2,944 research outputs found

    Towards adaptive multi-robot systems: self-organization and self-adaptation

    Get PDF
    Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG gefรถrderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugรคnglich.This publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation) respectively.The development of complex systems ensembles that operate in uncertain environments is a major challenge. The reason for this is that system designers are not able to fully specify the system during specification and development and before it is being deployed. Natural swarm systems enjoy similar characteristics, yet, being self-adaptive and being able to self-organize, these systems show beneficial emergent behaviour. Similar concepts can be extremely helpful for artificial systems, especially when it comes to multi-robot scenarios, which require such solution in order to be applicable to highly uncertain real world application. In this article, we present a comprehensive overview over state-of-the-art solutions in emergent systems, self-organization, self-adaptation, and robotics. We discuss these approaches in the light of a framework for multi-robot systems and identify similarities, differences missing links and open gaps that have to be addressed in order to make this framework possible

    Applications of Biological Cell Models in Robotics

    Full text link
    In this paper I present some of the most representative biological models applied to robotics. In particular, this work represents a survey of some models inspired, or making use of concepts, by gene regulatory networks (GRNs): these networks describe the complex interactions that affect gene expression and, consequently, cell behaviour

    Engineering evolutionary control for real-world robotic systems

    Get PDF
    Evolutionary Robotics (ER) is the field of study concerned with the application of evolutionary computation to the design of robotic systems. Two main issues have prevented ER from being applied to real-world tasks, namely scaling to complex tasks and the transfer of control to real-robot systems. Finding solutions to complex tasks is challenging for evolutionary approaches due to the bootstrap problem and deception. When the task goal is too difficult, the evolutionary process will drift in regions of the search space with equally low levels of performance and therefore fail to bootstrap. Furthermore, the search space tends to get rugged (deceptive) as task complexity increases, which can lead to premature convergence. Another prominent issue in ER is the reality gap. Behavioral control is typically evolved in simulation and then only transferred to the real robotic hardware when a good solution has been found. Since simulation is an abstraction of the real world, the accuracy of the robot model and its interactions with the environment is limited. As a result, control evolved in a simulator tends to display a lower performance in reality than in simulation. In this thesis, we present a hierarchical control synthesis approach that enables the use of ER techniques for complex tasks in real robotic hardware by mitigating the bootstrap problem, deception, and the reality gap. We recursively decompose a task into sub-tasks, and synthesize control for each sub-task. The individual behaviors are then composed hierarchically. The possibility of incrementally transferring control as the controller is composed allows transferability issues to be addressed locally in the controller hierarchy. Our approach features hybridity, allowing different control synthesis techniques to be combined. We demonstrate our approach in a series of tasks that go beyond the complexity of tasks where ER has been successfully applied. We further show that hierarchical control can be applied in single-robot systems and in multirobot systems. Given our long-term goal of enabling the application of ER techniques to real-world tasks, we systematically validate our approach in real robotic hardware. For one of the demonstrations in this thesis, we have designed and built a swarm robotic platform, and we show the first successful transfer of evolved and hierarchical control to a swarm of robots outside of controlled laboratory conditions.A Robรณtica Evolutiva (RE) รฉ a รกrea de investigaรงรฃo que estuda a aplicaรงรฃo de computaรงรฃo evolutiva na conceรงรฃo de sistemas robรณticos. Dois principais desafios tรชm impedido a aplicaรงรฃo da RE em tarefas do mundo real: a dificuldade em solucionar tarefas complexas e a transferรชncia de controladores evoluรญdos para sistemas robรณticos reais. Encontrar soluรงรตes para tarefas complexas รฉ desafiante para as tรฉcnicas evolutivas devido ao bootstrap problem e ร  deception. Quando o objetivo รฉ demasiado difรญcil, o processo evolutivo tende a permanecer em regiรตes do espaรงo de procura com nรญveis de desempenho igualmente baixos, e consequentemente nรฃo consegue inicializar. Por outro lado, o espaรงo de procura tende a enrugar ร  medida que a complexidade da tarefa aumenta, o que pode resultar numa convergรชncia prematura. Outro desafio na RE รฉ a reality gap. O controlo robรณtico รฉ tipicamente evoluรญdo em simulaรงรฃo, e sรณ รฉ transferido para o sistema robรณtico real quando uma boa soluรงรฃo tiver sido encontrada. Como a simulaรงรฃo รฉ uma abstraรงรฃo da realidade, a precisรฃo do modelo do robรด e das suas interaรงรตes com o ambiente รฉ limitada, podendo resultar em controladores com um menor desempenho no mundo real. Nesta tese, apresentamos uma abordagem de sรญntese de controlo hierรกrquica que permite o uso de tรฉcnicas de RE em tarefas complexas com hardware robรณtico real, mitigando o bootstrap problem, a deception e a reality gap. Decompomos recursivamente uma tarefa em sub-tarefas, e sintetizamos controlo para cada subtarefa. Os comportamentos individuais sรฃo entรฃo compostos hierarquicamente. A possibilidade de transferir o controlo incrementalmente ร  medida que o controlador รฉ composto permite que problemas de transferibilidade possam ser endereรงados localmente na hierarquia do controlador. A nossa abordagem permite o uso de diferentes tรฉcnicas de sรญntese de controlo, resultando em controladores hรญbridos. Demonstramos a nossa abordagem em vรกrias tarefas que vรฃo para alรฉm da complexidade das tarefas onde a RE foi aplicada. Tambรฉm mostramos que o controlo hierรกrquico pode ser aplicado em sistemas de um robรด ou sistemas multirobรด. Dado o nosso objetivo de longo prazo de permitir o uso de tรฉcnicas de RE em tarefas no mundo real, concebemos e desenvolvemos uma plataforma de robรณtica de enxame, e mostramos a primeira transferรชncia de controlo evoluรญdo e hierรกrquico para um exame de robรดs fora de condiรงรตes controladas de laboratรณrio.This work has been supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (Fundaรงรฃo para a Ciรชncia e Tecnologia) under the grants SFRH/BD/76438/2011, EXPL/EEI-AUT/0329/2013, and by Instituto de Telecomunicaรงรตes under the grant UID/EEA/50008/2013

