3,540 research outputs found

    Multi-objective optimisation for battery electric vehicle powertrain topologies

    Get PDF
    Electric vehicles are becoming more popular in the market. To be competitive, manufacturers need to produce vehicles with a low energy consumption, a good range and an acceptable driving performance. These are dependent on the choice of components and the topology in which they are used. In a conventional gasoline vehicle, the powertrain topology is constrained to a few well-understood layouts; these typically consist of a single engine driving one axle or both axles through a multi-ratio gearbox. With electric vehicles, there is more flexibility, and the design space is relatively unexplored. In this paper, we evaluate several different topologies as follows: a traditional topology using a single electric motor driving a single axle with a fixed gear ratio; a topology using separate motors for the front axle and the rear axle, each with its own fixed gear ratio; a topology using in-wheel motors on a single axle; a four-wheel-drive topology using in-wheel motors on both axes. Multi-objective optimisation techniques are used to find the optimal component sizing for a given requirement set and to investigate the trade-offs between the energy consumption, the powertrain cost and the acceleration performance. The paper concludes with a discussion of the relative merits of the different topologies and their applicability to real-world passenger cars

    ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ํ•ธ๋“ค๋ง์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ธํœ ๋ชจํ„ฐ ํ† ํฌ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ง ์ œ์–ด

