Noninterfering schedulers: when possibilistic noninterference implies probabilistic noninterference

We develop a framework for expressing and analyzing the behavior of probabilistic schedulers. There, we define noninterfering schedulers by a probabilistic interpretation of Goguen and Meseguer’s seminal notion of noninterference. Noninterfering schedulers are proved to be safe in the following sense: if a multi-threaded program is possibilistically noninterfering, then it is also probabilistically noninterfering when run under this scheduler

Formalizing probabilistic noninterference

We present an Isabelle formalization of probabilistic noninterference for a multi-threaded language with uniform scheduling. Unlike in previous settings from the literature, here probabilistic behavior comes from both the scheduler and the individual threads, making the language more realistic and the mathematics more challenging. We study resumption-based and trace-based notions of probabilistic noninterference and their relationship, and also discuss compositionality w.r.t. the language constructs and type-system-like syntactic criteria. The formalization uses recent development in the Isabelle probability theory library

Formal verification of language-based concurrent noninterference

We perform a formal analysis of compositionality techniques for proving possibilistic noninterference for a while language with parallel composition. We develop a uniform framework where we express a wide range of noninterference variants from the literature and compare them w.r.t. their contracts: the strength of the security properties they ensure weighed against the harshness of the syntactic conditions they enforce. This results in a simple implementable algorithm for proving that a program has a specific noninterference property, using only compositionality, which captures uniformly several security type-system results from the literature and suggests a further improved type system. All formalism and theorems have been mechanically verified in Isabelle/HOL

Formal verification of language-based concurrent noninterference

We perform a formal analysis of compositionality techniques for proving possibilistic noninterference for a while language with parallel composition. We develop a uniform framework where we express a wide range of noninterference variants from the literature and compare them w.r.t. their contracts: the strength of the security properties they ensure weighed against the harshness of the syntactic conditions they enforce. This results in a simple implementable algorithm for proving that a program has a specific noninterference property, using only compositionality, which captures uniformly several security type-system results from the literature and suggests a further improved type system. All formalism and theorems have been mechanically verified in Isabelle/HOL

Implementation-level analysis of cryptographic protocols and their applications to e-voting systems

Formal verification of security properties of both cryptographic operations, such as encryption, and protocols based on them, such as TLS, has been the goal of a substantial research effort in the last three decades. One fundamental limitation in the verification of these security properties is that analyses are typically carried out at the design level and hence they do not provide reliable guarantees on the implementations of these operations/protocols. To overcome this limitation, in this thesis we aim at establishing formally justified cryptographic guarantees directly at the implementation level for systems that are coded in Java and use cryptography. Our approach is based on a general framework for the cryptographic verification of Java programs (the CVJ framework) which formally links cryptographic indistinguishability properties and noninterference properties. In this way, it enables existing tools that can check standard noninterference properties, but a priori cannot deal with cryptography, to also establish cryptographic privacy properties for Java systems. The CVJ framework is stated and proven for a Java-like formal language which however does not cover all the data types and features commonly used in Java programs. Moreover, the framework originally supports only one cryptographic operation, namely public-key encryption. The first contribution of this thesis is hence to extend and to instantiate the CVJ framework in order to make it more widely applicable. We extend the underlying formal language with some features of Java which have not been captured yet, such as concurrency, and we restate and prove all the results of the framework to carry them over into this extended language. We then further instantiate the framework with additional cryptographic operations: digital signatures and public-key encryption, both now also including a public-key infrastructure, (private) symmetric encryption, and nonce generation. The methods and techniques developed within the CVJ framework are relevant and applicable independently of any specific tool employed. However, to illustrate the usefulness of this approach, we apply the framework along with two verification tools for Java programs, namely the fully automated static checker Joana and the interactive theorem prover KeY, to establish strong cryptographic privacy properties for systems which use cryptography, such as client-server applications and e-voting systems. In this context, the second major contribution of this thesis is the design, the implementation, and the deployment of a novel remote voting system called sElect (secure/simple elections). sElect is designed to be particularly simple and lightweight in terms of its structure, the cryptography it uses, and the user experience. One of its unique features is a fully automated procedure which does not require any user interaction and it is triggered as soon as voters look at the election result, allowing them to verify that their vote has been properly counted. The component of sElect which provides vote privacy is implemented in Java such that we can establish cryptographic guarantees directly on its implementation: by combining the techniques of the CVJ framework with a hybrid approach for proving noninterference, we are able to show that the Java implementation ensures strong cryptographic privacy of the votes cast with our proposed voting system. sElect is therefore the first full-fledged e-voting system with strong cryptographic security guarantees not only at the design level, but also on its implementation

Deductive Verification of Concurrent Programs and its Application to Secure Information Flow for Java

Formal verification of concurrent programs still poses a major challenge in computer science. Our approach is an adaptation of the modular rely/guarantee methodology in dynamic logic. Besides functional properties, we investigate language-based security. Our verification approach extends naturally to multi-threaded Java and we present an implementation in the KeY verification system. We propose natural extensions to JML regarding both confidentiality properties and multi-threaded programs

Security via Noninterference: Analyzing Information Flows

Nowadays, the security of information systems is of crucial importance. The large number of detected security vulnerabilities in many systems indicates that new methods for developing secure systems are necessary. These require an appropriate formal foundation. A widely used approach revolves around the notions noninterference and information flow. They allow to express and analyze the absence of illegal information flows and covert channels. In this thesis, the framework of noninterference for state-based asynchronous systems is extended and enriched with new techniques in order to gain a deeper understanding and a broader applicability. As a result, a formal foundation for developing secure systems is obtained. First, new results for the notion of intransitive noninterference are obtained. In particular, a complete characterization by unwinding relations makes the development of a polynomial-time verification algorithm possible in the first place. Second, the previous noninterference definitions are extended with support for policies changing during execution. To capture all resulting security requirements, a new theory of so-called dynamic noninterference is developed and compared to previous approaches. The applicability of this framework is demonstrated by several examples and a complex case study of a distributed dynamic access control system. Third, algorithmic problems are examined, in particular with regard to the question of decidability and complexity of the analyzed security definitions. New undecidability results for some of the present security definitions are obtained, and new efficient algorithms for the verification of both the previously existing and in this thesis developed different notions of noninterference are established

Programming Languages and Systems

This open access book constitutes the proceedings of the 29th European Symposium on Programming, ESOP 2020, which was planned to take place in Dublin, Ireland, in April 2020, as Part of the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2020. The actual ETAPS 2020 meeting was postponed due to the Corona pandemic. The papers deal with fundamental issues in the specification, design, analysis, and implementation of programming languages and systems