Logics for Unranked Trees: An Overview

Labeled unranked trees are used as a model of XML documents, and logical languages for them have been studied actively over the past several years. Such logics have different purposes: some are better suited for extracting data, some for expressing navigational properties, and some make it easy to relate complex properties of trees to the existence of tree automata for those properties. Furthermore, logics differ significantly in their model-checking properties, their automata models, and their behavior on ordered and unordered trees. In this paper we present a survey of logics for unranked trees

Parallel Beta Reduction Is Not Elementary Recursive

AbstractWe analyze the inherent complexity of implementing Lévy's notion of optimal evaluation for the λ-calculus, where similar redexes are contracted in one step via so-called parallel β-reduction. Optimal evaluation was finally realized by Lamping, who introduced a beautiful graph reduction technology for sharing evaluation contexts dual to the sharing of values. His pioneering insights have been modified and improved in subsequent implementations of optimal reduction. We prove that the cost of parallel β-reduction is not bounded by any Kalmár-elementary recursive function. Not only do we establish that the parallel β-step cannot be a unit-cost operation, we demonstrate that the time complexity of implementing a sequence of n parallel β-steps is not bounded as O(2n), O(22n), O(222n), or in general, O(Kl(n)), where Kl(n) is a fixed stack of l 2's with an n on top. A key insight, essential to the establishment of this non-elementary lower bound, is that any simply typed λ-term can be reduced to normal form in a number of parallel β-steps that is only polynomial in the length of the explicitly typed term. The result follows from Statman's theorem that deciding equivalence of typed λ-terms is not elementary recursive. The main theorem gives a lower bound on the work that must be done by any technology that implements Lévy's notion of optimal reduction. However, in the significant case of Lamping's solution, we make some important remarks addressing how work done by β-reduction is translated into equivalent work carried out by his bookkeeping nodes. In particular, we identify the computational paradigms of superposition of values and of higher-order sharing, appealing to compelling analogies with quantum mechanics and SIMD-parallelism