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2021.8. ์ด๊ฒฝ์ˆ˜.์ง€๋‚œ 10๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์ž์„ธ ์ œ์–ด์‹œ์Šคํ…œ(ESC)์€ ์น˜๋ช…์ ์ธ ์ถฉ๋Œ์„ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋งŽ์€ ์ƒ์šฉ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์—์„œ ๋น„์•ฝ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐœ์ „๋˜๊ณ  ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์ž์„ธ ์ œ์–ด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ์•…์ฒœํ›„๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ฏธ๋„๋Ÿฌ์šด ๋„๋กœ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์œ„ํ—˜ํ•œ ๋„๋กœ์—์„œ ๋ถˆ์•ˆ์ •ํ•œ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์ฃผํ–‰ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์‚ฌ๊ณ ๋ฅผ ํ”ผํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ํฐ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ์ตœ๊ทผ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๊ณ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ๋˜๋Š” ์Šคํฌ์ธ ์นด ๋“ฑ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ œ๋™์ œ์–ด์˜ ๋นˆ๋ฒˆํ•œ ๊ฐœ์ž…์€ ์šด์ „์˜ ์ฆ๊ฑฐ์›€์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ถˆ๋งŒ๋„ ์กด์žฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ „๋™ํ™”์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜, ์ž๋Ÿ‰ ์ž์„ธ ์ œ์–ด์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ์ž‘๋™ ์˜์—ญ์ธ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ์ฃผํ–‰ ํ•ธ๋“ค๋ง ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ฐ ํœ ์˜ ๋…๋ฆฝ์ ์ธ ๊ตฌ๋™์„ ์ ์šฉ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ธ ์ธํœ  ๋ชจํ„ฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ข…, ํšก๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ œ์–ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๋Š” ํ† ํฌ ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ง ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ์ˆ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ™œ๋ฐœํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์„ ํšŒ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ํ•ธ๋“ค๋ง ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ฃผํ–‰ ๋‹ค์ด๋‚˜๋ฏน ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ† ํฌ ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ง ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ €, ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋น„์„ ํ˜• ์ฃผํ–‰ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์ธ ํ•œ๊ณ„ ํ•ธ๋“ค๋ง ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž๋™ ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ ์ œ์–ด ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ† ํฌ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ง์ œ์–ด์— ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋‹ค์ด๋‚˜๋ฏนํ•œ ์ฃผํ–‰๋ชจ๋“œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ†ต์ฐฐ๋ ฅ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฏธ๋„๋Ÿฌ์šด ๋„๋กœ์—์„œ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๋†’์€ ์Šฌ๋ฆฝ ๊ฐ๋„์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณต ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ธํœ  ๋ชจํ„ฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ „๋ฅœ์— 2๊ฐœ ๋ชจํ„ฐ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ๊ณ ์œ ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์ธ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์–ธ๋”์Šคํ‹ฐ์–ด ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ๋ฅผ ์ง์ ‘์  ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ํ•ธ๋“ค๋ง ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ์˜ ์ฑ„ํ„ฐ๋ง ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ค„์ด๊ณ  ๋น ๋ฅธ ์‘๋‹ต์„ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ณผ๋„ ๋งค๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์‹ํ™”ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ •์ƒ ์ƒํƒœ ๋ฐ ๊ณผ๋„ ํŠน์„ฑ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ISO ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ์š” ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ์™€ ํšก ์Šฌ๋ฆฝ ๊ฐ๋„ ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ MASMC (Multiple Adaptive Sliding Mode Control) ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” 4๋ฅœ ๋ชจํ„ฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ๋™์  ํ† ํฌ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ง ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋†’์€ ๋น„์„ ํ˜• ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ „ํ›„๋ฅœ ํƒ€์ด์–ด์˜ ์ฝ”๋„ˆ๋ง ๊ฐ•์„ฑ์€ ์ ์‘์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ์•ˆ์ „๋ชจ๋“œ์™€ ๋‹ค์ด๋‚˜๋ฏน ๋ชจ๋“œ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ, ์šด์ „์ž๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ๊ธˆ ์›ํ•˜๋Š” ์ฃผํ–‰์˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๋งž๊ฒŒ ์„ ํƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด MASMC ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์ „๋™ํ™” ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์— ์ฃผํ–‰์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๊ณผ ๋‹ค์ด๋‚˜๋ฏนํ•œ ์ฃผํ–‰์˜ ์ฆ๊ฑฐ์›€์„ ์ฃผ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋กœ์จ, ์ „์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.In the last ten decades, vehicle stability control systems have been dramatically developed and adapted in many commercial vehicles to avoid fatal crashes. Significantly, ESC (Electric Stability Control) system can help escape the accident from unstable driving conditions with dangerous roads such as slippery roads due to inclement weather conditions. However, for the high performed vehicle, frequent intervention from ESC reduces the pleasure of fun-to-drive. Recently, the development of traction control technologies has been taking place with that of the electrification of vehicles. The IWMs (In-Wheel Motor system), which is one of the systems that can apply independent drive of each wheel, for the limit handling characteristics, which are the operation areas of the ESC, is introduced for the control that enables the lateral characteristics of the vehicle dynamics. Firstly, the automated drift control algorithm can be proposed for the nonlinear limit handling condition of vehicles. This approach can give an insight of fun-to-drive mode to TV (Torque Vector) control scheme, but also the stability control of high sideslip angle of the vehicle on slippery roads. Secondly, using IWMs system with front two motors, understeer gradient of vehicle, which is the unique characteristics of vehicle can be used for the proposed control strategy. A new transient parameter is formulated to be acquired rapid response of controller and reducing chattering effects. Simulation and vehicle tests are conducted for validation of TV control algorithm with steady-state and transient ISO-based tests. Finally, dynamic torque vectoring control with a four-wheel motor system with Multiple Adaptive Sliding Mode Control (MASMC) approach, which is composed of a yaw rate controller and sideslip angle controller, is introduced. Highly nonlinear characteristics, cornering stiffnesses of front and rear tires are estimated by adaptation law with measuring data. Consequently, there are two types of driving modes, the safety mode and the dynamic mode. MASMC algorithm can be found and validated by simulation in torque vectoring technology to improve the handling performance of fully electric vehicles.Chapter 1 Introduction 7 1.1. Background and Motivation 7 1.2. Literature review 11 1.3. Thesis Objectives 15 1.4. Thesis Outline 15 Chapter 2 Vehicle dynamic control at limit handling 17 2.1. Vehicle Model and Analysis 17 2.1.1. Lateral dynamics of vehicle 17 2.1.2. Longitudinal dynamics of vehicle 20 2.2. Tire Model 24 2.3. Analysis of vehicle drift for fun-to-drive 28 2.4. Designing A Controller for Automated Drift 34 2.4.1. Lateral controller 35 2.4.2. Longitudinal Controller 37 2.4.3. Stability Analysis 39 2.4.4. Validation with simulation and test 40 Chapter 3 Torque Vectoring Control with Front Two Motor In-Wheel Vehicles 47 3.1. Dynamic Torque Vectoring Control 48 3.1.1. In-wheel motor system (IWMs) 48 3.1.2. Dynamic system modeling 49 3.1.3. Designing controller 53 3.2. Validation with Simulation and Experiment 59 3.2.1. Simulation 59 3.2.2. Vehicle Experiment 64 Chapter 4 Dynamic handling control for Four-wheel Drive In-Wheel platform 75 4.1. Vehicle System Modeling 76 4.2. Motion Control based on MASMC 78 4.2.1. Yaw motion controller for the inner ASMC 80 4.2.2. Sideslip angle controller for the outer ASMC 84 4.3. Optimal Torque Distribution (OTD) 88 4.3.1. Constraints of dynamics 88 4.3.2. Optimal torque distribution law 90 4.4. Validation with Simulation 91 4.4.1. Simulation setup 91 4.4.2. Simulation results 92 Chapter 5 Conclusion and Future works 104 5.1 Conclusion 104 5.2 Future works 106 Bibliography 108 Abstract in Korean 114๋ฐ•

    Direct yaw-moment control of an in-wheel-motored electric vehicle based on body slip angle fuzzy observer

    Get PDF
    A stabilizing observer-based control algorithm for an in-wheel-motored vehicle is proposed, which generates direct yaw moment to compensate for the state deviations. The control scheme is based on a fuzzy rule-based body slip angle (beta) observer. In the design strategy of the fuzzy observer, the vehicle dynamics is represented by Takagi-Sugeno-like fuzzy models. Initially, local equivalent vehicle models are built using the linear approximations of vehicle dynamics for low and high lateral acceleration operating regimes, respectively. The optimal beta observer is then designed for each local model using Kalman filter theory. Finally, local observers are combined to form the overall control system by using fuzzy rules. These fuzzy rules represent the qualitative relationships among the variables associated with the nonlinear and uncertain nature of vehicle dynamics, such as tire force saturation and the influence of road adherence. An adaptation mechanism for the fuzzy membership functions has been incorporated to improve the accuracy and performance of the system. The effectiveness of this design approach has been demonstrated in simulations and in a real-time experimental settin

    Optimal Direct Yaw Moment Control of a 4WD Electric Vehicle

    Get PDF
    This thesis is concerned with electronic stability of an all-wheel drive electric vehicle with independent motors mounted in each wheel. The additional controllability and speed permitted using independent motors can be exploited to improve the handling and stability of electric vehicles. In this thesis, these improvements arise from employing a direct yaw moment control (DYC) system that seeks to adapt the understeer gradient of the vehicle and achieve neutral steer by employing a supervisory controller and simultaneously tracking an ideal yaw rate and ideal sideslip angle. DYC enhances vehicle stability by generating a corrective yaw moment realized by a torque vectoring controller which generates an optimal torque distribution among the four wheels. The torque allocation at each instant is computed by finding a solution to an optimization problem using gradient descent, a well-known algorithm that seeks the minimum cost employing the gradient of the cost function. A cost function seeking to minimize excessive wheel slip is proposed as the basis of the optimization problem, while the constraints come from the physical limitations of the motors and friction limits between the tires and road. The DYC system requires information about the tire forces in real-time, so this study presents a framework for estimating the tire force in all three coordinate directions. The sideslip angle is also a crucial quantity that must be measured or estimated but is outside the scope of this study. A comparative analysis of three different formulations of sliding mode control used for computation of the corrective yaw moment and an evaluation of how successfully they achieve neutral steer is presented. IPG Automotiveโ€™s CarMaker software, a high-fidelity vehicle simulator, was used as the plant model. A custom electric powertrain model was developed to enable any CarMaker vehicle to be reconfigured for independent control of the motors. This custom powertrain, called TVC_OpenXWD uses the torque/speed map of a Protean Pd18 implemented with lookup tables for each of the four motors. The TVC_OpenXWD powertrain model and controller were designed in MATLAB and Simulink and exported as C code to run them as plug-ins in CarMaker. Simulations of some common maneuvers, including the J-turn, sinusoidal steer, skid pad, and mu-split, indicate that employing DYC can achieve neutral steer. Additionally, it simultaneously tracks the ideal yaw rate and sideslip angle, while maximizing the traction on each tire[CB1] . The control system performance is evaluated based on its ability to achieve neutral steer by means of tracking the reference yaw rate, stabilizing the vehicle by means of reducing the sideslip angle, and to reduce chattering. A comparative analysis of sliding mode control employing a conventional switching function (CSMC), modified switching function (MSMC), and PID control (HSMC) demonstrates that the MSMC outperforms the other two methods in addition to the open loop system

    Autonomous corner modules as an enabler for new vehicle chassis solutions

    Get PDF
    Demands for new functions and refined attributes in vehicle dynamics areleading to more complex and more expensive chassis design. To overcome this, there hasbeen increasing interest in a novel chassis design that could be reused in the developmentprocess for new vehicle platforms and mainly allow functions to be regulated by software.The Autonomous Corner Module (ACM) was invented at Volvo Car Corporation (VCC) in1998. The invention is based upon actively controlled functions and distributed actuation. Themain idea is that the ACM should enable individual control of the functions of each wheel;propulsion/braking, alignment/steering and vertical wheel load. This is done by using hubmotorsand by replacing the lower control arm of a suspension with two linear actuators,allowing them to control steering and camber simultaneously. Along with activespring/damper and wheel motors, these modules are able to individually control each wheel\u27ssteering, camber, suspension and spin velocity. This provides the opportunity to replacemechanical drive, braking, steering and suspension with distributed wheel functions which, inturn, enable new vehicle architecture and design.The aim of this paper is to present the vehicle dynamic potential of the ACM solution, bydescribing its possible uses and relating them to previous research findings. Associated worksuggests chassis solutions where different fractions of the functions of the ACM capabilityhave been used to achieve benefits in vehicle dynamics. For instance, ideas on how to useactive camber control have been presented. Other studies have reported well-knownadvantages, such as, good transient yaw control from in-wheel motor propulsion and stablechassis behaviour from four-wheel steering, when affected by side wind. However, thistechnology also presents challenges. One example is how to control the relatively largeunsprung mass that occurs due to the extra weight from the in-wheel motor. The negativeinfluence from this source can be reduced by using active control of vertical forces. Theimplementation of ACM, or similar technologies, requires a well-structured hierarchy andcontrol strategy. Associated work suggests methods for chassis control, where tyre forces canbe individually distributed from a vehicle path description. The associated workpredominately indicates that the ACM introduces new opportunities and shows itself to be apromising enabler for vehicle dynamic functions
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore