20 research outputs found

    Properties of Catlin's reduced graphs and supereulerian graphs

    Get PDF
    A graph GG is called collapsible if for every even subset R⊆V(G)R\subseteq V(G), there is a spanning connected subgraph HH of GG such that RR is the set of vertices of odd degree in HH. A graph is the reduction of GG if it is obtained from GG by contracting all the nontrivial collapsible subgraphs. A graph is reduced if it has no nontrivial collapsible subgraphs. In this paper, we first prove a few results on the properties of reduced graphs. As an application, for 3-edge-connected graphs GG of order nn with d(u)+d(v)≥2(n/p−1)d(u)+d(v)\ge 2(n/p-1) for any uv∈E(G)uv\in E(G) where p>0p>0 are given, we show how such graphs change if they have no spanning Eulerian subgraphs when pp is increased from p=1p=1 to 10 then to 1515

    Spanning Eulerian subgraphs and Catlin’s reduced graphs

    Get PDF
    A graph G is collapsible if for every even subset R ⊆ V (G), there is a spanning connected subgraph HR of G whose set of odd degree vertices is R. A graph is reduced if it has no nontrivial collapsible subgraphs. Catlin [4] showed that the existence of spanning Eulerian subgraphs in a graph G can be determined by the reduced graph obtained from G by contracting all the collapsible subgraphs of G. In this paper, we present a result on 3-edge-connected reduced graphs of small orders. Then, we prove that a 3-edge-connected graph G of order n either has a spanning Eulerian subgraph or can be contracted to the Petersen graph if G satisfies one of the following: (i) d(u) + d(v) \u3e 2(n/15 − 1) for any uv 6∈ E(G) and n is large; (ii) the size of a maximum matching in G is at most 6; (iii) the independence number of G is at most 5. These are improvements of prior results in [16], [18], [24] and [25]

    Lai’s conditions for spanning and dominating closed trails

    Get PDF

    Fan-Type Conditions for Collapsible Graphs

    Get PDF

    Connected factors in graphs - a survey

    Get PDF

    On dominating and spanning circuits in graphs

    Get PDF
    An eulerian subgraph of a graph is called a circuit. As shown by Harary and Nash-Williams, the existence of a Hamilton cycle in the line graph L(G) of a graph G is equivalent to the existence of a dominating circuit in G, i.e., a circuit such that every edge of G is incident with a vertex of the circuit. Important progress in the study of the existence of spanning and dominating circuits was made by Catlin, who defined the reduction of a graph G and showed that G has a spanning circuit if and only if the reduction of G has a spanning circuit. We refine Catlin's reduction technique to obtain a result which contains several known and new sufficient conditions for a graph to have a spanning or dominating circuit in terms of degree-sums of adjacent vertices. In particular, the result implies the truth of the following conjecture of Benhocine et al.: If G is a connected simple graph of order n such that every cut edge of G is incident with a vertex of degree 1 and d(u)+d(v) > 2(1/5n-1) for every edge uv of G, then, for n sufficiently large, L(G) is hamiltonian

