On the roles of the programmer, the compiler and the runtime system when programming accelerators in OpenMP

OpenMP includes in its latest 4.0 specification the accelerator model. In this paper we present a partial implementation of this specification in the OmpSs programming model developed at the Barcelona Supercomputing Center with the aim of identifying which should be the roles of the programmer, the compiler and the runtime system in order to facilitate the asynchronous execution of tasks in architectures with multiple accelerator devices and processors. The design of OmpSs is highly biassed to delegate most of the decisions to the runtime system, which based on the task graph built at runtime (depend clauses) is able to schedule tasks in a data flow way to the available processors and accelerator devices and orchestrate data transfers and reuse among multiple address spaces. For this reason our implementation is partial, just considering from 4.0 those directives that enable the compiler the generation of the so called “kernels” to be executed on the target device. Several extensions to the current specification are also presented, such as the specification of tasks in “native” CUDA and OpenCL or how to specify the device and data privatization in the target construct. Finally, the paper also discusses some challenges found in code generation and a preliminary performance evaluation with some kernel applications.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author’s final draft

Multiple target task sharing support for the OpenMP accelerator model

The use of GPU accelerators is becoming common in HPC platforms due to the their effective performance and energy efficiency. In addition, new generations of multicore processors are being designed with wider vector units and/or larger hardware thread counts, also contributing to the peak performance of the whole system. Although current directive–based paradigms, such as OpenMP or OpenACC, support both accelerators and multicore-based hosts, they do not provide an effective and efficient way to concurrently use them, usually resulting in accelerated programs in which the potential computational performance of the host is not exploited. In this paper we propose an extension to the OpenMP 4.5 directive-based programming model to support the specification and execution of multiple instances of task regions on different devices (i.e. accelerators in conjunction with the vector and heavily multithreaded capabilities in multicore processors). The compiler is responsible for the generation of device-specific code for each device kind, delegating to the runtime system the dynamic schedule of the tasks to the available devices. The new proposed clause conveys useful insight to guide the scheduler while keeping a clean, abstract and machine independent programmer interface. The potential of the proposal is analyzed in a prototype implementation in the OmpSs compiler and runtime infrastructure. Performance evaluation is done using three kernels (N-Body, tiled matrix multiply and Stream) on different GPU-capable systems based on ARM, Intel x86 and IBM Power8. From the evaluation we observe speed–ups in the 8–20% range compared to versions in which only the GPU is used, reaching 96 % of the additional peak performance thanks to the reduction of data transfers and the benefits introduced by the OmpSs NUMA-aware scheduler.This work is partially supported by the IBM/BSC Deep Learning Center Initiative, by the Spanish Government through Programa Severo Ochoa (SEV-2015-0493), by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology through TIN2015-65316-P project and by the Generalitat de Catalunya (contract 2014-SGR-1051).Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

A Novel Set of Directives for Multi-device Programming with OpenMP

This work was supported by MEEP project, which has received funding from the European High-Performance Computing Joint Undertaking (JU) under grant agreement No 946002. The JU receives support from theEuropean Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and Spain, Croatia, Turkey.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

Programming models, compilers, and runtime systems for accelerator computing

Accelerators, such as GPUs and Intel Xeon Phis, have become the workhorses of high-performance computing. Typically, the accelerators act as co-processors, with discrete memory spaces. They possess massive parallelism, along with many other unique architectural features. In order to obtain high performance, these features must be carefully exploited, which requires high programmer expertise. This thesis presents new programming models, and the necessary compiler and runtime systems to ease the accelerator programming process, while obtaining high performance

JACC: An OpenACC Runtime Framework with Kernel-Level and Multi-GPU Parallelization

