Equivalence-Checking on Infinite-State Systems: Techniques and Results

The paper presents a selection of recently developed and/or used techniques for equivalence-checking on infinite-state systems, and an up-to-date overview of existing results (as of September 2004)

History-Preserving Bisimilarity for Higher-Dimensional Automata via Open Maps

We show that history-preserving bisimilarity for higher-dimensional automata has a simple characterization directly in terms of higher-dimensional transitions. This implies that it is decidable for finite higher-dimensional automata. To arrive at our characterization, we apply the open-maps framework of Joyal, Nielsen and Winskel in the category of unfoldings of precubical sets.Comment: Minor updates in accordance with reviewer comments. Submitted to MFPS 201

Decidability and coincidence of equivalences for concurrency

There are two fundamental problems concerning equivalence relations in con-currency. One is: for which system classes is a given equivalence decidable? The second is: when do two equivalences coincide? Two well-known equivalences are history preserving bisimilarity (hpb) and hereditary history preserving bisimi-larity (hhpb). These are both ‘independence ’ equivalences: they reflect causal dependencies between events. Hhpb is obtained from hpb by adding a ‘back-tracking ’ requirement. This seemingly small change makes hhpb computationally far harder: hpb is well-known to be decidable for finite-state systems, whereas the decidability of hhpb has been a renowned open problem for several years; only recently it has been shown undecidable. The main aim of this thesis is to gain insights into the decidability problem for hhpb, and to analyse when it coincides with hpb; less technically, we might say, to analyse the power of the interplay between concurrency, causality, and conflict. We first examine the backtracking condition, and see that it has two dimen

On the Decidability of Non Interference over Unbounded Petri Nets

Non-interference, in transitive or intransitive form, is defined here over unbounded (Place/Transition) Petri nets. The definitions are adaptations of similar, well-accepted definitions introduced earlier in the framework of labelled transition systems. The interpretation of intransitive non-interference which we propose for Petri nets is as follows. A Petri net represents the composition of a controlled and a controller systems, possibly sharing places and transitions. Low transitions represent local actions of the controlled system, high transitions represent local decisions of the controller, and downgrading transitions represent synchronized actions of both components. Intransitive non-interference means the impossibility for the controlled system to follow any local strategy that would force or dodge synchronized actions depending upon the decisions taken by the controller after the last synchronized action. The fact that both language equivalence and bisimulation equivalence are undecidable for unbounded labelled Petri nets might be seen as an indication that non-interference properties based on these equivalences cannot be decided. We prove the opposite, providing results of decidability of non-interference over a representative class of infinite state systems.Comment: In Proceedings SecCo 2010, arXiv:1102.516

A Polynomial Translation of pi-calculus FCPs to Safe Petri Nets

We develop a polynomial translation from finite control pi-calculus processes to safe low-level Petri nets. To our knowledge, this is the first such translation. It is natural in that there is a close correspondence between the control flows, enjoys a bisimulation result, and is suitable for practical model checking.Comment: To appear in special issue on best papers of CONCUR'12 of Logical Methods in Computer Scienc

Towards weak bisimilarity on a class of parallel processes.

A directed labelled graph may be used, at a certain abstraction, to represent a system's behaviour. Its nodes, the possible states the system can be in; its arrows labelled by the actions required to move from one state to another. Processes are, for our purposes, synonymous with these labelled transition systems. With this view a well-studied notion of behavioural equivalence is bisimilarity, where processes are bisimilar when whatever one can do, the other can match, while maintaining bisimilarity. Weak bisimilarity accommodates a notion of silent or internal action. A natural class of labelled transition systems is given by considering the derivations of commutative context-free grammars in Greibach Normal Form: the Basic Parallel Processes (BPP), introduced by Christensen in his PhD thesis. They represent a simple model of communication-free parallel computation, and for them bisimilarity is PSPACE-complete. Weak bisimilarity is believed to be decidable, but only partial results exist. Non-bisimilarity is trivially semidecidable on BPP (each process has finitely many next states, so the state space can be explored until a mis-match is found); the research effort in proving it fully decidable centred on semideciding the positive case. Conversely, weak bisimilarity has been known to be semidecidable for a decade, but no method for semideciding inequivalence has yet been found - the presence of silent actions allows a process to have infinitely many possible successor states, so simple exploration is no longer possible. Weak bisimilarity is defined coinductively, but may be approached, and even reached, by its inductively defined approximants. Game theoretically, these change the Defender's winning condition from survival for infinitely many turns to survival for K turns, for an ordinal k, creating a hierarchy of relations successively closer to full weak bisimilarity. It can be seen that on any set of processes this approximant hierarchy collapses: there will always exist some K such that the kth approximant coincides with weak bisimilarity. One avenue towards the semidecidability of non- weak bisimilarity is the decidability of its approximants. It is a long-standing conjecture that on BPP the weak approximant hierarchy collapses at o x 2. If true, in order to semidecide inequivalence it would suffice to be able to decide the o + n approximants. Again, there exist only limited results: the finite approximants are known to be decidable, but no progress has been made on the wth approximant, and thus far the best proven lower-bound of collapse is w1CK (the least non-recursive ordinal number). We significantly improve this bound to okx2(for a k-variable BPP); a key part of the proof being a novel constructive version of Dickson's Lemma. The distances-to-disablings or DD functions were invented by Jancar in order to prove the PSPACE-completeness of bisimilarity on BPP. At the end of his paper is a conjecture that weak bisimilarity might be amenable to the theory; a suggestion we have taken up. We generalise and extend the DD functions, widening the subset of BPP on which weak bisimilarity is known to be computable, and creating a new means for testing inequivalence. The thesis ends with two conjectures. The first, that our extended DD functions in fact capture weak bisimilarity on full BPP (a corollary of which would be to take the lower bound of approximant collapse to and second, that they are computable, which would enable us to semidecide inequivalence, and hence give us the decidability of weak bisimilarity

