IRESite—a tool for the examination of viral and cellular internal ribosome entry sites

The IRESite (http://www.iresite.org) presents carefully curated experimental evidence of many eukaryotic viral and cellular internal ribosome entry site (IRES) regions. At the time of submission, IRESite stored >600 records. The IRESite gradually evolved into a robust tool providing (i) biologically meaningful information regarding the IRESs and their experimental background (including annotation of IRES secondary structures and IRES trans-acting factors) as well as (ii) thorough concluding remarks to stored database entries and regularly updated evaluation of the reported IRES function. A substantial portion of the IRESite data results purely from in-house bioinformatic analyses of currently available sequences, in silico attempts to repeat published cloning experiments, DNA sequencing and restriction endonuclease verification of received plasmid DNA. We also present a newly implemented tool for displaying RNA secondary structures and for searching through the structures currently stored in the database. The supplementary material contains an updated list of reported IRESs

Closing the circle : current state and perspectives of circular RNA databases

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are covalently closed RNA molecules that have been linked to various diseases, including cancer. However, a precise function and working mechanism are lacking for the larger majority. Following many different experimental and computational approaches to identify circRNAs, multiple circRNA databases were developed as well. Unfortunately, there are several major issues with the current circRNA databases, which substantially hamper progression in the field. First, as the overlap in content is limited, a true reference set of circRNAs is lacking. This results from the low abundance and highly specific expression of circRNAs, and varying sequencing methods, data-analysis pipelines, and circRNA detection tools. A second major issue is the use of ambiguous nomenclature. Thus, redundant or even conflicting names for circRNAs across different databases contribute to the reproducibility crisis. Third, circRNA databases, in essence, rely on the position of the circRNA back-splice junction, whereas alternative splicing could result in circRNAs with different length and sequence. To uniquely identify a circRNA molecule, the full circular sequence is required. Fourth, circRNA databases annotate circRNAs' microRNA binding and protein-coding potential, but these annotations are generally based on presumed circRNA sequences. Finally, several databases are not regularly updated, contain incomplete data or suffer from connectivity issues. In this review, we present a comprehensive overview of the current circRNA databases and their content, features, and usability. In addition to discussing the current issues regarding circRNA databases, we come with important suggestions to streamline further research in this growing field

The 2012 Nucleic Acids Research Database Issue and the online Molecular Biology Database Collection

The 19th annual Database Issue of Nucleic Acids Research features descriptions of 92 new online databases covering various areas of molecular biology and 100 papers describing recent updates to the databases previously described in NAR and other journals. The highlights of this issue include, among others, a description of neXtProt, a knowledgebase on human proteins; a detailed explanation of the principles behind the NCBI Taxonomy Database; NCBI and EBI papers on the recently launched BioSample databases that store sample information for a variety of database resources; descriptions of the recent developments in the Gene Ontology and UniProt Gene Ontology Annotation projects; updates on Pfam, SMART and InterPro domain databases; update papers on KEGG and TAIR, two universally acclaimed databases that face an uncertain future; and a separate section with 10 wiki-based databases, introduced in an accompanying editorial. The NAR online Molecular Biology Database Collection, available at http://www.oxfordjournals.org/nar/database/a/, has been updated and now lists 1380 databases. Brief machine-readable descriptions of the databases featured in this issue, according to the BioDBcore standards, will be provided at the http://biosharing.org/biodbcore web site. The full content of the Database Issue is freely available online on the Nucleic Acids Research web site (http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/)

Comprehensive Analysis of Peripheral Exosomal circRNAs in Large Artery Atherosclerotic Stroke

Exosomes are crucial vehicles in intercellular communication. Circular RNAs (circRNAs), novel endogenous noncoding RNAs, play diverse roles in ischemic stroke. Recently, the abundance and stability of circRNAs in exosomes have been identified. However, a comprehensive analysis of exosomal circRNAs in large artery atherosclerotic (LAA) stroke has not yet been reported. We performed RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) to comprehensively identify differentially expressed (DE) exosomal circRNAs in five paired LAA and normal controls. Further, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to verify the RNA-Seq results in a cohort of stroke patients (32 versus 32). RNA-Seq identified a total of 462 circRNAs in peripheral exosomes; there were 25 DE circRNAs among them. Additionally, circRNA competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network and translatable analysis revealed the potential functions of the exosomal circRNAs in LAA progression. Two ceRNA pathways involving 5 circRNAs, 2 miRNAs, and 3 mRNAs were confirmed by qRT-PCR. In the validation cohort, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified two circRNAs as possible novel biomarkers, and a logistic model combining two and four circRNAs increased the area under the curve compared with the individual circRNAs. Here, we show for the first time the comprehensive expression of exosomal circRNAs, which displayed the potential diagnostic and biological function in LAA stroke

