriched μ-calculus is the extension of the propositional
μ-calculus with inverse programs, graded modalities, and nominals. While
satisfiability in several expressive fragments of the fully enriched
μ-calculus is known to be decidable and ExpTime-complete, it has recently
been proved that the full calculus is undecidable. In this paper, we study the
fragments of the fully enriched μ-calculus that are obtained by dropping at
least one of the additional constructs. We show that, in all fragments obtained
in this way, satisfiability is decidable and ExpTime-complete. Thus, we
identify a family of decidable logics that are maximal (and incomparable) in
expressive power. Our results are obtained by introducing two new automata
models, showing that their emptiness problems are ExpTime-complete, and then
reducing satisfiability in the relevant logics to these problems. The automata
models we introduce are two-way graded alternating parity automata over
infinite trees (2GAPTs) and fully enriched automata (FEAs) over infinite
forests. The former are a common generalization of two incomparable automata
models from the literature. The latter extend alternating automata in a similar
way as the fully enriched μ-calculus extends the standard μ-calculus.Comment: A preliminary version of this paper appears in the Proceedings of the
33rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP),
2006. This paper has been selected for a special issue in LMC
Solving Parity Games in Scala
Parity games are two-player games, played on directed graphs, whose nodes are labeled with priorities. Along a play, the maximal priority occurring infinitely often determines the winner. In the last two decades, a variety of algorithms and successive optimizations have been proposed. The majority of them have been implemented in PGSolver, written in OCaml, which has been elected by the community as the de facto platform to solve efficiently parity games as well as evaluate their performance in several specific cases.
PGSolver includes the Zielonka Recursive Algorithm that has been shown to perform better than the others in randomly generated games. However, even for arenas with a few thousand of nodes (especially over dense graphs), it requires minutes to solve the corresponding game.
In this paper, we deeply revisit the implementation of the recursive algorithm introducing several improvements and making use of Scala Programming Language. These choices have been proved to be very successful, gaining up to two orders of magnitude in running time
On P-transitive graphs and applications
We introduce a new class of graphs which we call P-transitive graphs, lying
between transitive and 3-transitive graphs. First we show that the analogue of
de Jongh-Sambin Theorem is false for wellfounded P-transitive graphs; then we
show that the mu-calculus fixpoint hierarchy is infinite for P-transitive
graphs. Both results contrast with the case of transitive graphs. We give also
an undecidability result for an enriched mu-calculus on P-transitive graphs.
Finally, we consider a polynomial time reduction from the model checking
problem on arbitrary graphs to the model checking problem on P-transitive
graphs. All these results carry over to 3-transitive graphs.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2011, arXiv:1106.081
Logical Combinators for Rich Type Systems
We present a functional approach to design rich type systems based on an elegant logical representation of types. The representation is not only clean but avoids exponential increases in combined complexity due to subformula duplication. This opens the way for solving a wide range of problems such as subtyping in exponential-time even though their direct translation into the underlying logic results in an exponential blowup of the formula size, yielding an incorrectly presumed two-exponential time complexity.Nous preÌsentons une approche fonctionnelle pour concevoir des systeÌmes de types riches baseÌe sur une repreÌsentation eÌleÌgante et logique des types. La repreÌsentation n'est pas seulement propre, mais eÌvite une augmentation exponentielle de la complexiteÌ en raison de duplication de sous-formules. Cela ouvre la voie pour reÌsoudre un large eÌventail de probleÌmes tels que le sous-typage en temps simplement exponentiel, meÌme si leur traduction directe dans la logique sous-jacente produit une explosion combinatoire de la taille de la formule, donnant une complexiteÌ en temps incorrectement preÌsumeÌe doublement exponentielle
Relentful Strategic Reasoning in 1 Alternating-Time Temporal Logic
Temporal logics are a well investigated formalism for the specification, verification, and synthesis of reactive systems.
Within this family, Alternating-Time Temporal Logic (ATL , for short) has been introduced as a useful generalization
of classical linear- and branching-time temporal logics, by allowing temporal operators to be indexed by coalitions of
agents. Classically, temporal logics are memoryless: once a path in the computation tree is quantified at a given node,
the computation that has led to that node is forgotten. Recently, mCTL has been defined as a memoryful variant
of CTL , where path quantification is memoryful. In the context of multi-agent planning, memoryful quantification
enables agents to ârelentâ and change their goals and strategies depending on their history.
In this paper, we define mATL , a memoryful extension of ATL , in which a formula is satisfied at a certain
node of a path by taking into account both the future and the past. We study the expressive power of mATL ,
its succinctness, as well as related decision problems. We also investigate the relationship between memoryful
quantification and past modalities and show their equivalence. We show that both the memoryful and the past
extensions come without any computational price; indeed, we prove that both the satisfiability and the model-checking
problems are 2EXPTIME-COMPLETE, as they are for AT
Reasoning About Strategies: On the Model-Checking Problem
In open systems verification, to formally check for reliability, one needs an
appropriate formalism to model the interaction between agents and express the
correctness of the system no matter how the environment behaves. An important
contribution in this context is given by modal logics for strategic ability, in
the setting of multi-agent games, such as ATL, ATL\star, and the like.
