Interlocutors-Related and Hearer-Specific Causes of Misunderstanding: Processing Strategy, Confirmation Bias and Weak Vigilance

Noises, similarities between words, slips of the tongue, ambiguities, wrong or false beliefs, lexical deficits, inappropriate inferences, cognitive overload, non-shared knowledge, topic organisation or focusing problems, among others, may cause misunderstanding. While some of these are structural factors, others pertain to the speaker or to both the speaker and the hearer. In addition to stable factors connected with the interlocutors′ communicative abilities, cultural knowledge or patterns of thinking, other less stable factors, such as their personal relationships, psychological states or actions motivated by physiological functions, may also result in communicative problems. This paper considers a series of further factors that may eventually lead to misunderstanding, and which solely pertain to the hearer: processing strategy, confirmation bias and weak vigilance

Chapter 16 The Role of Validation in Integrating Multiple Perspectives

The internet is the primary source of information about a broad range of topics, which may range from consumer and medical decisions to political and socio-scientific issues. The relevant information is often available in the form of written texts that convey divergent perspectives, such as different opinions, competing theoretical assumptions, arguments and counterarguments, and evidence and counterevidence. What are the challenges and potential problems associated with comprehending texts that convey multiple perspectives? How can students be supported to make the most of this obviously complicated reading situation? This chapter attempts to answer these questions from a particular theoretical perspective that revolves around the notion that readers routinely validate text information against pertinent and accessible knowledge and beliefs. We will discuss how validation acts in concert with the two other major component processes of text comprehension, activation and integration. This discussion will be followed by an outline of the Two-step Model of Validation, a model that makes predictions about circumstances that enable or hinder readers to form a coherent and consistent mental representation out of multiple perspectives

About Edible Restaurants: Conflicts between Syntax and Semantics as Revealed by ERPs

In order to investigate conflicts between semantics and syntax, we recorded ERPs, while participants read Dutch sentences. Sentences containing conflicts between syntax and semantics (Fred eats in a sandwich…/Fred eats a restaurant…) elicited an N400. These results show that conflicts between syntax and semantics not necessarily lead to P600 effects and are in line with the processing competition account. According to this parallel account the syntactic and semantic processing streams are fully interactive and information from one level can influence the processing at another level. The relative strength of the cues of the processing streams determines which level is affected most strongly by the conflict. The processing competition account maintains the distinction between the N400 as index for semantic processing and the P600 as index for structural processing

Experimental ordinary language philosophy: a cross-linguistic study of defeasible default inferences

This paper provides new tools for philosophical argument analysis and fresh empirical foundations for ‘critical’ ordinary language philosophy. Language comprehension routinely involves stereotypical inferences with contextual defeaters. J.L. Austin’s Sense and Sensibilia first mooted the idea that contextually inappropriate stereotypical inferences from verbal case-descriptions drive some philosophical paradoxes; these engender philosophical problems that can be resolved by exposing the underlying fallacies. We build on psycholinguistic research on salience effects to explain when and why even perfectly competent speakers cannot help making stereotypical inferences which are contextually inappropriate. We analyse a classical paradox about perception (‘argument from illusion’), suggest it relies on contextually inappropriate stereotypical inferences from appearance-verbs, and show that the conditions we identified as leading to contextually inappropriate stereotypical inferences are met in formulations of the paradox. Three experiments use a forced-choice plausibility-ranking task to document the predicted inappropriate inferences, in English, German, and Japanese. The cross-linguistic study allows us to assess the wider relevance of the proposed analysis. Our findings open up new perspectives for ‘evidential’ experimental philosophy

