Generalized Hamacher aggregation operators for intuitionistic uncertain linguistic sets: Multiple attribute group decision making methods

© 2019 by the authors. In this paper, we consider multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems in which the attribute values take the form of intuitionistic uncertain linguistic variables. Based on Hamacher operations, we developed several Hamacher aggregation operators, which generalize the arithmetic aggregation operators and geometric aggregation operators, and extend the algebraic aggregation operators and Einstein aggregation operators. A number of special cases for the two operators with respect to the parameters are discussed in detail. Also, we developed an intuitionistic uncertain linguistic generalized Hamacher hybrid weighted average operator to reflect the importance degrees of both the given intuitionistic uncertain linguistic variables and their ordered positions. Based on the generalized Hamacher aggregation operator, we propose a method for MAGDM for intuitionistic uncertain linguistic sets. Finally, a numerical example and comparative analysis with related decision making methods are provided to illustrate the practicality and feasibility of the proposed method

Classical Dynamic Consensus and Opinion Dynamics Models: A Survey of Recent Trends and Methodologies

The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.Consensus reaching is an iterative and dynamic process that supports group decision-making models by guiding decision-makers towards modifying their opinions through a feedback mechanism. Many attempts have been recently devoted to the design of efficient consensus reaching processes, especially when the dynamism is dependent on time, which aims to deal with opinion dynamics models. The emergence of novel methodologies in this field has been accelerated over recent years. In this regard, the present work is concerned with a systematic review of classical dynamic consensus and opinion dynamics models. The most recent trends of both models are identified and the developed methodologies are described in detail. Challenges of each model and open problems are discussed and worthwhile directions for future research are given. Our findings denote that due to technological advancements, a majority of recent literature works are concerned with the large-scale group decision-making models, where the interactions of decision-makers are enabled via social networks. Managing the behavior of decision-makers and consensus reaching with the minimum adjustment cost under social network analysis have been the top priorities for researchers in the design of classical consensus and opinion dynamics models

Prioritization of the launch of ICT products and services through linguistic multi-criteria decision-making

The market launch of new products and services is a basic pillar for large and medium-sized companies in the ICT (Information and Communications Technology) sector. Choosing the right moment for it is usually a differentiating factor in terms of competition, since it is a source of competitive advantage. There are several mechanisms and strategies to address this problem from the market perspective. However, the criteria of the different actors involved – managers, sales representatives, experts, etc. – coexist in the corporate sphere and they often differ, causing difficulties in priority setting processes in the launch of a product or service. The assessment of the prioritization of these criteria is usually expressed in natural language, thus adding a great deal of uncertainty. Fuzzy linguistic models have proved to be an efficient tool for managing the intrinsic uncertainty of this type of information. This paper presents a linguistic multi-criteria decision-making model, able to reconcile the different requirements and viewpoints existing in the corporate sector when planning the launch of new products and services. The proposed model is based on the fuzzy 2-tuple linguistic model, aimed at managing linguistic data expressing different corporate criteria, without compromising accuracy in the calculation of said data. In order to illustrate this, a practical case study is presented, in which the model is applied for scheduling the launch prioritization of several new products and services by a telecommunications company, within the deadlines set in its strategic planning.The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support received from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) for the Research Projects TIN2016-75850-R, TIN2016-79484-R and TIN2013-40658-P

Multi-criteria group decision making with a partialranking-based ordinal consensus reaching process for automotive development management

The consensus reaching process (CRP) aims at reconciling the conflicts between individual preferences when eliciting collective preferences. The ordinal CRP based on the positional orders of alternatives in linear rankings is straightforward and robust; however, for partial rankings involving preference, indifference and incomparability relations, there is no explicit positional order but are binary relations. This study focuses on partial rankings that may occur when using the ORESTE (organısation, rangement et Synthese de donnees relarionnelles, in French) method for making decisions, and designs an ordinal CRP pertaining to the binary relations of alternatives. Concretely, we propose an enhanced ordinal consensus measure with two hierarchies to measure the agreement levels between individual partial rankings. Consensus degrees are calculated based on the frequency distribution of binary relation types, which can avoid subjective axiomatic assumptions on the relations themselves. Besides, a consensus threshold determination method close to cognitive expression is developed. A feedback mechanism is designed to aid experts to modify preferences towards group consensus. An example about the evaluation of automotive design schemes is presented to validate the proposed ordinal CRP. A ranking result that allows the incomparability relations of design schemes is obtained after the information exchange among experts

A Consensus Model for Group Decision Making with Hesitant Fuzzy Information

This article presents a more improved consensus-based method for dealing with multi-person decision making (MPDM) that uses hesitant fuzzy preference relations (HFPRís) that arenít in the usual format. We proposed a Lukasiewicz transitivity (TL-transitivity)-based technique for establishing normalised hesitant fuzzy preference relations (NHFPRís) at the most essential level, after that, a model based on consensus is constructed. After that, a transitive closure formula is created in order to build TL -consistent hesitant fuzzy preference relations (HFPRís) and symmetrical matrices. Afterwards, a consistency analysis is performed to determine the degree of consistency of the data given by the decision makers (DMs), as a result, the consistency weights must be assigned to them. After combining consistency weights and preset(predeÖned) priority weights, the Önal priority weights vector of DMs is obtained (if there are any). The consensus process determines either data analysis and selection of a suitable alternative should be done directly or externally. The enhancement process aims to improve the DMís consensus measure, despite the implementation of an indicator for locating sluggish points, in the circumstance that an unfavorable agreement is achieved. Finally, a comparison case demonstrates the relevance and e§ectiveness of the proposed system. The conclusions indicate that the suggested strategy can provide insight into the MPDM system

