Flood Risk Mapping and Management in Urban Areas: Integrating Geomatics and Hydrodynamic Modeling - A Case Study of Al Bidi City, Saudi Arabia

In this paper, we focus on developing a comprehensive approach to map and manage flood risks in Al Bidi City, located in the Al-Aflaj Governorate of Saudi Arabia. By integrating geomatics (Remote Sensing and GIS) and hydrodynamic modeling (PCSWMM and HEC-RAS), the study aims to simulate and model flood risks in populated areas under different scenarios, considering the impact of climate change. The study generates three integrated maps: flood intensity, environmental sensitivity, and flood risks. Strategic solutions and mitigation measures are proposed based on the findings. The results indicate that Al Bidi City is exposed to flood risks originating from the west and progressing towards the east, primarily due to significant valleys such as Wadi Harm. Approximately 60% of the urban area is affected by torrential water. The study proposes the construction of embankments, channels, and culverts to redirect floodwaters to Wadi Al Jadwal in the east, as well as the implementation of industrial channels to manage floods in the northern valleys

Nature-based solutions efficiency evaluation against natural hazards: modelling methods, advantages and limitations

Nature-based solutions (NBS) for hydro-meteorological risks (HMRs) reduction and management are becoming increasingly popular, but challenges such as the lack of well-recognised standard methodologies to evaluate their performance and upscale their implementation remain. We systematically evaluate the current state-of-the art on the models and tools that are utilised for the optimum allocation, design and efficiency evaluation of NBS for five HMRs (flooding, droughts, heatwaves, landslides, and storm surges and coastal erosion). We found that methods to assess the complex issue of NBS efficiency and cost-benefits analysis are still in the development stage and they have only been implemented through the methodologies developed for other purposes such as fluid dynamics models in micro and catchment scale contexts. Of the reviewed numerical models and tools MIKE-SHE, SWMM (for floods), ParFlow-TREES, ACRU, SIMGRO (for droughts), WRF, ENVI-met (for heatwaves), FUNWAVE-TVD, BROOK90 (for landslides), TELEMAC and ADCIRC (for storm surges) are more flexible to evaluate the performance and effectiveness of specific NBS such as wetlands, ponds, trees, parks, grass, green roof/walls, tree roots, vegetations, coral reefs, mangroves, sea grasses, oyster reefs, sea salt marshes, sandy beaches and dunes. We conclude that the models and tools that are capable of assessing the multiple benefits, particularly the performance and cost-effectiveness of NBS for HMR reduction and management are not readily available. Thus, our synthesis of modelling methods can facilitate their selection that can maximise opportunities and refute the current political hesitation of NBS deployment compared with grey solutions for HMR management but also for the provision of a wide range of social and economic co-benefits. However, there is still a need for bespoke modelling tools that can holistically assess the various components of NBS from an HMR reduction and management perspective. Such tools can facilitate impact assessment modelling under different NBS scenarios to build a solid evidence base for upscaling and replicating the implementation of NBS

Nature-based solutions efficiency evaluation against natural hazards: Modelling methods, advantages and limitations

Nature-based solutions (NBS) for hydro-meteorological risks (HMRs) reduction and management are becoming increasingly popular, but challenges such as the lack of well-recognised standard methodologies to evaluate their performance and upscale their implementation remain. We systematically evaluate the current state-of-the art on the models and tools that are utilised for the optimum allocation, design and efficiency evaluation of NBS for five HMRs (flooding, droughts, heatwaves, landslides, and storm surges and coastal erosion). We found that methods to assess the complex issue of NBS efficiency and cost-benefits analysis are still in the development stage and they have only been implemented through the methodologies developed for other purposes such as fluid dynamics models in micro and catchment scale contexts. Of the reviewed numerical models and tools MIKE-SHE, SWMM (for floods), ParFlow-TREES, ACRU, SIMGRO (for droughts), WRF, ENVI-met (for heatwaves), FUNWAVE-TVD, BROOK90 (for landslides), TELEMAC and ADCIRC (for storm surges) are more flexible to evaluate the performance and effectiveness of specific NBS such as wetlands, ponds, trees, parks, grass, green roof/walls, tree roots, vegetations, coral reefs, mangroves, sea grasses, oyster reefs, sea salt marshes, sandy beaches and dunes. We conclude that the models and tools that are capable of assessing the multiple benefits, particularly the performance and cost-effectiveness of NBS for HMR reduction and management are not readily available. Thus, our synthesis of modelling methods can facilitate their selection that can maximise opportunities and refute the current political hesitation of NBS deployment compared with grey solutions for HMR management but also for the provision of a wide range of social and economic co-benefits. However, there is still a need for bespoke modelling tools that can holistically assess the various components of NBS from an HMR reduction and management perspective. Such tools can facilitate impact assessment modelling under different NBS scenarios to build a solid evidence base for upscaling and replicating the implementation of NBS