The rapid development in computing technology has paved the way for directive-based programming models towards a principal role in maintaining software portability of performance-critical applications. Efforts on such models involve a least engineering cost for enabling computational acceleration on multiple architectures while programmers are only required to add meta information upon sequential code. Optimizations for obtaining the best possible efficiency, however, are often challenging. The insertions of directives by the programmer can lead to side-effects that limit the available compiler optimization possible, which could result in performance degradation. This is exacerbated when targeting multi-GPU systems, as pragmas do not automatically adapt to such systems, and require expensive and time consuming code adjustment by programmers. This paper introduces JACC, an OpenACC runtime framework which enables the dynamic extension of OpenACC programs by serving as a transparent layer between the program and the compiler. We add a versatile code-translation method for multi-device utilization by which manually-optimized applications can be distributed automatically while keeping original code structure and parallelism. We show in some cases nearly linear scaling on the part of kernel execution with the NVIDIA V100 GPUs. While adaptively using multi-GPUs, the resulting performance improvements amortize the latency of GPU-to-GPU communications.Comment: Extended version of a paper to appear in: Proceedings of the 28th IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing, Data, and Analytics (HiPC), December 17-18, 202

OmpSs@cloudFPGA: An FPGA task-based programming model with message passing

Nowadays, a new parallel paradigm for energy-efficient heterogeneous hardware infrastructures is required to achieve better performance at a reasonable cost on high-performance computing applications. Under this new paradigm, some application parts are offloaded to specialized accelerators that run faster or are more energy-efficient than CPUs. Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA) are one of those types of accelerators that are becoming widely available in data centers. This paper proposes OmpSs@cloudFPGA, which includes novel extensions to parallel task-based programming models that enable easy and efficient programming of heterogeneous clusters with FPGAs. The programmer only needs to annotate, with OpenMP-like pragmas, the tasks of the application that should be accelerated in the cluster of FPGAs. Next, the proposed programming model framework automatically extracts parts annotated with High-Level Synthesis (HLS) pragmas and synthesizes them into hardware accelerator cores for FPGAs. Additionally, our extensions include and support two novel features: 1) FPGA-to-FPGA direct communication using a Message Passing Interface (MPI) similar Application Programming Interface (API) with one-to-one and collective communications to alleviate host communication channel bottleneck, and 2) creating and spawning work from inside the FPGAs to their own accelerator cores based on an MPI rank-like identification. These features break the classical host-accelerator model, where the host (typically the CPU) generates all the work and distributes it to each accelerator. We also present an evaluation of OmpSs@cloudFPGA for different parallel strategies of the N-Body application on the IBM cloudFPGA research platform. Results show that for cluster sizes up to 56 FPGAs, the performance scales linearly. To the best of our knowledge, this is the best performance obtained for N-body over FPGA platforms, reaching 344 Gpairs/s with 56 FPGAs. Finally, we compare the performance and power consumption of the proposed approach with the ones obtained by a classical execution on the MareNostrum 4 supercomputer, demonstrating that our FPGA approach reduces power consumption by an order of magnitude.This work has been done in the context of the IBM/BSC Deep Learning Center initiative. This work has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 754337 (EuroEXA), from Spanish Government (PID2019-107255GBC21/AEI/10.13039/501100011033), and from Generalitat de Catalunya (2017-SGR-1414 and 2017-SGR-1328).Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

On the Effectiveness of OpenMP teams for Programming Embedded Manycore Accelerators

With the introduction of more powerful and massively parallel embedded processors, embedded systems are becoming HPC capable. In particular heterogeneous on-chip systems (SoC) that couple a general-purpose host processor to a many-core accelerator are becoming more and more widespread, and provide tremendous peak performance/watt, well suited to execute HPC-class programs. The increased computation potential is however traded off for ease programming. Application developers are indeed required to manually deal with outlining code parts suitable for acceleration, parallelize there efficiently over many available cores, and orchestrate data transfers to/from the accelerator. In addition, since most manycores are organized as a collection of clusters, featuring fast local communication but slow remote communication (i.e., to another cluster's local memory), the programmer should also take care of properly mapping the parallel computation so as to avoid poor data locality. OpenMP v4.0 introduces new constructs for computation offloading, as well as directives to deploy parallel computation in a cluster-aware manner. In this paper we assess the effectiveness of OpenMP v4.0 at exploiting the massive parallelism available in embedded heterogeneous SoCs, comparing to standard parallel loops over several computation-intensive applications from the linear algebra and image processing domains