Mining Functional Elements in Messenger RNAs: Overview, Challenges, and Perspectives

Eukaryotic messenger RNA (mRNA) contains not only protein-coding regions but also a plethora of functional cis-elements that influence or coordinate a number of regulatory aspects of gene expression, such as mRNA stability, splicing forms, and translation rates. Understanding the rules that apply to each of these element types (e.g., whether the element is defined by primary or higher-order structure) allows for the discovery of novel mechanisms of gene expression as well as the design of transcripts with controlled expression. Bioinformatics plays a major role in creating databases and finding non-evident patterns governing each type of eukaryotic functional element. Much of what we currently know about mRNA regulatory elements in eukaryotes is derived from microorganism and animal systems, with the particularities of plant systems lagging behind. In this review, we provide a general introduction to the most well-known eukaryotic mRNA regulatory motifs (splicing regulatory elements, internal ribosome entry sites, iron-responsive elements, AU-rich elements, zipcodes, and polyadenylation signals) and describe available bioinformatics resources (databases and analysis tools) to analyze eukaryotic transcripts in search of functional elements, focusing on recent trends in bioinformatics methods and tool development. We also discuss future directions in the development of better computational tools based upon current knowledge of these functional elements. Improved computational tools would advance our understanding of the processes underlying gene regulations. We encourage plant bioinformaticians to turn their attention to this subject to help identify novel mechanisms of gene expression regulation using RNA motifs that have potentially evolved or diverged in plant species

Current practice in bicistronic ires reporter use: A systematic review

Bicistronic reporter assays have been instrumental for transgene expression, understanding of internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) translation, and identification of novel cap-independent translational elements (CITE). We observed a large methodological variability in the use of bicistronic reporter assays and data presentation or normalization procedures. Therefore, we systematically searched the literature for bicistronic IRES reporter studies and analyzed methodological details, data visualization, and normalization procedures. Two hundred fifty-seven publications were identified using our search strategy (published 1994–2020). Experimental studies on eukaryotic adherent cell systems and the cell-free translation assay were included for further analysis. We evaluated the following methodological details for 176 full text articles: the bicistronic reporter design, the cell line or type, transfection methods, and time point of analyses post-transfection. For the cell-free translation assay, we focused on methods of in vitro transcription, type of translation lysate, and incubation times and assay temperature. Data can be presented in multiple ways: raw data from individual cistrons, a ratio of the two, or fold changes thereof. In addition, many different control experiments have been suggested when studying IRES-mediated translation. In addition, many different normalization and control experiments have been suggested when studying IRES-mediated translation. Therefore, we also categorized and summarized their use. Our unbiased analyses provide a representative overview of bicistronic IRES reporter use. We identified parameters that were reported inconsistently or incompletely, which could hamper data reproduction and interpretation. On the basis of our analyses, we encourage adhering to a number of practices that should improve transparency of bicistronic reporter data presentation and improve methodological descriptions to facilitate data replication

Structural Studies of NediV-IRES-Mediated Translation Initiation

Viruses require a host cell to replicate and proliferate; upon infection they appropriate host resources and molecular machines. Specifically, viruses use ribosomes of the host to translate the information in their genome. Some viruses with single-stranded RNA genomes contain highly structured non-coding regions of RNA called internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) which are used to hijack the host’s ribosomes through a non-canonical cap-independent initiation pathway. Canonical translation initiation is a highly complex and regulated process: at least a dozen translation factors are necessary, and it is the rate-limiting step in eukaryotic translation. Viruses containing an IRES forgo canonical eukaryotic translation initiation factors and bypass some steps of canonical translation initiation by mimicking part of the host’s initiation machinery. The simplest among these IRESs are found in the intergenic region (IGR) of viruses in the family Dicistroviridae. These type IV IRESs from dicistroviruses have been structurally characterized in great detail in using the cricket paralysis virus (CrPV) and Israeli Acute Paralysis Virus (IAPV). To better understand how structure affects the function of these type IV IRESs, using single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), we have characterized a recently discovered IRES found in the IGR of the genome of Nedicistrovirus (NediV). Four complexes that represent each step in the alternative translation initiation mechanism were prepared and analyzed to solve the 3D structure and characterize the mechanism by which the NediV-IRES captures host ribosomes. With this, we were able to understand how the shorter stem-loop V (SL-V) of NediV-IRES impacts the well-characterized interaction of SL-V with eukaryotic small subunit ribosomal protein 25 (eS25) (Landry et al., 2009), which is important for the IRES:40S complex formation. This shortened stem-loop has been shown to fold in a way that does not support stable binding to the small ribosomal subunit (40S) and subsequent recruitment of the large ribosomal subunit (60S). NediV-IRES, rather, relies on direct recruitment of the 80S ribosome, which has been seen more commonly at low concentrations of Mg²⁺ for CrPV-IRES (Petrov et al., 2016). Solved structures also suggest that upon loading, NediV-IRES skips the first eEF2-dependent pseudo-translocation step necessary to bind to the ribosomal P site without the need of eEF2. Because of their simplicity, these type IV IRESs represent a robust potential tool for cell-free and vector-driven translation. Due to these structural and mechanistic differences observed, we propose that NediV-IRES, along with the NediV-like Antarctic picorna-like virus 1 (APLV-1)-IRES (Lu, 2019), represents a novel type IV IRES subclass.

ILF3 contributes to the establishment of the antiviral type i interferon program

Upon detection of viral infections, cells activate the expression of type I interferons (IFNs) and pro-inflammatory cytokines to control viral dissemination. As part of their antiviral response, cells also trigger the translational shutoff response which prevents translation of viral mRNAs and cellular mRNAs in a non-selective manner. Intriguingly, mRNAs encoding for antiviral factors bypass this translational shutoff, suggesting the presence of additional regulatory mechanisms enabling expression of the self-defence genes. Here, we identified the dsRNA binding protein ILF3 as an essential host factor required for efficient translation of the central antiviral cytokine, IFNB1, and a subset of interferon-stimulated genes. By combining polysome profiling and next-generation sequencing, ILF3 was also found to be necessary to establish the dsRNA-induced transcriptional and translational programs. We propose a central role for the host factor ILF3 in enhancing expression of the antiviral defence mRNAs in cellular conditions where cap-dependent translation is compromised.Fil: Watson, Samir. University of Edinburgh; Reino UnidoFil: Bellora, Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto Andino Patagónico de Tecnologías Biológicas y Geoambientales. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Instituto Andino Patagónico de Tecnologías Biológicas y Geoambientales; ArgentinaFil: Macias Numa, Sara Magdalena del Valle. University of Edinburgh; Reino Unid

An Internal Ribosome Entry Site Directs Translation of the 39-Gene from Pelargonium Flower Break Virus Genomic RNA: Implications for Infectivity