A uniform approach to the complexity and analysis of succinct systems

“ This thesis provides a unifying view on the succinctness of systems: the capability of a modeling formalism to describe the behavior of a system of exponential size using a polynomial syntax. The key theoretical contribution is the introduction of sequential circuit machines as a new universal computation model that focuses on succinctness as the central aspect. The thesis demonstrates that many well-known modeling formalisms such as communicating state machines, linear-time temporal logic, or timed automata exhibit an immediate connection to this machine model. Once a (syntactic) connection is established, many complexity bounds for structurally restricted sequential circuit machines can be transferred to a certain formalism in a uniform manner. As a consequence, besides a far-reaching unification of independent lines of research, we are also able to provide matching complexity bounds for various analysis problems, whose complexities were not known so far. For example, we establish matching lower and upper bounds of the small witness problem and several variants of the bounded synthesis problem for timed automata, a particularly important succinct modeling formalism. Also for timed automata, our complexity-theoretic analysis leads to the identification of tractable fragments of the timed synthesis problem under partial observability. Specifically, we identify timed controller synthesis based on discrete or template-based controllers to be equivalent to model checking. Based on this discovery, we develop a new model checking-based algorithm to efficiently find feasible template instantiations. From a more practical perspective, this thesis also studies the preservation of succinctness in analysis algorithms using symbolic data structures. While efficient techniques exist for specific forms of succinctness considered in isolation, we present a general approach based on abstraction refinement to combine off-the-shelf symbolic data structures. In particular, for handling the combination of concurrency and quantitative timing behavior in networks of timed automata, we report on the tool Synthia which combines binary decision diagrams with difference bound matrices. In a comparison with the timed model checker Uppaal and the timed game solver Tiga running on standard benchmarks from the timed model checking and synthesis domain, respectively, the experimental results clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of our new approach.Diese Dissertation liefert eine vereinheitlichende Sicht auf die Kompaktheit von Systemen: die Fähigkeit eines Modellierungsformalismus, das Verhalten eines Systems exponentieller Größe mit polynomieller Syntax zu beschreiben. Der wesentliche theoretische Beitrag ist die Einführung von sequenziellen Schaltkreis-Maschinen als neues universelles Berechnungsmodell, das sich auf den zentralen Aspekt der Kompaktheit konzentriert. Die Dissertation demonstriert, dass viele bekannte Modellierungsformalismen, wie z.B. kommunizierende Zustandsmaschinen, linear-Zeit temporale Logik (LTL) oder gezeitete Automaten eine direkte Verbindung zu diesem Maschinenmodell aufzeigen. Sobald eine (syntaktische) Verbindung hergestellt ist, können viele Komplexitätsschranken für strukturell beschränkte sequenzielle Schaltkreis-Maschinen für einen bestimmten Formalismus einheitlich übernommen werden. Neben einer weitreichenden Vereinheitlichung unabhängiger Forschungsrichtungen können auch zahlreiche Komplexitätsschranken für Analyse-Probleme etabliert werden, deren genaue Komplexität bisher noch nicht bekannt war. Zum Beispiel werden passende untere und obere Schranken des small witness Problems und mehrere Varianten des Synthese-Problems von Controllern mit beschränkter Größe für gezeitete Automaten bewiesen. Die theoretische Analyse deckt Fragmente geringerer Komplexität des partiell informierten Syntheseproblems für gezeitete Automaten auf. Es wird im Besonderen gezeigt, dass das gezeitete Syntheseproblem für diskrete oder Vorlagen-basierte Controller äquivalent zum Model Checking-Problem ist. Basierend auf dieser Einsicht wird ein neuartiger Model Checking-basierter Algorithmus zur effizienten Synthese von gültigen Instantiierungen von Vorlagen entwickelt. Der praktische Beitrag der Dissertation untersucht die Erhaltung von Kompaktheit in Analyse-Algorithmen durch die Benutzung symbolischer Datenstrukturen. Es wird ein allgemeiner Ansatz zur Kombination von Standard-Datenstrukturen vorgestellt, die jeweils bisher nur in Isolation verwendet werden konnten. Insbesondere wird für die Analyse von Netzwerken von gezeiteten Automaten das Tool Synthia vorgestellt, welches binäre Entscheidungs-Diagramme mit Differenzen-Matrizen verbindet. In einem experimentellen Vergleich mit den Tools Uppaal und Tiga wird klar die Effektivität des neuen Ansatzes belegt

26. Theorietag Automaten und Formale Sprachen 23. Jahrestagung Logik in der Informatik: Tagungsband

Der Theorietag ist die Jahrestagung der Fachgruppe Automaten und Formale Sprachen der Gesellschaft für Informatik und fand erstmals 1991 in Magdeburg statt. Seit dem Jahr 1996 wird der Theorietag von einem eintägigen Workshop mit eingeladenen Vorträgen begleitet. Die Jahrestagung der Fachgruppe Logik in der Informatik der Gesellschaft für Informatik fand erstmals 1993 in Leipzig statt. Im Laufe beider Jahrestagungen finden auch die jährliche Fachgruppensitzungen statt. In diesem Jahr wird der Theorietag der Fachgruppe Automaten und Formale Sprachen erstmalig zusammen mit der Jahrestagung der Fachgruppe Logik in der Informatik abgehalten. Organisiert wurde die gemeinsame Veranstaltung von der Arbeitsgruppe Zuverlässige Systeme des Instituts für Informatik an der Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel vom 4. bis 7. Oktober im Tagungshotel Tannenfelde bei Neumünster. Während des Tre↵ens wird ein Workshop für alle Interessierten statt finden. In Tannenfelde werden • Christoph Löding (Aachen) • Tomás Masopust (Dresden) • Henning Schnoor (Kiel) • Nicole Schweikardt (Berlin) • Georg Zetzsche (Paris) eingeladene Vorträge zu ihrer aktuellen Arbeit halten. Darüber hinaus werden 26 Vorträge von Teilnehmern und Teilnehmerinnen gehalten, 17 auf dem Theorietag Automaten und formale Sprachen und neun auf der Jahrestagung Logik in der Informatik. Der vorliegende Band enthält Kurzfassungen aller Beiträge. Wir danken der Gesellschaft für Informatik, der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel und dem Tagungshotel Tannenfelde für die Unterstützung dieses Theorietags. Ein besonderer Dank geht an das Organisationsteam: Maike Bradler, Philipp Sieweck, Joel Day. Kiel, Oktober 2016 Florin Manea, Dirk Nowotka und Thomas Wilk