Modal logics on rational Kripke structures

This dissertation is a contribution to the study of infinite graphs which can be presented in a finitary way. In particular, the class of rational graphs is studied. The vertices of a rational graph are labeled by a regular language in some finite alphabet and the set of edges of a rational graph is a rational relation on that language. While the first-order logics of these graphs are generally not decidable, the basic modal and tense logics are. A survey on the class of rational graphs is done, whereafter rational Kripke models are studied. These models have rational graphs as underlying frames and are equipped with rational valuations. A rational valuation assigns a regular language to each propositional variable. I investigate modal languages with decidable model checking on rational Kripke models. This leads me to consider regularity preserving relations to see if the class can be generalised even further. Then the concept of a graph being rationally presentable is examined - this is analogous to a graph being automatically presentable. Furthermore, some model theoretic properties of rational Kripke models are examined. In particular, bisimulation equivalences between rational Kripke models are studied. I study three subclasses of rational Kripke models. I give a summary of the results that have been obtained for these classes, look at examples (and non-examples in the case of automatic Kripke frames) and of particular interest is finding extensions of the basic tense logic with decidable model checking on these subclasses. An extension of rational Kripke models is considered next: omega-rational Kripke models. Some of their properties are examined, and again I am particularly interested in finding modal languages with decidable model checking on these classes. Finally I discuss some applications, for example bounded model checking on rational Kripke models, and mention possible directions for further research

Language Inclusion for Boundedly-Ambiguous Vector Addition Systems Is Decidable

We consider the problems of language inclusion and language equivalence for Vector Addition Systems with States (VASSes) with the acceptance condition defined by the set of accepting states (and more generally by some upward-closed conditions). In general the problem of language equivalence is undecidable even for one-dimensional VASSes, thus to get decidability we investigate restricted subclasses. On one hand we show that the problem of language inclusion of a VASS in k-ambiguous VASS (for any natural k) is decidable and even in Ackermann. On the other hand we prove that the language equivalence problem is Ackermann-hard already for deterministic VASSes. These two results imply Ackermann-completeness for language inclusion and equivalence in several possible restrictions. Some of our techniques can be also applied in much broader generality in infinite-state systems, namely for some subclass of well-structured transition systems

Equivalence of infinite-state systems with silent steps

This dissertation contributes to analysis methods for infinite-state systems. The dissertation focuses on equivalence testing for two relevant classes of infinite-state systems: commutative context-free processes, and one-counter automata. As for equivalence notions, we investigate the classical bisimulation and simulation equivalences. The important point is that we allow for silent steps in the model, abstracting away from internal, unobservable actions. Very few decidability results have been known so far for bisimulation or simulation equivalence for infinite-state systems with silent steps, as presence of silent steps makes the equivalence problem arguably harder to solve. A standard technique for bisimulation or simulation equivalence testing is to use the hierarchy of approximants. For an effective decision procedure the hierarchy must stabilize (converge) at level omega, the first limit ordinal, which is not the case for the models investigated in this thesis. However, according to a long-standing conjecture, the community believed that the convergence actually takes place at level omega+ omega in the class of commutative context free processes. We disprove the conjecture and provide a lower bound of omega * omega for the convergence level. We also show that all previously known positive decidability results for BPPs can be re-proven uniformly using the improved approximants techniques. Moreover dissertation contains an unsuccesfull attack on one of the main open problems in the area: decidability of weak bisimulation equivalence for commutative context-free processes. Our technical development of this section is not sufficient to solve the problem, but we believe it is a serious step towards a solution. Furtermore, we are able to show decidability of branching (stuttering) bisimulation equivalence, a slightly more discriminating variant of bisimulation equivalence. It is worth emphesizing that, until today, our result is the only known decidability result for bisimulation equivalence in a class of inifinite-state systems with silent steps that is not known to admit convergence of (some variant of) standard approximants at level omega. Finally we consider weak simulation equivalence over one-counter automata without zero tests (allowing zero tests implies undecidability). While weak bisimulation equivalence is known to be undecidable in this class, we prove a surprising result that weak simulation equivalence is actually decidable. Thus we provide a first example going against a trend, widely-believed by the community, that simulation equivalence tends to be computationally harder than bisimulation equivalence. In short words, the dissertation contains three new results, each of them solving a non-trivial open problem about equivalence testing of infinite-state systems with silent steps