Flood risk in urban areas: modelling, management and adaptation to climate change. A review

[Abstract:] The modelling and management of flood risk in urban areas are increasingly recognized as global challenges. The complexity of these issues is a consequence of the existence of several distinct sources of risk, including not only fluvial, tidal and coastal flooding, but also exposure to urban runoff and local drainage failure, and the various management strategies that can be proposed. The high degree of vulnerability that characterizes such areas is expected to increase in the future due to the effects of climate change, the growth of the population living in cities, and urban densification. An increasing awareness of the socio-economic losses and environmental impact of urban flooding is clearly reflected in the recent expansion of the number of studies related to the modelling and management of urban flooding, sometimes within the framework of adaptation to climate change. The goal of the current paper is to provide a general review of the recent advances in flood-risk modelling and management, while also exploring future perspectives in these fields of research

Coupled modeling of storm surge and coastal inundation: a case study in New York City during Hurricane Sandy

In this paper we describe a new method of modeling coastal inundation arising from storm surge by coupling a widely used storm surge model (ADCIRC) and an urban flood inundation model (FloodMap). This is the first time the coupling of such models is implemented and tested using real events. The method offers a flexible and efficient procedure for applying detailed ADCIRC storm surge modeling results along the coastal boundary (with typical resolution of ∼100 m) to FloodMap for fine resolution inundation modeling ( 70 m). In further testing, we explored the effects of mesh resolution and roughness specification. Results agree with previous studies that fine resolution is essential for capturing intricate flow paths and connectivity in urban topography. While the specification of roughness is more challenging for urban environments, it may be empirically optimized. The successful coupling of ADCIRC and FloodMap models for fine-resolution coastal inundation modeling unlocks the potential for undertaking large numbers of probabilistically-based synthetic surge events for street-level risk analysis

Impacts of Landscape Change on Water Resources

Changes in land use and land cover can have many drivers, including population growth, urbanization, agriculture, demand for food, evolution of socio-economic structure, policy regulations, and climate variability. The impacts of these changes on water resources range from changes in water availability (due to changes in losses of water to evapotranspiration and recharge) to degradation of water quality (increased erosion, salinity, chemical loadings, and pathogens). The impacts are manifested through complex hydro-bio-geo-climate characteristics, which underscore the need for integrated scientific approaches to understand the impacts of landscape change on water resources. Several techniques, such as field studies, long-term monitoring, remote sensing technologies, and advanced modeling studies, have contributed to better understanding the modes and mechanisms by which landscape changes impact water resources. Such research studies can help unlock the complex interconnected influences of landscape on water resources in terms of quantity and quality at multiple spatial and temporal scales. In this Special Issue, we published a set of eight peer-reviewed articles elaborating on some of the specific topics of landscape changes and associated impacts on water resources

Unraveling Long-Term Flood Risk Dynamics Across the Murray-Darling Basin Using a Large-Scale Hydraulic Model and Satellite Data

River floods are one of the most devastating extreme hydrological events, with oftentimes remarkably negative effects for human society and the environment. Economic losses and social consequences, in terms of affected people and human fatalities, are increasing worldwide due to climate change and urbanization processes. Long-term dynamics of flood risk are intimately driven by the temporal evolution of hazard, exposure and vulnerability. Although needed for effective flood risk management, a comprehensive long-term analysis of all these components is not straightforward, mostly due to a lack of hydrological data, exposure information, and large computational resources required for 2-D flood model simulations at adequately high resolution over large spatial scales. This study tries to overcome these limitations and attempts to investigate the dynamics of different flood risk components in the Murray-Darling basin (MDB, Australia) in the period 1973–2014. To this aim, the LISFLOOD-FP model, i.e., a large-scale 2-D hydrodynamic model, and satellite-derived built-up data are employed. Results show that the maximum extension of flooded areas decreases in time, without revealing any significant geographical transfer of inundated areas across the study period. Despite this, a remarkable increment of built-up areas characterizes MDB, with larger annual increments across not-flooded locations compared to flooded areas. When combining flood hazard and exposure, we find that the overall extension of areas exposed to high flood risk more than doubled within the study period, thus highlighting the need for improving flood risk awareness and flood mitigation strategies in the near future

Flood Prediction and Mitigation in Data-Sparse Environments

In the last three decades many sophisticated tools have been developed that can accurately predict the dynamics of flooding. However, due to the paucity of adequate infrastructure, this technological advancement did not benefit ungauged flood-prone regions in the developing countries in a major way. The overall research theme of this dissertation is to explore the improvement in methodology that is essential for utilising recently developed flood prediction and management tools in the developing world, where ideal model inputs and validation datasets do not exist. This research addresses important issues related to undertaking inundation modelling at different scales, particularly in data-sparse environments. The results indicate that in order to predict dynamics of high magnitude stream flow in data-sparse regions, special attention is required on the choice of the model in relation to the available data and hydraulic characteristics of the event. Adaptations are necessary to create inputs for the models that have been primarily designed for areas with better availability of data. Freely available geospatial information of moderate resolution can often meet the minimum data requirements of hydrological and hydrodynamic models if they are supplemented carefully with limited surveyed/measured information. This thesis also explores the issue of flood mitigation through rainfall-runoff modelling. The purpose of this investigation is to assess the impact of land-use changes at the sub-catchment scale on the overall downstream flood risk. A key component of this study is also quantifying predictive uncertainty in hydrodynamic models based on the Generalised Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) framework. Detailed uncertainty assessment of the model outputs indicates that, in spite of using sparse inputs, the model outputs perform at reasonably low levels of uncertainty both spatially and temporally. These findings have the potential to encourage the flood managers and hydrologists in the developing world to use similar data sets for flood management

Restoring flows in modified rivers

Doutoramento FLUVIO - River Restoration and Management / Instituto Superior de Agronomia / Instituto Superior Técnico / Faculdade de Arquitetura. Universidade de LisboaThis thesis was prepared based on an inter university agreement on joint doctorate supervision between the Instituto Superior de Agronomia from the University of Lisbon (ISA) and the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU)Free-flowing rivers support diverse, complex and dynamic ecosystems, as well as provide societal and economic services. Globally, however, the water flow of many rivers has been regulated by hydropower or other sources. Flow modification affects crucial ecosystem functions and processes, and organism’s capacity to fulfil its life cycle requirements. In light of these widespread effects, it is urgent to mitigate ecological impacts caused by existing water infrastructures. To achieve environmental objectives, as well as to manage water uses in a sustainable way, a thorough understanding of ecological responses to hydrological alterations on different temporal levels (e.g., environmental flow, hydropeaking) is essential. This work aims to establish holistic approaches for restoring flows in modified rivers, and to develop environmental flows able to sufficiently mitigate the ecological effects of short-term and annual flow modifications in fluvial ecosystems. This thesis disentangles the effects of multiple stressors and shows that flow regulation is a primary predictor of fish populations. Moreover, by assessing flow-ecology relationships on annual, seasonal, and sub-daily levels, this work identifies fundamental principles to implement flow restoration measures in rivers affected by water abstraction and hydropeaking. While more dynamic flows are generally recommended as environmental flows, flow restrictions are needed for hydropeaking mitigation. Regarding the latter, a seasonal framework for hydrological mitigation based on fish life-history stages is established, and thresholds are synthesized. Overall, this thesis advances the establishment of guidelines for successful flow restoration in river systems affected by competing water uses by establishing holistic flow restoration schemes and by subsuming quantitative and qualitative hydropeaking thresholds. Moreover, this thesis sets the topic of flow restoration into the broader context of hydromorphological river rehabilitation. Hence, this work contributes to a more balanced discussion on trade-offs between societal and environmental water usesN/

Characterizing the performance of low impact development under changes in climate and urbanization

Over the past decades, climate change and urbanization have altered the regional hydro-environments, causing a series of stormwater management problems including urban flood and non-point pollution. Low impact development (LID) has been identified as a sustainable strategy for stormwater management. However, given the complex impacts of climate change and urbanization on hydro-environments, the performance of LID strategy under future changes remains largely unexplored. Accordingly, this research characterized the LID performance under changes in climate and urbanization. To provide an additional reference to sustainable stormwater management, the following specific topics were addressed: (1) Through hydraulic and water quality modeling, the LID performances of flood mitigation and pollution removal were systematically evaluated at the city scale. (2) Through uncertainty analysis, the impact of model parameter uncertainty on the LID performance was taken into account. (3) Through sensitivity analysis, the impact of LID technical parameters (e.g., surface features, soil textures) on the LID performance was quantified. (4) Through scenario analysis, the LID performances under different hydrological patterns were compared. (5) Through spatial analysis, the distribution of LID performance on different land-cover types was determined. (6) Through adopting general circulation model (GCM) projections, the LID performance under future climate scenarios with different representative concentration pathways (RCPs) was investigated. (7) Through adopting integrated assessment model (IAM) projections, the LID performance under future urbanization scenarios with different shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) was explored. (8) By coupling climate and urbanization projections with land-cover distribution, the spatiotemporal trends of LID performance in the future were characterized.:Table of Contents List of Abbreviations VII List of Peer-Reviewed Publications on the Ph.D. Topic IX List of Co-authored Peer-Reviewed Publications on the Ph.D. Topic X 1 General Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Objectives 3 1.3 Innovation and Contribution to the Knowledge 3 1.4 Outline of the Dissertation 4 1.5 References 5 2 Literature Review 9 2.1 Hydraulic and Water Quality Modeling 9 2.1.1 Hydraulic Model 9 2.1.2 Water Quality Model 10 2.2 Low Impact Development (LID) 10 2.2.1 LID Practice 10 2.2.2 LID Performance 11 2.3 Performance Evaluation 13 2.3.1 Scenario Analysis 13 2.3.2 Spatial Analysis 13 2.3.3 Uncertainty Analysis 14 2.3.4 Sensitivity Analysis 14 2.4 Future Changes in Climate and Urbanization 15 2.4.1 Climate Change 15 2.4.2 Future Urbanization 16 2.5 References 17 3 Impact of Technical Factors on LID Performance 27 3.1 Introduction 28 3.2 Methods 30 3.2.1 Study Area 30 3.2.2 Model Description 31 3.2.2.1 Model Theory 31 3.2.2.2 Model Construction 31 3.2.2.3 Model Calibration and Validation 32 3.2.2.4 Model Uncertainty Analysis by GLUE Method 34 3.2.3 Hydrological Pattern Design 35 3.2.4 LID Strategy Design 35 3.2.4.1 Implementation of LID Practices 35 3.2.4.2 Sensitivity Analysis by Sobol’s Method 36 3.2.5 Correlation Analysis Using a Self-Organizing Map 37 3.2.6 Description of the RDS Load Components 37 3.3 Results 38 3.3.1 RDS Migration and Distribution in Baseline Strategy 38 3.3.1.1 RDS Migration under Hydrological Scenarios 38 3.3.1.2 RDS Distribution on Land-Cover Types 39 3.3.2 RDS Removal in LID Strategies 40 3.3.2.1 RDS Removal by LID Strategies 40 3.3.2.2 Spatial Distribution of the RDS Removal 42 3.3.2.3 LID Parameter Sensitivity Analysis Result 43 3.4 Discussion 45 3.4.1 Factors Influencing RDS Migration in the Baseline Strategy 45 3.4.2 RDS Removal Performance by LID Strategy 46 3.5 Conclusions 47 3.6 References 47 4 Impact of Hydro-Environmental Factors on LID Performance 53 4.1 Introduction 54 4.2 Methods 56 4.2.1 Study Area 56 4.2.2 Modeling Approach 56 4.2.2.1 Model Theory 56 4.2.2.2 Model Construction 56 4.2.2.3 Model Calibration and Validation 57 4.2.2.4 Model Uncertainty Analysis 57 4.2.3 LID Performance Analysis 58 4.2.3.1 LID Practice Implementation 58 4.2.3.2 LID Performance Evaluation 58 4.2.4 Hydrological Pattern Analysis 59 4.2.4.1 Scenario of ADP Length 59 4.2.4.2 Scenario of Rainfall Magnitude 59 4.2.4.3 Scenario of Long-Term pre-Simulation 60 4.2.5 Sensitivity Analysis of Hydrological Scenarios 60 4.3 Results 61 4.3.1 LID Performance under Different ADP Lengths 61 4.3.2 LID Performance under Different Rainfall Magnitudes 62 4.3.3 Spatial Distribution of LID Performance 63 4.3.4 Sensitivities of LID Performance to ADP Length and Rainfall Magnitude 66 4.4 Discussion 68 4.4.1 Impact of ADP Length and Rainfall Magnitude on LID Performance 68 4.4.2 Spatial Heterogeneity of LID Performance 68 4.4.3 Research Implications 69 4.5 Conclusions 70 4.6 References 71 5 Impact of Future Climate Patterns on LID Performance 77 5.1 Introduction 78 5.2 Methods 80 5.2.1 Study Area 80 5.2.2 Hydraulic and Water Quality Model 80 5.2.2.1 Model Development 80 5.2.2.2 Model Calibration and Validation 81 5.2.3 Climate Change Scenario Analysis 81 5.2.3.1 GCM Evaluation 81 5.2.3.2 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Concentration Scenario 82 5.2.3.3 GCM Downscaling 83 5.2.4 LID Performance Analysis 83 5.2.4.1 Implementation of LID Practices 83 5.2.4.2 Evaluation of LID Performance 84 5.2.4.3 Sensitivity Analysis on LID Performance 86 5.3 Results 86 5.3.1 Hydrological Characteristics under Future Climate Scenarios 86 5.3.2 LID Performance under Future Climate Scenarios 87 5.3.2.1 LID Short-Term Performance 87 5.3.2.2 LID Long-Term Performance 90 5.3.3 Impact of ADP Length and Rainfall Magnitude on LID Performance 92 5.3.3.1 LID Performance Uncertainty 92 5.3.3.2 Spatial Distribution of LID Performance 93 5.3.3.3 Sensitivity of LID Performance to Climate Change 95 5.4 Discussion 97 5.4.1 LID Performance in Short-Term Extremes and Long-Term Events 97 5.4.2 Impact of Climate Change on LID Performance 97 5.4.3 Research Implications 99 5.5 Conclusions 100 5.6 References 100 6 Impact of Climate and Urbanization Changes on LID Perfor-mance 109 6.1 Introduction 110 6.2 Methods 112 6.2.1 Study Area 112 6.2.2 Modeling Approach 112 6.2.2.1 Model Development 112 6.2.2.2 Model Calibration and Validation 113 6.2.3 Future Scenario Derivation 113 6.2.3.1 Climate Change Scenario 113 6.2.3.2 Urbanization Scenario 115 6.2.4 Flood Exposure Assessment 115 6.2.5 Implementation and Evaluation of LID Strategy 117 6.2.5.1 Implementation Scheme of LID Strategy 117 6.2.5.2 Performance Evaluation of LID Strategy 117 6.3 Results 118 6.3.1 Flood Exposure in Baseline and Future Scenarios 118 6.3.1.1 Hydrological Change in Future Climate Scenarios 118 6.3.1.2 Catchment Change in Future Urbanization Scenarios 118 6.3.1.3 Population and GDP Exposures to Flood in Future 121 6.3.2 Flood Exposure with Consideration of LID Strategy 123 6.3.2.1 Runoff Mitigation Performance of LID Strategy 123 6.3.2.2 Peak Mitigation Performance of LID Strategy 124 6.3.2.3 Population and GDP Exposures to Flood under LID Strategy 125 6.4 Discussion 126 6.4.1 Climate Change and Urbanization Exacerbated Flood Exposure Risk 126 6.4.2 LID Strategy Mitigated Flood Exposure Risk 126 6.5 Conclusions 127 6.6 References 127 7 Discussion and General Conclusions 133 7.1 Stormwater Management Performance of LID Strategy 133 7.2 Impact of Influencing Factors on LID Performance 134 7.3 LID Performance under Future Changes 135 7.4 Research Implications 136 7.5 References 137 8 Outlook of Future Research 139 8.1 Optimization of LID Performance 139 8.2 Cross-regional Study on Future Changes 139 8.3 Macro-scale Flood Risk Management 140 8.4 References 141 9 Appendices 143 9.1 Appendix for Chapter 3 143 9.1.1 The Determination of the GLUE Criteria 143 9.1.2 Model Uncertainty Analysis 143 9.1.3 The LID Installation Location 144 9.1.4 Figures 145 9.1.5 Tables 147 9.2 Appendix for Chapter 4 153 9.2.1 Scenario of Long-term pre-Simulation 153 9.2.2 Figures 153 9.2.3 Tables 158 9.3 Appendix for Chapter 5 164 9.3.1 Tables 164 9.4 Appendix for Chapter 6 169 9.4.1 Figures 169 9.4.2 Tables 170 9.5 Data Source 177 9.6 References 17