[EN] Pelargonium flower break virus (PFBV, genus Carmovirus) has a single-stranded positive-sense genomic RNA (gRNA) which contains five ORFs. The two 59-proximal ORFs encode the replicases, two internal ORFs encode movement proteins, and the 39-proximal ORF encodes a polypeptide (p37) which plays a dual role as capsid protein and as suppressor of RNA silencing. Like other members of family Tombusviridae, carmoviruses express ORFs that are not 59-proximal from subgenomic RNAs. However, in one case, corresponding to Hisbiscus chlorotic ringspot virus, it has been reported that the 39-proximal gene can be translated from the gRNA through an internal ribosome entry site (IRES). Here we show that PFBV also holds an IRES that mediates production of p37 from the gRNA, raising the question of whether this translation strategy may be conserved in the genus. The PFBV IRES was functional both in vitro and in vivo and either in the viral context or when inserted into synthetic bicistronic constructs. Through deletion and mutagenesis studies we have found that the IRES is contained within a 80 nt segment and have identified some structural traits that influence IRES function. Interestingly, mutations that diminish IRES activity strongly reduced the infectivity of the virus while the progress of the infection was favoured by mutations potentiating such activity. These results support the biological significance of the IRES-driven p37 translation and suggest that production of the silencing suppressor from the gRNA might allow the virus to early counteract the defence response of the host, thus facilitating pathogen multiplication and spread.This research was supported by grants BFU2006-11230 and BFU2009-11699 from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN) and by grants ACOM/2006/210 and ACOMP/2009/040 (to CH) and GVPRE/2008/121 (to OF-M) from the Generalitat Valenciana. The latter was the recipient of an I3P postdoctoral contract from the Spanish Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas and an additional contract from MICINN. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Fernandez Miragall, O.; Hernandez Fort, C. (2011). An Internal Ribosome Entry Site Directs Translation of the 39-Gene from Pelargonium Flower Break Virus Genomic RNA: Implications for Infectivity. PLoS ONE. 6(7):22617-22617. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022617S226172261767Gallie, D. R. (1996). Translational control of cellular and viral mRNAs. Plant Molecular Biology, 32(1-2), 145-158. doi:10.1007/bf00039381Kozak, M. (2002). Pushing the limits of the scanning mechanism for initiation of translation. Gene, 299(1-2), 1-34. doi:10.1016/s0378-1119(02)01056-9Sachs, A. B., Sarnow, P., & Hentze, M. W. (1997). Starting at the Beginning, Middle, and End: Translation Initiation in Eukaryotes. Cell, 89(6), 831-838. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80268-8Kozak, M. (1992). Regulation of Translation in Eukaryotic Systems. Annual Review of Cell Biology, 8(1), 197-225. doi:10.1146/annurev.cb.08.110192.001213Sonenberg, N., & Hinnebusch, A. G. (2009). Regulation of Translation Initiation in Eukaryotes: Mechanisms and Biological Targets. Cell, 136(4), 731-745. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.042F�tterer, J., & Hohn, T. (1996). Translation in plants-rules and exceptions. Plant Molecular Biology, 32(1-2), 159-189. doi:10.1007/bf00039382Gale, M., Tan, S.-L., & Katze, M. G. (2000). Translational Control of Viral Gene Expression in Eukaryotes. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 64(2), 239-280. doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.2.239-280.2000Kozak, M. (2001). Constraints on reinitiation of translation in mammals. Nucleic Acids Research, 29(24), 5226-5232. doi:10.1093/nar/29.24.5226Pelletier, J., & Sonenberg, N. (1988). Internal initiation of translation of eukaryotic mRNA directed by a sequence derived from poliovirus RNA. Nature, 334(6180), 320-325. doi:10.1038/334320a0Mokrejš, M., Mašek, T., Vopálenský, V., Hlubuček, P., Delbos, P., & Pospíšek, M. (2009). IRESite—a tool for the examination of viral and cellular internal ribosome entry sites. Nucleic Acids Research, 38(suppl_1), D131-D136. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp981Basso, J., Dallaire, P., Charest, P. J., Devantier, Y., & Laliberte, J.-F. (1994). Evidence for an Internal Ribosome Entry Site Within the 5’ Non-translated Region of Turnip Mosaic Potyvirus RNA. Journal of General Virology, 75(11), 3157-3165. doi:10.1099/0022-1317-75-11-3157Levis, C., & Astier-Manifacier, S. (1993). The 5′ untranslated region of PVY RNA, even located in an internal position, enables initiation of translation. Virus Genes, 7(4), 367-379. doi:10.1007/bf01703392Karetnikov, A., & Lehto, K. (2007). The RNA2 5’ leader of Blackcurrant reversion virus mediates efficient in vivo translation through an internal ribosomal entry site mechanism. Journal of General Virology, 88(1), 286-297. doi:10.1099/vir.0.82307-0Ivanov, P. A., Karpova, O. V., Skulachev, M. V., Tomashevskaya, O. L., Rodionova, N. P., Dorokhov, Y. L., & Atabekov, J. G. (1997). A Tobamovirus Genome That Contains an Internal Ribosome Entry Site Functionalin Vitro. Virology, 232(1), 32-43. doi:10.1006/viro.1997.8525Skulachev, M. V., Ivanov, P. A., Karpova, O. V., Korpela, T., Rodionova, N. P., Dorokhov, Y. L., & Atabekov, J. G. (1999). Internal