Algorithms and lower bounds in finite automata size complexity

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2006.Includes bibliographical references (p. 97-99).In this thesis we investigate the relative succinctness of several types of finite automata, focusing mainly on the following four basic models: one-way deterministic (1)FAs), one-way nondeterministic (1NFAs), two-way deterministic (2DFAS), and two-way nondeterministic (2NFAS). First, we establish the exact values of the trade-offs for all conversions from two-way to one-way automata. Specifically, we prove that the functions ... return the exact values of the trade-offs from 2DFAS to 1DFAS, from 2NFAS to 1DFAs, and from 2DFAs or 2NFAS to 1NFAs, respectively. Second, we examine the question whether the trade-offs from NFAs or 2NFAS to 2DiFAs are polynomial or not. We prove two theorems for liveness, the complete problem for the conversion from 1NFAS to 2DFAS. We first focus on moles, a restricted class of 2NFAs that includes the polynomially large 1NFAS which solve liveness. We prove that, in contrast, 2DFA moles cannot solve liveness, irrespective of size.(cont.) We then focus on sweeping 2NFAS, which can change the direction of their input head only on the end-markers. We prove that all sweeping 2NFAs solving the complement of liveness are of exponential size. A simple modification of this argument also proves that the trade-off from 2DFAS to sweeping 2NFAS is exponential. Finally, we examine conversions between two-way automata with more than one head-like devices (e.g., heads, linearly bounded counters, pebbles). We prove that, if the automata of some type A have enough resources to (i) solve problems that no automaton of some other type B can solve, and (ii) simulate any unary 2DFA that has additional access to a linearly-bounded counter, then the trade-off from automata of type A to automata of type B admits no recursive upper bound.by Christos Kapoutsis.Ph.D

