Copyright Literacy in Spanish Library and Information Sciences (LIS) students

Copyright literacy in Spanish Library and Information Sciences (LIS) students was studied using a web survey as part of a multinational research project. The study focused on their knowledge, opinions and experiences with various aspects of copyright and intellectual property legislation and training. Results show that Spanish students are familiar with copyright and related laws at the national level, as well as with Creative Commons Licenses. However, most of respondents were very unfamiliar with topics related to the protection of rights in the digital environment and international copyright issues. Therefore, there is a need to increase information and knowledge of copyright issues in the LIS curricula, since copyright issues are already, and will continue to be in the future, a relevant part of information professionals' expertise

Social justice research in library and information sciences: a case for discourse analysis

Scholars have employed a variety of research methodologies and methods to explore, probe, and uncover ways in which social justice is enacted, embodied, supported, or not supported by researchers, educators, and practitioners in library and information science and services (LIS). Discursive psychology as developed by social psychologist Jonathan Potter and critical discourse analysis as developed by Norman Fairclough are introduced as fruitful approaches to investigate the critical intersections of LIS and social justice. The theoretical development of social justice in LIS is discussed. Next, critical discourse analysis and discursive psychology are examined and then analyzed for goodness of fit with Kevin Rioux’s (2010) five underlying assumptions of social justice metatheory: (1) All human beings have an inherent worth and deserve information services that help address those needs; (2) People perceive reality and information in different ways, often within cultural or life role contexts; (3) There are many different types of information and knowledge, and these are societal resources; (4) Theory and research are pursued with the ultimate goal of bringing positive change to service constituencies; (5) The provision of information services is an inherently powerful activity. Drawing on the findings of the goodness of fit of Rioux’s metatheory and examples of discourse analytic studies in LIS, this article offers practical strategies for social justice researchers wanting to use critical discourse analysis or discursive psychology.published or submitted for publicationpublished or submitted for publicatio

Contributions of Pakistani authors to Library Philosophy and Practice from 2008 to 2017

: library philosophy and practice is a well-known online free access and peer reviewed journal in the field of library and information sciences. The online journal covers all aspect of librarianship and library and information sciences. The present study has carried out to analyze the contribution of Pakistani authors to library philosophy and practice from 2009 to 2017. The 86 total numbers of articles has been retrieved from LPP in chosen period of study. The recovered data has been categorized in number of bibliometric aspects like year wise publications, author’s collaboration, papers length, most prolific authors, most productive institutions and foreign contributions

CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCES: SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY OR PHILOSOPHY OF INFORMATION?

This article reviews the shift in the theoretical foundations of library and information science (LIS) on social epistemology to the philosophy of information. This shift bids have been submitted more than a decade ago where Luciano Floridi sees that the LIS has close relations with the philosophy of information. Paul Ricoeur's Hermeneutics Phenomenology used to understand and interpret Jesse Shera and Luciano Floridi’s texts and to reveal the implicit and hidden meanings in the text. This reading indicates that the LIS is a discipline that not only deals with knowledge alone but rather takes care of the content that we understand as meaningful data. With that also, we understand the information not only as a matter of semantic and regarded as an epistemic prerequisite for the establishment of knowledge. However, beyond that, the information is placed as the ontological. Meaning of information, then, becomes important for LIS to place in the appropriate position. The foundation on the philosophy of information can break the chain of LIS dependence on another field theory and develop his theory. Therefore, this foundation does not only contribute praxis to produce solutions to technical problems that are commonly done regarding the improvement and development of library services. Although, this foundation can provide a 'new' space for scientists in this field to expand its epistemic motion

El impacto de las publicaciones seriadas y su efecto sobre la producción científica cubana sobre Bibliotecología y Ciencias +de la Información