    Spanning Trails and Spanning Trees

    Get PDF
    There are two major parts in my dissertation. One is based on spanning trail, the other one is comparing spanning tree packing and covering.;The results of the spanning trail in my dissertation are motivated by Thomassen\u27s Conjecture that every 4-connected line graph is hamiltonian. Harary and Nash-Williams showed that the line graph L( G) is hamiltonian if and only if the graph G has a dominating eulerian subgraph. Also, motivated by the Chinese Postman Problem, Boesch et al. introduced supereulerian graphs which contain spanning closed trails. In the spanning trail part of my dissertation, I proved some results based on supereulerian graphs and, a more general case, spanning trails.;Let alpha(G), alpha\u27(G), kappa( G) and kappa\u27(G) denote the independence number, the matching number, connectivity and edge connectivity of a graph G, respectively. First, we discuss the 3-edge-connected graphs with bounded edge-cuts of size 3, and prove that any 3-edge-connected graph with at most 11 edge cuts of size 3 is supereulerian, which improves Catlin\u27s result. Second, having the idea from Chvatal-Erdos Theorem which states that every graph G with kappa(G) ≥ alpha( G) is hamiltonian, we find families of finite graphs F 1 and F2 such that if a connected graph G satisfies kappa\u27(G) ≥ alpha(G) -- 1 (resp. kappa\u27(G) ≥ 3 and alpha\u27( G) ≤ 7), then G has a spanning closed trail if and only if G is not contractible to a member of F1 (resp. F2). Third, by solving a conjecture posed in [Discrete Math. 306 (2006) 87-98], we prove if G is essentially 4-edge-connected, then for any edge subset X0 ⊆ E(G) with |X0| ≤ 3 and any distinct edges e, e\u27 2 ∈ E(G), G has a spanning ( e, e\u27)-trail containing all edges in X0.;The results on spanning trees in my dissertation concern spanning tree packing and covering. We find a characterization of spanning tree packing and covering based on degree sequence. Let tau(G) be the maximum number of edge-disjoint spanning trees in G, a(G) be the minimum number of spanning trees whose union covers E(G). We prove that, given a graphic sequence d = (d1, d2···dn) (d1 ≥ d2 ≥···≥ dn) and integers k2 ≥ k1 \u3e 0, there exists a simple graph G with degree sequence d satisfying k 1 ≤ tau(G) ≤ a(G) ≤ k2 if and only if dn ≥ k1 and 2k1(n -- 1) ≤ Sigmani =1 di ≤ 2k2( n -- 1 |I| -- 1) + 2Sigma i∈I di, where I = {lcub}i : di \u3c k2{rcub}

    Supereulerian Properties in Graphs and Hamiltonian Properties in Line Graphs

    Get PDF
    Following the trend initiated by Chvatal and Erdos, using the relation of independence number and connectivity as sufficient conditions for hamiltonicity of graphs, we characterize supereulerian graphs with small matching number, which implies a characterization of hamiltonian claw-free graph with small independence number.;We also investigate strongly spanning trailable graphs and their applications to hamiltonian connected line graphs characterizations for small strongly spanning trailable graphs and strongly spanning trailable graphs with short longest cycles are obtained. In particular, we have found a graph family F of reduced nonsupereulerian graphs such that for any graph G with kappa\u27(G) ≥ 2 and alpha\u27( G) ≤ 3, G is supereulerian if and only if the reduction of G is not in F..;We proved that any connected graph G with at most 12 vertices, at most one vertex of degree 2 and without vertices of degree 1 is either supereulerian or its reduction is one of six exceptional cases. This is applied to show that if a 3-edge-connected graph has the property that every pair of edges is joined by a longest path of length at most 8, then G is strongly spanning trailable if and only if G is not the wagner graph.;Using charge and discharge method, we prove that every 3-connected, essentially 10-connected line graph is hamiltonian connected. We also provide a unified treatment with short proofs for several former results by Fujisawa and Ota in [20], by Kaiser et al in [24], and by Pfender in [40]. New sufficient conditions for hamiltonian claw-free graphs are also obtained