Succinctness and Formula Size Games

Tämä väitöskirja tutkii erilaisten logiikoiden tiiviyttä kaavan pituuspelien avulla. Logiikan tiiviys viittaa ominaisuuksien ilmaisemiseen tarvittavien kaavojen kokoon. Kaavan pituuspelit ovat hyväksi todettu menetelmä tiiviystulosten todistamiseen. Väitöskirjan kontribuutio on kaksiosainen. Ensinnäkin väitöskirjassa määritellään kaavan pituuspeli useille logiikoille ja tarjotaan näin uusia menetelmiä tulevaan tutkimukseen. Toiseksi näitä pelejä ja muita menetelmiä käytetään tiiviystulosten todistamiseen tutkituille logiikoille. Tarkemmin sanottuna väitöskirjassa määritellään uudet parametrisoidut kaavan pituuspelit perusmodaalilogiikalle, modaaliselle μ-kalkyylille, tiimilauselogiikalle ja yleistetyille säännöllisille lausekkeille. Yleistettyjen säännöllisten lausekkeiden pelistä esitellään myös variantit, jotka vastaavat säännöllisiä lausekkeita ja uusia “RE over star-free” -lausekkeita, joissa tähtiä ei esiinny komplementtien sisällä. Pelejä käytetään useiden tiiviystulosten todistamiseen. Predikaattilogiikan näytetään olevan epäelementaarisesti tiiviimpi kuin perusmodaalilogiikka ja modaalinen μ-kalkyyli. Tiimilauselogiikassa tutkitaan systemaattisesti yleisten riippuvuuksia ilmaisevien atomien määrittelemisen tiiviyttä. Klassinen epäelementaarinen tiiviysero predikaattilogiikan ja säännöllisten lausekkeiden välillä osoitetaan uudelleen yksinkertaisemmalla tavalla ja saadaan tähtien lukumäärälle “RE over star-free” -lausekkeissa hierarkia ilmaisuvoiman suhteen. Monissa yllämainituista tuloksista hyödynnetään eksplisiittisiä kaavoja peliargumenttien lisäksi. Tällaisia kaavoja ja tyyppien laskemista hyödyntäen saadaan epäelementaarisia ala- ja ylärajoja yksittäisten sanojen määrittelemisen tiiviydelle predikaattilogiikassa ja monadisessa toisen kertaluvun logiikassa.This thesis studies the succinctness of various logics using formula size games. The succinctness of a logic refers to the size of formulas required to express properties. Formula size games are some of the most successful methods of proof for results on succinctness. The contribution of the thesis is twofold. Firstly, we define formula size games for several logics, providing methods for future research. Secondly, we use these games and other methods to prove results on the succinctness of the studied logics. More precisely, we develop new parameterized formula size games for basic modal logic, modal μ-calculus, propositional team logic and generalized regular expressions. For the generalized regular expression game we introduce variants that correspond to regular expressions and the newly defined RE over star-free expressions, where stars do not occur inside complements. We use the games to prove a number of succinctness results. We show that first-order logic is non-elementarily more succinct than both basic modal logic and modal μ-calculus. We conduct a systematic study of the succinctness of defining common atoms of dependency in propositional team logic. We reprove a classic non-elementary succinctness gap between first-order logic and regular expressions in a much simpler way and establish a hierarchy of expressive power for the number of stars in RE over star-free expressions. Many of the above results utilize explicit formulas in addition to game arguments. We use such formulas and a type counting argument to obtain non-elementary lower and upper bounds for the succinctness of defining single words in first-order logic and monadic second-order logic

On the Sizes of DPDAs, PDAs, LBAs

Abstract There are languages A such that there is a Pushdown Automata (PDA) that recognizes A which is much smaller than any Deterministic Pushdown Automata (DPDA) that recognizes A. There are languages A such that there is a Linear Bounded Automata (Linear Space Turing Machine, henceforth LBA) that recognizes A which is much smaller than any PDA that recognizes A. There are languages A such that both A and A are recognizable by a PDA, but the PDA for A is much smaller than the PDA for A. There are languages A 1 , A 2 such that A 1 , A 2 , A 1 ∩ A 2 are recognizable by a PDA, but the PDA for A 1 and A 2 are much smaller than the PDA for A 1 ∩ A 2 . We investigate these phenomema and show that, in all these cases, the size difference is captured by a function whose Turing degree is on the second level of the arithmetic hierarchy. Our theorems lead to infinitely-often results. For example: for infinitely many n there exists a language A n such that there is a small PDA for A n , but any DPDA for A n is large. We look at cases where we can get almost-all results, though with much smaller size differences

On the Sizes of DPDAs, PDAs, LBAs

Abstract There are languages A such that there is a Pushdown Automata (PDA) that recognizes A which is much smaller than any Deterministic Pushdown Automata (DPDA) that recognizes A. There are languages A such that there is a Linear Bounded Automata (Linear Space Turing Machine, henceforth LBA) that recognizes A which is much smaller than any PDA that recognizes A. There are languages A such that both A and A are recognizable by a PDA, but the PDA for A is much smaller than the PDA for A. There are languages A 1 , A 2 such that A 1 , A 2 , A 1 ∩ A 2 are recognizable by a PDA, but the PDA for A 1 and A 2 are much smaller than the PDA for A 1 ∩ A 2 . We investigate these phenenoma and show that, in all these cases, the size difference is captured by a function whose Turing degree is on the second level of the arithmetic hierarchy. Our theorems lead to infinitely-often results. For example: for infinitely many n there exists a language A n such that there is a small PDA for A n , but any DPDA for A n is large. We look at cases where we can get almost-all results, though with much smaller size differences