Objective.The aim of this study was to identify, from a quantitative perspective, differences between Cuban scientific research published in high visible journals and the rest of the national scientific production, using as analytical tools the quartiles of visibility established by the Scimago Journal & Country Rank,compiled from Scopus database. Method.As a case study, Cuban scientific output on Library and Information Sciences indexed by this database was selected. A battery of scientometric indicators was used to analyze levels of citation, collaboration and leadership involved in articles published by journals belonging to each of the visibility quartiles. Correlation between the studied indicators was analyzed. Results/Discussion.High dependence of the indicators based on citation analysis was confirmed, as well as correlation between international collaboration and journal quartiles of visibility. Conclusions.It is concluded that the national scientific output with the greatest influence on the international scientific community in this domain is mainly published by journals belonging to the first quartile of visibility. Likewise, it was identified that national scientific output on Library and Information Sciences depends on international collaboration to reach high levels of visibility, and still is not capable of systematically generate research with a significant impact on the international scientific community. Originality/Value.First bibliometric study of Cuban Library and Information Sciences using the impact of journals where research where published as main analytical category

Survival analysis of author keywords: An application to the library and information sciences area

"This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Peset, F, F Garzón-Farinós, LM González, X García-Massó, A Ferrer-Sapena, JL Toca-Herrera, and EA Sánchez-Pérez. 2019. "Survival Analysis of Author Keywords: An Application to the Library and Information Sciences Area." Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 71 (4). Wiley: 462-73. doi:10.1002/asi.24248, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24248. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving."[EN] Our purpose is to adapt a statistical method for the analysis of discrete numerical series to the keywords appearing in scientific articles of a given area. As an example, we apply our methodological approach to the study of the keywords in the Library and Information Sciences (LIS) area. Our objective is to detect the new author keywords that appear in a fixed knowledge area in the period of 1 year in order to quantify the probabilities of survival for 10 years as a function of the impact of the journals where they appeared. Many of the new keywords appearing in the LIS field are ephemeral. Actually, more than half are never used again. In general, the terms most commonly used in the LIS area come from other areas. The average survival time of these keywords is approximately 3 years, being slightly higher in the case of words that were published in journals classified in the second quartile of the area. We believe that measuring the appearance and disappearance of terms will allow understanding some relevant aspects of the evolution of a discipline, providing in this way a new bibliometric approach.Peset Mancebo, MF.; Garzón Farinós, MF.; Gonzalez, L.; García-Massó, X.; Ferrer Sapena, A.; Toca-Herrera, JL.; Sánchez Pérez, EA. (2020). Survival analysis of author keywords: An application to the library and information sciences area. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (Online). 71(4):462-473. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24248S462473714Aharony, N. (2011). Library and Information Science research areas: A content analysis of articles from the top 10 journals 2007–8. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 44(1), 27-35. doi:10.1177/0961000611424819Aizawa, A., & Kageura, K. (2003). Calculating association between technical terms based on co-occurrences in keyword lists of academic papers. Systems and Computers in Japan, 34(3), 85-95. doi:10.1002/scj.1197Athukorala, K., Hoggan, E., Lehtiö, A., Ruotsalo, T., & Jacucci, G. (2013). Information-seeking behaviors of computer scientists: Challenges for electronic literature search tools. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50(1), 1-11. doi:10.1002/meet.14505001041The View from Here. (2007). Scholarship in the Digital Age. doi:10.7551/mitpress/7434.003.0012Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Cunha, R. C., Varbanov, R. A., Hoh, Y. S., Knisley, M. L., & Holmes, M. A. (2015). Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention and Promotion in the Social Sciences by Gender. PLOS ONE, 10(11), e0143093. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143093Brophy, J., & Bawden, D. (2005). Is Google enough? Comparison of an internet search engine with academic library resources. Aslib Proceedings, 57(6), 498-512. doi:10.1108/00012530510634235Buckland, M. K. (2012). Obsolescence in subject description. Journal of Documentation, 68(2), 154-161. doi:10.1108/00220411211209168Chang, Y.-W., Huang, M.-H., & Lin, C.-W. (2015). Evolution of research subjects in library and information science based on keyword, bibliographical coupling, and co-citation analyses. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2071-2087. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1762-8Chen, G., & Xiao, L. (2016). Selecting publication keywords for domain analysis in bibliometrics: A comparison of three methods. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 212-223. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.01.006Cheng, F.-F., Huang, Y.-W., Yu, H.-C., & Wu, C.-S. (2018). Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence and social network analysis. Library Hi Tech, 36(4), 636-650. doi:10.1108/lht-01-2018-0004Colley, A., & Maltby, J. (2008). Impact of the Internet on our lives: Male and female personal perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 2005-2013. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.09.002Dehdarirad, T., Villarroya, A., & Barrios, M. (2014). Research trends in gender differences in higher education and science: a co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 101(1), 273-290. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1327-2Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information Processing & Management, 37(6), 817-842. doi:10.1016/s0306-4573(00)00051-0Dotsika, F., & Watkins, A. (2017). Identifying potentially disruptive trends by means of keyword network analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 114-127. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.020Figuerola, C. G., García Marco, F. J., & Pinto, M. (2017). Mapping the evolution of library and information science (1978–2014) using topic modeling on LISA. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1507-1535. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2432-9Gil-Leiva, I., & Alonso-Arroyo, A. (2007). Keywords given by authors of scientific articles in database descriptors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(8), 1175-1187. doi:10.1002/asi.20595Halevi, G., & Moed, H. F. (2013). The thematic and conceptual flow of disciplinary research: A citation context analysis of thejournal of informetrics, 2007. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(9), 1903-1913. doi:10.1002/asi.22897Michael Hall, C. (2011). Publish and perish? Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism. Tourism Management, 32(1), 16-27. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.07.001Han H. Gui J. &Xu S.(2014).Revealing research themes and their evolutionary trends using bibliometric data based on strategic diagrams (pp. 653–659).https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCC-C.2013.121Hjørland, B. (2000). Library and information science: practice, theory, and philosophical basis. Information Processing & Management, 36(3), 501-531. doi:10.1016/s0306-4573(99)00038-2Hjørland B. (2017).Library and information science (LIS). In Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization. Retrieved fromhttp://www.isko.org/cyclo/lis.Hjørland, B., & Albrechtsen, H. (1995). Toward a new horizon in information science: Domain-analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(6), 400-425. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199507)46:63.0.co;2-yHu, C.-P., Hu, J.-M., Deng, S.-L., & Liu, Y. (2013). A co-word analysis of library and information science in China. Scientometrics, 97(2), 369-382. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1076-7Kevork, E. K., & Vrechopoulos, A. P. (2009). CRM literature: conceptual and functional insights by keyword analysis. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 27(1), 48-85. doi:10.1108/02634500910928362Khan, G. F., & Wood, J. (2015). Information technology management domain: emerging themes and keyword analysis. Scientometrics, 105(2), 959-972. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1712-5Lee, S. (2016). A Study on Research Trends in Public Library Research in Korea Using Keyword Networks. Libri, 66(4). doi:10.1515/libri-2016-0052Leung, X. Y., Sun, J., & Bai, B. (2017). Bibliometrics of social media research: A co-citation and co-word analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 66, 35-45. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.06.012Li, M. (2018). Classifying and ranking topic terms based on a novel approach: role differentiation of author keywords. Scientometrics, 116(1), 77-100. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2741-7Liu, J., Tian, J., Kong, X., Lee, I., & Xia, F. (2018). Two decades of information systems: a bibliometric review. Scientometrics, 118(2), 617-643. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2974-5McClure, C. R., & Bishop, A. (1989). The Status of Research in Library/Information Science: Guarded Optimism. College & Research Libraries, 50(2), 127-143. doi:10.5860/crl_50_02_127Mela, C. F., Roos, J., & Deng, Y. (2013). Invited Paper—A Keyword History of Marketing Science. Marketing Science, 32(1), 8-18. doi:10.1287/mksc.1120.0764Milojević, S., Sugimoto, C. R., Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2011). The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science: Analysis of article title words. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1933-1953. doi:10.1002/asi.21602Niu, X., & Hemminger, B. M. (2011). A study of factors that affect the information-seeking behavior of academic scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 336-353. doi:10.1002/asi.21669Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific Utopia. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615-631. doi:10.1177/1745691612459058O’Mara-Eves, A., Thomas, J., McNaught, J., Miwa, M., & Ananiadou, S. (2015). Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches. Systematic Reviews, 4(1). doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-5Onyancha, O. B. (2018). Forty-Five Years of LIS Research Evolution, 1971–2015: An Informetrics Study of the Author-Supplied Keywords. Publishing Research Quarterly, 34(3), 456-470. doi:10.1007/s12109-018-9590-3Peset F. Garzón‐Farinos F. González L. García‐Massó X. Ferrer‐Sapena A. Toca‐Herrera J. &Sánchez‐Perez E. (2018f). Supplementary material S6. Survival analysis (Porter Stemmer method). Retrieved fromhttps://figshare.com/s/ec0e34e0aebf5df48a7bRadhakrishnan, S., Erbis, S., Isaacs, J. A., & Kamarthi, S. (2017). Novel keyword co-occurrence network-based methods to foster systematic reviews of scientific literature. PLOS ONE, 12(3), e0172778. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0172778Rayward, W. B. (2005). The historical development of information infrastructures and the dissemination of knowledge: A personal reflection. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 31(4), 19-22. doi:10.1002/bult.1720310407Runkler T.A.&Bezdek J.C.(2000).Automatic keyword extraction with relational clustering and Levenshtein distances. Ninth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. FUZZ‐ IEEE 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37063). Vol.2 (pp.636–640).https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.2000.839067Santos, J. B., & Irizo, F. J. O. (2005). Modelling citation age data with right censoring. Scientometrics, 62(3), 329-342. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0025-5Scimago Journal & Country Rank. (n.d.). Retrieved fromhttp://www.scimagojr.com/Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (1993). It’s About Time: Using Discrete-Time Survival Analysis to Study Duration and the Timing of Events. Journal of Educational Statistics, 18(2), 155-195. doi:10.3102/10769986018002155Su, H.-N., & Lee, P.-C. (2010). Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: a first look at journal papers in Technology Foresight. Scientometrics, 85(1), 65-79. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0259-8SUN, J. (1997). REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF INTERVAL-CENSORED FAILURE TIME DATA. Statistics in Medicine, 16(5), 497-504. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970315)16:53.0.co;2-jTang, R. (2005). Evolution of the interdisciplinary characteristics of information and library science. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 54-63. doi:10.1002/meet.1450410107Tuomaala, O., Järvelin, K., & Vakkari, P. (2014). Evolution of library and information science, 1965-2005: Content analysis of journal articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(7), 1446-1462. doi:10.1002/asi.23034Uddin, S., & Khan, A. (2016). The impact of author-selected keywords on citation counts. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1166-1177. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.004Vakkari, P. (1994). Library and Information Science: Its Content and Scope. Advances in Librarianship, 1-55. doi:10.1108/s0065-2830(1994)0000018003Walters, W. H., & Wilder, E. I. (2015). Disciplinary, national, and departmental contributions to the literature of library and information science, 2007-2012. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(6), 1487-1506. doi:10.1002/asi.23448Wang, M., & Chai, L. (2018). Three new bibliometric indicators/approaches derived from keyword analysis. Scientometrics, 116(2), 721-750. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2768-9Wang, Z.-Y., Li, G., Li, C.-Y., & Li, A. (2011). Research on the semantic-based co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 90(3), 855-875. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0563-yXu, J., Bu, Y., Ding, Y., Yang, S., Zhang, H., Yu, C., & Sun, L. (2018). Understanding the formation of interdisciplinary research from the perspective of keyword evolution: a case study on joint attention. Scientometrics, 117(2), 973-995. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2897-1Yang, S., Han, R., Wolfram, D., & Zhao, Y. (2016). Visualizing the intellectual structure of information science (2006–2015): Introducing author keyword coupling analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 132-150. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2015.12.003Zhang, J., Yu, Q., Zheng, F., Long, C., Lu, Z., & Duan, Z. (2015). Comparing keywords plus of WOS and author keywords: A case study of patient adherence research. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(4), 967-972. doi:10.1002/asi.2343

Communication and information science: two converging but different disciplines

The present study makes a comparative analysis between two Spanish academic communities, Communication and Library and Information Sciences. The set-up of these academic programmes in Spain, along with their size and the international scientific production of each community, is briefly described and compared. These communities are relatively new, being Library and Information Sciences the more recently implemented.The numbers differ greatly, both in the universities that offer these studies and in the size of their communities; there are five times as many professors in Communication as in Library and Information Sciences. In contrast,Library and Information Sciences has an international scientific productivity three times that of Communication, with articles published in journals with a higher impact factor

Library and Information Sciences university education figures in Spain: 2006

A picture is presented of the state of library and information science university education in Spain. Statistical data is provided about both the number and type of university programs, describing existing institutions, degree levels and providing data on student enrolment and teachers