Initiation of Translation Directed by the 5′-Untranslated Region of the Tobamovirus Subgenomic RNA I2. Virology, 263(1), 139-154. doi:10.1006/viro.1999.9928Jaag, H. M., Kawchuk, L., Rohde, W., Fischer, R., Emans, N., & Prufer, D. (2003). An unusual internal ribosomal entry site of inverted symmetry directs expression of a potato leafroll polerovirus replication-associated protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(15), 8939-8944. doi:10.1073/pnas.1332697100Balvay, L., Rifo, R. S., Ricci, E. P., Decimo, D., & Ohlmann, T. (2009). Structural and functional diversity of viral IRESes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms, 1789(9-10), 542-557. doi:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2009.07.005Kneller, E. L. P., Rakotondrafara, A. M., & Miller, W. A. (2006). Cap-independent translation of plant viral RNAs. Virus Research, 119(1), 63-75. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2005.10.010Rico, P., & Hern�ndez, C. (2004). Complete nucleotide sequence and genome organization of Pelargonium flower break virus. Archives of Virology, 149(3), 641-651. doi:10.1007/s00705-003-0231-5Martinez-Turino, S., & Hernandez, C. (2010). Identification and characterization of RNA-binding activity in the ORF1-encoded replicase protein of Pelargonium flower break virus. Journal of General Virology, 91(12), 3075-3084. doi:10.1099/vir.0.023093-0Martínez-Turiño, S., & Hernández, C. (2011). A membrane-associated movement protein of Pelargonium flower break virus shows RNA-binding activity and contains a biologically relevant leucine zipper-like motif. Virology, 413(2), 310-319. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2011.03.001Martinez-Turino, S., & Hernandez, C. (2009). Inhibition of RNA silencing by the coat protein of Pelargonium flower break virus: distinctions from closely related suppressors. Journal of General Virology, 90(2), 519-525. doi:10.1099/vir.0.006098-0Rico, P., & Hernández, C. (2009). Characterization of the subgenomic RNAs produced by Pelargonium flower break virus: Identification of two novel RNAs species. Virus Research, 142(1-2), 100-107. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2009.01.018Koh, D. C.-Y., Wong, S.-M., & Liu, D. X. (2003). Synergism of the 3′-Untranslated Region and an Internal Ribosome Entry Site Differentially Enhances the Translation of a Plant Virus Coat Protein. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278(23), 20565-20573. doi:10.1074/jbc.m210212200Hellen, C. U. T. (2001). Internal ribosome entry sites in eukaryotic mRNA molecules. Genes & Development, 15(13), 1593-1612. doi:10.1101/gad.891101Martínez-Salas, E. (1999). Internal ribosome entry site biology and its use in expression vectors. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 10(5), 458-464. doi:10.1016/s0958-1669(99)00010-5Dobrikova, E., Florez, P., Bradrick, S., & Gromeier, M. (2003). Activity of a type 1 picornavirus internal ribosomal entry site is determined by sequences within the 3’ nontranslated region. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(25), 15125-15130. doi:10.1073/pnas.2436464100Belsham, G. J. (2009). Divergent picornavirus IRES elements. Virus Research, 139(2), 183-192. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2008.07.001Fernández-Miragall, O., Quinto, S. L. de, & Martínez-Salas, E. (2009). Relevance of RNA structure for the activity of picornavirus IRES elements. Virus Research, 139(2), 172-182. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2008.07.009Pestova, T. V., Kolupaeva, V. G., Lomakin, I. B., Pilipenko, E. V., Shatsky, I. N., Agol, V. I., & Hellen, C. U. T. (2001). Molecular mechanisms of translation initiation in eukaryotes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(13), 7029-7036. doi:10.1073/pnas.111145798FERNANDEZ-MIRAGALL, O. (2003). Structural organization of a viral IRES depends on the integrity of the GNRA motif. RNA, 9(11), 1333-1344. doi:10.1261/rna.5950603ROBERTSON, M. E. M., SEAMONS, R. A., & BELSHAM, G. J. (1999). A selection system for functional internal ribosome entry site (IRES) elements: Analysis of the requirement for a conserved GNRA tetraloop in the encephalomyocarditis virus IRES. RNA, 5(9), 1167-1179. doi:10.1017/s1355838299990301Dorokhov, Y. L., Skulachev, M. V., Ivanov, P. A., Zvereva, S. D., Tjulkina, L. G., Merits, A., … Atabekov, J. G. (2002). Polypurine (A)-rich sequences promote cross-kingdom conservation of internal ribosome entry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(8), 5301-5306. doi:10.1073/pnas.082107599Xia, X., & Holcik, M. (2009). Strong Eukaryotic IRESs Have Weak Secondary Structure. PLoS ONE, 4(1), e4136. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004136Lu, J., Zhang, J., Wang, X., Jiang, H., Liu, C., & Hu, Y. (2006). In vitro and in vivo identification of structural and sequence elements in the 5’ untranslated region of Ectropis obliqua picorna-like virus required for internal initiation. Journal of General Virology, 87(12), 3667-3677. doi:10.1099/vir.0.82090-0Yang, L. J., Hidaka, M., Sonoda, J., Masaki, H., & Uozumi, T. (1997). Mutational Analysis of the Potato Virus Y 5′ Untranslated Region for Alteration in Translational Enhancement in Tobacco Protoplasts. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 61(12), 2131-2133. doi:10.1271/bbb.61.2131BERGAMINI, G., PREISS, T., & HENTZE, M. W. (2000). Picornavirus IRESes and the poly(A) tail jointly promote cap-independent translation in a mammalian cell-free system. RNA, 6(12), 1781-1790. doi:10.1017/s1355838200001679Bradrick, S. S. (2006). The hepatitis C virus 3’-untranslated region or a poly(A) tract promote efficient translation subsequent to the initiation phase. Nucleic Acids Research, 34(4), 1293-1303. doi:10.1093/nar/gkl019Lopez de Quinto, S. (2002). IRES-driven translation is stimulated separately by the FMDV 3’-NCR and poly(A) sequences. Nucleic Acids Research, 30(20), 4398-4405. doi:10.1093/nar/gkf569Song, Y., Friebe, P., Tzima, E., Junemann, C., Bartenschlager, R., & Niepmann, M. (2006). The Hepatitis C Virus RNA 3’-Untranslated Region Strongly Enhances Translation Directed by the Internal Ribosome Entry Site. Journal of Virology, 80(23), 11579-11588. doi:10.1128/jvi.00675-06Koh, D. C.-Y., Liu, D. X., & Wong, S.-M. (2002). A Six-Nucleotide Segment within the 3’ Untranslated Region of Hibiscus Chlorotic Ringspot Virus Plays an Essential Role in Translational Enhancement. Journal of Virology, 76(3), 1144-1153. doi:10.1128/jvi.76.3.1144-1153.2002Stupina, V. A., Meskauskas, A., McCormack, J. C., Yingling, Y. G., Shapiro, B. A., Dinman, J. D., & Simon, A. E. (2008). The 3’ proximal translational enhancer of Turnip crinkle virus binds to 60S ribosomal subunits. RNA, 14(11), 2379-2393. doi:10.1261/rna.1227808Truniger, V., Nieto, C., González-Ibeas, D., & Aranda, M. (2008). Mechanism of plant eIF4E-mediated resistance against a Carmovirus (Tombusviridae): cap-independent translation of a viral RNA controlledin cisby an (a)virulence determinant. The Plant Journal, 56(5), 716-727. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03630.xMiller, W. A., Wang, Z., & Treder, K. (2007). The amazing diversity of cap-independent translation elements in the 3′-untranslated regions of plant viral RNAs. Biochemical Society Transactions, 35(6), 1629-1633. doi:10.1042/bst0351629Miller, W. A., & White, K. A. (2006). Long-Distance RNA-RNA Interactions in Plant Virus Gene Expression and Replication. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 44(1), 447-467. doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143353Koh, D. C.-Y., Wang, X., Wong, S.-M., & Liu, D. X. (2006). Translation initiation at an upstream CUG codon regulates the expression of Hibiscus chlorotic ringspot virus coat protein. Virus Research, 122(1-2), 35-44. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2006.06.008Castaño, A., Ruiz, L., & Hernández, C. (2009). Insights into the translational regulation of biologically active open reading frames of Pelargonium line pattern virus. Virology, 386(2), 417-426. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2009.01.017Fraser, C. S., & Doudna, J. A. (2006). Structural and mechanistic insights into hepatitis C viral translation initiation. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 5(1), 29-38. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1558LÓPEZ-LASTRA, M., RIVAS, A., & BARRÍA, M. I. (2005). Protein synthesis in eukaryotes: The growing biological relevance of cap-independent translation initiation. Biological Research, 38(2-3). doi:10.4067/s0716-97602005000200003Pacheco, A., & Martinez-Salas, E. (2010). Insights into the Biology of IRES Elements through Riboproteomic Approaches. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, 2010, 1-12. doi:10.1155/2010/458927Bernstein, J., Sella, O., Le, S.-Y., & Elroy-Stein, O. (1997). PDGF2/c-sismRNA Leader Contains a Differentiation-linked Internal Ribosomal Entry Site (D-IRES). Journal of Biological Chemistry, 272(14), 9356-9362. doi:10.1074/jbc.272.14.9356Scheper, G. C., Voorma, H. O., & Thomas, A. A. M. (1994). Basepairing with 18S ribosomal RNA in internal initiation of translation. FEBS Letters, 352(3), 271-275. doi:10.1016/0014-5793(94)00975-9Dresios, J., Chappell, S. A., Zhou, W., & Mauro, V. P. (2005). An mRNA-rRNA base-pairing mechanism for translation initiation in eukaryotes. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 13(1), 30-34. doi:10.1038/nsmb1031Reigadas, S., Pacheco, A., Ramajo, J., de Quinto, S. L., & Martinez-Salas, E. (2005). Specific interference between two unrelated internal ribosome entry site elements impairs translation efficiency. FEBS Letters, 579(30), 6803-6808. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2005.11.015Ishitani, M., Xiong, L., Stevenson, B., & Zhu, J. K. (1997). Genetic analysis of osmotic and cold stress signal transduction in Arabidopsis: interactions and convergence of abscisic acid-dependent and abscisic acid-independent pathways. The Plant Cell, 9(11), 1935-1949. doi:10.1105/tpc.9.11.1935Knoester, M., van Loon, L. C., van den Heuvel, J., Hennig, J., Bol, J. F., & Linthorst, H. J. M. (1998). Ethylene-insensitive tobacco lacks nonhost resistance against soil-borne fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(4), 1933-1937. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.4.1933Mathews, D. H., Sabina, J., Zuker, M., & Turner, D. H. (1999). Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure. Journal of Molecular Biology, 288(5), 911-940. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.2700Zuker, M. (2003). Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Research, 31(13), 3406-3415. doi:10.1093/nar/gkg59

