27,824 research outputs found
Privacy-enhancing Aggregation of Internet of Things Data via Sensors Grouping
Big data collection practices using Internet of Things (IoT) pervasive
technologies are often privacy-intrusive and result in surveillance, profiling,
and discriminatory actions over citizens that in turn undermine the
participation of citizens to the development of sustainable smart cities.
Nevertheless, real-time data analytics and aggregate information from IoT
devices open up tremendous opportunities for managing smart city
infrastructures. The privacy-enhancing aggregation of distributed sensor data,
such as residential energy consumption or traffic information, is the research
focus of this paper. Citizens have the option to choose their privacy level by
reducing the quality of the shared data at a cost of a lower accuracy in data
analytics services. A baseline scenario is considered in which IoT sensor data
are shared directly with an untrustworthy central aggregator. A grouping
mechanism is introduced that improves privacy by sharing data aggregated first
at a group level compared as opposed to sharing data directly to the central
aggregator. Group-level aggregation obfuscates sensor data of individuals, in a
similar fashion as differential privacy and homomorphic encryption schemes,
thus inference of privacy-sensitive information from single sensors becomes
computationally harder compared to the baseline scenario. The proposed system
is evaluated using real-world data from two smart city pilot projects. Privacy
under grouping increases, while preserving the accuracy of the baseline
scenario. Intra-group influences of privacy by one group member on the other
ones are measured and fairness on privacy is found to be maximized between
group members with similar privacy choices. Several grouping strategies are
compared. Grouping by proximity of privacy choices provides the highest privacy
gains. The implications of the strategy on the design of incentives mechanisms
are discussed
Generating indicative-informative summaries with SumUM
We present and evaluate SumUM, a text summarization system that takes a raw technical text as input and produces an indicative informative summary. The indicative part of the summary identifies the topics of the document, and the informative part elaborates on some of these topics according to the reader's interest. SumUM motivates the topics, describes entities, and defines concepts. It is a first step for exploring the issue of dynamic summarization. This is accomplished through a process of shallow syntactic and semantic analysis, concept identification, and text regeneration. Our method was developed through the study of a corpus of abstracts written by professional abstractors. Relying on human judgment, we have evaluated indicativeness, informativeness, and text acceptability of the automatic summaries. The results thus far indicate good performance when compared with other summarization technologies
Joint Modeling of Content and Discourse Relations in Dialogues
We present a joint modeling approach to identify salient discussion points in
spoken meetings as well as to label the discourse relations between speaker
turns. A variation of our model is also discussed when discourse relations are
treated as latent variables. Experimental results on two popular meeting
corpora show that our joint model can outperform state-of-the-art approaches
for both phrase-based content selection and discourse relation prediction
tasks. We also evaluate our model on predicting the consistency among team
members' understanding of their group decisions. Classifiers trained with
features constructed from our model achieve significant better predictive
performance than the state-of-the-art.Comment: Accepted by ACL 2017. 11 page
Summarizing Dialogic Arguments from Social Media
Online argumentative dialog is a rich source of information on popular
beliefs and opinions that could be useful to companies as well as governmental
or public policy agencies. Compact, easy to read, summaries of these dialogues
would thus be highly valuable. A priori, it is not even clear what form such a
summary should take. Previous work on summarization has primarily focused on
summarizing written texts, where the notion of an abstract of the text is well
defined. We collect gold standard training data consisting of five human
summaries for each of 161 dialogues on the topics of Gay Marriage, Gun Control
and Abortion. We present several different computational models aimed at
identifying segments of the dialogues whose content should be used for the
summary, using linguistic features and Word2vec features with both SVMs and
Bidirectional LSTMs. We show that we can identify the most important arguments
by using the dialog context with a best F-measure of 0.74 for gun control, 0.71
for gay marriage, and 0.67 for abortion.Comment: Proceedings of the 21th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of
Dialogue (SemDial 2017
The TRECVID 2007 BBC rushes summarization evaluation pilot
This paper provides an overview of a pilot evaluation of
video summaries using rushes from several BBC dramatic series. It was carried out under the auspices of TRECVID.
Twenty-two research teams submitted video summaries of
up to 4% duration, of 42 individual rushes video files aimed
at compressing out redundant and insignificant material.
The output of two baseline systems built on straightforward
content reduction techniques was contributed by Carnegie
Mellon University as a control. Procedures for developing
ground truth lists of important segments from each video
were developed at Dublin City University and applied to
the BBC video. At NIST each summary was judged by
three humans with respect to how much of the ground truth
was included, how easy the summary was to understand,
and how much repeated material the summary contained.
Additional objective measures included: how long it took
the system to create the summary, how long it took the assessor to judge it against the ground truth, and what the
summary's duration was. Assessor agreement on finding desired segments averaged 78% and results indicate that while it is difficult to exceed the performance of baselines, a few systems did
- …