    On Eulerian subgraphs and hamiltonian line graphs

    Get PDF
    A graph {\color{black}GG} is Hamilton-connected if for any pair of distinct vertices {\color{black}u,v∈V(G)u, v \in V(G)}, {\color{black}GG} has a spanning (u,v)(u,v)-path; {\color{black}GG} is 1-hamiltonian if for any vertex subset S⊆V(G)S \subseteq {\color{black}V(G)} with ∣S∣≤1|S| \le 1, G−SG - S has a spanning cycle. Let δ(G)\delta(G), α2˘7(G)\alpha\u27(G) and L(G)L(G) denote the minimum degree, the matching number and the line graph of a graph GG, respectively. The following result is obtained. {\color{black} Let GG be a simple graph} with ∣E(G)∣≥3|E(G)| \ge 3. If δ(G)≥α2˘7(G)\delta(G) \geq \alpha\u27(G), then each of the following holds. \\ (i) L(G)L(G) is Hamilton-connected if and only if κ(L(G))≥3\kappa(L(G))\ge 3. \\ (ii) L(G)L(G) is 1-hamiltonian if and only if κ(L(G))≥3\kappa(L(G))\ge 3. %==========sp For a graph GG, an integer s≥0s \ge 0 and distinct vertices u,v∈V(G)u, v \in V(G), an (s;u,v)(s; u, v)-path-system of GG is a subgraph HH consisting of ss internally disjoint (u,v)(u,v)-paths. The spanning connectivity κ∗(G)\kappa^*(G) is the largest integer ss such that for any kk with 0≤k≤s0 \le k \le s and for any u,v∈V(G)u, v \in V(G) with u≠vu \neq v, GG has a spanning (k;u,v)(k; u,v)-path-system. It is known that κ∗(G)≤κ(G)\kappa^*(G) \le \kappa(G), and determining if κ∗(G)3˘e0\kappa^*(G) \u3e 0 is an NP-complete problem. A graph GG is maximally spanning connected if κ∗(G)=κ(G)\kappa^*(G) = \kappa(G). Let msc(G)msc(G) and sk(G)s_k(G) be the smallest integers mm and m2˘7m\u27 such that Lm(G)L^m(G) is maximally spanning connected and κ∗(Lm2˘7(G))≥k\kappa^*(L^{m\u27}(G)) \ge k, respectively. We show that every locally-connected line graph with connectivity at least 3 is maximally spanning connected, and that the spanning connectivity of a locally-connected line graph can be polynomially determined. As applications, we also determined best possible upper bounds for msc(G)msc(G) and sk(G)s_k(G), and characterized the extremal graphs reaching the upper bounds. %==============st For integers s≥0s \ge 0 and t≥0t \ge 0, a graph GG is (s,t)(s,t)-supereulerian if for any disjoint edge sets X,Y⊆E(G)X, Y \subseteq E(G) with ∣X∣≤s|X|\le s and ∣Y∣≤t|Y|\le t, GG has a spanning closed trail that contains XX and avoids YY. Pulleyblank in [J. Graph Theory, 3 (1979) 309-310] showed that determining whether a graph is (0,0)(0,0)-supereulerian, even when restricted to planar graphs, is NP-complete. Settling an open problem of Bauer, Catlin in [J. Graph Theory, 12 (1988) 29-45] showed that every simple graph GG on nn vertices with δ(G)≥n5−1\delta(G) \ge \frac{n}{5} -1, when nn is sufficiently large, is (0,0)(0,0)-supereulerian or is contractible to K2,3K_{2,3}. We prove the following for any nonnegative integers ss and tt. \\ (i) For any real numbers aa and bb with 03˘ca3˘c10 \u3c a \u3c 1, there exists a family of finitely many graphs \F(a,b;s,t) such that if GG is a simple graph on nn vertices with κ2˘7(G)≥t+2\kappa\u27(G) \ge t+2 and δ(G)≥an+b\delta(G) \ge an + b, then either GG is (s,t)(s,t)-supereulerian, or GG is contractible to a member in \F(a,b;s,t). \\ (ii) Let ℓK2\ell K_2 denote the connected loopless graph with two vertices and ℓ\ell parallel edges. If GG is a simple graph on nn vertices with κ2˘7(G)≥t+2\kappa\u27(G) \ge t+2 and δ(G)≥n2−1\delta(G) \ge \frac{n}{2}-1, then when nn is sufficiently large, either GG is (s,t)(s,t)-supereulerian, or for some integer jj with t+2≤j≤s+tt+2 \le j \le s+t, GG is contractible to a jK2j K_2. %==================index For a hamiltonian property \cp, Clark and Wormold introduced the problem of investigating the value \cp(a,b) = \max\{\min\{n: L^n(G) has property \cp\}: κ2˘7(G)≥a\kappa\u27(G) \ge a and δ(G)≥b}\delta(G) \ge b\}, and proposed a few problems to determine \cp(a,b) with b≥a≥4b \ge a \ge 4 when \cp is being hamiltonian, edge-hamiltonian and hamiltonian-connected. Zhan in 1986 proved that the line graph of a 4-edge-connected graph is Hamilton-connected, which implies a solution to the unsettled cases of above-mentioned problem. We consider an extended version of the problem. Let ess2˘7(G)ess\u27(G) denote the essential edge-connectivity of a graph GG, and define \cp\u27(a,b) = \max\{\min\{n: L^n(G) has property \cp\}: ess2˘7(G)≥aess\u27(G) \ge a and δ(G)≥b}\delta(G) \ge b\}. We investigate the values of \cp\u27(a,b) when \cp is one of these hamiltonian properties. In particular, we show that for any values of b≥1b \ge 1, \cp\u27(4,b) \le 2 and \cp\u27(4,b) = 1 if and only if Thomassen\u27s conjecture that every 4-connected line graph is hamiltonian is valid
    corecore