Understanding the biomolecular interactions involved in dimerisation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A

Translation initiation factor 5A (IF5A) is an essential, highly conserved protein found within all eukaryotic (eIF5A) and archaeal (aIF5A) cells. The IF5A protein is unique in that it contains the amino acid hypusine; a two-step post translational modification of a single, conserved lysine residue. Although hypusination of eIF5A is vital for eukaryotic cell viability, the primary role of the protein and its hypusine side chain remain a mystery. eIF5A, initially identified as a translation initiation factor, is not required for global protein synthesis leading to the prevailing proposal that eIF5A is purely involved in the translation of a select subset of mRNAs. Recently a number of mutational studies have focused on the conserved, hypusine-containing loop region of eIF5A where specific residues have been found to be essential for activity without affecting hypusination. It has been postulated that eIF5A exists as a dimer (40 kDa) under native conditions and that these residues may be at the interface of dimerisation. The aim of this research was therefore to conduct a mutational analysis of the loop region in support of this hypothesis. A functional analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae eIF5A mutant proteins K48D, G50A, H52A and K56A revealed that these substitutions impaired growth to varying degrees in vivo with G50A and K48D mutant proteins displaying the most convincing defects. Gel filtration profiles gave unexpected results determining eIF5A mutant and wild type proteins to have a native molecular weight of 30 to 31 kDa, suggesting that the eIF5A oligomeric state may be transitory and subject to certain conditions. The inconclusive results obtained from using gel filtration studies led to an investigation into the feasibility of producing native, hypusinated peptides for future structural studies using nuclear magnetic resonance. Hypusinated and unhypusinated eIF5A were successfully separated into their domains making this a possibility. Finally, this study proposes a role for eIF5A in eukaryotic IRES-driven translation initiation