Supporting efficient overlapping of host-device operations for heterogeneous programming with CtrlEvents

Producción CientíficaHeterogeneous systems with several kinds of devices, such as multi-core CPUs, GPUs, FPGAs, among others, are now commonplace. Exploiting all these devices with device-oriented programming models, such as CUDA or OpenCL, requires expertise and knowledge about the underlying hardware to tailor the application to each specific device, thus degrading performance portability. Higher-level proposals simplify the programming of these devices, but their current implementations do not have an efficient support to solve problems that include frequent bursts of computation and communication, or input/output operations. In this work we present CtrlEvents, a new heterogeneous runtime solution which automatically overlaps computation and communication whenever possible, simplifying and improving the efficiency of data-dependency analysis and the coordination of both device computations and host tasks that include generic I/O operations. Our solution outperforms other state-of-the-art implementations for most situations, presenting a good balance between portability, programmability and efficiency.Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación - FEDER (TIN2017-88614-R)Junta de Castilla y León (VA226P20)Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación - AEI and European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR (TED2021–130367B–I00 and MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS AND FITNESS OF GPGPU AND MULTICORE ARCHITECTURES FOR SCIENTIFIC APPLICATIONS

Recent trends in computing architecture development have focused on exploiting task- and data-level parallelism from applications. Major hardware vendors are experimenting with novel parallel architectures, such as the Many Integrated Core (MIC) from Intel that integrates 50 or more x86 processors on a single chip, the Accelerated Processing Unit from AMD that integrates a multicore x86 processor with a graphical processing unit (GPU), and many other initiatives from other hardware vendors that are underway. Therefore, various types of architectures are available to developers for accelerating an application. A performance model that predicts the suitability of the architecture for accelerating an application would be very helpful prior to implementation. Thus, in this research, a Fitness model that ranks the potential performance of accelerators for an application is proposed. Then the Fitness model is extended using statistical multiple regression to model both the runtime performance of accelerators and the impact of programming models on accelerator performance with high degree of accuracy. We have validated both performance models for all the case studies. The error rate of these models, calculated using the experimental performance data, is tolerable in the high-performance computing field. In this research, to develop and validate the two performance models we have also analyzed the performance of several multicore CPUs and GPGPU architectures and the corresponding programming models using multiple case studies. The first case study used in this research is a matrix-matrix multiplication algorithm. By varying the size of the matrix from a small size to a very large size, the performance of the multicore and GPGPU architectures are studied. The second case study used in this research is a biological spiking neural network (SNN), implemented with four neuron models that have varying requirements for communication and computation making them useful for performance analysis of the hardware platforms. We report and analyze the performance variation of the four popular accelerators (Intel Xeon, AMD Opteron, Nvidia Fermi, and IBM PS3) and four advanced CPU architectures (Intel 32 core, AMD 32 core, IBM 16 core, and SUN 32 core) with problem size (matrix and network size) scaling, available optimization techniques and execution configuration. This thorough analysis provides insight regarding how the performance of an accelerator is affected by problem size, optimization techniques, and accelerator configuration. We have analyzed the performance impact of four popular multicore parallel programming models, POSIX-threading, Open Multi-Processing (OpenMP), Open Computing Language (OpenCL), and Concurrency Runtime on an Intel i7 multicore architecture; and, two GPGPU programming models, Compute Unified Device Architecture (CUDA) and OpenCL, on a NVIDIA GPGPU. With the broad study conducted using a wide range of application complexity, multiple optimizations, and varying problem size, it was found that according to their achievable performance, the programming models for the x86 processor cannot be ranked across all applications, whereas the programming models for GPGPU can be ranked conclusively. We also have qualitatively and quantitatively ranked all the six programming models in terms of their perceived programming effort. The results and analysis in this research indicate and are supported by the proposed performance models that for a given hardware system, the best performance for an application is obtained with a proper match of programming model and architecture