An analysis of consensus approaches based on different concepts of coincidence

The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version.Soft consensus is a relevant topic in group decision making problems. Soft consensus measures are utilized to reflect the different agreement degrees between the experts leading the consensus reaching process. This may determine the final decision and the time needed to reach it. The concept of coincidence has led to two main approaches to calculating the soft consensus measures, namely, concordance among expert preferences and concordance among individual solutions. In the first approach the coincidence is obtained by evaluating the similarity among the expert preferences, while in the second one the concordance is derived from the measurement of the similarity among the solutions proposed by these experts. This paper performs a comparative study of consensus approaches based on both coincidence approaches. We obtain significant differences between both approaches by comparing several distance functions for measuring expert preferences and a consensus measure over the set of alternatives for measuring the solutions provided by experts. To do so, we use the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. Finally, these outcomes are analyzed using Friedman mean ranks in order to obtain a quantitative classification of the considered measurements according to the convergence criterion considered in the consensus reaching process

A linguistic Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Method to University Human Resource Management

Competition among different universities depends largely on the competition for talent. Talent evaluation and selection is one of the main activities in human resource management (HRM) which is critical for university development. Firstly, linguistic neutrosophic sets (LNSs) are introduced to better express multiple uncertain information during the evaluation procedure. We further merge the power averaging operator with LNSs for information aggregation and propose a LN-power weighted averaging (LNPWA) operator and a LN-power weighted geometric (LNPWG) operator. Then, an extended technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method is developed to solve a case of university HRM evaluation problem. The main contribution and novelty of the proposed method rely on that it allows the information provided by different decision makers (DMs) to support and reinforce each other which is more consistent with the actual situation of university HRM evaluation. In addition, its effectiveness and advantages over existing methods are verified through sensitivity and comparative analysis. The results show that the proposal is capable in the domain of university HRM evaluation and may contribute to the talent introduction in universities

Multicriteria Consensus Models to Support Intelligent Group Decision-Making

The development of intelligent systems is progressing rapidly, thanks to advances in information technology that enable collective, automated, and effective decision-making based on information collected from diverse sources. Group decision-making (GDM) is a key part of intelligent decision-making (IDM), which has received considerable attention in recent years. IDM through GDM refers to a decision-making problem where a group of intelligent decision-makers (DMs) evaluate a set of alternatives with respect to specific attributes. Intelligent communication among DMs aims to give orders to the available alternatives. However, GDM models developed for IDM must incorporate consensus support models to effectively integrate input from each DM into the final decision. Many efforts have been made to design consensus models to support IDM, depending on the decision problem or environment. Despite promising results, significant gaps remain in research on the design of such support models. One major drawback of existing consensus models is their dependence on the type of decision environment, making them less generalizable. Moreover, these models are often static and cannot respond to dynamic changes in the decision environment. Another limitation is that consensus models for large-scale decision environments lack an efficient communication regime to enable DM interactions. To address these challenges, this dissertation proposes developing consensus models to support IDM through GDM. To address the generalization issue of existing consensus models, reinforcement learning (RL) is proposed. RL agents can be built on the Markov decision process to enable IDM, potentially removing the generalization issue of consensus support models. Contrary to most consensus models, which assume static decision environments, this dissertation proposes a computationally efficient dynamic consensus model to support dynamic IDM. Finally, to facilitate secure and efficient interactions among intelligent DMs in large-scale problems, Blockchain technology is proposed to speed up the consensus process. The proposed communication regime also includes trust-building mechanisms that employ Blockchain protocols to remove enduring and limitative assumptions on opinion similarity among agents

Fuzzy Techniques for Decision Making 2018

Zadeh's fuzzy set theory incorporates the impreciseness of data and evaluations, by imputting the degrees by which each object belongs to a set. Its success fostered theories that codify the subjectivity, uncertainty, imprecision, or roughness of the evaluations. Their rationale is to produce new flexible methodologies in order to model a variety of concrete decision problems more realistically. This Special Issue garners contributions addressing novel tools, techniques and methodologies for decision making (inclusive of both individual and group, single- or multi-criteria decision making) in the context of these theories. It contains 38 research articles that contribute to a variety of setups that combine fuzziness, hesitancy, roughness, covering sets, and linguistic approaches. Their ranges vary from fundamental or technical to applied approaches

Multiple-Criteria Decision Making

Decision-making on real-world problems, including individual process decisions, requires an appropriate and reliable decision support system. Fuzzy set theory, rough set theory, and neutrosophic set theory, which are MCDM techniques, are useful for modeling complex decision-making problems with imprecise, ambiguous, or vague data.This Special Issue, “Multiple Criteria Decision Making”, aims to incorporate recent developments in the area of the multi-criteria decision-making field. Topics include, but are not limited to:- MCDM optimization in engineering;- Environmental sustainability in engineering processes;- Multi-criteria production and logistics process planning;- New trends in multi-criteria evaluation of sustainable processes;- Multi-criteria decision making in strategic management based on sustainable criteria