    Applying autonomy to distributed satellite systems: Trends, challenges, and future prospects

    Get PDF
    While monolithic satellite missions still pose significant advantages in terms of accuracy and operations, novel distributed architectures are promising improved flexibility, responsiveness, and adaptability to structural and functional changes. Large satellite swarms, opportunistic satellite networks or heterogeneous constellations hybridizing small-spacecraft nodes with highperformance satellites are becoming feasible and advantageous alternatives requiring the adoption of new operation paradigms that enhance their autonomy. While autonomy is a notion that is gaining acceptance in monolithic satellite missions, it can also be deemed an integral characteristic in Distributed Satellite Systems (DSS). In this context, this paper focuses on the motivations for system-level autonomy in DSS and justifies its need as an enabler of system qualities. Autonomy is also presented as a necessary feature to bring new distributed Earth observation functions (which require coordination and collaboration mechanisms) and to allow for novel structural functions (e.g., opportunistic coalitions, exchange of resources, or in-orbit data services). Mission Planning and Scheduling (MPS) frameworks are then presented as a key component to implement autonomous operations in satellite missions. An exhaustive knowledge classification explores the design aspects of MPS for DSS, and conceptually groups them into: components and organizational paradigms; problem modeling and representation; optimization techniques and metaheuristics; execution and runtime characteristics and the notions of tasks, resources, and constraints. This paper concludes by proposing future strands of work devoted to study the trade-offs of autonomy in large-scale, highly dynamic and heterogeneous networks through frameworks that consider some of the limitations of small spacecraft technologies.Postprint (author's final draft

    A new model for solution of complex distributed constrained problems

    Full text link
    In this paper we describe an original computational model for solving different types of Distributed Constraint Satisfaction Problems (DCSP). The proposed model is called Controller-Agents for Constraints Solving (CACS). This model is intended to be used which is an emerged field from the integration between two paradigms of different nature: Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) and the Constraint Satisfaction Problem paradigm (CSP) where all constraints are treated in central manner as a black-box. This model allows grouping constraints to form a subset that will be treated together as a local problem inside the controller. Using this model allows also handling non-binary constraints easily and directly so that no translating of constraints into binary ones is needed. This paper presents the implementation outlines of a prototype of DCSP solver, its usage methodology and overview of the CACS application for timetabling problems

    ํ˜‘์—… ๋กœ๋ด‡์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์„œ๋น„์Šค ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜๊ณผ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก 

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ „๊ธฐยท์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€,2020. 2. ํ•˜์ˆœํšŒ.๊ฐ€๊นŒ์šด ๋ฏธ๋ž˜์—๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋กœ๋ด‡์ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ์ž„๋ฌด๋ฅผ ํ˜‘๋ ฅํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ชจ์Šต์€ ํ”ํžˆ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ชจ์Šต์ด ์‹คํ˜„๋˜๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€์˜ ์–ด๋ ค์›€์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ € ๋กœ๋ด‡์„ ์šด์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ๋ช…์„ธํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์€ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด์™€ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง€์‹์„ ์•Œ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ž˜์„œ ๋กœ๋ด‡์ด๋‚˜ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง€์‹์ด ์—†๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋“ค์ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋Œ€์˜ ๋กœ๋ด‡์ด ํ˜‘๋ ฅํ•˜๋Š” ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ์ž‘์„ฑํ•˜๊ธฐ๋Š” ์‰ฝ์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•  ๋•Œ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ๊นŠ์–ด์„œ, ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๋„ ๊ฐ„๋‹จํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ƒ์œ„ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ๋ฏธ์…˜ ๋ช…์„ธ์™€ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ํ–‰์œ„ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋ž˜๋ฐ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ„์–ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋ณธ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋Š” ํฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์ž‘์€ ๋กœ๋ด‡๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์ด ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•œ ๋กœ๋ด‡๋“ค์ด ์„œ๋กœ ๊ตฐ์ง‘์„ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด ๋ฏธ์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ์ง€์›ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด๋‚˜ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง€์‹์ด ๋ถ€์กฑํ•œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋„ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ๋™์ž‘์„ ์ƒ์œ„ ์ˆ˜์ค€์—์„œ ๋ช…์„ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฝํŠธ ์–ธ์–ด๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” ์–ธ์–ด๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฝํŠธ ์–ธ์–ด์—์„œ๋Š” ์ง€์›ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๋„ค ๊ฐ€์ง€์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์ธ ํŒ€์˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ, ๊ฐ ํŒ€์˜ ์„œ๋น„์Šค ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋ž˜๋ฐ, ๋™์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ชจ๋“œ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ, ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์ž‘์—…(๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ ํƒœ์Šคํ‚น)์„ ์ง€์›ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์šฐ์„  ๋กœ๋ด‡์€ ํŒ€์œผ๋กœ ๊ทธ๋ฃน ์ง€์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ณ , ๋กœ๋ด‡์ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ์„œ๋น„์Šค ๋‹จ์œ„๋กœ ์ถ”์ƒํ™”ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ณตํ•ฉ ์„œ๋น„์Šค๋ฅผ ๋ช…์„ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ ํƒœ์Šคํ‚น์„ ์œ„ํ•ด 'ํ”Œ๋žœ' ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋…์„ ๋„์ž…ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๋ณตํ•ฉ ์„œ๋น„์Šค ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์ด๋ฒคํŠธ๋ฅผ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์‹œ์ผœ์„œ ๋™์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ชจ๋“œ๊ฐ€ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‚˜์•„๊ฐ€ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ํ˜‘๋ ฅ์ด ๋”์šฑ ๊ฒฌ๊ณ ํ•˜๊ณ , ์œ ์—ฐํ•˜๊ณ , ํ™•์žฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋†’์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๊ตฐ์ง‘ ๋กœ๋ด‡์„ ์šด์šฉํ•  ๋•Œ ๋กœ๋ด‡์ด ์ž„๋ฌด๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋„์ค‘์— ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ์ƒ๊ธธ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ƒํ™ฉ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋กœ๋ด‡์„ ๋™์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํ–‰์œ„๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋™์ ์œผ๋กœ๋„ ํŒ€์„ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ณ , ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋Œ€์˜ ๋กœ๋ด‡์ด ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ์„œ๋น„์Šค๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ฃน ์„œ๋น„์Šค๋ฅผ ์ง€์›ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ผ๋Œ€ ๋‹ค ํ†ต์‹ ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฝํŠธ ์–ธ์–ด์— ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ํ™•์žฅ๋œ ์ƒ์œ„ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฝํŠธ ์–ธ์–ด๋Š” ๋น„์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€๋„ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ํ˜‘๋ ฅ ์ž„๋ฌด๋ฅผ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๋ช…์„ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ํ–‰์œ„๋ฅผ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋ž˜๋ฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๊ฐ€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์žฌ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ฑ๊ณผ ํ™•์žฅ์„ฑ์„ ์ค‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‘” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์ด ์ตœ๊ทผ ๋งŽ์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์ด๋“ค ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ฆฌ๋ˆ…์Šค ์šด์˜์ฒด์ œ์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด ๋งŽ์€ ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด ์ž์›์„ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ์šด์˜์ฒด์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋“ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, ์ž์› ์ œ์•ฝ์ด ์‹ฌํ•œ ํฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์ž‘์€ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ž˜์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ž„๋ฒ ๋””๋“œ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•  ๋•Œ ์“ฐ์ด๋Š” ์ •ํ˜•์ ์ธ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์ •์  ๋ถ„์„๊ณผ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์˜ˆ์ธก์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ํ–‰์œ„๋ฅผ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•˜๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ์ œ์•ฝ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ž˜์„œ ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ์™ธ๋ถ€์˜ ์ด๋ฒคํŠธ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ์ค‘๊ฐ„์— ํ–‰์œ„๋ฅผ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝํ•˜๋Š” ๋กœ๋ด‡์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์œ ํ•œ ์ƒํƒœ ๋จธ์‹  ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํ”Œ๋กœ์šฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋™์  ํ–‰์œ„๋ฅผ ๋ช…์„ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ™•์žฅ๋œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ ์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋Ÿ‰์„ ๋งŽ์ด ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ์‘์šฉ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋ฃจํ”„ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๋ช…์‹œ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ํ˜‘์—… ์šด์šฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋กœ๋ด‡ ์‚ฌ์ด์— ๊ณต์œ ๋˜๋Š” ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ € ์ค‘์•™์—์„œ ๊ณต์œ  ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ผ์ด๋ธŒ๋Ÿฌ๋ฆฌ ํƒœ์Šคํฌ๋ผ๋Š” ํŠน๋ณ„ํ•œ ํƒœ์Šคํฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ณต์œ  ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ธ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋กœ๋ด‡์ด ์ž์‹ ์˜ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์šด ๋กœ๋ด‡๋“ค๊ณผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ์บ์ŠคํŒ…์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ํฌํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ ‡๊ฒŒ ํ™•์žฅ๋œ ์ •ํ˜•์ ์ธ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์‹ค์ œ ๋กœ๋ด‡ ์ฝ”๋“œ๋กœ ์ž๋™ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋˜์–ด, ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ์„ค๊ณ„ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์— ์ด์ ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„๋‹ค. ๋น„์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ๋ช…์„ธํ•œ ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฝํŠธ ์–ธ์–ด๋Š” ์ •ํ˜•์ ์ธ ํƒœ์Šคํฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ค‘๊ฐ„ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์ธ ์ „๋žต ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์˜ ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜๊ณผ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋Œ€์˜ ์‹ค์ œ ๋กœ๋ด‡์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ํ˜‘์—…ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.In the near future, it will be common that a variety of robots are cooperating to perform a mission in various fields. There are two software challenges when deploying collaborative robots: how to specify a cooperative mission and how to program each robot to accomplish its mission. In this paper, we propose a novel software development framework