Examining Semantic Effects in Conceptual Combination

Conceptual combination is a cognitive process that produces complex concepts (e.g., adjective-noun pairs) from simple concepts. The Selective Modification Model (SMM; Smith, Osherson, Rips, & Keane, 1988) postulates that simple adjective-noun combinations (e.g., red apple) are understood by the modifier red selecting the colour attribute of the head noun apple. Theories of conceptual combination have not extended to fulfill our understanding of how complex adjective-noun pairs (e.g., empty dream) are processed. This exploratory study had two main objectives: to determine which semantic variables best captured the processing of complex adjective-noun pairs and to examine the semantic effects of conceptual combination to extend current theories. Adjective-noun combinations were manipulated based on subjective ratings (i.e., concreteness and plausibility; see the preliminary study) or objective measures (i.e., age of acquisition and semantic distance) and compared. Two hundred and ninety-three participants were randomly assigned to complete one of three computerized tasks that differentially engaged semantic processing from shallow to deep, including the non-pronounceable double lexical decision task (Experiment 1), the pronounceable double lexical decision task (Experiment 2), and the meaningfulness task (Experiment 3). Across all tasks, the subjective model outperformed the objective model in reaction time and accuracy analyses. Adjective-noun processing was facilitated by concrete, early acquired head nouns, as well as adjective-noun pairs that were rated as plausible and situated close in semantic space. Interestingly, adjectives paired with abstract head nouns were difficult to process across tasks regardless of how plausible the pair was. In conclusion, semantic variables rated by participants are valuable and may better capture how the mental lexicon is organized and accessed, and further research should pursue innovative ways of examining how abstract head nouns are processed to incorporate into existing theories

The P600 as a continuous index of integration effort

The integration of word meaning into an unfolding utterance representation is a core operation of incremental language comprehension. There is considerable debate, however, as to which component of the ERP signal—the N400 or the P600—directly reflects integrative processes, with far reaching consequences for the temporal organization and architecture of the comprehension system. Multistream models maintaining the N400 as integration crucially rely on the presence of a semantically attractive plausible alternative interpretation to account for the absence of an N400 effect in response to certain semantic anomalies, as reported in previous studies. The single-stream Retrieval–Integration account posits the P600 as an index of integration, further predicting that its amplitude varies continuously with integrative effort. Here, we directly test these competing hypotheses using a context manipulation design in which a semantically attractive alternative is either available or not, and target word plausibility is varied across three levels. An initial self-paced reading study revealed graded reading timesfor plausibility,suggesting differential integration effort. A subsequent ERP study showed no N400 differences across conditions, and that P600 amplitude is graded for plausibility. These findings are inconsistent with the interpretation of the N400 as an index of integration, as no N400 effect emerged even in the absence of a semantically attractive alternative. By contrast, the link between plausibility, reading times, and P600 amplitude supports the view that the P600 is a continuous index of integration effort. More generally, our results support a single-stream architecture and eschew the need for multi-stream accounts

Social Context Effects on the N400: Evidence for Implicit Theory of Mind?

A prevailing theory within research into Theory of Mind – the ability to attribute mental states to others – is the existence of a two-system model: an automatic fast-paced “implicit” system, followed by a reason-based “explicit” system. Behavioural evidence supports a double dissociation: children fail social tasks with higher cognitive load but pass implicit measures, and Autistic individuals pass reason-based social tasks with practice but fail implicit measures. This thesis probes the neural basis for implicit Theory of Mind, asking: to what extent do individuals automatically process the comprehension of task partners during a Joint Comprehension task? EEG evidence here indicates participants display an N400 – a neural marker indicating lack of comprehension – when a partner deprived of context cannot understand a sentence displayed, even when the participant has the full context for comprehension. This “Social N400” appears to indicate that participants model partner comprehension, their mental state, in real time. The effect is shown in adults and adolescents; does not appear to be explained by sub-mentalising effects; and notably is absent when the task lacks a prompt to consider the confederate’s comprehension. The results suggest implicit mentalising is not automatic, but a cognitive tool employed when online modelling would aid task demands. The Joint Comprehension task outlined provides a tool to further examine the neural basis of implicit social cognition, particularly within Autism Spectrum Disorder where an impairment in implicit mentalising is suggested

Orthographic facilitation in oral vocabulary acquisition

An experiment investigated whether exposure to orthography facilitates oral vocabulary learning. A total of 58 typically developing children aged 8-9 years were taught 12 nonwords. Children were trained to associate novel phonological forms with pictures of novel objects. Pictures were used as referents to represent novel word meanings. For half of the nonwords children were additionally exposed to orthography, although they were not alerted to its presence, nor were they instructed to use it. After this training phase a nonword-picture matching posttest was used to assess learning of nonword meaning, and a spelling posttest was used to assess learning of nonword orthography. Children showed robust learning for novel spelling patterns after incidental exposure to orthography. Further, we observed stronger learning for nonword-referent pairings trained with orthography. The degree of orthographic facilitation observed in posttests was related to children's reading levels, with more advanced readers showing more benefit from the presence of orthography