Recently, Chatterjee, Henzinger, and Piterman introduced Strategy Logic, which
we denote here by CHP-SL, with the aim of getting a powerful framework for
reasoning explicitly about strategies. CHP-SL is obtained by using first-order
quantifications over strategies and has been investigated in the very specific
setting of two-agents turned-based games, where a non-elementary model-checking
algorithm has been provided. While CHP-SL is a very expressive logic, we claim
that it does not fully capture the strategic aspects of multi-agent systems. In
this paper, we introduce and study a more general strategy logic, denoted SL,
for reasoning about strategies in multi-agent concurrent games. We prove that
SL includes CHP-SL, while maintaining a decidable model-checking problem. In
particular, the algorithm we propose is computationally not harder than the
best one known for CHP-SL. Moreover, we prove that such a problem for SL is
NonElementarySpace-hard. This negative result has spurred us to investigate
here syntactic fragments of SL, strictly subsuming ATL\star, with the hope of
obtaining an elementary model-checking problem. Among the others, we study the
sublogics SL[NG], SL[BG], and SL[1G]. They encompass formulas in a special
prenex normal form having, respectively, nested temporal goals, Boolean
combinations of goals and, a single goal at a time. About these logics, we
prove that the model-checking problem for SL[1G] is 2ExpTime-complete, thus not
harder than the one for ATL\star
Reasoning about LTL Synthesis over finite and infinite games
In the last few years, research formal methods for the analysis and the verification of properties of systems has increased greatly. A meaningful contribution in this area has been given by algorithmic methods developed in the context of synthesis. The basic idea is simple and appealing: instead of developing a system and verifying that it satisfies its specification, we look for an automated procedure that, given the specification returns a system that is correct by construction. Synthesis of reactive systems is one of the most popular variants of this problem, in which we want to synthesize a system characterized by an ongoing interaction with the environment. In this setting, large effort has been devoted to analyze specifications given as formulas of linear temporal logic, i.e., LTL synthesis.
Traditional approaches to LTL synthesis rely on transforming the LTL specification into parity deterministic automata, and then to parity games, for which a so-called winning region is computed. Computing such an automaton is, in the worst-case, double-exponential in the size of the LTL formula, and this becomes a computational bottleneck in using the synthesis process in practice.
The first part of this thesis is devoted to improve the solution of parity games as they are used in solving LTL synthesis, trying to give efficient techniques, in terms of running time and space consumption, for solving parity games. We start with the study and the implementation of an automata-theoretic technique to solve parity games. More precisely, we consider an algorithm introduced by Kupferman and Vardi that solves a parity game by solving the emptiness problem of a corresponding alternating parity automaton. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates that this algorithm outperforms other algorithms when the game has a small number of priorities relative to the size of the game. In many concrete applications, we do indeed end up with parity games
where the number of priorities is relatively small. This makes the new algorithm quite useful in practice.
We then provide a broad investigation of the symbolic approach for solving parity games. Specifically, we implement in a fresh tool, called SPGSolver, four symbolic algorithms to solve parity games and compare their performances to the corresponding explicit versions for different classes of games. By means of benchmarks, we show that for random games, even for constrained random games, explicit algorithms actually perform better than symbolic algorithms. The situation changes, however, for structured games, where symbolic algorithms seem to have the advantage. This suggests that when evaluating algorithms for parity-game solving, it would be useful to have real benchmarks and not only random benchmarks, as the common practice has been.
LTL synthesis has been largely investigated also in artificial intelligence, and specifically in
automated planning. Indeed, LTL synthesis corresponds to fully observable nondeterministic planning in which the domain is given compactly and the goal is an LTL formula, that in turn is related to two-player games with LTL goals. Finding a strategy for these games means to synthesize a plan for the planning problem. The last part of this thesis is then dedicated to investigate LTL synthesis under this different view. In particular, we study a generalized form of planning under partial observability, in which we have multiple, possibly infinitely many, planning domains with the same actions and observations, and goals expressed over observations, which are possibly temporally extended. By building on work on two-player games with imperfect information in the Formal Methods literature, we devise a general technique, generalizing the belief-state construction, to remove partial observability. This reduces the planning problem to a game of perfect information with a tight correspondence between plans and strategies. Then we instantiate the technique and solve some generalized planning problems
The Complexity of Enriched Mu-Calculi
The fully enriched μ-calculus is the extension of the propositional
μ-calculus with inverse programs, graded modalities, and nominals. While
satisfiability in several expressive fragments of the fully enriched
μ-calculus is known to be decidable and ExpTime-complete, it has recently
been proved that the full calculus is undecidable. In this paper, we study the
fragments of the fully enriched μ-calculus that are obtained by dropping at
least one of the additional constructs. We show that, in all fragments obtained
in this way, satisfiability is decidable and ExpTime-complete. Thus, we
identify a family of decidable logics that are maximal (and incomparable) in
expressive power. Our results are obtained by introducing two new automata
models, showing that their emptiness problems are ExpTime-complete, and then
reducing satisfiability in the relevant logics to these problems. The automata
models we introduce are two-way graded alternating parity automata over
infinite trees (2GAPTs) and fully enriched automata (FEAs) over infinite
forests. The former are a common generalization of two incomparable automata
models from the literature. The latter extend alternating automata in a similar
way as the fully enriched μ-calculus extends the standard μ-calculus