Adaptive multiscale processing for contrast enhancement

This paper introduces a novel approach for accomplishing mammographic feature analysis through overcomplete multiresolution representations. We show that efficient representations may be identified from digital mammograms within a continuum of scale space and used to enhance features of importance to mammography. Choosing analyzing functions that are well localized in both space and frequency, results in a powerful methodology for image analysis. We describe methods of contrast enhancement based on two overcomplete (redundant) multiscale representations: (1) Dyadic wavelet transform (2) (phi) -transform. Mammograms are reconstructed from transform coefficients modified at one or more levels by non-linear, logarithmic and constant scale-space weight functions. Multiscale edges identified within distinct levels of transform space provide a local support for enhancement throughout each decomposition. We demonstrate that features extracted from wavelet spaces can provide an adaptive mechanism for accomplishing local contrast enhancement. We suggest that multiscale detection and local enhancement of singularities may be effectively employed for the visualization of breast pathology without excessive noise amplification

COMPUTER AIDED SYSTEM FOR BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS USING CURVELET TRANSFORM

Breast cancer is a leading cause of death among women worldwide. Early detection is the key for improving breast cancer prognosis. Digital mammography remains one of the most suitable tools for early detection of breast cancer. Hence, there are strong needs for the development of computer aided diagnosis (CAD) systems which have the capability to help radiologists in decision making. The main goal is to increase the diagnostic accuracy rate. In this thesis we developed a computer aided system for the diagnosis and detection of breast cancer using curvelet transform. Curvelet is a multiscale transform which possess directionality and anisotropy, and it breaks some inherent limitations of wavelet in representing edges in images. We started this study by developing a diagnosis system. Five feature extraction methods were developed with curvelet and wavelet coefficients to differentiate between different breast cancer classes. The results with curvelet and wavelet were compared. The experimental results show a high performance of the proposed methods and classification accuracy rate achieved 97.30%. The thesis then provides an automatic system for breast cancer detection. An automatic thresholding algorithm was used to separate the area composed of the breast and the pectoral muscle from the background of the image. Subsequently, a region growing algorithm was used to locate the pectoral muscle and suppress it from the breast. Then, the work concentrates on the segmentation of region of interest (ROI). Two methods are suggested to accomplish the segmentation stage: an adaptive thresholding method and a pattern matching method. Once the ROI has been identified, an automatic cropping is performed to extract it from the original mammogram. Subsequently, the suggested feature extraction methods were applied to the segmented ROIs. Finally, the K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifiers were used to determine whether the region is abnormal or normal. At this level, the study focuses on two abnormality types (mammographic masses and architectural distortion). Experimental results show that the introduced methods have very high detection accuracies. The effectiveness of the proposed methods has been tested with Mammographic Image Analysis Society (MIAS) dataset. Throughout the thesis all proposed methods and algorithms have been applied with both curvelet and wavelet for comparison and statistical tests were also performed. The overall results show that curvelet transform performs better than wavelet and the difference is statistically significant

Evaluation of a multi-scale enhancement protocol for digital mammography

We have carried out a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) study for the enhancement of mammographic features in digitized mammograms. The study evaluated the benefits of multi-scale enhancement methods in terms of diagnostic performance of radiologists. The enhancement protocol relied on multi-scale expansions and non-linear enhancement functions. Dyadic spline wavelet functions were used together with a sigmoidal non-linear enhancement function. We designed a computer interface ona softcopy display and performed an ROC study with three radiologists, who specialized in mammography. Clinical cases were obtained from a national mammography database of digitized radiographs prepared by the University of South Florida and Harvard Medical School. Our study focused on dense mammograms, i.e. mammograms of density 3 and 4 on the American College of Radiology breast density rating, which are the most difficult cases in screening, were selected. To compare the performance of radiologists with an without using multi-scale enhancement, two groups of 30 cases each were diagnosed. Each group contained 15 cases of cancerous and 15 cases of normal mammograms. Conventional ROC analysis was applied, and the resulting ROC curves indicated improved diagnostic performance when radiologists used multi-scale non-linear enhancement

Evaluation of a Multi-Scale Enhancement Protocol for Digital Mammography

We have carried out a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) study for the enhancement of mammographic features in digitized mammograms. The study evaluated the benefits of multi-scale enhancement methods in terms of diagnostic performance of radiologists. The enhancement protocol relied on multi-scale expansions and non-linear enhancement functions. Dyadic spline wavelet functions (first derivative of a cubic spline) were used together with a sigmoidal non-linear enhancement function. We designed a computer interface on a softcopy display and performed an ROC study with three radiologists, who specialized in mammography. Clinical cases were obtained from a national mammography database of digitized radiographs prepared by the University of South Florida (USF) and Harvard Medical School. Our study focused on dense mammograms, i.e. mammograms of density 3 and 4 on the American College of Radiology (ACR) breast density rating, which are the most difficult cases in screening, were selected. To compare the performance of radiologists with and without using multi-scale enhancement, two groups of 30 cases each were diagnosed. Each group contained 15 cases of cancerous and 15 cases of normal mammograms. Conventional ROC analysis was applied, and the resulting ROC curves indicated improved diagnostic performance when radiologists used multi-scale non-linear enhancement

Breast Mass Segmentation Using a Semi-automatic Procedure Based on Fuzzy C-means Clustering

Mammography is the primary modality that helped in the early detection and diagnosis of women breast diseases. Further, the process of extracting the masses in mammogram represents a challenging task facing the radiologists, due to problems such as fuzzy or speculated borders, low contrast and the presence of intensity inhomogeneities. Aims to help the radiologists in the diagnosis of breast cancer, many approaches have been conducted to automatically segment the masses in mammograms. Towards this aim, in this paper, we present a new approach for extraction of tumors from region-of-interest (ROI) using the algorithm of Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) setting two clusters for semi-automated segmentation. The proposed method meant to select as input data the set of pixels that enable to get the meaningful information required to segment the masses with high accuracy. This could be accomplished through eliminating unnecessary pixels, which influence on this process through separating it outside of the input data using an optimal threshold given by monitoring the change of clusters rate during the process of threshold decrementing. The proposed methodology has successfully segmented the masses, with an average sensitivity of 82.02% and specificity of 98.23%

Computer assisted screening of digital mammogram images

The use of computer systems to assist clinicians in digital mammography image screening has advantages over traditional methods. Computer algorithms can enhance the appearance of the images and highlight suspicious areas. Screening provides a more thorough examination of the images. Any computer system that does screening of digital mammograms contains components to address multiple tasks such as: image segmentation, mass lesion detection and classification, and microcalcification detection and classification. This dissertation provides both effective and efficient improvements to existing algorithms, which segment mammogram images and locate mass lesions. In addition, we provide a new algorithm to evaluate and report the results for mass lesion detection. The algorithm presented for mammogram segmentation uses a histogram based operator to define the boundaries between the different components of a mammogram image. It employs a unique clustering algorithm to produce closed, labeled sets of pixels which represent the distinct image components. The mass location algorithm uses a variation of template matching to locate suspicious areas. An evaluation of potential templates and algorithms is included. The method for testing and recording the results of the mass location algorithm groups suspicious pixels into regions and then compares them to the pathology

Deep-Learning-Based Computer- Aided Systems for Breast Cancer Imaging: A Critical Review

[EN] This paper provides a critical review of the literature on deep learning applications in breast tumor diagnosis using ultrasound and mammography images. It also summarizes recent advances in computer-aided diagnosis/detection (CAD) systems, which make use of new deep learning methods to automatically recognize breast images and improve the accuracy of diagnoses made by radiologists. This review is based upon published literature in the past decade (January 2010-January 2020), where we obtained around 250 research articles, and after an eligibility process, 59 articles were presented in more detail. The main findings in the classification process revealed that new DL-CAD methods are useful and effective screening tools for breast cancer, thus reducing the need for manual feature extraction. The breast tumor research community can utilize this survey as a basis for their current and future studies.This project has been co-financed by the Spanish Government Grant PID2019-107790RB-C22, "Software development for a continuous PET crystal systems applied to breast cancer".Jiménez-Gaona, Y.; Rodríguez Álvarez, MJ.; Lakshminarayanan, V. (2020). Deep-Learning-Based Computer- Aided Systems for Breast Cancer Imaging: A Critical Review. Applied Sciences. 10(22):1-29. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228298S1291022Jemal, A., Bray, F., Center, M. M., Ferlay, J., Ward, E., & Forman, D. (2011). Global cancer statistics. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 61(2), 69-90. doi:10.3322/caac.20107Gao, F., Chia, K.-S., Ng, F.-C., Ng, E.-H., & Machin, D. (2002). Interval cancers following breast cancer screening in Singaporean women. International Journal of Cancer, 101(5), 475-479. doi:10.1002/ijc.10636Munir, K., Elahi, H., Ayub, A., Frezza, F., & Rizzi, A. (2019). Cancer Diagnosis Using Deep Learning: A Bibliographic Review. Cancers, 11(9), 1235. doi:10.3390/cancers11091235Nahid, A.-A., & Kong, Y. (2017). Involvement of Machine Learning for Breast Cancer Image Classification: A Survey. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2017, 1-29. doi:10.1155/2017/3781951Ramadan, S. Z. (2020). Methods Used in Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Cancer Detection Using Mammograms: A Review. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2020, 1-21. doi:10.1155/2020/9162464CHAN, H.-P., DOI, K., VYBRONY, C. J., SCHMIDT, R. A., METZ, C. E., LAM, K. L., … MACMAHON, H. (1990). Improvement in Radiologists?? Detection of Clustered Microcalcifications on Mammograms. Investigative Radiology, 25(10), 1102-1110. doi:10.1097/00004424-199010000-00006Olsen, O., & Gøtzsche, P. C. (2001). Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. The Lancet, 358(9290), 1340-1342. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06449-2Mann, R. M., Kuhl, C. K., Kinkel, K., & Boetes, C. (2008). Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. European Radiology, 18(7), 1307-1318. doi:10.1007/s00330-008-0863-7Jalalian, A., Mashohor, S. B. T., Mahmud, H. R., Saripan, M. I. B., Ramli, A. R. B., & Karasfi, B. (2013). Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: a review. Clinical Imaging, 37(3), 420-426. doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2012.09.024Sarno, A., Mettivier, G., & Russo, P. (2015). Dedicated breast computed tomography: Basic aspects. Medical Physics, 42(6Part1), 2786-2804. doi:10.1118/1.4919441Njor, S., Nyström, L., Moss, S., Paci, E., Broeders, M., Segnan, N., & Lynge, E. (2012). Breast Cancer Mortality in Mammographic Screening in Europe: A Review of Incidence-Based Mortality Studies. Journal of Medical Screening, 19(1_suppl), 33-41. doi:10.1258/jms.2012.012080Morrell, S., Taylor, R., Roder, D., & Dobson, A. (2012). Mammography screening and breast cancer mortality in Australia: an aggregate cohort study. Journal of Medical Screening, 19(1), 26-34. doi:10.1258/jms.2012.011127Marmot, M. G., Altman, D. G., Cameron, D. A., Dewar, J. A., Thompson, S. G., & Wilcox, M. (2013). The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. British Journal of Cancer, 108(11), 2205-2240. doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.177Pisano, E. D., Gatsonis, C., Hendrick, E., Yaffe, M., Baum, J. K., Acharyya, S., … Rebner, M. (2005). Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening. New England Journal of Medicine, 353(17), 1773-1783. doi:10.1056/nejmoa052911Carney, P. A., Miglioretti, D. L., Yankaskas, B. C., Kerlikowske, K., Rosenberg, R., Rutter, C. M., … Ballard-Barbash, R. (2003). Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening Mammography. Annals of Internal Medicine, 138(3), 168. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008Woodard, D. B., Gelfand, A. E., Barlow, W. E., & Elmore, J. G. (2007). Performance assessment for radiologists interpreting screening mammography. Statistics in Medicine, 26(7), 1532-1551. doi:10.1002/sim.2633Cole, E. B., Pisano, E. D., Kistner, E. O., Muller, K. E., Brown, M. E., Feig, S. A., … Braeuning, M. P. (2003). Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mammography in Patients with Dense Breasts Who Underwent Problem-solving Mammography: Effects of Image Processing and Lesion Type. Radiology, 226(1), 153-160. doi:10.1148/radiol.2261012024Boyd, N. F., Guo, H., Martin, L. J., Sun, L., Stone, J., Fishell, E., … Yaffe, M. J. (2007). Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 356(3), 227-236. doi:10.1056/nejmoa062790Bird, R. E., Wallace, T. W., & Yankaskas, B. C. (1992). Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology, 184(3), 613-617. doi:10.1148/radiology.184.3.1509041Kerlikowske, K. (2000). Performance of Screening Mammography among Women with and without a First-Degree Relative with Breast Cancer. Annals of Internal Medicine, 133(11), 855. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-133-11-200012050-00009Nunes, F. L. S., Schiabel, H., & Goes, C. E. (2006). Contrast Enhancement in Dense Breast Images to Aid Clustered Microcalcifications Detection. Journal of Digital Imaging, 20(1), 53-66. doi:10.1007/s10278-005-6976-5Dinnes, J., Moss, S., Melia, J., Blanks, R., Song, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2001). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of double reading of mammograms in breast cancer screening: findings of a systematic review. The Breast, 10(6), 455-463. doi:10.1054/brst.2001.0350Robinson, P. J. (1997). Radiology’s Achilles’ heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the Röntgen image. The British Journal of Radiology, 70(839), 1085-1098. doi:10.1259/bjr.70.839.9536897Rangayyan, R. M., Ayres, F. J., & Leo Desautels, J. E. (2007). A review of computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer: Toward the detection of subtle signs. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 344(3-4), 312-348. doi:10.1016/j.jfranklin.2006.09.003Vyborny, C. J., Giger, M. L., & Nishikawa, R. M. (2000). COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION AND DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST CANCER. Radiologic Clinics of North America, 38(4), 725-740. doi:10.1016/s0033-8389(05)70197-4Giger, M. L. (2018). Machine Learning in Medical Imaging. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 15(3), 512-520. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.12.028Xu, Y., Wang, Y., Yuan, J., Cheng, Q., Wang, X., & Carson, P. L. (2019). Medical breast ultrasound image segmentation by machine learning. Ultrasonics, 91, 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2018.07.006Shan, J., Alam, S. K., Garra, B., Zhang, Y., & Ahmed, T. (2016). Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Ultrasound Using Computerized BI-RADS Features and Machine Learning Methods. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 42(4), 980-988. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.11.016Zhang, Q., Xiao, Y., Dai, W., Suo, J., Wang, C., Shi, J., & Zheng, H. (2016). Deep learning based classification of breast tumors with shear-wave elastography. Ultrasonics, 72, 150-157. doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2016.08.004Cheng, J.-Z., Ni, D., Chou, Y.-H., Qin, J., Tiu, C.-M., Chang, Y.-C., … Chen, C.-M. (2016). Computer-Aided Diagnosis with Deep Learning Architecture: Applications to Breast Lesions in US Images and Pulmonary Nodules in CT Scans. Scientific Reports, 6(1). doi:10.1038/srep24454Shin, S. Y., Lee, S., Yun, I. D., Kim, S. M., & Lee, K. M. (2019). Joint Weakly and Semi-Supervised Deep Learning for Localization and Classification of Masses in Breast Ultrasound Images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 38(3), 762-774. doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2872031Wang, J., Ding, H., Bidgoli, F. A., Zhou, B., Iribarren, C., Molloi, S., & Baldi, P. (2017). Detecting Cardiovascular Disease from Mammograms With Deep Learning. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 36(5), 1172-1181. doi:10.1109/tmi.2017.2655486Kooi, T., Litjens, G., van Ginneken, B., Gubern-Mérida, A., Sánchez, C. I., Mann, R., … Karssemeijer, N. (2017). Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions. Medical Image Analysis, 35, 303-312. doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.07.007Debelee, T. G., Schwenker, F., Ibenthal, A., & Yohannes, D. (2019). Survey of deep learning in breast cancer image analysis. Evolving Systems, 11(1), 143-163. doi:10.1007/s12530-019-09297-2Keen, J. D., Keen, J. M., & Keen, J. E. (2018). Utilization of Computer-Aided Detection for Digital Screening Mammography in the United States, 2008 to 2016. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 15(1), 44-48. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.033Henriksen, E. L., Carlsen, J. F., Vejborg, I. M., Nielsen, M. B., & Lauridsen, C. A. (2018). The efficacy of using computer-aided detection (CAD) for detection of breast cancer in mammography screening: a systematic review. Acta Radiologica, 60(1), 13-18. doi:10.1177/0284185118770917Gao, Y., Geras, K. J., Lewin, A. A., & Moy, L. (2019). New Frontiers: An Update on Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Imaging in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. American Journal of Roentgenology, 212(2), 300-307. doi:10.2214/ajr.18.20392Pacilè, S., Lopez, J., Chone, P., Bertinotti, T., Grouin, J. M., & Fillard, P. (2020). Improving Breast Cancer Detection Accuracy of Mammography with the Concurrent Use of an Artificial Intelligence Tool. Radiology: Artificial Intelligence, 2(6), e190208. doi:10.1148/ryai.2020190208Huynh, B. Q., Li, H., & Giger, M. L. (2016). Digital mammographic tumor classification using transfer learning from deep convolutional neural networks. Journal of Medical Imaging, 3(3), 034501. doi:10.1117/1.jmi.3.3.034501Yap, M. H., Pons, G., Marti, J., Ganau, S., Sentis, M., Zwiggelaar, R., … Marti, R. (2018). Automated Breast Ultrasound Lesions Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 22(4), 1218-1226. doi:10.1109/jbhi.2017.2731873Moon, W. K., Lee, Y.-W., Ke, H.-H., Lee, S. H., Huang, C.-S., & Chang, R.-F. (2020). Computer‐aided diagnosis of breast ultrasound images using ensemble learning from convolutional neural networks. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 190, 105361. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105361LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444. doi:10.1038/nature14539Miotto, R., Wang, F., Wang, S., Jiang, X., & Dudley, J. T. (2017). Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 19(6), 1236-1246. doi:10.1093/bib/bbx044Shin, H.-C., Roth, H. R., Gao, M., Lu, L., Xu, Z., Nogues, I., … Summers, R. M. (2016). Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 35(5), 1285-1298. doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2528162Lee, J.-G., Jun, S., Cho, Y.-W., Lee, H., Kim, G. B., Seo, J. B., & Kim, N. (2017). Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: General Overview. Korean Journal of Radiology, 18(4), 570. doi:10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.570Suzuki, K. (2017). Overview of deep learning in medical imaging. Radiological Physics and Technology, 10(3), 257-273. doi:10.1007/s12194-017-0406-5Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336-341. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2003). Five Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96(3), 118-121. doi:10.1177/014107680309600304Han, S., Kang, H.-K., Jeong, J.-Y., Park, M.-H., Kim, W., Bang, W.-C., & Seong, Y.-K. (2017). A deep learning framework for supporting the classification of breast lesions in ultrasound images. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 62(19), 7714-7728. doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aa82ecMoreira, I. C., Amaral, I., Domingues, I., Cardoso, A., Cardoso, M. J., & Cardoso, J. S. (2012). INbreast. Academic Radiology, 19(2), 236-248. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2011.09.014Abdelhafiz, D., Yang, C., Ammar, R., & Nabavi, S. (2019). Deep convolutional neural networks for mammography: advances, challenges and applications. BMC Bioinformatics, 20(S11). doi:10.1186/s12859-019-2823-4Byra, M., Jarosik, P., Szubert, A., Galperin, M., Ojeda-Fournier, H., Olson, L., … Andre, M. (2020). Breast mass segmentation in ultrasound with selective kernel U-Net convolutional neural network. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 61, 102027. doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2020.102027Jiao, Z., Gao, X., Wang, Y., & Li, J. (2016). A deep feature based framework for breast masses classification. Neurocomputing, 197, 221-231. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.02.060Arevalo, J., González, F. A., Ramos-Pollán, R., Oliveira, J. L., & Guevara Lopez, M. A. (2016). Representation learning for mammography mass lesion classification with convolutional neural networks. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 127, 248-257. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.12.014Peng, W., Mayorga, R. V., & Hussein, E. M. A. (2016). An automated confirmatory system for analysis of mammograms. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 125, 134-144. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.09.019Al-Dhabyani, W., Gomaa, M., Khaled, H., & Fahmy, A. (2020). Dataset of breast ultrasound images. Data in Brief, 28, 104863. doi:10.1016/j.dib.2019.104863Piotrzkowska-Wróblewska, H., Dobruch-Sobczak, K., Byra, M., & Nowicki, A. (2017). Open access database of raw ultrasonic signals acquired from malignant and benign breast lesions. Medical Physics, 44(11), 6105-6109. doi:10.1002/mp.12538Fujita, H. (2020). AI-based computer-aided diagnosis (AI-CAD): the latest review to read first. Radiological Physics and Technology, 13(1), 6-19. doi:10.1007/s12194-019-00552-4Sengupta, S., Singh, A., Leopold, H. A., Gulati, T., & Lakshminarayanan, V. (2020). Ophthalmic diagnosis using deep learning with fundus images – A critical review. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 102, 101758. doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101758Ganesan, K., Acharya, U. R., Chua, K. C., Min, L. C., & Abraham, K. T. (2013). Pectoral muscle segmentation: A review. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 110(1), 48-57. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.10.020Huang, Q., Luo, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2017). Breast ultrasound image segmentation: a survey. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 12(3), 493-507. doi:10.1007/s11548-016-1513-1Noble, J. A., & Boukerroui, D. (2006). Ultrasound image segmentation: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 25(8), 987-1010. doi:10.1109/tmi.2006.877092Kallergi, M., Woods, K., Clarke, L. P., Qian, W., & Clark, R. A. (1992). Image segmentation in digital mammography: Comparison of local thresholding and region growing algorithms. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 16(5), 323-331. doi:10.1016/0895-6111(92)90145-yTsantis, S., Dimitropoulos, N., Cavouras, D., & Nikiforidis, G. (2006). A hybrid multi-scale model for thyroid nodule boundary detection on ultrasound images. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 84(2-3), 86-98. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2006.09.006Ilesanmi, A. E., Idowu, O. P., & Makhanov, S. S. (2020). Multiscale superpixel method for segmentation of breast ultrasound. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 125, 103879. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103879Chen, D.-R., Chang, R.-F., Kuo, W.-J., Chen, M.-C., & Huang, Y. .-L. (2002). Diagnosis of breast tumors with sonographic texture analysis using wavelet transform and neural networks. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 28(10), 1301-1310. doi:10.1016/s0301-5629(02)00620-8Cheng, H. D., Shan, J., Ju, W., Guo, Y., & Zhang, L. (2010). Automated breast cancer detection and classification using ultrasound images: A survey. Pattern Recognition, 43(1), 299-317. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2009.05.012Chan, H.-P., Wei, D., Helvie, M. A., Sahiner, B., Adler, D. D., Goodsitt, M. M., & Petrick, N. (1995). Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 40(5), 857-876. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/40/5/010Tanaka, T., Torii, S., Kabuta, I., Shimizu, K., & Tanaka, M. (2007). Pattern Classification of Nevus with Texture Analysis. IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 3(1), 143-150. doi:10.1002/tee.20246Singh, B., Jain, V. K., & Singh, S. (2014). Mammogram Mass Classification Using Support Vector Machine with Texture, Shape Features and Hierarchical Centroid Method. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics, 4(5), 687-696. doi:10.1166/jmihi.2014.1312Pal, N. R., Bhowmick, B., Patel, S. K., Pal, S., & Das, J. (2008). A multi-stage neural network aided system for detection of microcalcifications in digitized mammograms. Neurocomputing, 71(13-15), 2625-2634. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2007.06.015Ayer, T., Chen, Q., & Burnside, E. S. (2013). Artificial Neural Networks in Mammography Interpretation and Diagnostic Decision Making. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2013, 1-10. doi:10.1155/2013/832509Sumbaly, R., Vishnusri, N., & Jeyalatha, S. (2014). Diagnosis of Breast Cancer using Decision Tree Data Mining Technique. International Journal of Computer Applications, 98(10), 16-24. doi:10.5120/17219-7456Landwehr, N., Hall, M., & Frank, E. (2005). Logistic Model Trees. Machine Learning, 59(1-2), 161-205. doi:10.1007/s10994-005-0466-3Abdel-Zaher, A. M., & Eldeib, A. M. (2016). Breast cancer classification using deep belief networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 46, 139-144. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.015Nishikawa, R. M., Giger, M. L., Doi, K., Metz, C. E., Yin, F.-F., Vyborny, C. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (1994). Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. Medical Physics, 21(2), 265-269. doi:10.1118/1.597287Guo, R., Lu, G., Qin, B., & Fei, B. (2018). Ultrasound Imaging Technologies for Breast Cancer Detection and Management: A Review. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 44(1), 37-70. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.09.012Kang, C.-C., Wang, W.-J., & Kang, C.-H. (2012). Image segmentation with complicated background by using seeded region growing. AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 66(9), 767-771. doi:10.1016/j.aeue.2012.01.011Prabusankarlal, K. M., Thirumoorthy, P., & Manavalan, R. (2014). Computer Aided Breast Cancer Diagnosis Techniques in Ultrasound: A Survey. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics, 4(3), 331-349. doi:10.1166/jmihi.2014.1269Abdallah, Y. M., Elgak, S., Zain, H., Rafiq, M., A. Ebaid, E., & A. Elnaema, A. (2018). Breast cancer detection using image enhancement and segmentation algorithms. Biomedical Research, 29(20). doi:10.4066/biomedicalresearch.29-18-1106K.U, S., & S, G. R. (2016). Objective Quality Assessment of Image Enhancement Methods in Digital Mammography - A Comparative Study. Signal & Image Processing : An International Journal, 7(4), 01-13. doi:10.5121/sipij.2016.7401Pizer, S. M., Amburn, E. P., Austin, J. D., Cromartie, R., Geselowitz, A., Greer, T., … Zuiderveld, K. (1987). Adaptive histogram equalization and its variations. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 39(3), 355-368. doi:10.1016/s0734-189x(87)80186-xPisano, E. D., Zong, S., Hemminger, B. M., DeLuca, M., Johnston, R. E., Muller, K., … Pizer, S. M. (1998). Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms. Journal of Digital Imaging, 11(4), 193-200. doi:10.1007/bf03178082Wan, J., Yin, H., Chong, A.-X., & Liu, Z.-H. (2020). Progressive residual networks for image super-resolution. Applied Intelligence, 50(5), 1620-1632. doi:10.1007/s10489-019-01548-8Umehara, K., Ota, J., & Ishida, T. (2017). Super-Resolution Imaging of Mammograms Based on the Super-Resolution Convolutional Neural Network. Open Journal of Medical Imaging, 07(04), 180-195. doi:10.4236/ojmi.2017.74018Dong, C., Loy, C. C., He, K., & Tang, X. (2016). Image Super-Resolution Using Deep Convolutional Networks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 38(2), 295-307. doi:10.1109/tpami.2015.2439281Jiang, Y., & Li, J. (2020). Generative Adversarial Network for Image Super-Resolution Combining Texture Loss. Applied Sciences, 10(5), 1729. doi:10.3390/app10051729Schultz, R. R., & Stevenson, R. L. (1994). A Bayesian approach to image expansion for improved definition. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 3(3), 233-242. doi:10.1109/83.287017Lei Zhang, & Xiaolin Wu. (2006). An edge-guided image interpolation algorithm via directional filtering and data fusion. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 15(8), 2226-2238. doi:10.1109/tip.2006.877407Shorten, C., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2019). A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning. Journal of Big Data, 6(1). doi:10.1186/s40537-019-0197-0Weiss, K., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., & Wang, D. (2016). A survey of transfer learning. Journal of Big Data, 3(1). doi:10.1186/s40537-016-0043-6Ling Shao, Fan Zhu, & Xuelong Li. (2015). Transfer Learning for Visual Categorization: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Syste

Hexagonal wavelet processing of digital mammography

This paper introduces a novel approach for accomplishing mammographic feature analysis through overcomplete multiresolution representations. We show that efficient representations may be identified from digital mammograms and used to enhance features of importance to mammography within a continuum of scale-space. We present a method of contrast enhancement based on an overcomplete, non-separable multiscale representation: the hexagonal wavelet transform. Mammograms are reconstructed from transform coefficients modified at one or more levels by local and global non-linear operators. Multiscale edges identified within distinct levels of transform space provide local support for enhancement. We demonstrate that features extracted from multiresolution representations can provide an adaptive mechanism for accomplishing local contrast enhancement. We suggest that multiscale detection and local enhancement of singularities may be effectively employed for the visualization of breast pathology without excessive noise amplification

The Combination of Mammography and MRI for Diagnosing Breast Cancer Using Fuzzy NN and SVM

Breast cancer is one of the common cancers among women so that early diagnosing of it can effectively help its treatment in this study, considering combination of Mammography and MRI pictures, we will try to recognize glands in existing pictures which identify all around of gland complete and precisely and separate it completely. In this method using artificial intelligence algorithm such as Affine transformation, Gabor filter, neural network, and support vector machine, image analysis will be carried out. The accuracy of proposed method is 98.14. In this work a special framework is presented which simplifies cancer diagnosis. The algorithm of proposed method is tested on z16 images. High speed and lack of human error are the most important factors in proposed intelligent system