that separates mission specification and robot behavior programming, which is called service-oriented and model-based (SeMo) framework. Also, it can support distributed robot systems, swarm robots, and their hybrid. For mission specification, a novel scripting language is proposed with the expression capability. It involves team composition and service-oriented behavior specification of each team, allowing dynamic mode change of operation and multi-tasking. Robots are grouped into teams, and the behavior of each team is defined with a composite service. The internal behavior of a composite service is defined by a sequence of services that the robots will perform. The notion of plan is applied to express multi-tasking. And the robot may have various operating modes, so mode change is triggered by events generated in a composite service. Moreover, to improve the robustness, scalability, and flexibility of robot collaboration, the high-level mission scripting language is extended with new features such as team hierarchy, group service, one-to-many communication. We assume that any robot fails during the execution of scenarios, and the grouping of robots can be made at run-time dynamically. Therefore, the extended mission specification enables a casual user to specify various types of cooperative missions easily. For robot behavior programming, an extended dataflow model is used for task-level behavior specification that does not depend on the robot hardware platform. To specify the dynamic behavior of the robot, we apply an extended task model that supports a hybrid specification of dataflow and finite state machine models. Furthermore, we propose a novel extension to allow the explicit specification of loop structures. This extension helps the compute-intensive application, which contains a lot of loop structures, to specify explicitly and analyze at compile time. Two types of information sharing, global information sharing and local knowledge sharing, are supported for robot collaboration in the dataflow graph. For global information, we use the library task, which supports shared resource management and server-client interaction. On the other hand, to share information locally with near robots, we add another type of port for multicasting and use the knowledge sharing technique. The actual robot code per robot is automatically generated from the associated task graph, which minimizes the human efforts in low-level robot programming and improves the software design productivity significantly. By abstracting the tasks or algorithms as services and adding the strategy description layer in the design flow, the mission specification is refined into task-graph specification automatically. The viability of the proposed methodology is verified with preliminary experiments with three cooperative mission scenarios with heterogeneous robot platforms and robot simulator.Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation 1 1.2 Contribution 7 1.3 Dissertation Organization 9 Chapter 2. Background and Existing Research 11 2.1 Terminologies 11 2.2 Robot Software Development Frameworks 25 2.3 Parallel Embedded Software Development Framework 31 Chapter 3. Overview of the SeMo Framework 41 3.1 Motivational Examples 45 Chapter 4. Robot Behavior Programming 47 4.1 Related works 48 4.2 Model-based Task Graph Specification for Individual Robots 56 4.3 Model-based Task Graph Specification for Cooperating Robots 70 4.4 Automatic Code Generation 74 4.5 Experiments 78 Chapter 5. High-level Mission Specification 81 5.1 Service-oriented Mission Specification 82 5.2 Strategy Description 93 5.3 Automatic Task Graph Generation 96 5.4 Related works 99 5.5 Experiments 104 Chapter 6. Conclusion 114 6.1 Future Research 116 Bibliography 118 Appendices 133 ์š”์•ฝ 158Docto

    Multi-Robot Task Allocation Based on Swarm Intelligence

    Get PDF

    BEHAVIORAL COMPOSITION FOR HETEROGENEOUS SWARMS

    Get PDF
    Research into swarm robotics has produced a robust library of swarm behaviors that excel at defined tasks such as flocking and area search, many of which have potential for application to a wide range of military problems. However, to be successfully applied to an operational environment, swarms must be flexible enough to achieve a wide array of specific objectives and usable enough to be configured and employed by lay operators. This research explored the use of the Mission-based Architecture for Swarm Composability (MASC) to develop mission-specific tactics as compositions of more general, reusable plays for use with the Advanced Robotic Systems Engineering Laboratory (ARSENL) swarm system. Three tactics were developed to conduct autonomous search of a geographic area and investigation of generated contacts of interest. The tactics were tested in live-flight and virtual environment experiments and compared to a preexisting monolithic behavior implementation completing the same task. Measures of performance were defined and observed that verified the effectiveness of solutions and confirmed the advantages that composition provides with respect to reusability and rapid development of increasingly complex behaviors.Lieutenant Commander, United States NavyApproved for public release. Distribution is unlimited
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore